COMPLETE OR BALANCED? Providing variable treatments will not make a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

complete or balanced
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

COMPLETE OR BALANCED? Providing variable treatments will not make a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMPLETE OR BALANCED? Providing variable treatments will not make a street incomplete! Plan for all uses, but balance the solutions Share the road, it is a public rights-of-way Many issues, but can only afford a few solutions Demand


slide-1
SLIDE 1

COMPLETE OR BALANCED?

Providing variable treatments will not make a street incomplete!

Plan for all uses, but balance the solutions Share the road, it is a “public rights-of-way” Many issues, but can only afford a few solutions Demand should not drive facilities, vision should Those exposed to the most danger, need our help Keep in mind the broader social & environmental goals

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mike Singleton

Avid cyclist, daily commuter, runner & walker for 40 years LEED AP, AICP, CTP & Landscape architect Experience for the last decade has been on: Complete streets & integrated land use planning Multi-modal transportation planning and design Current projects include: Uptown Mobility Plan / Community Plan Update SDSU Bike Access Study San Diego Pedestrian Master Plan UCSD Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Carlsbad ADA Transition Plan

slide-3
SLIDE 3

We walk (and ride) the talk

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BROADER PLANNING GOALS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Public Rights-of-Way

Wheeled Travelway Wheeled Travelway

STREET ROAD

Parking Parking Directional Divider Building Interface Activated Space Non-vehicular Travelway Furnishing Zones Utilities Zone

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rights-

Subject to Vehicular Codes

Public

  • f-Way

Public Rights-of-Way

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Complete Streets / Smart Mobility LEED ND Sustainable Communities Transit Supportive Planning Walkable Communities Active Transport Healthy Community Design New Urbanism /Smart Growth Urban Forestry Smart Mobility

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HOLT BLVD. MOBILITY & COMPLETE ST. STRATEGIC PLAN

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HISTORY OF HOLT BOULEVARD

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

ONTARIO

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

CURRENT CONDITIONS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Challenges and Existing Conditions

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Challenges and Existing Conditions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Challenges and Existing Conditions

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Challenges and Existing Conditions

slide-25
SLIDE 25

107’ ROW 118’ ROW

slide-26
SLIDE 26

74’ ROW 87’ ROW

slide-27
SLIDE 27

92’ ROW 98’ ROW

slide-28
SLIDE 28

96’ ROW 80’ ROW

slide-29
SLIDE 29

91’ ROW 103’ ROW

slide-30
SLIDE 30

98’ ROW 105’ ROW

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ANALYSIS

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Full user counts were completed

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Existing and Projected Land Uses

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Add more roadway capacity for vehicles

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Anticipated Future Volumes Based on the Ontario Plan

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Pedestrian Levels are Relatively High

slide-37
SLIDE 37

BRT on Holt Boulevard

slide-38
SLIDE 38

BRT on Holt Boulevard- Segment 6

slide-39
SLIDE 39

15 Minute Walk Times (Future BRT & Existing Bus Stops)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Walk Times / Housing Density (BRT & Existing Bus Stops)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

15 Minute Walk Times / Land Use (BRT & Existing Bus Stops)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Adjusted Station Locations (West and East Drift)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Comparison of Employment Ridership Potentials

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Comparison of Residential Ridership Potentials

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Bike 15 Minute Ride Times from Holt & Euclid

slide-46
SLIDE 46

PUBLIC INPUT on OPTIONS

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Public Input on Preliminary Preferences

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Add more roadway capacity for vehicles

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Provide various traffic calming measures to reduce speeds

Additional Traffic Signals Reduced Radius Turns or Bulb-outs Pedestrian Median Refuges Landscaped Medians Speed Monitors Medians Preventing Cross Movements

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Keep and / or wrap around the ends of on-street parking

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Improve crossings that are not at signalized intersections

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Improve crossings at existing signalized intersections

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Add tree resources for shade, aesthetics & traffic calming

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Add bike facilities on the Boulevard

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Activate the street edge with commerce & places to sit

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Provide priority transit facilities such as shared bus lanes

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Where traffic is not as great, reduce the number of lanes

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Add wider parkway strips for trees or medians with trees

slide-59
SLIDE 59

RANGE OF CONCEPTS BEING CONSIDERED

slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62
slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64
slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67
slide-68
SLIDE 68
slide-69
SLIDE 69
slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71

EXISTING ROW (from 74’ to 150’ with everything in between)

slide-72
SLIDE 72

CURB-TO-CURB (10’-15’ reserved for walkways / parkways)

slide-73
SLIDE 73

VARIABLE ROW EXPANSIONS TO LIMIT BLDG. DEMOS

slide-74
SLIDE 74

HISTORIC PROPERTIES at risk if ROW expanded as shown above

slide-75
SLIDE 75

HISTORIC BUILDINGS potentially at risk with ROW expanded to 96’

slide-76
SLIDE 76

NON-HISTORIC W/O CHARACTER at risk if ROW expanded as shown

slide-77
SLIDE 77

NON-HISTORIC W/O CHARACTER at risk if ROW expanded as shown

slide-78
SLIDE 78

NON-HISTORIC WITH CHARACTER at risk with ROW expanded to 96’

slide-79
SLIDE 79

OTHER NON-HISTORIC BLDGS. at risk if ROW expanded > as shown

slide-80
SLIDE 80

COMPOSITE OF ALL BUILDINGS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED

slide-81
SLIDE 81

6 Lane Rd. (will not be too difficult) Will be difficult

slide-82
SLIDE 82

and Pedestrian District Nodes Possible BRT

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Possible Bike Facilities

Class 2.5: Bike Blvd. Class 2:Bike Lane Class 3: Route Class 1: Path

slide-84
SLIDE 84

WHAT CAN STREETS DO BETTER?

slide-85
SLIDE 85

STREET RECLAMATION

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Existing Condition

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Proposed Condition- Did it need to go from 50’ to 130’?

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Walkability Connectivity Accessibility Safety

Walkability: Required Components

slide-89
SLIDE 89

W1 - Harsh environmental conditions W2 - Poor maintenance W4 - Lack of bufger from high speed/high volume trafc W6 - Walkway obstructions W5 - Absence of site amenities W3 - Perceived unsafe walkways due to fear of crime

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Changing the scale of a street without changing lane capacity

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Using gateways to pinch the roadway down for traffic calming

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Concentrating uses and design treatments to create nodes

slide-93
SLIDE 93

“Green “ Street

Pedestrian Bulbouts Mid-block Crossings Ladder Style Crosswalk Runofg inlets into planters Native Plant Strip and Bioswale Oily Water Separators Zero Curb Parking Lot Bio- swale Pop-out Water Harvest Planter Silva Cells Higher Refectance Paving Mulching Permeable Concrete Permeable Pavers

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Streets need to solve their own problems (runoff / urban heat island)

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Road diets and edge friction for traffic calming

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Fully accommodates non-peak traffic flows Provides mobility options (bike, ped. , ADA & transit) Supports smart growth, air quality & trip reduction goals Supports traffic calming & safety goals Fosters healthy economies, environments & lifestyles Recognizes human scale, street activation & defensible space

Street

Complete

My Definition

  • f a

Complete Street