commercial pv projects with aee solar
play

Commercial PV Projects with AEE Solar Glenn Hall AEE Applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Commercial PV Projects with AEE Solar Glenn Hall AEE Applications Engineer 1/26/2019 Seminar Discussion Topics Considering 60-cell vs 72-cell modules for Commercial PV Projects Trends and developments for Commercial PV Systems


  1. Commercial PV Projects with AEE Solar Glenn Hall AEE Applications Engineer 1/26/2019

  2. Seminar Discussion Topics Considering 60-cell vs 72-cell modules for Commercial PV Projects • Trends and developments for Commercial PV Systems • Sizing arrays with regards to Inverter capacity • Optimal tilt of arrays on Commercial Projects • NEC 2014/2017 Rapid Shutdown for Commercial Projects • ‒ NEC2017 Module Level Requirements – Jan. 1, 2019! Trends and developments for Commercial PV in 2019 • ‒ Inverter Advances Ballasted and Metal Roof Racking Systems • Example of maximizing output of a ballasted commercial PV system • New Aerocompact Metal Roof offerings • ‒ New! SnapNrack Ultrarail for Commercial Roof Projects Benefits of Commercial PV Monitoring • Commercial Ground Racking Solutions • Aerocompact Ballasted Ground Mounts • New! PLP Power Peak Ground Mount System • Benefits of Commercial PV System Monitoring • Tax Credits – ITC and MACRS Depreciation •

  3. 60-Cell vs. 72-Cell Modules Considerations with using 72-Cell modules for Commercial Projects Spike in demand for 72-cell modules! Tight supply, due to drop in ITC at end of 2019. o Last year, projects with long timelines benefited from easier sourcing of 60-cell panels o 60-Cell modules often are not much higher cost per watt than equivalent 72-Cell modules o Minimum order quantities often apply for 72-cell panels – full pallets or containers o Module power densities are typically higher using 60-Cell modules o PERC and Split-Cell options increased power densities for both 60 and 72-cell modules o 72-Cell panels may be restricted in areas with heavy snow load, or need Alpine Brackets o Two people often required to handle 72-Cell modules, 60-cell panels are one person o More aesthetic options available for 60-cell modules, if this is a customer requirement o 60-Cell Modules (typical) 72-Cell Modules (typical) Polycrystalline – 270-300 Watts Polycrystalline – 335 to 350 Watts • • Monocrystalline – 300 to 335+ Watts Monocrystalline – 350 to 380 Watts • • High Efficiency Mono – 350+ Watts High Efficiency Mono – Not Typical • •

  4. Commercial PV Design Trends Higher DC to AC inverter load ratio ‒ <120% DC:AC in the past was regarded as the PV industry standard ‒ 130% to 135% is becoming much more common ‒ Inverters such as SMA Core1, Fronius Symo, and SolarEdge inverters, can utilize high DC to AC Ratios PV in designs that can be up to 150%! • A 50kW inverter could be used for up to a 75kW DC Solar Array ‒ Inverters can reach peak output earlier in the day, and minimal clipping during high irradiance is allowed. Inverters are not damaged by the PV Array. ‒ Fewer inverters needed for given site. Results in lower cost to purchase and deliver, and install. Also lower cost to maintain, service, and warranty. ‒ More kWh can be generated at the site with lower overall costs, considering materials, install labor, BOS, and maintenance. ‒ This results in lower cost per generated kWh for the PV system. High tilt angles on commercial projects are not always ideal ‒ Higher tilts angles results in larger inter-row spacing to prevent shading ‒ High percentage of net-metered solar production occurs during summer months ‒ Therefore, lower tilt angles allow larger PV arrays and more net energy production ‒ East/West racking solutions eliminate inter-row shading. ‒ Lower tilts and E/W maximizes module density; lower install cost and ballast weight ‒ Some considering West facing arrays to avoid higher TOU utility rates

  5. Rapid Shutdown Considerations NEC2014 690.12(B)(1), the PV Array Boundary for limiting voltage for • controlled conductors is 10’ Applies to all energized DC conductors on or inside of a building • Conductors outside this boundary must be under 30 volts in 30 seconds • This allows first responders to de-energize the high voltage conductors quickly • Roof Mounted Commercial inverters within the PC Array Boundary met • NEC2014, but now do NOT meet NEC2017 code. Free Standing SMA Core1 commercial inverters easily located next to a PV Array • Other commercial inverters placed on ballast racks • Some 3 rd party String Level RSD devices available • Examples: Midnite Solar LSOB, Birdhouse with Shut Off Boxes, Innovative Solutions • NEC2017 code reduces the PV Array Boundary to 1’, and limits maximum • voltage allowed within the PV Array to 80 VDC. NEC2017 shrinks the boundary for controlled conductors to a 1’ perimeter • Conductors outside this boundary must be under 30 volts in 30 seconds. • Jan.1, 2019 – NEC 2017 690.12(B)(2) becomes effective • Voltage within the array boundary must be under 80 volts in 30 seconds • In essence, this requires Rapid Shutdown at the module level • Two module/one input optimizer solutions may be over this voltage, coldest day! •

  6. NEC2017 Compliant Module Level RSD Options Meeting NEC2017 Module Level RSD requirements after Jan.1, 2019 • Tigo TS4-F MLPE – Shutoff under each module, with Sunspec inverters • SMA Residential inverters with -41 • SMA Commercial Core-1 inverters with -41 • Fronius Symo Advanced Commercial inverters as examples • No signaling Gateway or additional wiring needed, powerline communications • Solar modules with Maxim optimized junction boxes • Rapid Shutdown Functionality built into module junction box • Used with inverter manufacturers with SunSpec powerline communications • Tigo TS4-S or TS4-O optimizers, with Cloud Connect and Gateway • Enhanced range of rooftop Gateway makes deployment easier • Monitoring (TS4-S/TS4-O) and Optimization (TS4-O) added functionality • IMO FireRaptor RSD • Two panels served with each MLPE Device • Separate Emergency Switch, AC Powered • Midnite Little Shut Off Box (LSOB) • Transmitter placed around inverter output conductor • One LSOB receiver under each module for NEC2017 • Only one LSOB receiver needed for states still on earlier code cycles • Separate Bleed Down Unit also available for inverters that do not dissipate • voltage SolarEdge single panel optimizers (P320/P370/P400/P505) or commercial • optimizers that have two inputs (P800P/P860) Enphase IQ/IQ+/IQx microinverters • Traditional string inverters may become limited to being used on carports and • for ground mount PV Arrays NEC2014/NEC2017 Rapid Shutdown requirements are only required for roof • mounted solar arrays

  7. NEC Adoption Map – 1/1/2019

  8. NEC Adoption Map – 1/1/2019

  9. SMA Tripower Core1 – 50kW Inverter • • • • • • • • • • • •

  10. SolarEdge – Commercial Inverters

  11. Enphase IQ for Commercial Projects Enphase IQ microinverters • Enphase Energy’s 7th generation microinverter • IQ7 for 235-350W 60-cell modules • IQ7+ for 300-440W 60 and 72-cell modules • IQ7X for 96-cell modules, (SunPower and • Panasonic) Two wire IQ Trunk Cable system, reduced • components, resulting in lower costs 25-year warranty product in US • Roof top Aggregator – Acts as easy plug and play • roof top combiner Envoy IQ for both 1P-120/240VAC and • 3P-208VAC or 3P-240VAC projects High CEC Efficiency rating of 97.5% • Next Gen - IQ8 to be released later this year! • Commercial Applications • Module level optimization, with high DC to AC ratios • UL1741-SA Compliant for new utility requirements, • and Smart Grid Ready Built in module level NEC2017 • Rapid Shutdown compliance Ideal for smaller commercial projects, as well as • larger ones with broken up arrays that may be difficult to meet Rapid Shutdown compliance. Applicable to 3P-208-WYE or 3P-240-DELTA grids! •

  12. Commercial Rooftop Racking Flat-roof arrays using ballasted racking solutions • • Quick to design & install • Fewer materials needed than rail-based systems • Minimizes or eliminates roof penetrations • Avoids re-sealing • Easier servicing of roof • Less roof warranty issues Limitations of ballasted systems • • Seismic-related building codes may mandate some penetrations • Not suitable for roofs with greater than 5° slope • Not suitable for roofs over 50’ high • Wind exposure drives ballast and module tilt limitations • Be sure that designer and/or supplier uses correct wind loads, exposure categories, and risk factors!

  13. Penetrating vs. Ballasted Penetrating Racking Ballasted Racking Roof penetrations into roof Weight of array plus additional • • structure anchors PV array ballast anchors PV array Roof penetrations must be Few to no roof penetrations • • properly sealed for array life required to anchor array Higher tilt angles are possible Tilt angles typically <10° to • • to increase module efficiency minimize wind effects Can be installed on pitched or Pitch of roof limited depending • • flat roof surfaces on racking solution Lower array weight than Higher roof loading due to • • ballasted, less roof dead load ballast weight, higher dead load Roof maintenance requires Array can be more easily • • removal of array racking and removed and reinstalled for roof re-installation of penetrations maintenance Easier Wire management and Special consideration to wire • • MLPE Attachment Options management and MLPEs

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend