Combined Exposures to Dangerous Substances in the Workplace; An - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

combined exposures to dangerous substances in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Combined Exposures to Dangerous Substances in the Workplace; An - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Combined Exposures to Dangerous Substances in the Workplace; An epidemiological perspective Roel Vermeulen, PhD Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Combined Exposures to Dangerous Substances in the Workplace; An epidemiological perspective

Roel Vermeulen, PhD Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences University of Utrecht

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences

An interfacultary research institute within the faculties Veterinary Medicine, Medicine, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biology of Utrecht University The mission of IRAS is to provide education and research

  • n the human health risks of

exposure to potentially harmful agents in the environment, at the workplace and through the food chain

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Dr. Roel Vermeulen
  • Background:

– Environmental Health – Toxicology – Epidemiology

  • Focus area IRAS

– Cancer Epidemiology

  • Hemato- Lymphopoietic disorders
  • Lung

– Molecular epidemiology

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Focus Area Environmental Cancer

  • Hemato- Lymphopoietic disorders

– Benzene – Dioxin – Electromagnetic fields – Formaldehyde – Trichloroethylene – Selected pesticides

  • Lung

– Asbestos – Diesel exhaust – Indoor air pollution – Metals – Polycyclic Hydrocarbons

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Exposures in the Workplace are by Definition Complex

  • Combined exposures to multiple chemicals

– Multiple exposures / complex mixtures

  • Combined exposures to chemicals and

psychosocial risk factors

– Occupational exposures and stress

  • Combined exposures and lifestyle factors

– Occupational exposures and nutritional status

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Synergistic or Antagonistic?

  • Antagonistic

– Saturation of metabolic systems

  • Synergistic

– Inflamation + genotoxicity

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Epidemiological Evidence?

H o d g s o n ( 1 9 9 0 ) K u z m i c k i e n e ( 2 0 0 7 ) S z e s z e n i a - D a b r o w s k a ( 1 9 9 9 ) A s t r a k i a n a k i s ( 2 0 0 7 ) F r i t s c h i ( 2 0 0 4 ) W u - W i l l i a m s ( 1 9 9 3 ) L e v i n ( 1 9 8 7 ) M a s t r a n g e l o ( 2 0 0 8 ) M e r c h a n t ( 1 9 8 1 ) H e n d e r s o n ( 1 9 7 3 ) K o s k e l a ( 1 9 9 0 ) 1 . 1 6 8 1 5 . 9 7 R R

O v e r a ll ( I- s q u a r e d = 9 7 .8 % , p = 0 .0 0 0 ) A lb e r g h in i ( 1 9 9 1 ) L e v in ( 1 9 8 8 ) L a a k k o n e n ( 2 0 0 8 ) P u k k a la ( 1 9 9 7 ) W a n g ( 2 0 0 2 ) S ta r k ( 1 9 9 0 ) S p e r a ti ( 1 9 9 9 ) F a u s tin i ( 1 9 9 3 ) J a h n ( 1 9 9 9 ) G u n n a r d o ttir ( 1 9 9 1 ) M a s tr a n g e lo ( 2 0 0 5 ) W ik lu n d ( 1 9 9 4 ) B u r m e is te r ( 1 9 8 1 ) A la v a n ja ( 2 0 0 5 ) R o n c o ( 1 9 9 2 ) L e e ( 2 0 0 6 ) M a s tr a n g e lo ( 1 9 9 6 ) W ilk u n d ( 1 9 8 8 ) 1 .2 0 7 1 4 .8 4 R R

Lung cancer risk associated with working in A) cotton textile industry and B) agricultural industry. A B

Lenters et al., submitted

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals

  • Rubber industry

– Cross-sectional survey on genotoxic exposures in the rubber industry

  • RAPTES

– to characterize the physical, chemical and oxidant properties

  • f inhaled particulate matter and establish which of these

characteristics are critical determinates of adverse systemic and respiratory effects

  • Synergy

– Synergistic effects of multiple exposures to lung carcinogens

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Rubber I ndustry

  • The rubber industry has been associated with

increased cancer risks: lung, bladder, larynx and leukemia1

  • Exposure to a complex mixture of compounds
  • Aromatic amines
  • PAHs
  • Carbon black
  • Nitrosamines
  • Solvents
  • Both inhalation and dermal exposure2

 Current genotoxic risks largely unknown

  • 1. IARC Monographs “The rubber industry” (1982)
  • 2. Vermeulen et al. Occup Environ Med (2003)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rubber Industry; Complex Mixture of Compounds

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Particulate exposure; Mass and Mutagenicity

Geometric mean particulate exposure (mg/m3) for each production function in each plant

mix pre mod cur fin ship es lab 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 2 3 4 5 6

mg/m3 Production function Company

Geometric mean mutagenicity TSM exposure (rev/m3) for each production function in each plant

mix pre mod cur fin ship lab 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Rev/m3 Production function Company

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Potency Measures of Combined Exposures

  • Relevance of potency measures?

– Mutagenicity – Oxidant properties – Metabonomics

  • Legislation?

Holmes et al., 2008

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pooled Analysis of European Case-control Studies on the Interaction of Occupational Carcinogens in the Development of Lung Cancer

Included case-control studies: HDA Germany AUT Germany LUCAS Sweden TURI N-ROME I taly EAGLE I taly I NCO-Copernicus Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, UK LUCA France PARI S France I CARE France EPI C The Netherlands Montreal Canada Overall alm ost 3 0 ,0 0 0 cases and controls

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Targeted Exposures – Lung Carcinogens

Asbestos

chrysotile (white asbestos); amphibole;

  • ther type

Chrom ium

chromium VI; total chromium

Nickel

soluble nickel compounds; insoluble nickel compounds; total nickel

PAHs

benzo(a)pyrene; naphthalene

Respirable Crystalline Silica

respirable quartz; respirable cristobalite; respirable tridymite; respirable crystalline silica

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Challenges in Detecting Interactions

The power to detect interactions in epidemiological studies is low:

  • Increase in study size
  • Improved exposure assessment methods
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Joint Exposure Prevalences

pah cr ni as mmmf rcs dme asb

4722 (33%) 3008 (21%) 1467 (10%) 396 (3%) 1714 (12%) 933 (7%) 1748 (12%)

pah

3502 (24%) 2196 (15%) 2873( 20%) 1641 (12%) 3744 (26%) 4656 (32%)

cr

2217 (16%) 296 (2%) 1607 (11%) 912 (6%) 81 (1%)

ni

281 (2%) 248 (2%) 80 (1%) 62

as

81 (1%) 2389 (17%) 2346 (16%)

mmmf

723 (5%) 17

rcs

2902 (20%)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Joint Exposure Prevalences - High

pah cr ni as mmmf rcs dme asb

567 (4%) 7 6 10

pah

7 7 18 686 (5%) 525 (4%)

Cr

7

Ni As mmmf rcs

438 (3%)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Highest Joint Exposure Prevalences

  • Highest joint prevalences found for:

– Asbestos and PAH (33%; 4% high) – PAH and diesel (32%; 4% high) – PAH and silica (26%; 5% high) – Silica and diesel (20%; 3% high)

Relatively low joint prevalences

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Challenges in Detecting Interactions

The power to detect interactions in epidemiological studies is low:

  • Increase in study size
  • Improved exposure assessment methods
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

I m proved Exposure Assessm ent

Required data: Personal measurement data is preferred above stationary Individual data points needed to build multivariate models Auxiliary data, such as:

  • Purpose/ strategy of measurement
  • Sampling devices
  • Analytical procedures
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Data collection – So far

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000

** Canada ** ** Czech Rep. ** Denmark Finland ** France ** ** Germany ** ** Hungary ** Iceland ** Italy ** ** NL ** Norway ** Poland ** ** Sweden ** ** UK ** ** Slovakia ** ** Romania ** ** Russia ** Data being entered at moment Data already in ExpoSYN (n ~28,000)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Research Actions

  • Integration of functional test systems into

epidemiological research

  • Improved exposure assessment tools

– Better utilization of existing data?

  • Large epidemiological studies on
  • ccupational risk factors
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Contact Information

www.iras.uu.nl www.juliuscenter.nl