Communicating Advanced Geophysical Classification to Stakeholders - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

communicating advanced geophysical classification to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Communicating Advanced Geophysical Classification to Stakeholders - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Communicating Advanced Geophysical Classification to Stakeholders Herb Nelson Program Manager for Munitions Response SERDP & ESTCP 571-372-6400 herb.nelson@nrl.navy.mil Outline Before the first engagement with stakeholders At the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Communicating Advanced Geophysical Classification to Stakeholders

Herb Nelson Program Manager for Munitions Response SERDP & ESTCP 571-372-6400 herb.nelson@nrl.navy.mil

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Before the first engagement with stakeholders
  • At the first planning meeting
  • During the course of the project
  • At the conclusion of the field work

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Before You Meet with Stakeholders

  • Develop a basic understanding of the technology

you don’t have to be able to solve the equations that describe

the process

EMI data → intrinsic parameters → classification decision

  • Make sure classification is appropriate to your site

this stuff is great and works most places but not everywhere

  • Make sure you have a qualified contractor

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Training Resources

  • USACE Training
  • ITRC “Tech Reg” Guidance Document & Internet-based

Training

  • ESTCP Training Resources

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

At the First Planning Meeting

  • There is a big change here but it may not be what you

think

we’ve always left metal in the ground

missed detections due to obstructions anomalies below threshold

we just didn’t know much about that metal

  • Using classification we know a lot about the items we

leave in the ground

and we have put quality systems in place to prove it

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

At the First Planning Meeting

  • Don’t exaggerate the capabilities of classification

it’s a really cool technology there really are no silver bullets

  • Seek buy-in on the remedial action objectives

defined and quantitative RAOs make classification much easier should have been spelled out in the DD or ROD

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

At the First Planning Meeting

  • Be ready with a

thoughtfully-developed QAPP

  • This is the cornerstone of

the QC/QA process and should enable all team members to have confidence in the project results

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

During the Course of the Project

  • Enforce the QC reporting schedule specified in the

QAPP and make sure the QA Geophysicist stays up to date

  • Stakeholder confidence is increased by

early identification of QC issues

careful and complete root cause analyses prompt implementation of any required corrective actions

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Example Project Documentation

  • Surface Clearance Memo
  • IVS Tech Memo
  • Weekly QC Reports throughout the field work
  • Anomaly Selection Tech Memo
  • Intrusive Investigation Report
  • Final Analysis Report and Justification for Stop Dig Point

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Surface Clearance Memo

  • Was everything found consistent with the CSM?
  • Is there anything the analysts need to know?

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 10

CSM Evidence Found in Surface Sweep 37-mm projectile Y 2.36-in rocket Y 60-mm mortar Y 75-mm projectile Y 81-mm mortar N 3-in stokes mortar Y Unexpected munition N

slide-11
SLIDE 11

IVS Tech Memo

  • Is the Sensor Functioning Properly and Ready to Collect

Data?

SLO Initial Dynamic IVS Seed Position

0.50

Accuracy

0.25 Y offset (m) 0.00 IVS Seed 1 IVS Seed 2

  • 0.25
  • 0.50

X offset (m)

  • 0.50
  • 0.25

0.00 0.25 0.50

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

IVS Tech Memo

  • Are the remedial objectives achievable?

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Anomaly Selection Tech Memo

  • Were all the blind seeds detected within spec?

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Intrusive Investigation Report

  • Were all recovered items consistent with analyst’s

predictions?

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 14

SW-30825

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Intrusive Investigation Report

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What We Are Doing to Facilitate This

  • Develop a set of standard QC and QA plots in

UX‑Analyze

  • Work hard at the QC interface between data collection

and data analysis

  • Make sure both of the above are in line with the evolving

QAPP template

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Verification and Validation

  • Involve the stakeholders early and often in planning

draft plan before field work final plans after contractor completes field work

  • Verify the stop-dig threshold

dig past the last TOI

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Contractor Stop Dig Threshold

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 18

23 digs past the last TOI

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Verify The Threshold

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 19

200 digs past the last TOI

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Verification and Validation

  • Involve the stakeholders early and often in planning

draft plan before field work final plans after contractor completes field work

  • Verify the stop-dig threshold

dig past the last TOI

  • Validate the whole process

targeted investigation of items classified as likely clutter

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Validate the Process

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 21

200 digs past the last TOI 100 randomly selected

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Verification and Validation

  • Involve the stakeholders early and often in planning

draft plan before field work final plans after contractor completes field work

  • Verify the stop-dig threshold

dig past the last TOI

  • Validate the whole process

targeted investigation of items classified as likely clutter

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

For More Information

serdp-estcp.org

Featured Initiatives > Munitions Response Initiatives > Classification Applied to Munitions Response Or Search – Classification Applied to Munitions Response

M2S2 Webinar - Communicating Classification to Stakeholders 23