commonsense explanations
play

Commonsense Explanations Zipfs Law: A Brief . . . of Sparsity, Zipf - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . Why Do We Need a . . . Continuity: Main . . . Commonsense Explanations Zipfs Law: A Brief . . . of Sparsity, Zipf Law, and Main Idea Behind Our . . . Resulting Explanation Nashs Bargaining


  1. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . Why Do We Need a . . . Continuity: Main . . . Commonsense Explanations Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . of Sparsity, Zipf Law, and Main Idea Behind Our . . . Resulting Explanation Nash’s Bargaining Solution Nash’s Bargaining . . . Resulting Explanation . . . Home Page Olga Kosheleva 1 , Vladik Kreinovich 1 , and Kittawit Autchariyapanikul 2 Title Page 1 University of Texas at El Paso ◭◭ ◮◮ El Paso, Texas 79968, USA ◭ ◮ Olgak@utep.edu, vladik@utep.edu 2 Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Page 1 of 32 kittawit.a@mju.ac.th Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 1. Need for Commonsense Explanations Why Do We Need a . . . • In the 19 century, Continuity: Main . . . Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . – from Adam Smith through Karl Marx, Main Idea Behind Our . . . – economic phenomena were described by relatively Resulting Explanation simple intuitively clear formulas. Nash’s Bargaining . . . • However, it was well understood that these formulas Resulting Explanation . . . provide, at best: Home Page – a qualitative understanding, and Title Page – qualitative predictions. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Economics and finance are complex phenomena. ◭ ◮ Page 2 of 32 • So not surprisingly, simple models do not provide a good quantitative description of these phenomena. Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  3. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 2. Need for Commonsense Explanations (cont-d) Why Do We Need a . . . • Starting with the 20 century, new models appeared Continuity: Main . . . that allow us: Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . Main Idea Behind Our . . . – in many cases, Resulting Explanation – to make reasonable accurate predictions. Nash’s Bargaining . . . • The corresponding models more adequately describe Resulting Explanation . . . economic and financial phenomena. Home Page • However, they are often very mathematically compli- Title Page cated, far from common sense. ◭◭ ◮◮ • And here lies a problem: ◭ ◮ – since models are complicated, requiring complex Page 3 of 32 math beyond what most people know, Go Back – people in general – and politicians in particular – Full Screen do not fully trust these models. Close Quit

  4. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 3. Need for Commonsense Explanations (cont-d) Why Do We Need a . . . • This lack of complete trust is understandable, since: Continuity: Main . . . Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . – sometimes, predictions of previous models turn out Main Idea Behind Our . . . to be wrong, and Resulting Explanation – decisions based on these predictions made crisis sit- Nash’s Bargaining . . . uations worse. Resulting Explanation . . . • It is therefore desirable to come up with commonsense Home Page explanations: Title Page – for the current models, or at least ◭◭ ◮◮ – for the major assumptions behind these models and ◭ ◮ for the main features of these models. Page 4 of 32 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  5. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 4. Need for Commonsense Explanations (cont-d) Why Do We Need a . . . • This need is similar to the well-publicized need for ex- Continuity: Main . . . plainable AI. Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . Main Idea Behind Our . . . • A female CEO who was denied a bank loan by an AI- Resulting Explanation computer program would like to make sure that: Nash’s Bargaining . . . – this denial was based on inadequate state of her Resulting Explanation . . . company Home Page – and not on the fact that, in the past, most loans Title Page were given to men. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 5 of 32 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  6. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 5. What We Do in This Talk Why Do We Need a . . . • Of course, the goal of having explainable econometrics Continuity: Main . . . is complex. Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . Main Idea Behind Our . . . • It requires joint efforts of many researchers. Resulting Explanation • In this talk, we provide just three examples of the de- Nash’s Bargaining . . . sired commonsense explanations. Resulting Explanation . . . Home Page • Specifically, we provide commonsense explanation: Title Page – for sparsity, ◭◭ ◮◮ – for Zipf law, and – for Nash’s bargaining solution. ◭ ◮ Page 6 of 32 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  7. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 6. What Is Sparsity: A Brief Reminder Why Do We Need a . . . • Econometric analysis often starts with trying to use Continuity: Main . . . linear regression. Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . Main Idea Behind Our . . . • We try to predict the value y ( t + 1) of the desirable Resulting Explanation quantity y at the next moment of time t + 1 (e.g., Nash’s Bargaining . . . month or year). Resulting Explanation . . . • We predict y ( t + 1) as a linear combination of: Home Page – the values x 1 ( t ), . . . , x n ( t ) of different quantities at Title Page the current moment of time, ◭◭ ◮◮ – and maybe of their past values x i ( t − 1), x i ( t − 2), ◭ ◮ . . . Page 7 of 32 • Usually: Go Back – just to be on the safe side, Full Screen – we add as many quantities x i and as many past moments of time as possible. Close Quit

  8. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 7. What Is Sparsity: A Brief Reminder (cont-d) Why Do We Need a . . . • We understand that some of these values may be irrel- Continuity: Main . . . evant. Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . Main Idea Behind Our . . . • In the process of regression, it usually turns out that Resulting Explanation many of these variables are indeed irrelevant. Nash’s Bargaining . . . • We can see it by observing that the coefficients at these Resulting Explanation . . . variables are close to 0. Home Page • The problem with using the usual linear regression Title Page methods for linear regression is that: ◭◭ ◮◮ – since the data is noisy, and linear dependence is ◭ ◮ approximate, Page 8 of 32 – we do not get perfect match, and thus, do not get Go Back exactly 0 values even where there is no dependence. Full Screen • These erroneously non-zero value make the resulting predictions much less accurate. Close Quit

  9. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 8. What Is Sparsity: A Brief Reminder (cont-d) Why Do We Need a . . . • Much more accurate predictions can be obtained if: Continuity: Main . . . Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . – we explicitly require, from the very beginning, Main Idea Behind Our . . . – that a large number of the coefficients be zero, i.e., Resulting Explanation that the dependence is sparse . Nash’s Bargaining . . . • This is the main idea behind, e.g., the LASSO method. Resulting Explanation . . . Home Page • Sparsity is not limited to economics and finance, it is a useful tool in data processing in general. Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 9 of 32 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  10. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 9. Why Do We Need a Commonsense Explanation Why Do We Need a . . . for Sparsity Continuity: Main . . . • At first glance, what we described makes sense. Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . Main Idea Behind Our . . . • However, one can also raise a serious counter-argument: Resulting Explanation – in economics and in finance, everything is inter- Nash’s Bargaining . . . related, Resulting Explanation . . . – often, a small event across the world causes some Home Page stocks to go up or down, Title Page – so why would there be zero coefficients at all? ◭◭ ◮◮ • The previous text does not provide any commonsense ◭ ◮ explanation. Page 10 of 32 • It just states the empirical fact that the resulting best- Go Back fit formulas are often sparse. Full Screen • It would thus be nice to have some commonsense ex- planation for this empirical phenomenon of sparsity. Close Quit

  11. Need for . . . What Is Sparsity: A . . . 10. Continuity: Main Commonsense Feature Un- Why Do We Need a . . . derlying Our Explanation Continuity: Main . . . • Our commonsense explanation is based on a reasonable Zipf’s Law: A Brief . . . feature of continuity – that: Main Idea Behind Our . . . Resulting Explanation – small changes in one or several quantities should Nash’s Bargaining . . . lead to Resulting Explanation . . . – small changes in other quantities. Home Page • Of course, there are extreme situations when there is Title Page no continuity. ◭◭ ◮◮ • For example: ◭ ◮ – if the amount of money that a company needs to Page 11 of 32 pay right away is slightly smaller than its current Go Back amount of liquid assets, – it can easily pay its creditors and suppliers. Full Screen Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend