Congressional Budget Office January 4, 2016 Frameworks for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

congressional budget office
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Congressional Budget Office January 4, 2016 Frameworks for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Congressional Budget Office January 4, 2016 Frameworks for Distributional Analyses Annual Meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations San Francisco, California Kevin Perese Principal Analyst, Tax Analysis Division Frameworks for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Congressional Budget Office

Annual Meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations San Francisco, California

January 4, 2016

Kevin Perese Principal Analyst, Tax Analysis Division

Frameworks for Distributional Analyses

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Frameworks for Distributional Analyses

by Edward Harris Kevin Perese Joshua Shakin

The information in this presentation is preliminary and is being circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment as developmental work for analysis for the Congress.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Distributional Analyses Have Historically Been Tax-Centric

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

  • Everyone pays taxes

(either directly or indirectly).

  • There are explicit

progressive/redistributive properties in the tax system.

  • There are high-quality tax data.
  • There is a lot of theoretical work on tax

incidence in the economics literature.

Why? Distributional Analyses Have Historically Been Tax-Centric

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

  • Joint Committee on Taxation
  • Congressional Budget Office, Tax Analysis Division
  • Treasury Department, Office of Tax Analysis
  • Tax Policy Center (Urban Institute/Brookings Institution)

Who Has Been Performing These Analyses? Distributional Analyses Have Historically Been Tax-Centric

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

But there’s more to government than just taxes. Our goal is to use a framework that allows for the analysis of the distributional effects of government transfers while dealing with the effects of large intergenerational transfer programs in cross-sectional analyses of household income.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

CBO’s Current Distributional Framework (Based on Before-Tax Income)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Market Income Before-Tax Income After-Tax Income Cash and In-Kind

  • Govt. Transfers

Direct and Indirect Federal Taxes

‒ = + =

CBO’s Current Distributional Framework

Used to rank households and as the denominator in average tax rate calculations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Quintiles Lowest Second Middle Fourth Highest All Households Market Income 14,700 28,800 49,400 79,700 234,100 81,400

+ Government

Transfers 7,100 12,300 12,100 10,400 8,900 10,200

= Before-Tax

Income 21,800 41,100 61,500 90,000 243,000 91,600

− Federal Taxes

1,300 4,000 8,600 16,100 62,500 18,700

= After-Tax

Income 20,600 37,100 52,900 73,900 180,400 72,800 Average Federal Tax Rate (Percentage of Before-Tax Income) 5.7 9.8 14.1 17.9 25.7 20.5 Dollars

Distribution of Household Income, Government Transfers, and Federal Taxes, 2006 (CBO’s Current Distributional Framework)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

CBO’s Current Distributional Framework

Strengths Shortcomings

  • Before-tax income, a broad

income measure, is a proxy for both overall economic well-being and ability to pay tax liabilities.

  • Before-tax income is

therefore an appropriate denominator for calculating average tax rates.

  • Because before-tax income

includes government transfers, retired households are relatively evenly spread among before-tax income groups.

  • The framework is tax-centric,

so it doesn’t allow for analysis of government transfers—that is, analysts cannot calculate meaningful transfer rates or net tax and transfer rates.

  • Therefore, the redistributive

properties of transfers and taxes are not treated equally.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Market Income Distributional Framework

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Market Income Before-Tax Income After-Tax Income Cash and In-Kind

  • Govt. Transfers

Direct and Indirect Federal Taxes

‒ = + =

Market Income Distributional Framework

Used to rank households and as the denominator in average tax rate calculations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Market Income Distributional Framework

Strengths Shortcomings

  • Market income is an intuitive

measure of pre-government income.

  • The framework lets analysts

calculate transfer rates, tax rates, and net tax and transfer rates.

  • “Market income” suggests no

government intervention, but the measure includes the effects of other, less direct governmental policies.

  • Market income is not a good

proxy for overall economic well-being and ability to pay tax liabilities.

  • Life-cycle patterns in market

income make retired people appear poor in cross- sectional analyses.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

After-Tax Income Distributional Framework

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Market Income Before-Tax Income After-Tax Income Cash and In-Kind

  • Govt. Transfers

Direct and Indirect Federal Taxes

‒ = + =

After-Tax Income Distributional Framework

Used to rank households and as the denominator in average tax rate calculations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

After-Tax Income Distributional Framework

Strengths Shortcomings

  • After-tax income is a proxy

for overall economic well- being.

  • It can be used as a

benchmark for how income inequality is changing over time regardless of source (market income, transfers, or taxes).

  • After-tax income is not an

appropriate denominator for calculating tax or transfer rates because taxes and transfers are included in it.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Trying to Strike a Balance

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Cross-Sectional Analysis Large Intergenerational Transfers

Trying to Strike a Balance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Gross Income Distributional Framework

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Market Income Before-Tax Income After-Tax Income Social Insurance Transfers Direct and Indirect Federal Taxes

‒ =

Gross Income Distributional Framework

Gross Income Means-Tested Transfers

= = + +

Used to rank households and as the denominator in average tax rate calculations

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Gross Income Distributional Framework

Strengths Shortcomings

  • The framework allows

analysts to calculate means- tested transfer rates, tax rates, and net tax and transfer rates.

  • It accounts for life-cycle

income patterns caused by the receipt of social insurance benefits.

  • Gross income does not fully

represent people’s ability to pay their tax liabilities.

  • There is some redistribution

in social insurance programs that the framework does not capture.

  • Social insurance benefits and

the taxes that finance them are not treated equally.

  • Not including public goods

results in an incomplete fiscal picture when calculating net tax and transfer rates.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Going From Before-Tax Income Quintiles to Gross Income Quintiles Shuffles the Households.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Overlap Between Gross Income Quintiles and Before-Tax Income Quintiles, 2006

Before-Tax Income Quintiles Lowest Second Middle Fourth Highest Total Gross Income Quintiles Lowest 81.2 14.5 3.9 0.5 0.0 100 Second 18.6 73.8 6.5 1.0 0.1 100 Middle 0.0 11.2 84.7 3.9 0.2 100 Fourth 0.0 0.0 5.5 92.8 1.7 100 Highest 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 98.0 100

Percentage Points

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Before-Tax Income Lowest Quintile Second Quintile

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Before-Tax Income Gross Income Second Quintile Lowest Quintile

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Before-Tax Income Gross Income

From Middle, Fourth, and Highest Quintiles

Second Quintile Lowest Quintile

slide-27
SLIDE 27

26

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Before-Tax Income Gross Income Second Quintile Lowest Quintile

slide-28
SLIDE 28

27

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Before-Tax Income Gross Income

From Middle, Fourth, and Highest Quintiles

Second Quintile Lowest Quintile

slide-29
SLIDE 29

28

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

A Hypothetical Policy Change

A targeted payment of $3,000 to households below 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines that phases out linearly between 100 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty guidelines

slide-30
SLIDE 30

29

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Recipient’s Income as a Percentage of the Federal Poverty Guidelines $3,500

A Hypothetical Policy Change

Government Benefit Received

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

What are the distributional effects of such a policy (implemented as a means-tested transfer program or as a refundable tax credit) using a before-tax income framework and a gross income framework?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

31

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Lowest Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Highest Quintile All Households

Refundable Tax Credit

$

Change in After-Tax Income Resulting From the Hypothetical Policy Change, Before-Tax Income Distributional Framework

slide-33
SLIDE 33

32

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Lowest Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Highest Quintile All Households

Refundable Tax Credit Means-Tested Transfer

$

Change in After-Tax Income Resulting From the Hypothetical Policy Change, Before-Tax Income Distributional Framework

slide-34
SLIDE 34

33

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Lowest Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Highest Quintile All Households

Refundable Tax Credit Means-Tested Transfer

$

Change in After-Tax Income Resulting From the Hypothetical Policy Change, Gross Income Distributional Framework

slide-35
SLIDE 35

34

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Using a before-tax income framework produces different distributional results depending on whether the policy is implemented as a refundable tax credit or a means-tested transfer, even though they are economically identical policies. Using a gross income framework, however, produces identical distributional results.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

35

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Notes

Market income consists of labor income, business income, capital gains (profits realized from the sale of assets), capital income excluding capital gains, income received in retirement for past services, and other sources of income. Government transfers are cash payments and in-kind benefits from social insurance and other government assistance programs. Those transfers include payments and benefits from federal, state, and local governments. Before-tax income is market income plus government transfers. Social insurance transfers are Social Security benefits for workers, spouses, survivors, and the disabled; Medicare payments; and unemployment insurance benefits. Gross income is market income plus social insurance transfers. Means-tested transfers include payments and benefits from Medicaid; the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP (formerly Food Stamps); housing assistance programs; and several smaller programs. Federal taxes include individual income taxes, payroll taxes, corporate income taxes, and excise taxes. After-tax income is before-tax income minus federal taxes. Income groups are created by ranking households by various income measures, adjusted for household size. Quintiles (fifths) contain equal numbers of people.