compass ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique
play

COMPASS: ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique Gregory Ducrocq - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMPASS: ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique Gregory Ducrocq DHU-FIRE, Hpital Bichat, Assistance Publique Hpitaux de Paris, INSERM U1148 LVTS, French Alliance for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Conflits dintrt Orateur: Astra


  1. COMPASS: ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique Gregory Ducrocq DHU-FIRE, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM U1148 LVTS, French Alliance for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials

  2. Conflits d’intérêt Orateur: Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, BMS, Sanofi CEC: Sanofi, Philips DSMB: Abbot, MicroPort Frais de voyage: Astra Zeneca, Biotronik

  3. Evolution de la mortalité hospitalières après IDM USIK USIC-2000 FAST-MI FAST-MI-2 Puymirat et al. JAMA 2012

  4. Long-term death rates post ACS remain high The UK – Belgian GRACE experience Fox KAA, et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2755 – 2764

  5. Comment améliorer le traitement antithrombotique en prévention secondaire? Antiagrégants plaquettaires Inhibiteur du récepteur de la Inhibiteur du récepteur P2Y12: thrombine PAR-1: Vorapaxar ticagrelor TRA2P trial Morrow et al NEJM 2012 Pegasus trial Bonaca et al NEJM 2015

  6. Comment améliorer le traitement antithrombotique en prévention secondaire? Anticoagulant

  7. COMPASS: Design Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d + Aspirin 100 mg o.d 27 400 patients R Rivaroxaban 5 mg b.i.d Run-in Screening period period Aspirin 100 mg o.d Primary outcome : MI, Stroke, CV death Eikelboom J.W. et al N Engl J Med , 2017

  8. COMPASS: critères d’inclusion Coronariens Maladie artérielle périphérique - ATCD IDM - ATCD revascularisation des membres inférieurs - Multitronculaires - ATCD amputation - Symptomatiques - Claudication intermittente et - ATL multi-vaisseaux - ABI < 0.9 - Pontage multi vaisseaux - Sténose artère périphérique ≥ 50% - ATCD de revascularisation carotide ou sténose carotide ≥ 50 %

  9. COMPASS: critères d’inclusion Coronariens: critères d’enrichissement Coronariens - ≥ 65 ans - ATCD IDM - < 65 ans - Multitronculaires - Tabagisme actif - Symptomatiques - Diabète - ATL multi-vaisseaux - Insuffisance rénale (DFG - Pontage multi vaisseaux < 60) - Insuffisance cardiaque - AVC non lacunaire ≥ 1 mois

  10. COMPASS: critères de non- inclusion - Haut risque de saignement - AVC < 1 mois - ATCD d’AVC hémorragique ou lacunaire - Insuffisance cardiaque - FE < 30% - NYHA 3 ou 4 - DFG < 15 mL / min - Indication de DAPT - Maladie non cardiaque au pronostic défavorable - …….

  11. COMPASS: caractéristiques de la population

  12. COMPASS: critère primaire d’efficacité (IDM, AVC , décès CV)

  13. COMPASS: saignements

  14. COMPASS: bénéfice clinique net

  15. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique

  16. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique • Il y a un besoin clinique Fox KAA, et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2755 – 2764

  17. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique • Il y a un besoin clinique • Réduction de la mortalité

  18. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait changer ma pratique Analyse du registre REACH 31 873 patients • Il y a un besoin clinique • Réduction de la mortalité Exclude d • La population de COMPASS 29,9% Eligible représente une large 52,9% proportion de nos patients Non- include d 17,2% Darmon A et al Eur Heart J 2017

  19. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait ne pas changer ma pratique

  20. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait ne pas changer ma pratique • C ompétition avec d’autres stratégies…

  21. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait ne pas changer ma pratique • C ompétition avec d’autres stratégies • Chez quels patients en pratique?

  22. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait ne pas changer ma pratique • C ompétition avec d’autres stratégies • Chez quels patients en pratique? • Comment sélectionner les patients?

  23. COMPASS: Ce qui pourrait ne pas changer ma pratique • C ompétition avec d’autres stratégies • Chez quels patients en pratique? • Comment sélectionner les patients? • Quelle stratégie d’initiation?

  24. Conclusion • Nouveau concept en prévention secondaire • Beaucoup de questions sur la mise en pratique

  25. Backup

  26. Bleedings events Aspirin Riva 2.5mg BID n (%) + Aspirin n (%) Site of Major Bleeding : GI 65 (0,7) 140(1,5) 2,15(1,60-2,89) <0,001 Intra cranial 24(0,3) 28(0,3) 1,16(-0,67-2,00) 0,60 Skin or injection site 12(0,1) 28(0,3) 2,31(1,18-4,54) 0,01 Urinary 21(0,2) 13(0,1) 0,61(0,31-1,23) 0,16 1. Eikelboom JW et al. New Engl J Med 2017; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709118;

  27. Identifying the COMPASS Eligible Subset in the REACH Registry REACH overall population N=65,531 Excluded: CVD alone or risk factor alone n=21,052 REACH PAD/CAD n=44,479 Excluded: missing data on inclusion criteria AND exclusion criteria n=12,606 REA CH PAD/CAD evaluable = COMPASS- EVALUABLE n=31,873 Excluded: exclusion criteria n=9518 COMPASS COMPASS-EXCLUDED INELIGIBLE Excluded: patients with CAD/PAD but not fulfilling n=14,998 inclusion criteria n=5480 COMPASS NOT INCLUDED COMPASS-ELIGIBLE N=16,875 Darmon A et al Eur Heart J, 2017 (In Press)

  28. Eligibility to COMPASS and reasons for exclusion High Bleeding Risk 51,8 60 Oral Anticoagulant 44,8 Treatment 50 Excluded DAPT for ACS/PCI < 12 29,9% months 40 25,9 Ischaemic stroke < 1 Eligible 30 year 52,9% Severe renal failure 12,4 20 2,2 10 Non- 0 included Darmon A et al Eur Heart J, 2017 (In Press) 17,2%

  29. Main cardiovascular events rates Non Included Excluded Eligible COMPASS aspirin alone 7 6.5 5.6 p < 0,01 for each comparison 6 5 4.2 3.6 4 3.2 2.9 3 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.7 1 0.4 0 CV death, MI, or Stroke All cause mortality CV Death Non CV Death Per 100 patients / year

  30. CAD PAD COMPASS: Study Population Definition of CAD Definition of PAD  Previous MI  Previous aorto-femoral bypass surgery, limb bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal OR angioplasty of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries  Stable angina or unstable angina with OR documented multi-vessel CAD, >50% stenosis  Previous limb or foot amputation for arterial in at least 2 major coronary arteries on coronary vascular disease* angiography, or positive stress test (electrocardiogram) or nuclear perfusion OR scintigram  History of intermittent claudication and either an OR ankle/arm blood pressure ratio ≤0.90 or significant peripheral artery stenosis (>50%)  Multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention documented by angiography or non-invasive OR testing by duplex ultrasound  Multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting OR surgery within 1 week or at least 4 years ago or  Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis # >50% as with recurrent angina or ischaemia at any time diagnosed by duplex ultrasound or angiography following surgery

  31. COMPASS Randomised 27,395 Patients with ◄ Index CAD or PAD Worldwide COMPASS Trial COMPASS was conducted in 33 countries with 602 sites Ireland UK Denmark Sweden Finland Poland Ukraine Details N=382 N=541 N=575 N=735 N=119 N=518 N=821 Russia Canada N=682 Netherlands N=2443 N=2522 United States Belgium N=455 China N=1475 France N=191 Japan N=1556 N=1086 Germany N=766 South Korea N=415 Switzerland N=58 Philippines N=651 Italy N=1014 Colombia N=942 Czech Rep Israel Ecuador N=257 Malaysia N=1553 Brazil N=263 Slovakia N=92 N=247 N=1515 Hungary N=734 Australia Romania N=423 N=353 Chile N=641 South Africa N=581 Argentina N=2789 www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01776424 [accessed 21 Mar 2017]; Bosch J et al , Can J Cardiol 2017;33:1027 – 1035

  32. ◄ Index Efficacy of Combination Regimen of Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID with Aspirin was Consistent Across all Subgroups (1 of 2) COMPASS Result Rivaroxaban Aspirin Hazard Ratio Interaction 2.5 mg bid + aspirin n/N (%) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) (95% CI) p-value n/N (%) Details 0.755 (0.661 – 0.863) All patients 379/9152 (4.1) 496/9126 (5.4) Age 0.243 0.640 (0.484 – 0.848) <65 years 80/2150 (3.7) 126/2184 (5.8) ≥65 to <75 years 0.743 (0.612 – 0.901) 179/5078 (3.5) 238/5045 (4.7) ≥75 years 0.880 (0.687 – 1.127) 120/1924 (6.2) 132/1897 (7.0) Sex 0.759 0.764 (0.657 – 0.888) Male 300/7093 (4.2) 393/7137 (5.5) 0.723 (0.539 – 0.969) Female 79/2059 (3.8) 103/1989 (5.2) Region 0.599 0.766 (0.551 – 1.065) North America 63/1304 (4.8) 80/1309 (6.1) 0.823 (0.644 – 1.052) South America 93/2054 (4.5) 111/2054 (5.4) 0.657 (0.474 – 0.910) West Europe 117/2855 (4.1) 141/2855 (4.9) 0.620 (0.430 – 0.894) East Europe 59/1607 (3.7) 90/1604 (5.6) 0.834 (0.632 – 1.100) Asia Pacific & Other 47/1332 (3.5) 74/1304 (5.7) Ethnicity 0.375 0.761 (0.642 – 0.901) White Caucasian 236/5672 (4.2) 307/5682 (5.4) 0.305 (0.064 – 1.460) Black/African American 2/76 (2.6) 8/92 (8.7) 0.638 (0.452 – 0.901) Asian 54/1452 (3.7) 81/1397 (5.8) 0.869 (0.652 – 1.159) Other 87/1952 (4.5) 100/1955 (5.1) 0,1 Favours 1 Favours 10 Riva 2.5mg BID Aspirin + Aspirin alone Eikelboom JW et al. New Engl J Med 2017; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709118

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend