THE PREMIUM VALUE DEFINED GROWTH INDEPENDENT
Conference Call 2011 Budget December 2, 2010 THE PREMIUM VALUE - - PDF document
Conference Call 2011 Budget December 2, 2010 THE PREMIUM VALUE - - PDF document
DEFINED GROWTH INDEPENDENT Conference Call 2011 Budget December 2, 2010 THE PREMIUM VALUE Canadian Natural Canadian Natural Today Today Strong well balanced, diversified assets with significant upside Strong experienced teams;
CNQ
2
- Strong well balanced, diversified assets with significant upside
- Strong experienced teams; operational, technical, financial
- Efficient operations (safe, minimize enviro footprint, low cost)
- Significant free cash flow
- Capital allocation flexibility and discipline
- Strong balance sheet
- Return on capital focused
Canadian Natural Today Canadian Natural Today
CNQ
3
- Assets that provide significant free cash flow
- Focus on effective allocation of cash flow
- Ability to take on more mid and long term projects
- Effective leverage of technology and expertise across our vast
asset base
Canadian Natural The Next Step in Our Evolution Canadian Natural The Next Step in Our Evolution
CNQ
4
- Continued focus on oil development
- Greater proportion of capital allocated to mid and long term
projects
–Thermal projects –Light oil EOR projects –Horizon Oil Sands expansion
- Preserve natural gas assets for long term recovery
- Focus on Execution Excellence - operational, technical,
financial
- Preserve capital allocation flexibility
- Opportunistic acquisitions
- Dividends
- Pay down debt – ensure balance sheet strength
- Share buybacks
Canadian Natural Going Forward Canadian Natural Going Forward
CNQ
5
Financial Objectives Financial Objectives
- To maintain a strong balance sheet
–Debt / book capitalization target of 35% - 45% – Q3/10 at 26.3% –Debt / EBITDA target of 1.8x - 2.2x – Q3/10 at 1.1x
- To maintain strong credit ratings allowing for access and
flexibility in public debt markets
- To finance the operations of the Company with a flexible
capital structure
–Bank credit facilities –US and Canadian debt capital markets –Tenor diversification –Manageable refinancing risk –Proactive risk management
Financial Discipline
CNQ
6
Going Forward 2011 Going Forward 2011
- 6% boe production growth – 10% oil growth
- Allocate $2.4 billion to $2.8 billion (>~ 45% of budget) to future
production growth (post 2011)
- Pay down debt
- Deliver $1.0 billion to $1.8 billion of free cash flow
CNQ
7
Production 2010F* 2011B* % Change Crude oil (mbbl/d) Canada Light and NGLs 50-51 54-58 11% Pelican Lake 38-39 43-47 17% Heavy 93-94 101-105 10% Thermal 89-91 97-105 12% International 63-65 49-59 (16%) Horizon 90-93 105-112 19% Total 423-430 449-486 10% Natural gas (mmcf/d) 1,242-1,250 1,177-1,246 (3%) BOE/D 630-638 645-694 6%
Canadian Natural 2011 Budget Canadian Natural 2011 Budget
*Rounded to the nearest 1,000 bbl/d Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
CNQ
8
Capital ($ million) 2010F 2011B % Change Natural gas 700 600 (14%) Crude oil Pelican Lake 500 615 23% Heavy 630 820 30% Thermal 555 1,345 142% Light
Canada 315 460 46% North Sea 180 370 106% Offshore West Africa 250 135 (46%)
Total crude oil 2,430 3,745 54% Horizon
Sustaining and reclamation 130 220 69% Capital Projects 360 800-1,200 122-233% Other 80 100 25%
Total Horizon 570 1,120-1,520 96-167% Acquisition and Midstream 1,900 110
- Total
5,600 5,575-5,975 0-7%
Canadian Natural 2011 Budget Canadian Natural 2011 Budget
CNQ
9
Canadian Natural 2011 Budget Canadian Natural 2011 Budget
2010F 2011B Change Production (boe/d) 630-638 645-694 6% Cash Flow* ($ million) $6,100-6,500 $7,000-7,400 14% Capital ($ million) $5,600 $5,575-5,975 0-7% Free Cash Flow ($ million) $500-900 $1,025-1,825 104% Debt ($ million) $8,900 $8,000 ($900) Debt/book 28.7% 25.6% (3.1%)
*Based on average annual WTI of US$84.32/bbl Nymex of US$4.31/mmbtu and an exchange rate of US$0.98 to C$1.00.
CNQ
10
Asset Overview Asset Overview
CNQ
11
Natural Gas Outlook Natural Gas Outlook
- Shale gas production is real
- Shale gas reserves look real
- Shale gas full cycle returns at $4.00 AECO not certain
–Sweet spots – yes –Liquids rich – yes to maybe –Overall – too early to tell
- LNG supply threat still exists
- Anticipate North America natural gas market to be over
supplied for 2-7 years
- Being the most efficient producer is paramount
CNQ
12
Natural Gas Overall Strategy Natural Gas Overall Strategy
- Leverage our dominant infrastructure and land base
–Maintain our position as most efficient producer
- Continue to strengthen our unconventional / tight gas
asset base
- Continue to delineate new / emerging plays / technology
- Stay prepared for strengthening of natural gas prices
- Opportunistic acquisitions
CNQ
13
2010F 2011B % Change Production (mmcf/d) 1,217-1,222 1,150-1,210 (3%) Drilling (net wells) 100 72 (28%) Capital ($ million) Turnaround / Maintenance $100 $120 20% Land / Seismic $50 $65 30% Drill, Complete, Tie-in $550 $415 (25%) Total $700 $600 (14%)
North America Natural Gas 2011 Plan North America Natural Gas 2011 Plan
CNQ
14
Natural Gas Future Growth Potential Natural Gas Future Growth Potential
200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 2010F 2011 2012 2013 2014 Natural Gas Forecast $6.00 plus Natural Gas Sub $4.00 Natural Gas
Upside Potential Option Disciplined Allocation
- f Capital
(mmcf/d)
5% Growth Potential 12% Proactive Decline
Focus on Creating Value Focus on Creating Value
$6 plus S u b $ 4
No Growth
$4-$5 $4.00-$5.00 Natural Gas
CNQ
15
International Overall Strategy International Overall Strategy
- Maintain our existing operations
- Convert undeveloped potential to production
–As platform slots become available
- North Sea
- Ninian
- Tiffany
- Murchison
- Progress near pool development in Côte d’Ivoire
- Progress “Big E” exploration in South Africa
- Monitor acquisition opportunities
- Generate significant free cash flow
- Offshore West Africa
- Espoir
- Baobab
Leverage Expertise Leverage Expertise
CNQ
16
International Free Cash Flow International Free Cash Flow
Our International assets account for a substantial portion of Canadian Natural’s free cash flow
Core Area with Significant Free Cash Flow Core Area with Significant Free Cash Flow
Production Free Cash Flow
International ~8% International ~25%
2011B 2011B
CNQ
17
2010F 2011B % Change Crude oil production (mbbl/d) 33-34 27-32 (12%) Capital ($ million) $180 $370 106%
North Sea 2011 Plan North Sea 2011 Plan
- 10 workovers
- 2.3 net wells drilled
- Facility improvements – Lyell subsea pump, manifold
upgrades
- Turnaround on 4 platforms
–Lower volumes due to turnarounds and fixed cost nature result in higher op costs in 2011
CNQ
18
Offshore West Africa 2011 Plan Offshore West Africa 2011 Plan
- Complete Olowi development
- 2 Gabon exploration wells (Gamba, Vandji) potential drills
- Prepare for Espoir and Baobab infill programs
- Progress South Africa “Big E” exploration
2010F 2011B % Change Crude oil production (mbbl/d) 30-31 22-27 (20%) Capital ($ million) $250 $135 (46%)
CNQ
19
2010F 2011B % Change Production* (mbbl/d) 50-51 54-58 11% Drilling (net wells) 117 138 18% Capital ($ million) Drilling, completions and tie-ins 155 290 87% Technology, EOR 160 170 6% Total 315 460 46%
Canadian Light Oil 2011 Plan Canadian Light Oil 2011 Plan
. * Includes NGLs.
- Target modest production growth of 2%-10% per year in 2012
and beyond
CNQ
20
Canadian Light Oil Canadian Light Oil
- Mature basin
- Large land holdings
across basin
- Optimize existing water
floods to maximize value
- New pool exploration
- New technology application
– Horizontal wells – Multistage fracs
- Tertiary recovery
– CO2 – ASP
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009
Gross Operated Light Oil Production (bbl/d) 1 billion barrels recovered since 1974 peak
Value Creation in Mature Basin Value Creation in Mature Basin
CNQ
21
Technology Leverage / Implementation Technology Leverage / Implementation
Capital ($ million) 2010F 2011B Light Oil $160 $170 Primary Heavy Oil $20 $30 Thermal $20 $30 Pelican Lake $10 $10 Natural Gas $40 $65 Total $250 $305
CNQ
22
- Current production
– Crude oil 93 mbbl/d
- Land (net)
– Developed 0.4 million acres – Undeveloped 1.2 million acres
- Facilities
– 5 major crude oil processing facilities – 4 salt cavern disposal wells and 1 under development – ECHO sales pipeline 143 miles
- Drilling Forecast
– 9,000 net wells in 10 year plan – Drill 600-800 net wells per year
~144 Miles
Dominate Land Base and Infrastructure Dominate Land Base and Infrastructure
Note: Reflects Q3/10 actual production, before royalties.
Primary Heavy Oil Production Areas Primary Heavy Oil Production Areas
ECHO Pipeline CNQ Developed Lands CNQ Undeveloped Lands
CNQ
23
Strong Cash on Cash Returns Strong Cash on Cash Returns
Primary Heavy Oil 2011 Plan Primary Heavy Oil 2011 Plan
2010F 2011B % Growth Production (mbbl/d) 93-94 101-105 10% Drilling (net wells) 650 790 22% Recompletion (net wells) 522 465 (11%) Capital ($ million) 630 820 30%
- Target production growth of roughly 10% per year for the next
three years
CNQ
24
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 1995 2001 2007 2013 2019
Primary Waterflood Polymerflood
Pelican Lake Oil Pool Pelican Lake Oil Pool
- World class oil pool
- Polymer flood successful both
technically and economically
- Technology enhancement will
continue to improve
- il recovery
Massive Resource to Exploit Massive Resource to Exploit
Contingent Resources 198 mmbbl Probable Reserves 103 mmbbl Proved Reserves 246 mmbbl Produced to Date 140 mmbbl
How much of that oil is producible?
OOIP 4.1 billion barrels Developed Region (barrels per day)
Convert waterfloods to polymer
Polymer flood
Primary Waterflood
17%
CNQ
25
Pelican Lake 2011 Plan Pelican Lake 2011 Plan
- Technology Success Story
– Long reach horizontal wells – Leading edge polymer flood
- Staged conversion to polymer flood - % of field polymer flooded
– 2009 25% – 2010 44% – 2011 54% – 2012 61% – 2013 71%
- Facility expansions for polymer and other developments
– 2010 44,500 bbl/d to 52,500 bbl/d – 2011 52,500 bbl/d to 68,500 bbl/d – 2012 68,500 bbl/d to 106,500 bbl/d to accommodate other properties
- Polymer flood optimization
– Still on steep part of learning curve – Performance – Operating costs
CNQ
26
2010F 2011B % Growth Production (mbbl/d) 38-39 43-47 17% Drilling (net wells) Producers 30 11 (63%) Injectors 100 82 (18%) Capital ($ million) 500 615 23%
Pelican Lake Plan Pelican Lake Plan
Note: Rounded to the nearest 1,000 bbl/d.
- Significant pre-investment for future polymer volumes
- Polymer response in 18 – 24 months from injection
- Production target ranges
– 2012 50,000-60,000 bbl/d – 2013 75,000-80,000 bbl/d – 2014 78,000-82,000 bbl/d
CNQ
27
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Thermal Heavy Oil Sands
- Land Holdings (net)
– McMurray - 373,000 acres
- Birch Mountain
- Gregoire
- Kirby
- Grouse
- Germain
- Leismer
- Ipiatik
– Clearwater - 201,000 acres
- Primrose
- Wolf Lake
- Hilda Lake
- Marie Lake
– Grand Rapids - 267,000 acres – Carbonates - 317,000 acres Great Assets, Huge Land Base Great Assets, Huge Land Base
Scale 1:1,730,000
Oil Sands Deposits
Calgary Edmonton Grande Prairie Fort McMurray
CNQ
28
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Potential Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Potential
Estimated Bitumen in Place 34.5 billion barrels total
Clearwater 11 billion barrels Kirby Grouse Leismer Birch Mountain Gregoire McMurray
23.5 billion barrels
Contingent Resources 5.0 billion bbl Probable Reserves 0.6 billion bbl Proved Reserves 0.7 billion bbl Produced to Date 0.3 billion bbl
CNQ
29
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Growth Plan Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Growth Plan
Oil Facility Target Steam-In Phase Reservoir Capacity Target Timing
(bbl/d) (year)
Primrose South/North - CSS Clearwater 80,000 On Stream Primrose East - CSS Clearwater 40,000 On Stream Kirby Phase 1- SAGD McMurray 40,000 2013 Kirby Phase 2- SAGD McMurray 30,000-60,000 2016 Grouse - SAGD McMurray 60,000 2016 Birch Mountain Phase 1 - SAGD McMurray 60,000 2018 Birch Mountain Phase 2 - SAGD McMurray 60,000 2021 Gregoire Ph 1 - SAGD McMurray 60,000 2023
Growth for Decades Growth for Decades
- 445,000 bbl/d of oil facility capacity in the defined growth plan
- 30,000-60,000 bbl/d addition every 2-3 years
CNQ
30
2010F 2011B % Change Production (mbbl/d) 89-91 97-105 12% Drilling (net wells) Producers 40 201 403% Kirby SAGD pairs 16
- Strats
207 359 73% Service / Observations wells 6 16 167% Total 253 592 134% Capital ($ million) 555 1,345 142%
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands 2011 Plan Thermal Heavy Oil Sands 2011 Plan
- Thermal targeted production ranges
–2012 105,000-115,000 bbl/d –2013 125,000-130,000 bbl/d –2014 150,000-160,000 bbl/d
CNQ
31
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Primrose Plan Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Primrose Plan
- Significant pad adds to fully develop
- Optimize steaming techniques
- Potential future facility debottleneck / expansion
- Wolf Lake; McMurray / Grand Rapids development
- Follow up process
–In-fill drilling, steam flood, solvents
- Leverage technology
–Industry learning curve still steep
CNQ
32
- Kirby will be developed through two phases plus debottleneck
potential
- Kirby Phase 1 sanctioned November 2010
–Peak production - 40,000 bbl/d
Contingent Steam-In Million barrels PIIP* Reserves Resources Date Kirby Phase 1 365 2013 Proved 69 Probable 116 Kirby Phase 2 726 350 2016 Kirby Phase 1 - Debottleneck 434 170 2024
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Kirby Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Kirby
* Petroleum initially in place (PIIP).
CNQ
33
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Kirby Land Holdings Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Kirby Land Holdings
CNQ Oilsands Acquisition Kirby Phase 2 Kirby North Kirby Central Kirby Phase 1 Kirby South
Kirby North Plant (Remote Steam) Kirby South Plant (Steam & Oil Treating)
- Acquired lands creates
- verall operating and
capital cost synergies
- Similar to Primrose
development
–Kirby Phase 2 regulatory application 2011
CNQ
34
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Kirby Phase 1 Development Plan Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Kirby Phase 1 Development Plan
- Kirby South Processing Plant
–118,000 bw/d water treating –118,000 bs/d steam generation –40,000 bbl/d oil treating
- Initial Field Development
–47 SAGD horizontal well pairs (16 in 2011) –7 surface pads –5.2 km of field pipelines
- Utilities
–60 man operations camp –Office, warehouse –Water source and disposal wells –688 man construction camp (temporary)
- Capital cost $1,254 million
CNQ
35
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Key Kirby Milestones Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Key Kirby Milestones
Plant Site Earthworks November 2010 Initiate Pad Drilling April 2011 Site Mechanical Construction June 2011 Construction Complete August 2013 First Steam December 2013 First Oil February 2014
CNQ
36
Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Projects Update Thermal Heavy Oil Sands Projects Update
- Primrose field development
- Kirby hub
–Kirby Phase 1, Kirby Phase 2, debottleneck –Kirby Phase 2 regulatory application 2011/12
- Grouse
–Strat well delineation –Regulatory application 2011/12
- Birch Mountain East
–Strat well delineation –Regulatory application 2011/12
- Gregoire
–Work existing data
- Germain
–Initiate strat program
CNQ
37
Horizon Oil Sands Horizon Oil Sands
- Mining resources
–16 billion barrels petroleum initially in place, PIIP (bitumen) with 6 billion barrels* of recoverable PIIP
- Phased development (SCO)
- 110 mbbl/d capacity
(Phase 1)
- Target expansion to
232 to 250 mbbl/d
- Target future expansions to
~500 mbbl/d
- Significant free cash flow
generation for decades
UTS SYN SHC SYN SYN DVN PCA SU PCA IOL ECA SU SU IOL HSE XOM SHC SU Synenco SHC XOM ECA ECA Deer Creek SU Fort McMurray
~43 miles
CNQ CNQ
CNQ Horizon Oil Sands
World Class Opportunity World Class Opportunity
*Includes 3.5 billion barrels of bitumen upgraded to 3 billion barrels of proved and probable SCO reserves. Note: Volumes are gross lease.
CNQ
38
Horizon Oil Sands Phase 1 Evolution Horizon Oil Sands Phase 1 Evolution
- Start up
Dec 2008 – May 2009
- Fine tune
- perating procedures
May 2009 – Dec 2009
- Winter operating
procedures Dec 2009 – Mar 2010
- Fine tune
preventative maintenance Mar 2010 – Dec 2010
- Maintain reliability at
design rates (110,000 bbl/d SCO) 2011
CNQ
39
Horizon Oil Sands Tranche 2 Reliability Horizon Oil Sands Tranche 2 Reliability
- Purpose: Increase reliability and lower operating costs
- Ore Preparation Plant 3
- n stream Q4 2011
- Hydro transport
- n stream Q4 2011
- Tank expansion
- n stream Q1 2011
- Upgrading
–Sulfur Unit 3
- n stream Q4 2013
–Gas recovery
- n stream Q2 2014
–Butane treating
- n stream Q2 2014
- On schedule, trending below cost estimate
–$830 million target versus $925 million original estimate (10% reduction)
- Reliability projects will add 5,000 bbl/d SCO capacity
CNQ
40
Horizon Oil Sands Future Expansion Horizon Oil Sands Future Expansion
- Lessons learned complete
- Execution strategy framework complete
- Build to produce 34º API SCO - upgrade
- Cost estimate progressing
CNQ
41
Reliability
- OPP 3, Hydrotransport, Sulfur Unit 3
(Tranche 2)
- 5,000 bbl/d SCO capacity increase in 2011/12
Directive 74
- Equipment and tailings process required to meet
new ERCB regulations Phase 2A
- Upgrading debottlenecking and coker expansion
- 10,000 bbl/d SCO capacity increase in 2013/14
Phase 2B
- OPP 4, Froth Treatment, Vacuum Distillations,
Gas/Oil Hydrotreater
- 45,000 bbl/d SCO capacity increase
Phase 3
- OPP 5, Extraction 3&4, Combined Hydrotreater,
Sulfur recovery
- 80,000 bbl/d SCO capacity increase
Horizon Oil Sands Future Expansion Horizon Oil Sands Future Expansion
CNQ
42
Horizon Oil Sands Expansion to 250,000 bbl/d 34º API SCO Horizon Oil Sands Expansion to 250,000 bbl/d 34º API SCO
- Execution strategy
–Debottlenecking and expansion to be combined –Expansion will be broken into 46 individual projects
- Stop and start at CNQ discretion
–Each project (46) will be broken into Engineering & Procurement (E&P) and Construction (C)
- Construction will only be awarded when E&P is at required levels and
market can absorb more construction
- Engineering will be extended past the 80/20 rule used in Phase 1
- Lump sum E&P or C will be used when possible
- Highly unlikely to use lump sum EPC
–Construction labor force to be capped at 5,500
- Phase 1 peak 10,000
–Yearly capital exposure capped at $2.0 billion - $2.5 billion
CNQ
43
2010F 2011B % Production (mbbl/d) 90-93 105-112 19% Operating costs ($/bbl) $33-37 $30-36 (6%) Sustaining capital* ($ million) $130 $220 69% Project capital ($ million) Reliability - Tranche 2 $320 $370 Directive 74 and Technology $10 $130 Phase 2A $25 $200-230 Phase 2B $5 $10-295 Phase 3 $0 $90-150 Phase 4 $0 $0-25 Total $360 $800-1,200
Horizon Oil Sands 2011 Plan Horizon Oil Sands 2011 Plan
*Includes reclamation capital.
CNQ
44
- 1. Complete more detailed cost estimate Q1/11
- 2. Kick off E&P work in Q1/11 for
- Directive 74 – 2 of 2 projects
- Phase 2A – 4 of 5 projects
- Phase 3 – 3 of 14 projects
- 3. If market conditions are favorable and economics meet
threshold criteria
Q1 – Kick off construction on
- Directive 74 – 1 of 2 projects
- Phase 2A – 1 of 5 projects
- Phase 3 – 2 of 14 projects
Q3 – Kick off detailed engineering and procurement
- Phase 2A – Last 1 of 5 projects
- Phase 2B – 19 of 25 projects
- Phase 3 – 2 of 14 projects
Q3 – Kick off construction on
- Phase 2B – 1 of 25 projects
Horizon Oil Sands Next Steps Horizon Oil Sands Next Steps
CNQ
45
Canadian Natural 2011 and Beyond Canadian Natural 2011 and Beyond
- Vast balanced assets
- Well defined yet flexible plan
- Leveraging technology
- Capital allocation flexibility
- Significant free cash flow
- 2011
–6% boe production growth – 10% oil growth –Allocate $2.4 billion to $2.8 billion (> 45% of budget) to future production growth (post 2011) –Pay down debt –Deliver $1.0 billion to $1.8 billion of free cash flow
CNQ
46
Canadian Natural Free Cash Flow Uses Canadian Natural Free Cash Flow Uses
1) Opportunistic acquisitions 2) Pre invest in long term developments
–EOR –Strat wells –Strategic play development
3) Dividends
–Ten consecutive years of dividend increases –Must be sustainable
4) Pay down debt 5) Share buybacks
–Target to eliminate dilution
Prudent Use of Free Cash Flow Prudent Use of Free Cash Flow
CNQ
47
Canadian Natural Advantage Canadian Natural Advantage
- Management, business philosophy, practice
- Strong, balanced assets
–Vast opportunities
- Balanced, proven, effective strategy
- Control over capital allocation
- Nimble
–Capture opportunities –Willingness to make tough decisions
- Significant free cash flow
- Canadian Natural culture
–Control of costs –Execution focused –Efficient operations
The Premium Value, Defined Growth Independent The Premium Value, Defined Growth Independent
CNQ
48
THE PREMIUM VALUE DEFINED GROWTH INDEPENDENT
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
2500, 855 - 2 Street SW Calgary Alberta T2P 4J8 phone: 403.517.6700 fax: 403.517.7350 email: ir@cnrl.com www.cnrl.com VALUE CREATION • RETURN ON CAPITAL • LOW-COST PRODUCER • RETURN ON ASSETS
THE FUTURE CLEARLY DEFINED
CNQ
49
Certain statements in this document or documents incorporated herein by reference constitute forward-looking statements or information (collectively Certain statements relating to the Company in this document or documents incorporated herein by reference constitute forward-looking statements or information (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “plan”, “estimate”, “target”, “continue”, “could” “intend”, “may”, “potential”, “predict”, “should”, “will”, “objective”, “project”, “forecast”, “goal”, “guidance”, “outlook”, “effort” “seeks”, “schedule” or expressions of a similar nature suggesting future
- utcome or statements regarding an outlook. Disclosure related to expected future commodity pricing, production volumes, royalties, operating costs, capital
expenditures, and other guidance provided in the 2010 outlook section and throughout this document and the documents incorporated herein by reference constitute forward looking statements. Disclosure of plans relating to existing and future developments including but not limited to Horizon, Primrose East, Pelican Lake, Olowi Field (Offshore Gabon), and the Kirby Thermal Oil Sands Project also constitute forward-looking statements. This forward-looking information is based on annual budgets and multi-year forecasts and is reviewed and revised throughout the year if necessary in the context of targeted financial ratios, project returns, product pricing expectations and balance in project risk and time horizons. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks. The reader should not place undue reliance on these forward looking statements as there can be no assurances that the plans, initiatives or expectations upon which they are based will occur. In addition, statements relating to “reserves” are deemed to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment based on certain estimates and assumptions that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. The total amount or timing of actual future production may vary significantly from reserve and production estimates. The forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company and the industry in which the Company
- perates, which speak only as of the date such statements were made or as of the date of the report or document in which they are contained and are
subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others: general economic and business conditions which will, among other things, impact demand for and market prices of the Company’s products; volatility of and assumptions regarding crude oil and natural gas prices; fluctuations in currency and interest rates; assumptions on which the Company’s current guidance is based; economic conditions in the countries and regions in which the Company conducts business; political uncertainty, including actions of or against terrorists, insurgent groups or other conflict including conflict between states; industry capacity; ability of the Company to implement its business strategy, including exploration and development activities; impact of competition; the Company’s defense of lawsuits; availability and cost of seismic, drilling and other equipment; ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to complete its capital programs; the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to secure adequate transportation for its products; unexpected difficulties in mining, extracting or upgrading the Company’s bitumen products; potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; ability of the Company to attract the necessary labour required to build its thermal and oil sands mining projects; operating hazards and other difficulties inherent in the exploration for and production and sale of crude oil and natural gas; availability and cost of financing; the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ success of exploration and development activities and their ability to replace and expand crude oil and natural gas reserves; timing and success of integrating the business and
- perations of acquired companies; production levels; imprecision of reserve estimates and estimates of recoverable quantities of crude oil, bitumen, natural
gas and liquids not currently classified as proved; actions by governmental authorities; government regulations and the expenditures required to comply with them (especially safety and environmental laws and regulations and the impact of climate change initiatives on capital and operating costs); asset retirement
- bligations; the adequacy of the Company’s provision for taxes; and other circumstances affecting revenues and expenses. Certain of these factors are
discussed in more detail under the heading “Risk Factors”. The Company’s operations have been, and at times in the future may be affected by political developments and by federal, provincial and local laws and regulations such as restrictions on production, changes in taxes, royalties and other amounts payable to governments or governmental agencies, price or gathering rate controls and environmental protection regulations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of the Company’s assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The impact of any one factor on a particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are dependent upon other factors, and the Company’s course of action would depend upon its assessment of the future considering all information then available. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed in this report could also have material adverse effects on forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations conveyed by the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information available to it on the date such forward-looking statements are made, no assurances can be given as to future results, levels of activity and achievements. All subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no
- bligation to update forward-looking statements should circumstances or Management’s estimates or opinions change.
Forward Looking Statements Forward Looking Statements
CNQ
50
Special Note Regarding Currency, Production and Reserves In this document, all references to dollars refer to Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. Production data is presented on a before royalties basis unless
- therwise stated. In addition, reference is made to oil and gas in common units called barrel of oil equivalent (“boe”). A boe is derived by converting six
thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil (6 mcf:1 bbl). This conversion may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation, since the 6mcf:1bbl ratio is based on an energy equivalency at the burner tip and does not represent the value equivalency at the well head. Reserves National Instrument 51-101 Standards for Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) of the Canadian Securities Administrators imposes requirements and standards for Canadian public companies engaged in oil and gas activities. The Company has an exemption from certain provisions under NI 51-101. This exemption allows the Company to substitute SEC requirements under Regulations S-K and S-X for certain disclosures required under NI 51-
- 101. On December 31, 2008, the SEC released its final rules for the modernization of oil and gas reporting (“Final Rule”). The material changes include the
ability to include oil sands mining as an oil and gas activity, ability to use reliable technology to establish undeveloped reserves, the optional ability to report probable reserves, the requirement to track undeveloped locations, as well as the directive to use 12-month average prices and current costs. These resulting changes are more in line with the NI 51-101, however, there are material differences to the type of volumes disclosed and the basis from which the volumes are determined. NI 51-101 requires gross reserves and future net revenue under forecast pricing and costs. The SEC requires disclosure of net reserves, after royalties, under 12-month average prices and current costs. The difference between the reported numbers under the two disclosure standards can be material. For the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company retained qualified independent reserves evaluators (“IQRE”), Sproule Associates Limited (“Sproule”), and GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. (“GLJ”), to evaluate and review all of the Company’s proved, as well as probable crude oil, synthetic crude oil, bitumen, coal bed methane, NGLs and natural gas reserves and prepare Evaluation Reports on these reserves. Sproule evaluated and reviewed all of the Company’s crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, coal bed methane and NGLs reserves. GLJ evaluated all of the synthetic crude oil reserves related to the Company’s oil sands mine. Reserves estimates provided in this presentation are working interest volumes, before royalties, and are as of December 31, 2009. The reserves volumes provided are evaluated by IQRE under SEC guidelines using 12-month average prices and current costs. Resources The Contingent resource estimates provided in this presentation are evaluated in accordance to Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGEH”) standards as directed under NI 51-101. These estimates are evaluated internally. No independent third party evaluation or audit was completed. Contingent resources provided are best estimates as of December 31, 2009. The contingent resources are evaluated using deterministic methods which represent the expected outcome with no optimism or conservatism. Contingent resources, as per COGEH definition, are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from know accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but are not currently considered commercially viable due to one or more
- contingencies. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of these resources.
Due to the inherent differences in standards and requirements employed in the evaluation of reserves and contingent resources the total volumes of reserves or resources are not to be considered indicative of total volumes that may actually recovered and are provided for illustrative purposes only. Petroleum initially in place volumes provided are discovered resources which include: production, reserves, contingent resources and unrecoverable volumes. Special Note Regarding non-GAAP Financial Measures Management's discussion and analysis includes references to financial measures commonly used in the oil and gas industry, such as cash flow, cash flow per share and EBITDA (net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation depletion and amortization, asset retirement obligation accretion, unrealized foreign exchange, stock-based compensation expense and unrealized risk management activity). These financial measures are not defined by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and therefore are referred to as non-GAAP measures. The non-GAAP measures used by the Company may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The Company uses these non-GAAP measures to evaluate the performance of the Company and of its business segments. The non-GAAP measures should not be considered an alternative to or more meaningful than net earnings, as determined in accordance with Canadian GAAP, as an indication of the Company's performance. Volumes shown are Company share before royalties unless otherwise stated.