COLLINS PROGRAM UPDATE AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS DEFENCE INDUSTRY UNIT 13 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
COLLINS PROGRAM UPDATE AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS DEFENCE INDUSTRY UNIT 13 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
COLLINS PROGRAM UPDATE AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS DEFENCE INDUSTRY UNIT 13 JUL 2012 AIR VICE MARSHAL CHRIS DEEBLE PROGRAM MANAGER COLLINS & WEDGETAIL What happens when you get it wrong! OPERATIONAL CYCLE plus OPERATIONAL AND INTERMEDIATE
What happens when you get it wrong!
OPERATIONAL CYCLE plus OPERATIONAL AND INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE
WORK NOT UNDERTAKEN REDUCED RELIABILITY
TECHNICAL AND INTEGRITY MAY BE COMPROMISED OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS NOT MET
INCREASING COST OF OWNERSHIP
LOSS OF GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC CONFIDENCE SYSTEM AVAILABILITY
Depot Maintenance Depot Maintenance
ABILITY TO FURTHER ENHANCE THE CAPABILITY IS COMPROMISED
Getting Sustainment Right for CCSM
Depot Maintenance OPERATIONAL CYCLE plus OPERATIONAL AND INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE
ILS PLANNING BASE AND DISCIPLINES MAINTENANCE
- TECHNICAL INTEGRITY ASSURANCE
- RESPONSIBILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND
AUTHORITY DEFINED
- MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE UNDERSTOOD
- MAINTENANCE PLANS ESTABLISHED
- RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY &
MAINTAINABILITY DISCIPLINES EMPLOYED TO OPTIMISE THE MAINENTANCE PLAN
- DISCIPLINED GOVERNANCE
SUPPLY SUPPORT
- SUPPLY CHAIN RATIONALISED
- SUPPLY CHAIN PRIMED
- SUPPLIES ALLIGNED WITH MAINTENANCE
PROGRAM
- OBSOLESCENCE MANAGED
- SPARES MODELS WITH FEEDBACK LOOPS
- SUPPLY CHAIN RESPONSIVE AND LEVEL
LOADED
CAPABILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (WHOLE-OF-LIFE & WHOLE-OF-CAPABILITY) STAKEHOLDER IMPERATIVES ALIGNED INDUSTRY EFFICIENT, LEVEL LOADED AND WITH CAPACITY SUSTAINMENT FOUNDATIONS
- ENTERPRISE FRAMEWORK ESTABLISHED
- LOGISTICS SUPPORT FUNDED
- LOGISTICS PLANS IN PLACE
- MAINT REQUIREMENTS DETERMINATION
UNDERTAKEN
- LOGISTICS SUPPORT ANALYSIS COMPLETE
- INITIAL THROUGH LIFE COST MODELS
ESTABLISHED
Depot Maintenance
What has changed for CCSM?
- Rizzo and Navy CIP initiatives
- GM Submarines appointed
- ISSC signed and operative
- Budget increase $706m over the next 4 years and
>$1.6b over the decade
- New MSA developed and signed
These are game changers for the CCSM
- Coles Phase 2 report
– Enterprise perspective – Must change the way we do business across the CCSM enterprise – ISSC imperative reinforced – Setting realistic goals for CCSM availability – Must clearly articulate the benefits of what we are doing
We cannot waste this opportunity!!
Delivered thru Savings, efficiency and productivity
CCSM Program Strategy
- Safety, Reliability and Optimised
Maintenance Program
– Reliability Centred and Condition Based Maintenance
- Supply Support Reform
– Optimised Inventory – Optimised Supply Chain
- Strategic Contracts
– Performance Based and incentives for efficiency – 5 year rolling contracts – Make-Buy – Broader and sustainable industry base
- Culture Change
– Enterprise behaviours – Responsibility, Accountability and Authority – Governance
THREE BOATS AVAILABLE TO NAVY
INCORPORATION OF CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENTS AND LOTE
REFORM PROGRAM
- SAFETY, RELIABILITY
AND OPTIMISED MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
- SUPPLY SUPPORT
REFORM
- STRATEGIC
CONTRACTS
- CULTURE AND CHANGE
MANAGEMENT
ISSC TRANSITION MATURE ISSC
TRANSITION TO FUTURE SUBMARINE
GET AVAILABILITY RIGHT
CONFIDENCE CHECK POINT
RATIONALISE PROJECTS
- Recast Continuous
Improvement Projects
- Conduct Service Life
Evaluation
- Establish Diesel LBTF
10 YEAR OPERATING CYCLE AND 2 YEAR FCD FCD’s NOSE TO TAIL ONE BOAT IN FCD FOUR BOATS IN WA LEVEL LOADED ASC SA AND WA
FOUR BOATS AVAILABLE TO NAVY
10 YR OPERATING CYCLE 2 YEAR FCD ADDITIONAL OP CYCLE TRANSITION TO FSM TRANSITION TO 10 YR OP CYCLE AND 2 YEAR FCD THREE BOATS RELIABLY AND REGULARLY FOUR REDUCED COST OF OWNERSHIP $/MRD SINGLE BOAT IN FCD IMPLEMENT SLEP AND RATIONALISE PROJECTS
CCSM Strategic Contracts
CCSM CAPABILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
NAVY CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND RIZZO ALIGNED TRANSFORMATION
Collins Sustainment
- Operational requirement
being met
- Logistics cost of
- wnership understood
and managed
- Drive for ongoing
efficiencies
- Whole-of-Life Whole-of-
Capability Management Plan
SAFETY RELIABILITY AND OPTIMISED MAINTENANCE PROGRAM SUPPLY SUPPORT SYSTEM REFORM SERVICE LIFE EVALUATION CULTURE AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT
FY12/13 FY13/14 FY15/16 FY16/17 FY17/18 STRATEGY FOR MSI ISSC DEVELOP MS ISSC AND CONDUCT RFT NEGOTIATE MS ISSC
MISSION SYSTEM INTEGRATOR
MSI ISSC TRANSTION PERIOD MATURE MSI ISSC PSI ISSC TRANSTION PERIOD MATURE PSI ISSC
PLATFORM SYSTEM INTEGRATOR
TRANSITION MSA MATURE MSA
MATERIEL SUSTAINMENT AGREEMENT
EXTEND EXISTING JFSRS CONTRACT
SERS TRANSITION MATURE SERS CONTRACT
DEVELOP NAVY CONOPS NEGOTIATE SERS CONTRACT
SM ESCAPE AND RESCUE SYSTEM CONTRACT
TRANSITION MATURE THALES CONTRACT
THALES SONAR SUSTAINMENT
PP2 YR3 PP2 YR4 PP2 YR5 TP YR1 TP YR2 PP1 YR1 PP1 YR2 PP1 YR3 PP1 YR4 PP1 YR5
Transition Period Performance Period 1 Performance Period 2 TCE Re-set for PP2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
ISSC Contracting model
TCE Agreed for PP1 TCE Re-set for PP3 Cycle continues until 2031 (Planned LOT)
PP2 YR3 PP2 YR4 PP2 YR5 TP YR1 TP YR2 PP1 YR1 PP1 YR2 PP1 YR3 PP1 YR4 PP1 YR5
Transition Period Performance Period 1 Performance Period 2 TCE Re-set for PP2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TCE Agreed for PP1 TCE Re-set for PP3
TCE Reset
Required ‘Mature’ Performance Levels 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Actual Cost Performance
Cost Saving Cost Overrun
50:50
50:50
TCE
Integrated ISSC Cost Model
Drive for continuous improvement and efficiencies
PAIN GAIN
BCE TCE Set
Moderated by Performance Framework
PP2 YR3 PP2 YR4 PP2 YR5 TP YR1 TP YR2 PP1 YR1 PP1 YR2 PP1 YR3 PP1 YR4 PP1 YR5
TransitionPeriod Performance Period 1 Performance Period 2 TCE Re-set for PP2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TCE Agreed for PP1 TCE Re-set for PP3
Re-assess PMF
Required ‘Mature’ Performance Levels ‘Transitional’ Performance Levels 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Actual Performance
Superior Performance Poor Performance
X%
X%
PROFIT
Integrated ISSC Performance Model
PP3 YR3 PP3 YR4 PP3 YR5 PP2 YR3 PP2 YR4 PP2 YR5 TP YR1 TP YR2 PP1 YR1 PP1 YR2 PP1 YR3 PP1 YR4 PP1 YR5
Transition Period Performance Period 1 Performance Period 2 TCE Re-set for PP2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TCE Agreed for PP1 TCE Re-set for PP3
CCSM Program Operational and Saving Goals
Performance Period 3
10 YEAR OPERATING CYCLE AND 2 YEAR FCD
CN10 $540-570M $90-95M per CCSM pa CN10 $450-480M $75-80M per CCSM pa CN10 $300-360M $50-60M per CCSM pa
Saving levers
- Optimised
Maintenance program
- Optimised Inventory
- Optimised Supply
Chain
- Strategic PB based
contracts
- Culture Change
NOTE Cost modelling and benchmarking underway to verify
3 BOATS RELIABLY, MORE REGULARLY 4
2 BOATS RELIABLY, OCCASIONAL 3
4 BOATS RELIABLY
COST AVAIL
OPTIMISED INVENTORY OPTIMISED SUPPLY CHAIN OPTIMISED MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
Australian Submarine Enterprise Performance Goal
TP1 TP2 PP1 PP2
Drive to understand true Logistic Cost of Ownership through Continuous Improvement Minimise cost Minimise Downtime Maximise Utility
800 450
$/MRD
FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
Australian Submarine Enterprise Initiatives
FY 14/15 FY 15/16
MRD Target
800 450
$/MRD
- Enterprise initiatives
- Safety, Reliability and Optimised
Maintenance Program
- Whole-of-Submarine safety case
- Rizzo reforms – Maintenance Engineering
- Reliability Centred and Condition Based
Maintenance
- Supply support reform
- Logistics Support Analysis
- Optimised Inventory
- Optimised Supply Chain
- Strategic Contracts
- Make – Buy Discipline
- Performance Based Incentive Contracts
- 5 year rolling contracts
- Productivity Improvement
- Labour utilisation and efficiencies
- Culture Change
- Responsibility, Accountability and Authority
clarity
- Outcomes focussed and performance driven
- Enterprise Governance
- Benchmarking
FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
ISSC Performance Measure Hierarchy
Safety KRA Availability KRA Reliability and Quality KRA Maintainability KRA Supportability KRA Cost KRA
KPI-01: Days Late from Maintenance Availability (DLMA)
Performance Fee Profit Payment Period
KPI-02: Adjusted Schedule Performance Index (ASPI)
Performance Fee Profit Payment Period
KPI-03: Mission System Availability (MSA)
Performance Fee Profit Payment Period
KPI-04: Post Maintenance Availability URDEFs
Performance Fee Profit Payment Period
KPI-05: Priority 1 Contractor Demand Satisfaction Rate
Performance Fee Profit Payment Period
KPI-06: Priority 2 Contractor Demand Satisfaction Rate
Performance Fee Profit Payment Period
SHI-16: Maintenance Availability Work Scope Growth
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-08: Maintenance Availability Schedule Growth
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-09: Days Variation into Maintenance Availability – Navy (DVMA-N)
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-18: Percentage of Organic Maintenance Compliance
Reverse Measure Monthly
SHI-10: Days Available for Maintenance
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-19: Number & Age of Unsatisfied Priority 1 Demands
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-15: Number of Extant Concessions
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-11: Mean Time Between Critical Failure (MTBCF)
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-12: Top 20 Reliability Degraders
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-17: Top 20 Maintainability Degraders
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
Behaviours KRA
SHI-23: Number of Non Codified Demands
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-22: Global Demand Satisfaction Rate (DSR)
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-21: Number of Cannibalisations
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-13: Number & Age of Open External CARS Past Required Rectification Date
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-25: Staff Turn Over by Region and Resource Code
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-20: Number & Age of Unsatisfied Priority 2 Demands
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-14: Configuration Record Accuracy
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-04: Maintenance Availability Price Growth
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-05: Labour Efficiency per Maintenance Availability
Strategic Review Annual
SHI-06: Top 20 Cost Drivers
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SHI-07: Sustainment Cost per Actual Maintenance Day
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-01: Number of Priority 1 Safe URDEFs
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-02: HRI 1 – 9 Safety Risks
Strategic Review Monthly
SHI-24: Number & Age of Defective Material Design Reports (DMDR)
Reverse Measure Monthly
SO-07: Responsiveness to Requests for Information
Strategic Review Annual
SO-04: Relationship with CCSM Organisations
Strategic Review Annual SO-03: Performance Culture Strategic Review Annual
SO-02: Continuous Improvement and Innovation Culture
Strategic Review Annual
SO-08: DMO Company Balanced Scorecard
Strategic Review Annual
SO-09: Make-Buy Objectives
Strategic Review Annual
SO-11: Transitional Objectives
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
SO-06: Annual Trend of the Adjusted Performance Levels of the SHIs
Strategic Review Annual
SO-05: Annual Trend of the Adjusted Performance Levels of the KPIs
Strategic Review Annual
SHI-03: Achievement of Whole of Submarine Safety Case Milestones
Strategic Review Monthly
SO-10: Sustainable Financial Outcome
Strategic Review Strategic Review Annual Annual
SO-01: Safety Culture
Strategic Review Strategic Review Annual Annual CCSM Performance Measure Hierarchy Version 15 Dated 14 Feb 12
Legend (noting colours dependent on KRA)
Strategic Objective (SO) are annually assessed performance measure typically used to reflect long term behaviours against KRAs Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are quarterly assessed performance measures used to reflect lag delivery of performance against specified requirements System Health Indicators (SHIs) are performance measures used to reflect a both lead and lag performance against specified requirements Type 1 Performance Measure reflects those performance measures which have existing data/ process and will require minimal resources to enable use in PMF reporting from ED. Type 2 Performance Measure reflects those performance measures which have some (partial) data/process and will require limited resources to make into a Type 1 and use in PMF reporting Type 3 Performance Measure reflects those performance measures which have no existing data/process and will require dedicated resources to make into a Type 1 and use in PMF reporting. Typically a Transition Milestone.
SHI-26: Commonwealth Approval Response Satisfaction
Reverse Measure Profit Payment Period
SHI-29: Commonwealth Achievement of end to end milestones in Maintenance Availability
Reverse Measure Profit Payment Period Type 4 Performance Measure reflects the Strategic Objectives which have yet to be reviewed in detail as at the date of this Version.
SHI-27: Commonwealth Materiel Satisfaction
Reverse Measure Profit Payment Period
SHI-28: Commonwealth Provision of Reliability / Condition Monitoring Data
Reverse Measure Reverse Measure Profit Payment Period Profit Payment Period
SHI-30: TML Accuracy
Strategic Review Profit Payment Period
Note: This diagram reflects the current state of the various performance measures represented in the Strategic Objectives (SOs), Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and System Health Indicators (SHIs). Accordingly, this diagram will need to change through the life of the contract to reflect changes in reporting requirements and access to data including:
- a. at the completion of each Transition Milestone activity which allows the change from a Type 2 or 3 to a Type 1;
- b. after each PMF Efficacy Review; and
- c. at the completion of Type 2 activities resulting in a change from a Type 2 to a Type 1.
Managing CCSM Capability
NAVY HQ SUBFOR INDUSTRY PARTNERS
Materiel Sustainment/Acquisition Agreement In-Service Support Contract
COLLINS PROGAM OFFICE
CAPABILITY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REVIEW BOARD
Deliver Capability (FIC Based) Capability Management Sea/Air
- worthiness &
safety
Understand Demand Materiel Delivery Services Supplier Management Services Integration Services Deliver Products Deliver Services Deliver Advice Performance Based Affordable Efficient
ALIGNED METRICS
CCSM Enterprise Framework
` SUSTAINMENT ENTERPRISE INFORMED CUSTOMER
What is required?
INTELLIGENT BUYER
How to buy it?
RELIABLE SUPPLIERS
How to deliver it efficiently?
ENTERPRISE BEHAVIOURS
- VALUES BASED BEHAVIOURS
- BEST FOR PROGRAM DECISIONS
- NO SURPRISES
- SHARED UNDERSTANDING AND
ALLOCATION OF RISK
- PARTNERING WITH TRUST AND
RESPECT
- RESPECT FOR KNOWLEDGE AND
EXPERTISE
- PERFORMANCE DRIVEN
- JOINT GOVERNANCE AND
DECISION MAKING
Collins Enterprise Framework
SUSTAINMENT ENTERPRISE NAVY DMO
PLATFORM AND MISSION SYSTEM INTEGRATORS
In-Service Support Contracts
ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Clear lines of Responsibility, Accountability and Authority Disciplined Processes
- Baseline management
- Cost and schedule
- Management reserve
MISSION SYSTEM INTEGRATOR
Submarine Enterprise Framework
PLATFORM SYSTEM INTEGRATOR
STRONGER SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRY CAPABILITY BUY-IN COMPETE BASED ON VALUE FOR MONEY
RECOGNISE UNIQUE NATURE
(INVEST, PARTNERSHIPS
- r JOINT
VENTURES)
SYSTEM INTEGRATOR ROLE
(BEST PRACTICE)
UNIQUE NATURE COMPETITIVENESS
TEAM COLLINS Best Practice
PROGRAM PERFORMANCE
Stakeholder Integration Business Plan and Business Cases (Materiel Sustainment and Acquisition Agreements) Risks, Issues and Opportunity Management Help Needed and Independent Reviews Program Communication Leadership and Accountability
Baseline Change Management Execution & Control Schedule Financial Configuration/Technical Performance Organisation/Workforce Infrastructure
Strategic Guidance
Integrated Logistics Support
WHY USE BEST PRACTICE?
- FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING COMPLEXITY
AND AMBIGUITY
- SETS BATTLE RHYTHM
- CREATES CONTEXT FOR DECISION MAKING
- PROVEN PROCESSES AND LESSONS
LEARNT
- PREDICTIVE AND PROACTIVE RISK
MANAGEMENT
- SETS CLEAR LINES OF RESPONSIBILITY,
ACCOUNTABILITY AND AUTHORITY
- STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT – INTERNAL
AND EXTERNAL
- BREAKS DOWN STOVEPIPES
- MANAGES BASELINES
PMC&W
DG Collins Acquisition Program DG Collins Sustainment Program
Director Collins Project Engineering Director Collins Projects Director Collins Strategic Contracting Director Collins Sustainment Director Program Control Director Collins Sustainment Logistics Director Collins Commercial
- Sustainment
Collins Chief Engineer
Collins Program Strategic Planning
Director Collins Reform Program Director Collins Strategic Engagement Director Collins Analysis and Reporting Director Collins Commercial
- Projects
Collins Program - Organisation
Director SM Escape and Rescue Manager Collins Resources Director Collins Sustainment Engineering Manager
Engineering Forum
Director Collins Project Logistics
Change Control Boards Logistics IPT Commercial IPT
Escape and Rescue IPT
INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAMS INTEGRATED PROJECT TEAMS
+
SERVICE LIFE EVALUATION TEAM
CCSM Program Responsibility, Accountability and Authority
MONEY
WORKFORCE &OPERATING EXPENSES
DEFENCE AGREEMENTS
CN10 BUDGET
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY INDUSTRY CONTRACTS GOVERNANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
MAJORS AND MINORS MATERIAL ACQUISTION AGREEMENT MATERIAL SUSTIANMNET AGREEMENT
DGCAP
- PROJECTS
- MISSION SYSTEM
SUSTAINMENT
- MAA
MANAGEMENT
PM C&W
- CCSM PROGRAM
DGCSP
- CCSM
SUSTAINMENT
- SER SUSTAINMENT
- MSA MANAGEMENT
ACQUISTION CHANGE CONTROL BOARD PROGRAM REVIEW BOARD SUSTAINMENT CHANGE CONTROL BOARD
- PLATFORM
SYSTEM INTEGRATOR ISSC
- SERC SYSTEM
CORDINATOR
- MISSION SYSTEM
INTEGRATOR ISSC
- SONAR ISSC
COLLINS PROGRAM
CCSM Enterprise Governance Framework
PROGRAM REVIEW BOARD
DMO/NAVY/INDUSTRY PARTNERS
STAKEHOLDER GROUP CN/GMSM/CEO ASC/DoFD COLLINS SUSTAINMENT
- Change Control Board
- Risk Issues and
Opportunities Review Board
COLLINS PROJECTS
- Change Control Board
- Risk Issues and
Opportunities Review Board
Integrated Product Teams Integrated Project Teams
TEAM COLLINS
STEERING COMMITTEE SECDEF/CDF/SECFIN
WHOLE-OF- GOVERNMENT
Submarine Whole-of-Life Whole-of Capability
WORKFORCE MAJOR SYSTEMS TRAINING INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANSTION SUPPLY
SUBMARINE CAPABILITY ENABLING INPUTS TO CAPABILITY FORCE IN BEING FUTURE FORCE ENHANCED FORCE STRATEGY TO FIC BASED TASK SCHEDULE RISK
TRANSITION TO FSM DCP PROJECTS INCREASED AVAILABILITY & RELIABILITY
DOCTRINE
PLATFORM MISSION SYSTEM ESCAPE & RESCUE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK TO MAKE DECISIONS
- GROWING CREWS
- PROJECT PRIORITIES
AND IMPLEMENTATION
- LIFE OF TYPE
CONSIDERATIONS
- TRANSITION OF
CAPABILITY
- BUILDING AND
SUSTAINING INDUSTRY BASE
OBSOLESCENCE TREATMENTS