CommStat 8/30/18 "The First Time I Felt It" by Stevie S. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
commstat 8 30 18 the first time i felt it by stevie s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CommStat 8/30/18 "The First Time I Felt It" by Stevie S. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 22, 2022 573 likes •1.17k views

CommStat 8/30/18 "The First Time I Felt It" by Stevie S. The first time I can remember ever drinking, at least more than just a single small sip for taste, given with "permission", I was the age of ten. I can remember going

slide-1
SLIDE 1

CommStat 8/30/18

slide-2
SLIDE 2

https://www.writersforrecovery.org/blog/2018/7/16/the-first-time-i-felt-it-by-stevie-s

The first time I can remember ever drinking, at least more than just a single small sip for taste, given with "permission", I was the age of ten. I can remember going over to my friend's house We'll call her M. M & I played computer a while, but grew bored. Tried going a walk, to realized yet again that there simply wasn't much to do in the small town of Palmer. Back at her place, she suggested we try a bit of her mother's Kahlua from the fridge, mixed with some low-fat milk. It was good, sweet and creamy, with a very mild alcoholic taste to it. I drank until my head felt light. I drank until I felt funny. I drank until I couldn't stop laughing. I drank just until I knew I'd want to do it again when given the chance. Which didn't take much for a 10-year-old female under 5 feet.

"The First Time I Felt It" by Stevie S.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/upshot/opioids-overdose-deaths-rising-fentanyl.html

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MAT in Prison Update Ben Watts Department of Corrections

slide-5
SLIDE 5

UVMMC Prescribing Data 2018 Quarter 2 Update

  • Dr. Stephen Leffler
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

4/1/18 - 6/30/18

Opioid Prescriptions over 50 pills per provider

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Opioid Prescriptions over 50 pills per provider by quarter

10/15-12/15 10/16-12/16 01/17-03/17 4/17-6/17 7/17-9/17 10/17-12/17 1/18-3/18 4/1/18 - 6/30/18

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Opioid Prescriptions > 50 pills per provider by quarter

those who prescribed 0 or 1 prescription 4/18-6/18 have been removed 10/15-12/15 10/16-12/16 01/17-03/17 4/17-6/17 7/17-9/17 10/17-12/17 1/18-3/18 4/1/18 - 6/30/18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Police Data for Youth Ages 13-21 Valcour Agencies in Chittenden County Kayla Donohue & Nancy Stetson

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Teens and young adults ages 13-21 from August 2017 – July 2018

14,621 incidents

  • 1,191 for Alcohol
  • 472 for Marijuana
  • 35 for Heroin or Other Opioids

7,729 unique individuals: 1,382 – two involvements 505 – three involvements 250 – four involvements 484 – five or more involvements

**Note: involvements include any role, including caller, traffic stop, witness, etc.

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

DCF-Family Services Data & FamilyStat

Beth Maurer, MSW District Director June 28, 2018

slide-23
SLIDE 23

39 41 42 40 34 48 62 65 65 67 77 67 75 71 58 61 61 58 66 57 58 50 35 36 31 29 31 24 21 22 20 21 26 30 28 30 28 27 25 37 42 39 41 42 68 73 77 72 74 71 71 71 69 70 70 75 67 63 57 60 63 67 77 79 91 89 11 16 11 16 12 14 11 13 10 7 10 11 11 10 6 8 6 5 8 7 8 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Number of Kids in Care Year/Quarter

Number of Children in Custody, by Age, by Quarter, 2013-2018 (1st quarter), Burlington

B 0-5 B 6-11 B 12-17 B 18+

slide-24
SLIDE 24

275 290 284 281 300 336 400 412 463 497 533 526 530 519 517 500 488 443 448 451 470 478 194 200 194 212 226 228 227 230 245 273 302 307 313 351 349 327 326 319 322 316 349 357 479 479 468 462 463 481 493 479 483 488 484 476 464 466 426 423 439 445 452 457 469 484 47 53 36 45 42 42 36 47 42 33 34 33 35 39 31 35 32 39 28 28 44 28 100 200 300 400 500 600

Number of Children in Custody, by Age, by Quarter, 2013- 2018 (1st qrt), Statewide

0-5 6-11 12-17 18+

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

DCF Family Services Caseload Report

6/3/18

(Ongoing Cases)

District Family Support Cases Total Custody Abuse/ Neglect Delinquent Child Behavior Voluntary Care Total CCO With Removal Parent With Other Parent With Other Del Youth Probation Court- Involved CHILD count FAMILY Total Court Involved CHILDREN + Family Support Cases ADO-St Albans 72 204 164 25 15 92 47 15 30 3 19 318 288 390 BDO-Burlington 107 188 143 23 22 198 83 27 88 14 14 414 413 521 HDO-Hartford 18 77 70 2 5 44 19 10 15 2 7 130 102 148 JDO-St Johnsbury 21 62 52 2 8 36 13 12 11 2 4 104 91 125 LDO-Brattleboro 30 174 166 3 5 60 45 5 10 9 243 173 273 MDO-Barre 73 130 119 5 6 125 55 16 54 5 28 288 237 361 NDO-Newport 26 55 44 5 6 20 9 1 10 7 10 92 92 118 RDO-Rutland 74 141 114 12 12 3 43 21 7 15 9 24 217 227 291 SDO-Springfield 20 87 73 4 10 19 15 3 1 2 5 113 101 133 TDO-Bennington 39 113 95 10 8 51 35 9 7 8 15 187 173 226 V-Morrisville 32 47 36 6 3 2 12 5 1 6 1 4 64 76 96 YDO-Middlebury 24 72 65 3 4 45 30 6 9 2 5 124 102 148 Total 536 1350 1141 100 104 5 745 377 112 256 55 144 2294 2075 2830 Children in Custody Conditional Custody Order Delinquent, No Custody

slide-27
SLIDE 27

DCF Family Services Caseload Report

6/3/18

(Intake Cases)

District Total Accepted Intakes 1/1/2017 – 12/31/3017 Total Child Safety Intervention SW FTEs Total On-Going SW FTEs ADO – St. Albans 661 7 18 BDO – Burlington 929 9 22 HDO – Hartford 347 3 9 JDO – St. Johnsbury 294 3 5 LDO – Brattleboro 441 4 11 MDO – Barre 608 6 12 NDO – Newport 357 4 5 RDO – Rutland 546 5 13.5 SDO – Springfield 289 3 8 TDO – Bennington 418 4 8 VDO – Morrisville 222 2 4.5 YDO – Middlebury 234 2 9 Total 5346 52 125

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Child's Age Nov-15 total % of 0-5 Custody Population Nov-16 total % of 0-5 Custody Population Nov-17 total % of 0-5 Custody Population 59 59.00% 55 66.27% 42 59.15% 1 67 58.77% 58 58.00% 54 64.29% 2 59 67.82% 54 64.29% 62 62.00% 3 59 66.29% 70 73.68% 37 54.41% 4 53 66.25% 53 71.62% 64 68.09% 5 48 69.57% 39 60.94% 37 67.27% Total 345 64.01% 329 65.80% 296 62.71% Table 2: Number and Percent of Kids Ages 0-5 in Custody due to Substance Abuse Issues Child's Age Nov-15 total % of 0-5 Custody Population Nov-16 total % of 0-5 Custody Population Nov-17 total % of 0-5 Custody Population 51 51.00% 46 55.42% 29 40.85% 1 54 47.37% 44 44.00% 43 51.19% 2 49 56.32% 45 53.57% 50 50.00% 3 43 48.31% 53 55.79% 31 45.59% 4 41 51.25% 46 62.16% 50 53.19% 5 38 55.07% 32 50.00% 32 58.18% Total 276 51.21% 266 53.20% 235 49.79% Table 3: Number and Percent of Kids Ages 0-5 in Custody due to Opiate Abuse Issues

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Capacity to handle the work…?

Capacity Equation: # of on-going social workers FTEs (-) vacant positions (-) 0.5 FTE for social workers with less than 6 months exp. divided by the family caseload Calculated variance with a 15:1 social worker to family ratio

District

Ongoing FSW FTEs

# Vacant Positions

# Less Staff (count @ .5 reduction) Total FTE Capacity Reduction

Adjusted Ongoing FSW Count

FAMILY Caseload Avg Per Auth FSW

CHILD/ FAMILY Avg Per Auth FSW

Adjusted Family Caseload Average

FSW Capacity

ADO-St Albans

18

0.0

2.0 1.0

17

16.0 21.7

16.9 88.54%

BDO-Burlington

22

0.0

6.0 3.0

19

18.8 23.7

21.7 69.01%

HDO-Hartford

9

1.0

1.0 1.5

7.5

11.3 16.4

13.6 110.29%

JDO-St Johnsbury

5

1.0

1.0 1.5

3.5

18.2 25.0

26.0 57.69%

LDO-Brattleboro

11

0.0

0.0 0.0

11

15.7 24.8

15.7 95.38%

MDO-Barre

12

2.0

0.0 2.0

10

19.8 30.1

23.7 63.29%

NDO-Newport

5

1.0

1.0 1.5

3.5

18.4 23.6

26.3 57.07%

RDO-Rutland

13.5

3.0

0.0 3.0

10.5

16.8 21.6

21.6 69.38%

SDO-Springfield

8

3.0

1.0 3.5

4.5

12.6 16.6

22.4 66.83%

TDO-Bennington

8

0.0

2.0 1.0

7

21.6 28.3

24.7 60.69%

V-Morrisville

4.5

0.0

1.0 0.5

4

16.9 21.3

19.0 78.95%

YDO-Middlebury

9

1.0

0.0 1.0

8

11.3 16.4

12.8 117.65%

Total

125

12.0

15.0 19.5

105.5

16.6 22.6

19.7 77.90%

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

FamilyStat

High risk/high needs families who are struggling with addiction and are at risk of separation because of incarceration and/or death.

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Sally Borden (KidSafe) Liz Nault/Beth Maurer – DCF- FSD Peggy Heath/Kyla Boyce/Leslie Stapleton – DCF- ESD Jackie Corbally (BPD Opiate Mgr) Amie Baker – Lund Mitch Barron - Centerpoint Nya Pyskacek - CHCB Sarah Russell – Burlington Housing Authority Jane Helmstetter – AHS Field Services Liz Mitchell – Children’s Mental Health Debbie Thibault - DOC David Riegel/Andrew Gonyea – VT Foundation of Recovery Julie Ryley – DV Specialist, FSD Jennifer Spagnuolo – Chittenden Clinic Shannon Fogg/Erin Langlois – Easter Seals Kelly Breeyear – Recovery supports

FamilySTAT Service Coordination Team:

Meets monthly to review cases and includes: People who are connected to this initiative (or could be), are on the ROI, but are not on the Service Coordination Team:

  • Margaret Tarmy – VT Chronic Care Initiative
  • Mark Ciociola – Voc Rehab
  • Amanda Hudak – Valley Vista
  • Kelly Dougherty – STEPS
  • Allyson Laackman – BHA (Executive Director)
  • Nikki Moyer – BPD
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Client’s Name:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Date of Referral to FamilyStat: 6-22-18 Date release of information signed: CFPT protected discussion FSD Risk Assessment result (at referral): High FSD Risk Re-assessment result (at FamilyStat discharge): ESD Self-Sufficiency Matrix result (at referral): P1: 68 (12/2017) P2: P1: P2: P1: P2: P1: P2: P1: P2: ESD Self-Sufficiency Matrix result (at FamilyStat discharge): P1: P2: P1: P2: P1: P2: P1: P2: P1: P2: Date child(ren) were removed from the home/date child(ren) were reunified: N/A Total number of days between removal and reunification: Date of treatment recommendations/date entered treatment: Timely access to treatment = days between treatment recommendations and entry into treatment Already in treatment Is DV a barrier to treatment? N/A

slide-34
SLIDE 34

What were the barriers to treatment the team identified? Family #1: Family #2: Family #3: Family #4: Family #5: Is the parent(s) at risk

  • f incarceration (Y/N)?

N Was the parent(s) incarcerated (Y/N)? N Did the parent(s) experience an

  • verdose episode

within the past month (Y/N)? Unknown Did the parent(s) engage with a recovery coach (Y/N)? Do the parent(s) have safe, stable and sober housing (Y/N)? She may be facing eviction Are the child(ren) attending child care and/or school regularly (Y/N)? Yes, but over the last few weeks his attendance has slipped

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Iceland Model of Prevention Jon Sigfusson

https://planetyouth.community/

slide-58
SLIDE 58
  • 9/27 (Thursday) 8:30-11:00 AM
  • Burlington Electric

Next CommStat Meeting