co 2 emissions production based accounting vs consumption
play

CO 2 emissions production-based accounting vs consumption Insights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Motivation The Methodology Results Summary CO 2 emissions production-based accounting vs consumption Insights from the WIOD databases B. Boitier 1 1 Lab. ERASME, Ecole Centrale Paris, baptiste.boitier[at]erasme-team.eu Final WIOD Conference:


  1. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary CO 2 emissions production-based accounting vs consumption Insights from the WIOD databases B. Boitier 1 1 Lab. ERASME, Ecole Centrale Paris, baptiste.boitier[at]erasme-team.eu Final WIOD Conference: Causes and Consequences of Globalization, Groningen, 2012 B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  2. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary Content Motivation 1 The Methodology 2 Databases MRIO method Results 3 General results Results analysis Summary 4 Synthesis Discussions B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  3. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary GHG Accounting Framework Introduction Actual GHG accounting system is a production-based accounting: “national inventories include greenhouse gas emissions and removals taking place within national territory and offshore areas over which the country has jurisdiction” IPCC, 2007 Thereby, none “official” accounting system considers the consumption side, i.e. GHG embodied in goods. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  4. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary GHG Accounting Framework Introduction Actual GHG accounting system is a production-based accounting: “national inventories include greenhouse gas emissions and removals taking place within national territory and offshore areas over which the country has jurisdiction” IPCC, 2007 Thereby, none “official” accounting system considers the consumption side, i.e. GHG embodied in goods. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  5. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary GHG Accounting Framework An example Example Country A decides to reduce its power generation capacity without none measure to reduce domestic demand for electricity. So Country A imports electricity from country B to fit its domestic demand which used fossil fuel for its PG. With production-based accounting, country A becomes virtuous whereas country B degrades its GHG balance. But with consumption-based GHG accounting, country A will increase its emissions whereas GHG emissions in country B remain the same. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  6. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary GHG Accounting Framework An example Example Country A decides to reduce its power generation capacity without none measure to reduce domestic demand for electricity. So Country A imports electricity from country B to fit its domestic demand which used fossil fuel for its PG. With production-based accounting, country A becomes virtuous whereas country B degrades its GHG balance. But with consumption-based GHG accounting, country A will increase its emissions whereas GHG emissions in country B remain the same. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  7. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary GHG Accounting Framework An example Example Country A decides to reduce its power generation capacity without none measure to reduce domestic demand for electricity. So Country A imports electricity from country B to fit its domestic demand which used fossil fuel for its PG. With production-based accounting, country A becomes virtuous whereas country B degrades its GHG balance. But with consumption-based GHG accounting, country A will increase its emissions whereas GHG emissions in country B remain the same. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  8. Motivation The Methodology Results Summary GHG Accounting Framework A policy issue Numerous countries are reluctant to pledge binding commitments Example In Norway, large part of its GHG emissions comes from fossil fuels quarrying that are exported. Thus, to reduce its emissions (counted with production-based), Norway must reduce its production whereas it is not the final consumer of the fossils fuels (Peters and Hertwich, 2008). B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  9. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary Outline Motivation 1 The Methodology 2 Databases MRIO method Results 3 General results Results analysis Summary 4 Synthesis Discussions B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  10. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary WIOD databases WIOTs and Environmental Accounts Use of WIOTs in which “ changes in inventories and valuables ” have been removed and other final consumptions agregated. (1995-2009, 41 countries, 35 economic sectors) Use of “ Environmental Accounts ” and especially CO 2 emissions distributed between the 36 sectors and 41 countries from 1995 to 2009. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  11. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary WIOD databases WIOTs and Environmental Accounts Use of WIOTs in which “ changes in inventories and valuables ” have been removed and other final consumptions agregated. (1995-2009, 41 countries, 35 economic sectors) Use of “ Environmental Accounts ” and especially CO 2 emissions distributed between the 36 sectors and 41 countries from 1995 to 2009. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  12. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary Outline Motivation 1 The Methodology 2 Databases MRIO method Results 3 General results Results analysis Summary 4 Synthesis Discussions B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  13. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary MRIO method Generalized form Use of theorectical framework developed by Peters (2008) for Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) method. Starting from WIOTs: x = Ax + f (1) Where: x , is the vector of output, f , the final consumptions and A , the inter-industrial matrix (measured per unit of output) B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  14. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary MRIO method Generalized form Use of theorectical framework developed by Peters (2008) for Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) method. Starting from WIOTs: x = Ax + f (1) Where: x , is the vector of output, f , the final consumptions and A , the inter-industrial matrix (measured per unit of output) B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  15. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary MRIO method Detailed form In detail:  x 1   A 11 ··· A 1 v ··· A 1 N   x 1   f 1 m   .   . . .   .   .  ... ... . . . . . . N         . . . . . .       ∑   x m A m 1 ··· A mv ··· A mN x m f vm (2) = +                 m = 1         . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . .         . . . . . . x N A N 1 ··· A Nv ··· A NN x N f Nm Where: x m , is the vector of output of the country m , f v , m , a vector of the final demands in country m addressed to country v . and A mv , the inter-industrial matrix between country m and country v . B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  16. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary MRIO method Final good multipliers The output can be calculated in terms of final consumption: x = ∑ ( I − A ) − 1 f m = ∑ (3) y m m m Thereby, domestic output used for domestic final consumption in country m: y m , m = ( 1 − A ) − 1 f m , m And, domestic output of country m used for foreign final consumption in country v : y m , v = ( 1 − A ) − 1 f m , v B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  17. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary MRIO method Emissions per origin (1/2) Emissions of country m for domestic consumption: E m , m = e m y m , m (with e m : the emissions per unit of output) And emissions of country m export in country v : E m , v = e m y m , v Thus, the matrix of embodied emissions can be drawn as:  E 11 E 1 v E 1 N  ··· ··· . . .  ... ...  . . .   . . .   E m 1 E mv E mN ··· ···       . . . ... ... . . .   . . . E N 1 E Nv E NN ··· ··· B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  18. Motivation The Methodology Databases Results MRIO method Summary MRIO method Emissions per origin (2/2) National consumption-based and production-based CO 2 emissions are computed as: E cons = E d + E imp + E H (4) E prod = E d + E exp + E H (5) with: E imp = ∑ E mv m � = v E exp = ∑ E mv v � = m and E H : national emissions coming from direct households’ consumption. B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  19. Motivation The Methodology General results Results Results analysis Summary Outline Motivation 1 The Methodology 2 Databases MRIO method Results 3 General results Results analysis Summary 4 Synthesis Discussions B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

  20. Motivation The Methodology General results Results Results analysis Summary Results Aggregated regions Aggregated matrices: 1995 2000 2005 2009 *: Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Mexico and Turkey B. Boitier CO 2 embodied in trade: WIOD insights

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend