Collaborations: Tsampikos Kottos (Wesleyan) Holger Schanz - - PDF document

collaborations tsampikos kottos wesleyan holger schanz
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Collaborations: Tsampikos Kottos (Wesleyan) Holger Schanz - - PDF document

The conductance of small mesoscopic disordered rings Doron Cohen, Ben-Gurion University Collaborations: Tsampikos Kottos (Wesleyan) Holger Schanz (Gottingen) Swarnali Bandopadhyay (BGU) Yoav Etzioni (BGU) Tal Peer (BGU) Rangga Budoyo


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The conductance of small mesoscopic disordered rings Doron Cohen, Ben-Gurion University

Collaborations: Tsampikos Kottos (Wesleyan) Holger Schanz (Gottingen) Swarnali Bandopadhyay (BGU) Yoav Etzioni (BGU) Tal Peer (BGU) Rangga Budoyo (Wesleyan) Alex Stotland (BGU) Discussions: Michael Wilkinson (UK) Bernhard Mehlig (Goteborg) Yuval Gefen (Weizmann) Shmuel Fishman (Technion) $ISF, $GIF, $DIP, $BSF

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Driven Systems

Non interacting “spinless” electrons in a ring. H(Q, P; Φ(t)) − ˙ Φ = electro motive force (RMS) G ˙ Φ2 = rate of energy absorption

  • Flux

Ring dot Flux wire Radiation

grain Metallic

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Linear Response Theory (LRT)

H = {En} − Φ(t){Inm} G = π¯ h

  • n,m

|Imn|2 δT(En − EF) δΓ(Em − En) G = π¯ h(̺(EF))2 |Imn|2 applies if EMF driven transitions ≪ relaxation

  • therwise

connected sequences of transitions are essential. leading to Semi Linear Response Theory (SLRT)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Semi Linear Response Theory (SLRT)

H = {En} − Φ(t){Inm} dpn dt = −

  • m

wnm(pn − pm) wnm = const × gnm × EMF2 Scaled transition rates: gnm = 2̺−3

F

|Inm|2 (En−Em)2 δΓ(En−Em)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Semi Linear Response Theory (cont.)

+J −J

E

J En

gnm = 2̺−3

F

|Inm|2 (En−Em)2 δΓ(En−Em) The SLRT analog of the Kubo formula: G = π¯ h(̺(EF))2 |Imn|2 where |Imn|2 ≡ inverse resistivity of the network |Imn|2harmonic ≪ |Imn|2 ≪ |Imn|2algebraic

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Conductance of mesoscopic rings

(e) (b) (a) (d) (c)

S S

Naive expectation (assuming Γ > ∆): G = e2 2π¯ hM ℓ L + O

Γ

  • L = perimeter of the ring

ℓ = mean free path ∝ W 2 ℓ∞ = localization length ≈ Mℓ Ballistic regime: L ≪ ℓ Diffusive regime: ℓ ≪ L ≪ ℓ∞ Anderson regime: ℓ∞ ≪ L

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Conductance versus disorder

1

G Drude G Diffusive regime regime Ballistic regime Anderson−Mott ∼(∆/Γ) disorder strength (1/l)

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10 10

1

w

10

  • 8

10

  • 4

10 10

4

G

Drude Kubo Meso

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The RMT modeling

{|vnm|2} ≡ {X} Characterization of the perturbation matrix:

  • bandwidth (b)
  • sparsity (p)
  • texture

10 10

2

10

4

L / l

10

  • 6

10

  • 4

10

  • 2

10

GMeso /GKubo

numerical results for the tight binding model corresponding RMT results VRH approximation for the RMT results

Comparison between:

  • Actual results based on “real” matrices
  • RMT results based on “artificial” matrices
  • Semi-analytical VRH estimate
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ergodicity of the eigenstates

  • Weak disorder (ballistic rings):

Wavefunctions are localized in mode space.

  • Strong disorder (Anderson localization):

Wavefunctions are localized in real space.

10

−2

10

−1

10 5 10 15 20 25 30

1−gT PR

10

  • 2

10 10

2

w

10 10

2

PR

mode space position space mode-pos. space

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

p 10

  • 4

10

  • 2

10 10

2

X/<X>

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

F(X)

W=0.05 W=0.35 W=7.50

p

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Modeling of sparsity

X ≡ |vnm|2 ∼ 1 M2v2

F exp

  • − x

l∞

  • log(X)

p <X> = p X log(<X>) X X0

1 1

X X X0 X1 BiModal distribution LogBox distribution

X ∈ LogBox[X0, X1] ˜ p ≡ (ln(X1/X0))−1 p ≡ Prob

  • X > X

−˜ p ln ˜ p X ≈ ˜ pX1 ∼ pX1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The VRH estimate

G = π¯ h

e

L

2

n,m

|vmn|2 δT(En−EF) δΓ(Em−En) G = 1 2

e

L

2

̺F

  • ˜

Cqm(ω) δΓ(ω) dω ˜ Cqm-LRT(ω) ≡ 2π̺F X ˜ Cqm-SLRT(ω) ≡ 2π̺F X where by definition:

ω

  • Prob
  • X > X
  • ∼ 1

For strong disorder we get: X ≈ v2

F exp

  • −∆ℓ

ω

  • G

  • exp
  • −∆ℓ

|ω|

  • exp
  • −|ω|

ωc

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LRT, SLRT and beyond

− ˙ Φ = electro motive force (RMS) G ˙ Φ2 = rate of energy absorption

Semi linear response theory [1]

  • D. Cohen, T. Kottos and H. Schanz,

“Rate of energy absorption by a closed ballistic ring”, (JPA 2006) [2]

  • S. Bandopadhyay, Y. Etzioni and D. Cohen,

The conductance of a multi-mode ballistic ring, (EPL 2006) [3]

  • M. Wilkinson, B. Mehlig, D. Cohen,

The absorption of metallic grains, (EPL 2006) [4]

  • D. Cohen,

“From the Kubo formula to variable range hopping”, (PRB 2007) [5]

  • T. Peer, R. Budoyo, A. Stotland, T. Kottos and D. Cohen,

The conductance of disordered rings, (arXiv 2007) Beyond (semi) linear response theory [6]

  • D. Cohen and T. Kottos,

“Non-perturbative response of Driven Chaotic Mesoscopic Systems”, (PRL 2000) [7]

  • A. Stotland and D. Cohen,

”Diffractive energy spreading and its semiclassical limit”, (JPA 2006) [8]

  • A. Silva and V.E. Kravtsov,

Beyond FGR, (PRB 2007) [9] D.M. Basko, M.A. Skvortsov and V.E. Kravtsov, Dynamical localization, (PRL 2003)