conducting a long term case study in a software firm
play

Conducting a Long-Term Case Study in a Software Firm Experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conducting a Long-Term Case Study in a Software Firm Experience Report Sofia Sherman Irit Hadar Dept. of Information Systems University of Haifa Software Architecture Lab. The research Research agenda: To define the software


  1. Conducting a Long-Term Case Study in a Software Firm Experience Report Sofia Sherman Irit Hadar Dept. of Information Systems University of Haifa Software Architecture Lab.

  2. The research  Research agenda:  To define the software architecture process in different development methodologies and the role of the software architect within them  Research field  One of the world's largest software providers  Research population  Software architects employed in the firm with different levels of seniority  Software developers practicing software architecture  Research plan (1) analysis of the current state (2) development and improvement of a proposed solution (3) evaluation and validation of the developed solutions Software Architecture Lab. 2

  3. Classification of our study within academia-industry collaboration  Completion project [Cohen, Nelson and Walsh, 2002]  Funding  Non-financial benefits (access to data) [Perkman and Walsh , 2009; Walsh et al, 2012]  Technology development research  Development of process and tool [Perkman and Walsh , 2009] Software Architecture Lab. 3

  4. The challenges Challenge Explanation Consequences Perceived Immediate contribution of Attitude towards importance the research is not evident researchers is distrust. of academic to developers. research It is hard to convince them to take it seriously. Resource Dedicating time for interview Leads to the perception allocation – or questionnaire is often that time spent on the time budget perceived as a waste of research becomes an time, by both middle investment of the management and developer’s own time developers. budget. Software Architecture Lab. 4

  5. The challenges (cont ’) Challenge Explanation Consequences Concerns The advantage of managers’ Developers providing only regarding motivating developers to partial information, providing collaborate with the sometimes even inaccurate data researchers. data. Developers cannot be sure This, in turn, may also lead that information provided in to suspicious attitude the questionnaire or interview towards research outputs. would not harm them in the future. Concerns Developers’ concerns Developers providing only regarding the regarding research outcomes’ partial information or none research influence. at all. outcomes Software Architecture Lab. 5

  6. The challenges (cont ’) The Explanation Consequences challenge Applying The lack of firms’ There is no motivation research motivation to cooperate to validate, generalize outcomes in once the main purpose of and publish the results, the field the research has been which is highly important achieved. to the academic researcher. Software Architecture Lab. 6

  7. Discussion – enhancing collaboration  Bringing the contribution of academic research to industry to the software developers’ awareness  Providing developers with academic literature  Promoting participation in academic seminars  Encouraging research-related discussions  Facilitating better communication  Providing both parties with common terminology  Providing both parties with common interests  Bridging the gap via education  Including topics related to the contribution of academic research to industry in CS and SE curriculum. Software Architecture Lab. 7

  8. Questions? Thank you! Software Architecture Lab. 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend