Comparison of congestion management techniques: nodal, zonal and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparison of congestion management techniques nodal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comparison of congestion management techniques: nodal, zonal and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comparison of congestion management techniques: nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing Thomas-Olivier Lautier (thomas.leautier@iae-toulouse.fr) Toulouse, June 2014 Unconstrained dispatch c I q c E q I E p U P I q


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thomas-Olivier Léautier (thomas.leautier@iae-toulouse.fr)

Comparison of congestion management techniques: nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing

Toulouse, June 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Unconstrained dispatch

2

P

E q

 

P

I q

 

cE q

 

cI q

 

I E

I I  I E pU qE

U

qI

U

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Nodal pricing

3

P

E q

 

P

I q

 

cE q

 

cI q

 

I E  K I I  K pE

N

pI

N

qE

N

qI

N

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Efficiency of Nodal pricing (Proposition 1)

  • A market with nodal pricing has at least one Nash

Equilibrium where producers offer at their marginal cost. All Nash Equilibrium result in the same locally efficient dispatch

  • Intuition: infinitesimally small producers cannot affect

local market price

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Efficiency of discriminatory pricing (Propositions 2 and 3)

  • There exist Nash equilibria in a network with discriminatory
  • pricing. All such Nash equilibria have the following

properties

1. The dispatched production is identical to the network’s efficient dispatch in each node 2. All production in node I with marginal cost at or below ci

N(qi N) is offered

at the network competitive nodal price pi

N=ci N(qi N)

3. Other offers are not accepted and are not uniquely determined in equilibrium

  • Intuition: inframarginal producers (even infinitesimally small)

can affect the price they receive

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Counter trading

6

P

E q

 

P

I q

 

cE q

 

cI q

 

I E  K I I  K pE

N

pI

N

qE

N

qI

N

pU

qE

U

qI

U

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Efficiency of counter trading (Propositions 4 and 5)

  • There exist Nash equilibria in a zonal market with counter
  • trading. All such Nash equilibria have the following

properties

1. The dispatched production is identical to the network’s efficient dispatch in each node 2. In strictly export-constrained nodes, production with marginal cost at or above the network’s competitive nodal price pi

N=ci N(qi N) are offered at

pi

N

3. In stricly import-constrained nodes, all production with marginal cost at

  • r below pi

N is offered at pi N

4. Equilibrium is unchanged whether producers are allowed to update their offers in the counter-trading stage or not

  • Intuition: producers bid low to be dispatched in the day-

ahead, and bought back in the counter-trading market

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Inefficiency of counter trading (Corollary 2)

  • In comparison to nodal pricing, there is an extra payoff from

the system operator to constrained off producers

  • Therefore, production investment will be too high in strictly

export constrained nodes

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Comments and suggestions

  • Important policy issue
  • Results are driven by assumption of infinitesimally small
  • producers. How realistic is it?
  • What would happen in the presence of congestion

management instruments (e.g., Financial Transmission Rights)

9