CONSULTATION MEETING ON THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGROS VOLUNTARY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
consultation meeting on the republic of montenegro s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CONSULTATION MEETING ON THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGROS VOLUNTARY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 04, 2023 411 likes •725 views

CONSULTATION MEETING ON THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGROS VOLUNTARY NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN VIENNA, AUSTRIA, 17-18 OCTOBER 2013 BENNIE LOMBARD MEMBER GROUP OF EXPERTS ASSISTING THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL 1540 COMMITTEE The

slide-1
SLIDE 1

CONSULTATION MEETING ON THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO’S VOLUNTARY NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN

VIENNA, AUSTRIA, 17-18 OCTOBER 2013

BENNIE LOMBARD

MEMBER GROUP OF EXPERTS ASSISTING THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL 1540 COMMITTEE

The views expressed are those of the presenter and do not necessarily represent the views of the 1540 Committee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

  • Recent Developments: 1540 Committee
  • Origin of Voluntary National Implementation Action Plans (NAP)
  • Indicative Elements of a NAP
  • NAP of Argentina and Serbia
  • 1540 Matrix Overview
  • 1540 Matrix Analysis of States in the Region
  • 1540 Matrix Analysis of the Republic of Montenegro
slide-3
SLIDE 3

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 1540 COMMITTEE

  • 27 September 2013: Resolution 2118 (2013)

OP 14: Reporting Requirement of any violation of resolution 1540 (2004)

  • 25 September 2013: New 1540 Chair

Ambassador Oh Joon, Permanent Representative

  • f the Republic of Korea to the United Nations
  • April / July 2013: Visits to States at their invitation:

Trinidad and Tobago / Grenada

  • June 2013: Programme of Work / Peer Review Poland & Croatia
  • May 2013: New Matrix Format
  • February 2013: Request for updated information and Point of Contact
slide-4
SLIDE 4

ORIGIN OF VOLUNTARY NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLANS (NAP)

  • In reporting and dialogue context

States encouraged to submit details of intergovernmental processes, national practices or implementation plans

  • Resolution1673 (2006) encouraged

States to provide additional information on their implementation

  • f resolution 1540 (2004)
  • Resolution 1810 (2008) encouraged

States to prepare on a voluntary basis summary action plans to map out their priorities and plans for implementing the key provisions of resolution 1540 (2004) and to submit such plans to the Committee

  • Resolution 1977 (2011) voluntary NAP

“8. Encourages all States to prepare on a voluntary basis national implementation action plans, with the assistance of the 1540 Committee as appropriate, mapping out their priorities and plans for implementing the key provisions of resolution 1540 (2004), and to submit those plans to the 1540 Committee”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

INDICATIVE ELEMENTS OF A NAP

  • 1540 Committee not prescriptive in terms of format and content of a voluntary NAP
  • FORMAT determined by State in accordance with its own priorities and specific

circumstances. – Narrative or table format or combination of both – Useful if NAP is in easily understandable format that succinctly communicates the objectives to be achieved in realizing full implementation of the resolution 1540(2004)

  • CONTENT can include an outline of what needs to be done, by whom and in

accordance with specific time-frames and guided by: – Selective focus on certain implementation areas – Comprehensive approach on all areas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

INDICATIVE ELEMENTS OF A NAP

  • PROCESS to draft NAP useful to involve all relevant stakeholders in an intra-

governmental consultative process and could involve the following: – Conducting a gap analysis – Establishing priorities for closing gaps – Ascertaining why these gaps exist and potential problems or opportunities associated with closing the gaps – Identifying potential courses of action that would help close the gaps, and making an appropriate choice – Executing the appropriate actions – Evaluating the steps taken, and revising implementation as appropriate

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Kyrgyzstan 2 April 2013
  • Belarus 2 July 2012
  • Serbia 6 June 2012
  • France 27 September 2011
  • Canada12 August 2010
  • Argentina17 March 2009
  • United States of America 20 April

2007

7 STATES SUBMITTED NAP SUBMITTED NAP

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • FORMAT: Narrative. Submitted

through letter from Permanent Representative

  • CONTENT: Focus on mainly export

controls and emphasis on regional cooperation

  • NATIONAL ACTION PLAN

– Focal point and Coordinator: Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Department of International Security and Nuclear and Space Affairs – National Working Group: OECD Committee on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises (CIME) ministerial bodies responsible for monitoring

  • Activities: Seminars on relevant

technologies, organizes workshops on outreach to businesses and another on end- users and end-user declarations.

  • REGIONAL ACTION PLAN
  • Effective control of the transfer
  • f dual-use technologies and

materials is possible only through specific harmonization

  • f legislative and operational

efforts at the regional level.

  • MERCOSUR Working Group on

WMD

  • Regional seminars / workshops

NAP OF ARGENTINA

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • FORMAT: Narrative and Table format.

Submitted through letter from Permanent Representative

  • CONTENT: Comprehensive approach.

Table:

  • NATIONAL ACTION PLAN (2012-

2016) – Working Group for improvement

  • f NAP 1540 Implementation

– Meet at least twice a year. Monitor 1540 implementation and provide guidance

NAP OF SERBIA

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NAP OF SERBIA

NAP consist of 5 Chapters: Introduction Goals and Measures of NAP (Table) Follow-up on Implementation Further Development of NAP Resources Table of 7 Goals, Measures, Responsibility, Indicators Refraining from Support Criminalization of WMD-Related Activities Effective Control Measures Control Lists Increased Awareness Dialogue and Co-operation Prevention

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • In use since 2005. Primary method used by the 1540 Committee to organize

information about 1540 implementation by Member States

  • Reference tool for facilitating technical assistance and enhanced dialogue with
  • States. Not a tool for measuring compliance of States with their non-proliferation
  • bligations
  • Information on voluntary commitments is for reporting purpose only and does not

constitute in any way a legal obligation arising from resolution 1540 or its successive resolutions

  • Origin of Information: National Reports, Official Government Information,

Intergovernmental Organizations

  • 1540 Group of Experts prepare Matrix for each UN Member State. Approval by the

1540 Committee.

  • Last approval done in 2010, updating a continues process. Posted on 1540

website with State’s consent.

1540 MATRIX OVERVIEW

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1540 MATRIX OVERVIEW

  • Matrix covers 5 Main Areas (Worksheets):

– OP 1 and related matters from OP 5, OP 6, OP 8 (a), (b), (c) and OP 10 – OP 2 – OP3 (a) and (b) – OP3 (c) and (d) – OP 6, 7 and 8 (d)

  • Total of 389 fields. OP 2 and OP 3 also include two additional fields on National

Legal Framework and Enforcement

  • Each Field have 3 possible inscriptions. Not indicative of compliance, evidence only

– X: Relevant measure taken or specific reference found – ?: Measure taken but question about pertinence or copy of legislation not available – Blank: No information

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Legal, Technical, Scientific

Developments since 2005 require Template review

  • 2013 Approved New Template

– Reduced number of pages (18 to 12) and follows resolution structure (BCN to NCB) – Four Explanatory notes (Explaining “Other” and Description of Delivery System and related Materials – One Hyperlink to BWC CBM First Worksheet Re-ordered: Legally binding instruments, codes of conduct, arrangements, Statements Worksheets on OP2 and OP3 One table in each section containing the common areas of the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons fields, thus giving a simplified view of these fields Worksheet on OP6, 7 and 8(d) Additional fields: Engagement with Industry, Information on Points of Contact

1540 MATRIX OVERVIEW

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ministry of Interior and Public Administration ? Customs Law of the Republic of Montenegro, Art 3 x Border control 1. if YES, indicate source document YES if YES, indicate source document YES Remarks Enforcement: civil/criminal penalties, and measures of implementation, etc National legal framework Which of the following legislation, procedures, measures, agencies exist to control border crossings, export/import and other transfers of CW and Related Materials ? Can violators be penalized ? State: Montenegro Date of Report: (as Serbia and Montegro) 5 January 2005 Date of Addendum 1: 20 January 2006 Date of Report 2008 (as Montenegro):19 February 2008

OP 3 (c) and (d) and related matters from OP 6 and OP 10 - Controls of CW including Related Materials

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NW: Ministry of Interior and Public Administration CW: Ministry of Interior and Public Administration BW: Ministry of Interior and Public Administration x x x NW: Customs Law of the Republic of Montenegro, Art.3 CW: Customs Law of the Republic of Montenegro, Art.3 BW: Customs Law of the Republic of Montenegro, Art 3 x x x Border control 1 B W C W N W B W C W N W if YES, source document YES if YES, source document YES Remarks Enforcement: civil/criminal penalties, and measures of implementation, etc National legal framework Which of the following legislation, procedures, measures, agencies exist to control border crossings, export/import and

  • ther transfers of

NW, CW, BW and Related Materials ? Can violators be penalized ?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1540 MATRIX OVERVIEW

slide-17
SLIDE 17

06/2012: National Round Table Meeting X (OSCE) X 22.11.2004 16.01.2006 02.07.2008 The former Yugoslav Republic

  • f Macedonia

06/2010: hosted Regional Workshop X (OSCE) X 29.11.2004 09.01.2006 27.07.2010 11.08.2011 17.04.2013 Croatia X (OSCE) X X 18.11.2004 10.03.2006 Bulgaria 04/2013: National Implementation Action Plan drafting session X (OSCE) X 03.12.2004 22.03.2006 08.11.2012 Bosnia & Herzegovina X X X X 28.04.2004 03.01.2008 Albania Other Country Visit Point of Contact Assistance Offers Assistance Requests NAP Matrices posted Reports to the Committee State

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Other Country Visit Point of Contact Assistance Offers Assistance Requests NAP Matrices posted Reports to the Committee State X X X 28.10.2004 08.11.2005 29.02.2008 22.06.2012 Slovenia 11/2011: Meeting

  • n the Preparation
  • f a National

Action Plan X X X X 05.01.2005 20.01.2006 30.06. 2008 04.01.2012 Serbia X X X 27.10.2004 11.11.2005 21.12.2007 15.04.2011 Romania 10/2012: National Round Table Meeting X X X 05.01.2005 20.01.2006 19.02.2008 Montenegro

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1540 MATRIX ANALYSIS OF STATES IN THE REGION

Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovenia, Romania

OP2 – National Legal Framework

85.7 88.9 44.4 88.9 77.8 77.8 88.9 55.6 33.3 33.3 66.7 77.8 66.7 100 66.7 77.8 88.9 77.8 100 100 44.4 100 100 100 100 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 77.8 77.8 88.9 88.9 44.4 77.8 66.7 55.6 88.9 77.8

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

involvement of non-State actors activities related to means of delivery financing assisting participate as an accomplice use transfer transport develop stockpile/store possess acquire manufacture/produce

Biological Weapons Chemical Weapons Nuclear Weapons

slide-20
SLIDE 20

OP2 – Enforcement

66.7 33.3 100 88.9 88.9 55.6 77.8 100 55.6 66.7 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 44.4 100 88.9 88.9 88.9 100 100 77.8 100 88.9 100 88.9 66.7 44.4 100 100 77.8 88.9 100 100 77.8 77.8 88.9 100 100

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

involvement of non-State actors activities related to means of delivery financing assisting participate as an accomplice use transfer transport develop stockpile/store possess acquire manufacture/produce

Biological Weapons Chemical Weapons Nuclear Weapons

slide-21
SLIDE 21

OP3 a) b) – National Legal Framework

33.3 44.4 77.8 55.6 55.6 44.4 44.4 100 100 100 33.3 44.4 55.6 44.4 44.4 66.7 55.6 55.6 66.7 66.7 11.1 22.2 55.6 44.4 33.3 44.4 44.4 33.3 33.3 33.3

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Measures to account for / secure/ physically protect means of delivery Regulations for physical protection of facilities/materials/transports Measures to secure transport Measures to secure storage Measures to secure use Measures to secure production Measures to account for transport Measures to account for storage Measures to account for use Measures to account for production

Biological Weapons Chemical Weapons Nuclear Weapons

slide-22
SLIDE 22

OP3 a) b) – Enforcement

33.3 55.6 88.9 66.7 66.7 55.6 66.7 33.3 33.3 55.6 22.2 55.6 55.6 55.6 55.6 66.7 66.7 66.7 55.6 66.7 11.1 22.2 44.4 44.4 33.3 33.3 55.6 44.4 33.3 44.4

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Measures to account for / secure/ physically protect means of delivery Regulations for physical protection of facilities/materials/transports Measures to secure transport Measures to secure storage Measures to secure use Measures to secure production Measures to account for transport Measures to account for storage Measures to account for use Measures to account for production

Biological Weapons Chemical Weapons Nuclear Weapons

slide-23
SLIDE 23

OP 3 c) d) – National Legal Framework

100 44.4 88.9 77.8 100 77.8 88.9 100 100 100 66.7 100 100 88.9 55.6 77.8 66.7 88.9 100 22.2 100 77.8 88.9 88.9 100 100 100 100 66.7 88.9 100 100 66.7 77.8 66.7 88.9 100 22.2 100 77.8 88.9 88.9 100 100 100 100 66.7 100 100 100 77.8 77.8 66.7 88.9

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

C o ntro l o f impo rtatio n C o ntro l o f pro viding transpo rt services C o ntro l o f pro viding funds R e-expo rt co ntro l T rans-shipment co ntro l T ransit co ntro l Intangible transfers C atch all clause End-user co ntro ls C o ntro l lists N atio nal licensing autho rity General licensing Individual licensing Licensing pro visio ns Expo rt co ntro l legislatio n in place Enfo rcement agencies/ autho rities C o ntro l o f bro kering, trading in, nego tiating, o therwise assisting in sale o f go o ds and techno lo gy T echnical suppo rt o f bo rder co ntro l measures B o rder co ntro l

Biological Weapons Chemical Weapons Nuclear Weapons

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OP 3 c) d) – Enforcement

100 44.4 88.9 66.7 88.9 66.7 55.6 100 44.4 88.9 55.6 77.8 88.9 100 100 100 77.8 88.9 100 22.2 88.9 77.8 88.9 66.7 55.6 100 33.3 88.9 66.7 66.7 100 100 100 100 77.8 88.9 100 22.2 100 77.8 88.9 66.7 55.6 100 44.4 88.9 66.7 88.9 100 100 100 100 66.7 88.9

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

C o ntro l o f impo rtatio n C o ntro l o f pro viding transpo rt services C o ntro l o f pro viding funds R e-expo rt co ntro l T rans-shipment co ntro l T ransit co ntro l Intangible transfers C atch all clause End-user co ntro ls C o ntro l lists N atio nal licensing autho rity General licensing Individual licensing Licensing pro visio ns Expo rt co ntro l legislatio n in place Enfo rcement agencies/ autho rities C o ntro l o f bro kering, trading in, nego tiating, o therwise assisting in sale o f go o ds and techno lo gy T echnical suppo rt o f bo rder co ntro l measures B o rder co ntro l

Biological Weapons Chemical Weapons Nuclear Weapons

slide-25
SLIDE 25

1540 MATRIX ANALYSIS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO National Report submitted 5 January 2005 (As Serbia and Montenegro) Additional Information submitted on 20 January 2006 and 19 February 2008 (As Montenegro) Point of Contact communicated General Assistance request conveyed as follows:

  • 1. Effective international expert and technical assistance, as well as a possibility to exchange

legislative, legal and administrative experience in the field of non-proliferation would be most welcome and would make it possible to pursue the above-mentioned goals more effectively

  • 2. Continued expert assistance from the UK Government would be highly appreciated
  • 3. WCO Columbus Programme of Capacity Building - diagnostic mission completed
slide-26
SLIDE 26

1540 MATRIX ANALYSIS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO

Examples of Areas in which the Matrix has relatively fewer Identified Measures: OP 1 and related matters from OP 5, OP 6, OP 8 (a), (b), (c) and OP 10

  • Nuclear Terrorism Convention
  • CPPNM 2005 Amendment
  • 1925 Geneva Protocol
  • Statements on non-possession of WMD and non-provision of WMD to non-

state actors OP2: Effective Laws

  • NW: Manufacture, stockpile, develop, accomplice, assist, means of

delivery, non-state actors

  • CW: Accomplice, Assist, means of delivery, non-state actors
  • BW: Manufacture, stockpile, develop, accomplice, assist, means of

delivery, non-state actors

slide-27
SLIDE 27

1540 MATRIX ANALYSIS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO OP 3 (a) and (b): Account for/Secure/Physically protect NW, CW and BW, / Related Materials

  • NW, CW, BW: Transport, accounting, production, physical

protection, registration, personnel reliability check, delivery

  • NW: Code of Conduct and Guidance on the import, export of

radioactive sources, IAEA Illicit Trafficking Database

  • BW: Regulations for genetic engineering work, safety and security
  • f biological materials
slide-28
SLIDE 28

1540 MATRIX ANALYSIS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO OP 3 (c) and (d): Controls

  • NW, CW, BW: Enforcement, intangible transfers, transit control

enforcement, general licensing, exceptions, deemed export, interagency review, updating of lists, controlling funds and transportation, extraterritorial applicability OP 6, 7 and 8 (d) - Control lists, Assistance, Information

  • Work with and inform industry and public
slide-29
SLIDE 29

CONTACT DETAILS

Chair of the 1540 Committee Secretariat of the 1540 Committee Attention: Chair, 1540 Committee: H.E. Ambassador Oh Joon, Permanent Representative of The Republic of Korea to the United Nations 730 Third Avenue, TB-08040E, United Nations, New York, NY 10017 Fax: +1 (212) 963-1300, Email: sc-1540-Committee@un.org 1540 Committee Group of Experts 300 East, 42nd Street, Third Floor, New York, NY 10017 Fax:+1 (917) 367 9358, Email: 1540experts@un.org 1540 Committee Website www.un.org/sc/1540