community health worker support for chronically ill
play

Community Health Worker Support for Chronically-ill Patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community Health Worker Support for Chronically-ill Patients Nadirah Rogers and Judith Long Improving Care in the Community: How to Effectively Deploy Community Health Workers Date November 1, 2018 # December 4, #PCORI2018 2018


  1. Community Health Worker Support for Chronically-ill Patients Nadirah Rogers and Judith Long Improving Care in the Community: How to Effectively Deploy Community Health Workers Date November 1, 2018 ‹#› • December 4, #PCORI2018 2018

  2. Nadirah Rogers and Judith Long Disclosures: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI-1310-07292) 2 • November 1 , 2018

  3. Objectives At the conclusion of this activity, the participant should be able to identify: • Ways a standardized intervention can provide tailored support • Key elements of a CHW intervention that enable efficacy • Tools and training to facilitate dissemination and scale of evidence-based interventions 3 • November 1, 2018

  4. 4 • November 1, 2018

  5. 5 • November 1, 2018

  6. 6 6 • November 1, 2018

  7. Standardized work practices • Manuals for CHWs, managers and program directors 7 • November 1, 2018

  8. Training & Certification Based on core competencies for each role Manager CHW Certification Director 8 • November 1, 2018

  9. Technology Documentation, reporting and data infrastructure 9 • November 1, 2018

  10. 10 10 • November 1, 2018

  11. Objective Determine, in a multi-center randomized controlled trial, whether 6 months of goal setting and CHW support leads to improved outcomes compared to goal setting alone. Sites: VAMC, FQHC, Academic HC 11 11 • November 1, 2018

  12. Methods Participants: • Uninsured or publicly insured • Residents of high-poverty regions in Philadelphia • ≥2: hypertension, diabetes, obesity, tobacco dependence Outcomes assessed at 6, 9 months: • Self-rated physical health, mental health, chronic disease control, patient activation, quality of care, hospitalizations Analysis: • Intent-to-treat • Generalized estimating equations 12 12 • November 1, 2018

  13. Intervention Adaptations (1-3 months): • Tailored communication, software and training • Separate CHWs at each site • Work privileges Core intervention: • 6 months of tailored support • Weekly contact and monthly face-to-face 13 • November 1, 2018

  14. Participants (n=592) Age, years 52.6 African-American 94% Household Income < 15K 65% Trauma History 98% 14 • November 1, 2018

  15. Patient Tailored Support CHW (also veteran) organized 65 year old socially isolated outings with other veterans: veteran with PTSD and bowling, movies, urban hypertension garden 32 year-old single mother with CHW advocated for patient to move to 1 st floor with a asthma living in moldy shelter basement window 15 • November 1, 2018

  16. Outcomes blank Diff-in-Diff P value ∆Self -rated Physical Health -0.7 0.30 ∆Self -rated Mental Health 0.8 0.41 ∆Chronic disease control blank 0.21 -6.3 blank Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Obesity (BMI) -0.2 blank -0.2 blank Diabetes (HbA1c%) Tobacco dependence (Cig per day) -0.5 blank ∆Patient Activation 1.9 0.06 Risk Diff P value blank 0.12 <0.001 Highest Quality (Comprehensiveness) Highest Quality (Supportive of Self-Management) 0.12 <0.001 16 16 • November 1, 2018

  17. Total Hospital Days 17 • November 1, 2018

  18. Hospitalizations Diff-in-Diff P value blank Mean Length of Stay -3.1 0.06 Risk Diff P value blank Repeat Admissions 0.4 0.02 30-d Readmission 0.3 0.04 18 • November 1, 2018

  19. Dissemination http://chw.upenn.edu/ 19 • November 1, 2018

  20. Veterans and IMPaCT vimeo.com This is "Veterans and IMPaCT" by Penn Center for CHWs https://vimeo.com/290342176 20 • November 1, 2018

  21. 21 • November 1, 2018

  22. Participants (n=592) Age, years 52.6 African-American 94% Household Income < 15K 65% Trauma History 98% Baseline Chronic Disease Control Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) 161.6 Obesity (BMI) 42.5 Diabetes (HbA1c%) 10.5 Tobacco dependence (Cig per day) 9.3 22 • November 1, 2018

  23. Limitations • Geographically limited Follow-up period was only 9 months • • Hospitalization data for veterans was limited to the VA network 23 • November 1, 2018

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend