complete flat lorentzian three manifolds
play

Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds Introduction Proper group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds J. Danciger Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds Introduction Proper group actions AdS geometry: fibrations A new properness criterion Fibrations of Margulis spacetimes Extra Slides: proof of


  1. Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds J. Danciger Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds Introduction Proper group actions AdS geometry: fibrations A new properness criterion Fibrations of Margulis spacetimes Extra Slides: proof of properness criterion, geometric transition Jeffrey Danciger with F . Gu´ eritaud and F . Kassel University of Texas – Austin jdanciger@math.utexas.edu XXII nd Rolf Nevanlinna Colloquium August 8, 2013

  2. Complete flat Lorentzian manifolds Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds J. Danciger Question Introduction 1. Classify the topology of manifolds M admitting a flat Lorentzian metric, Proper group actions which is geodesically complete. AdS geometry: fibrations 2. Understand the geometry of those metrics. A new properness criterion These manifolds are quotients of Minkowski space R n , 1 : M = Γ \ R n , 1 , where Fibrations of Margulis Γ ⊂ Isom ( R n , 1 ) = O ( n , 1 ) ⋉ R n + 1 , a group of isometries. spacetimes Extra Slides: proof of Question properness criterion, geometric transition 3. Which groups Γ can act properly discontinuosly and freely by isometries on Minowski space? 4. Given such Γ , classify proper isometric group actions Γ → Isom ( R n , 1 ) . Study dimension n = 3. 3. long known due to Fried–Goldman 4. nearly complete (Fried–Goldman, Goldman–Labourie–Margulis, D–Gu´ eritaud–Kassel) Today: give a topological classification ( Γ finitely generated); in particular all complete flat Lorentian three-manifolds are tame .

  3. Which groups act properly discontinuously? Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds Let Γ ⊂ O ( 2 , 1 ) ⋉ R 3 be a group of isometries. J. Danciger Then, T ∈ Γ is of the form T ( x ) = Ax + b Introduction A ∈ O ( 2 , 1 ) is the linear part and b ∈ R 3 is the translational part . Proper group actions Denote the homomorphism L : T �→ A . AdS geometry: fibrations Easy example: Γ = Z × Z × Z , generated by three independent translations. A new properness criterion Here, the linear part L (Γ) is trivial and M = Γ \ R 3 ∼ = T 3 . Fibrations of Margulis spacetimes Fried–Goldman ’83: If Γ acts properly and freely, then either Extra Slides: proof of properness criterion, ◮ Γ is solvable, or geometric transition ◮ L : Γ → O ( 2 , 1 ) is injective and discrete. So Γ ∼ = L (Γ) is a surface group, necessarily non-compact (Mess). = ⇒ Γ is a free group. In fact, dichotomy holds more generally for Γ ⊂ Aff ( R 3 ) . Conjecture (Auslander ’64) A group of affine transformations acting properly discontinuously and cocompactly on affine space is virtually solvable.

  4. Free groups acting properly discontinuously Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds Fried–Goldman ’83: If Γ acts properly, freely and Γ is not solvable then the J. Danciger linear part L (Γ) ∼ = Γ is a non-compact surface group. = ⇒ Γ a free group. Introduction Proper group actions AdS geometry: ◮ Γ is called affine deformation of L (Γ) . fibrations ◮ Margulis ’83: first examples. A new properness criterion ◮ M called a Margulis spacetime . Fibrations of Margulis spacetimes Extra Slides: proof of properness criterion, So, in n = 3, it remains to: geometric transition ◮ Understand which affine deformations of a surface group give proper actions. ◮ Determine the topology of the quotients.

  5. Topology: tameness Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds Let the free group Γ ⊂ O ( 2 , 1 ) ⋉ R 2 , 1 act properly discontinuously on R 2 , 1 . J. Danciger Let M = Γ \ R 2 , 1 be the quotient manifold. Introduction Proper group actions ◮ Expect M to be a handle-body. But is M even tame? AdS geometry: ◮ A manifold is tame if it is the interior of a compact manifold with boundary. fibrations ◮ Exist wild manifolds which are homotopically trivial (Whitehead). A new properness criterion ◮ Tameness of hyperbolic three-manifolds: conjectured by Marden in ’74. only Fibrations of Margulis recently proven by Agol and Calegari–Gabai in ’06. spacetimes ◮ Drumm (’90) constructed examples Γ by building fundamental domains Extra Slides: proof of (crooked planes) ( = ⇒ tame). properness criterion, geometric transition ◮ Drumm–Goldman conjectured that all Margulis spacetimes can be built by Drumm’s technique. therefore Conjecture (Drumm-Goldman ’90s) All Margulis spacetimes are tame ◮ Partial results due to Charette–Drumm–Goldman, in case rank (Γ) = 2.

  6. Topology: tameness Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds J. Danciger Theorem (D–Gu´ eritaud–Kassel, Choi–Goldman) Let Γ ⊂ O ( 2 , 1 ) ⋉ R 3 be a free group which acts properly on R 2 , 1 . Assume the Introduction linear part L (Γ) is convex cocompact. Then the quotient M = Γ \ R 2 , 1 is tame, Proper group actions diffeomorphic to a handle-body. AdS geometry: fibrations A new properness ◮ In progress: general case allowing for linear part L (Γ) to have parabolics. criterion will classify the topology of all complete affine three-manifolds. Fibrations of Margulis spacetimes ◮ We prove that M is fibered in (time-like) geodesics over a hyperbolic Extra Slides: proof of surface S = L (Γ) \ H 2 , where L (Γ) is the linear part. properness criterion, ⇒ M ∼ geometric transition = = S × R . ◮ point of view: Margulis spacetimes (flat) behave like infinitesimal versions of AdS manifolds (curved). ◮ AdS = anti de Sitter geometry: constant negative curvature model space. ◮ can make the intuition precise: (paraphrased) Theorem (D-Gu´ eritaud-Kassel) The complete flat Lorentzian metric on M is realized as a limit of complete metrics of constant curvature.

  7. Hyperbolic surfaces Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds H 2 = upper hemisphere in CP 1 . J. Danciger Isom 0 H 2 = PSL ( 2 , R ) =: G . Introduction Proper group actions ◮ Γ 0 ⊂ PSL ( 2 , R ) discrete = ⇒ Γ 0 acts properly discontinuously. AdS geometry: ◮ b/c point stabilizer is compact. fibrations ◮ If Γ 0 is f.g. and acts freely then S = Γ 0 \ H 2 is a surface of finite type A new properness criterion (tameness in two-dimensions). Fibrations of Margulis ◮ Γ 0 called convex cocompact if all elements are hyperbolic (translation spacetimes length > 0). Extra Slides: proof of properness criterion, geometric transition

  8. Deforming representations Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds G = PSL ( 2 , R ) . J. Danciger g = sl ( 2 , R ) . Introduction Proper group actions Consider a path ρ t : Γ 0 → G with ρ 0 = id : Γ 0 → Γ 0 . AdS geometry: fibrations � ◮ Derivative ρ ′ = d is a representation Γ 0 → TG ∼ � = G ⋉ g . � A new properness d t � t = 0 criterion Fibrations of Margulis = ⇒ ρ ′ ( γ ) = ( γ, u ( γ )) where u : Γ 0 → g is spacetimes � Extra Slides: proof of u ( γ ) = d � ρ t ( γ ) γ − 1 properness criterion, � d t geometric transition � t = 0 “infinitesimal deformation” of Γ 0 in G . cocycle condition: u ( γ 1 γ 2 ) = u ( γ 1 ) + Ad γ 1 u ( γ 2 ) . ◮ γ �→ ( γ, u ( γ )) is a representation Γ 0 → G ⋉ g . Notation Γ u := { ( γ, u ( γ )) } ⊂ G ⋉ g . 0

  9. The associated affine action Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds J. Danciger Notation Introduction Γ u := { ( γ, u ( γ )) } ⊂ G ⋉ g . Proper group actions 0 AdS geometry: fibrations A new properness G ⋉ g acts by affine transformations on g : criterion Fibrations of Margulis ( g , u ) ∈ G ⋉ g acts by ( g , u ) · v := Ad g v + u spacetimes Extra Slides: proof of properness criterion, geometric transition ◮ preserves indefinite metric on g coming from Killing form . ◮ For G = PSL ( 2 , R ) , signature = ( 2 , 1 ) ⇒ identify R 2 , 1 = g . = ◮ ◮ therefore G ⋉ g ⊂ Isom R 2 , 1 . ◮ In fact, G ⋉ g = Isom 0 R 2 , 1 . ◮ by Fried–Goldman, any proper isometric action on R 2 , 1 must have the form Γ u 0 (up to f.i.). Which Γ u 0 act properly?

  10. Margulis’s opposite sign lemma Complete flat Lorentzian three-manifolds exponential decay J. Danciger exponential growth Introduction Proper group actions Action of ( γ, u ( γ )) : linear translation AdS geometry: fibrations A new properness criterion Fibrations of Margulis Margulis invariant: spacetimes Extra Slides: proof of Observation properness criterion, geometric transition signed translation length of ( γ, u ( γ )) given by d λ u ( γ ) . Notation ◮ λ ( γ ) = hyperbolic translation length of γ ∈ PSL ( 2 , R ) . ◮ d λ u ( γ ) = rate of change of λ ( γ ) under the infinitesimal deformation u ( γ ) . Lemma (Margulis) If there are γ 1 , γ 2 ∈ Γ 0 such that d λ u ( γ 1 ) ≥ 0 and d λ u ( γ 2 ) ≤ 0 then Γ u 0 does not act properly discontinuously on R 2 , 1 .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend