[PPT] - CMS Spokesperson Report - Current Status and Challenges Talk PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

CMS Spokesperson Report - Current Status and Challenges

Talk Presented to CMS RRB-45 CERN-RRB-2017-096 Joel Butler

Oct. 24, 2017

SLIDE 2

Outline

Introduction
Management and Collaboration News
2017 Run
2018 Run and LS2
Computing
Some Recent Physics Highlights
CMS HL-LHC upgrades: Progress towards TDRs,

LHCC/UCG Reviews, and Schedules

Summary and outlook

RRB45 24/10/17 2

SLIDE 3

Introduction

RRB45 24/10/17 3

SLIDE 4

From last RRB: Challenges Ahead, Task “Pileup” in 2017

Execute the Extended Year End Technical Stop (EYETS) –

installation parts of the Phase I Upgrade

Produce extensive physics results on full, larger than

expected, 2016 data set

with a computing budget that is rising less than the data

volume

Do FOUR Phase 2 Upgrade TDRs (Tracker, Barrel

Calorimeter, Muon detectors, Endcap Calorimeter) and TWO Interim design documents (Trigger, DAQ/HLT)

Take high quality data in 2017 with rising luminosity and

analyze it quickly and efficiently

Continue to build the remainder of Phase I Upgrade

24/10/17 RRB45 4

We are now well along in this program and have generally met the challenge with some bumps

SLIDE 5

Management News

RRB45 24/10/17 5

SLIDE 6

Management Evolution

September 1 is the date when new appointments go into

effect for coordinators, system managers , spokespersons, CB chair team, as well as corresponding deputies and many conveners, L2, and L3 managers

The new Management Board Organigram is on the next

slide

The previous one is in backup
“Other States B” is a new category in the Regional

Representation that is driven by expansion of CMS member institutions that are not from full CERN Member States

Upgrade Coordination will be stable through the completion
f the TDRs and costs but will have some changes that will

be up and running well before next September

RRB45 24/10/17 6

SLIDE 7

24/10/17 RRB45 7

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * = new

SLIDE 8

Collaboration News

RRB45 24/10/17 8

SLIDE 9

Status of Initiatives, etc.

Diversity Study group
Conveners chosen, remainder of committee being

recruited

Machine Learning Forum Successfully Launched
Evolution of the Computing Model, a.k.a., ECoM17,

delivered its final report and has been told to implement it

Considering formation of a group to consider more distant

future – HL-LHC

Plan transition of HL-LHC Upgrade from development and

approval of TDRs to execution of the upgrade

Will use a “Reflection Group” to make a plan for the

management/coordination of the upgrade to presented in December of 2017 for approval in February 2018

RRB45 24/10/17 9

SLIDE 10

Expanding and improving CMS

Engagement Office was established about 10 months ago. Led by Kerstin Borras

Mandate: help and support CMS, on the side of the institutes as well as on the side of the

projects and coordination areas, to cope with the unprecedented list of tasks to be

accomplished. The Engagement Office is charged to work with all stakeholders, including

existing committees and bodies, to identify areas of concern and to develop solutions.

 4 main areas of activities:

1) Institute Engagement

For New institutes: Set up all procedures and helping new institutes phasing in to CMS
For Member institutes: Provide assistance to institutes experiencing problems to phase into

CMS and to contribute at an appropriate level

2) Coverage of Tasks, Remote Contributions, Efficiency & Sustainability 3) Coordination of EPR (service work) and related items 4) Measures for Diversity, Young Scientists, Career Evolution

24/10/17 RRB45 10

SLIDE 11

New Collaborators

New members (approved at June or September CMS week)
Full member: Montenegro University, Montenegro, Sun Yat-sen University,

China, Tsinghua University, China

Cooperating member: Northern Illinois University, USA
Associate member: Lebanese American University, Lebanon
Associate member: Sevilla University, GIE, Spain
Other actions taken by CB in CMS Week in Rio de Janeiro (Sept)
Presentations
Sri Lanka: consortium of University of Colombo and University of Ruhuna

presented case for full membership

Latvia: consortium of Riga Technical Institute (RTU) and University of Latvia

(LU) presented case for full membership

Dundee University, UK: presented case for Associated membership
New Institutes
5 institutes (2 new countries) to present in Dec: 1 full member (Mexico),

3 cooperating (Qatar, Kuwait, Lebanon), 1 associate (Poland)

> 5 in exploration phase

RRB45 24/10/17 11

SLIDE 12

Operations: 2017 Startup after Extended Year-End Technical Stop (EYETS)

RRB45 24/10/17 12

SLIDE 13

Operations Status

From my Feb 21, 2017 report to LHCC 129, about startup of

the Pixels

“Startup Implications: We will lose some luminosity at the

beginning of the run since some commissioning must be done with collisions . We expect to “effectively” recover it through higher efficiency, better resolution, and lower fake rate.

Pixel Commissioning seemed more difficult than

anticipated

Timing problem between Layer 1 and Layer 2
Layer 1 Readout chip efficiency problem
Higher noise in Layer 1 than design goal
Single Event Upsets (SEUs) from the TBM
This led to extra commissioning time early in run
Dead time due to stuck modules has been “mitigated” by

system of local resets which we have been steadily improving

Some down time because Power cycling is necessary to

clear some stuck TBMs (SEUs)

We have recovered operational efficiency
even at high luminosity
Performance is better at this early stage than the best (final

re-reconstruction) we had in 2016 data even at 1.8E34, achieved in 2017

RRB45 24/10/17 13

SLIDE 14

Data Recording Efficiency

24/10/17 RRB45 14

The recording efficiency so far in 2017 is 89.8% as compared to 92.5% for 2016.
This reflects the period to commission the pixels and to resolve the problems
This has improved lately, to mid 90’s, even in very high luminosity running
I had expected to lose about 10% of the data for the run, but the actual loss is ~1 fb-1, or

2.7% “so far”, much, much less than we will gain in performance

We are now running leveled at 1.5E34 leveled with the machine over 1.8E34 (but fewer

bunches, 1868) and recently up to 2.2E34

Pileup can be as high as 50-60

SLIDE 15

Selected performance results: Pixel Hit Efficiency

Dynamic inefficiency is much smaller than in the old detector
… but expected to be even smaller: ~98% at 2*1034cm-2s-1

24/10/17 15

August 2017 2016 Old detector

Note: the x scales are different!!

RRB45

SLIDE 16

Some B Physics Plots (from early in the run, ~ July 20)

24/10/17 16

DP-17-029

RRB45

SLIDE 17

Pixels after Technical Stop 2 (TS2) (week 39)

At TS2, we were doing well with the pixel detector
Systems of soft resets and power cycles kept efficiency high
The detector was keeping up with very high luminosity
After TS2, we encountered a new problem (about two weeks ago)
After a power cycle to free stuck TBMs, DC-DC converters began to

die permanently

This reduces our ability to deal with stuck TBMs
We are attacking this problem vigorously, but so far do not

understand it

While we are able to run through 2017 with only a slight loss of

efficiency, efficiency may be a problem if 2018 brings very high luminosity

We have to consider the possibility that we will need to access the

detector in the YETS and, if granted, this could add time to its overall length (which we will of course try to minimize)

RRB45 24/10/17 17

SLIDE 18

HF Phase 1: Summary

24/10/17 RRB45 18

New handles to achieve noise reduction are in use:

– PMT with dual- anode readout and TDC information

Smooth installation and operation

– All 3456 channels, ADC&TDC, working

Substantial rate reduction for MET paths achieved

 The HF Upgrade is done

SLIDE 19

Hadron Endcap Calorimeter (HE) Phase 1 Modified Plan

Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs) are a new technology

that provides superior performance than the Hybrid Photodiodes used as the photosensors for HB and HE

3X the quantum efficiency, high gain  better S/N, no

High voltage necessary, works in strong B fields, low cost,

Decided not to install the full 36 Readout Boxes in

2017

Degradation of the signal with radiation exposure

lower than projected  not needed for the 2017 run

We did Install ONE Readout Box (HEP17), initially as an

installation test, but after detailed review of impact on

2017 analysis kept upgraded HEP17 in for collisions We learned a huge amount about installation, commissioning, performance, which is far superior to current system.

Based on HEP17 success, we are considering the

installation of the full HE upgrade in YETS 2017-18 (normal winter stop)

Otherwise must install in LS2 along with Barrel

Hadron Calorimeter (HB)

19 24/10/17 RRB45

SLIDE 20

Run 2 Status and Issues, Progress and Plans for 2017 and 2018

RRB45 24/10/17 20

SLIDE 21

Run 2 Schedule

21 RRB45 24/10/17

16L2 led to luminosity on the low side in the first part of 2017
Measures discovered led to higher luminosity, but also with higher pileup
Peak luminosity limit achieved is ~2.2e34 !
2018, after 16L2 is remedied, is expected to be a heavy luminosity

production year so will have well over 100 fb-1 from Run 2

~3% of integrated luminosity expected by the end of the program

YETS

SLIDE 22

YETS 17/18 and LS2

YETS 17/18 is “normal” 13-14 weeks
HE full upgrade installation proposed
Some normal repair and maintenance
Possible work on DC-DC converters
LS2, partial list
Assuming the Layer 1 ROC problem is solved and ROCs are
btained in time, build new modules, with the new TBMs and

refurbish Layer 1

DC-DC converter repair might require significant effort depending
n what we learn
HB Phase 1 upgrade – replace HPDs with SiPMs, change

longitudinal segmentation, add better timing

Would have also to do HE upgrade if not done in YETS/17/18
GE1/1 installation (Phase 2 Muons)
Forward CSC work (Phase 2 Muons)
Phase 2 infrastructure upgrades and many other activities

RRB45 24/10/17 22

SLIDE 23

Computing

RRB45 24/10/17 23

SLIDE 24

Computing Status and Prospects

CMS adapted well to the unexpectedly large data harvest in 2016
Early in the 2017 run, LHC problems resulted in lower luminosity, but

not lower data volume (fewer buncheshigher pileup)

In the last month, there has been a huge increase of LHC performance
8b4e + BCS + beta* of 30 cm => per bunch luminosity would scale to 2.3e34 in a full

machine

PU (which is 35 averaged over the fill) well over 40, and 55 for long periods
LHC turnaround time as low as 2 hours
All of this has put pressure on the Tier-0 system – load depends
n ~ PU * LHC Efficiency * HLT rate
2018 will be a “luminosity production year”, expected to generate a lot
f data and there will a legacy re-processing of all Run 2 data starting

in 2019

ECOM17: Grounds up study of computing with time frame of next few

years

Chaired by T. Boccali (Pisa) and F. Wuerthwein (UCSD)
Their initial report has now been approved and implementation has started
A similar group may now be formed to look at longer term (HL-LHC) issues

RRB45 24/10/17 24

SLIDE 25

Tier-0 status

Tier-0 under pressure

after the LHC TS2

Change in daily

produced output evident

CPUs are holding up –

up to 1 day of prompt delay over the 48h at times

Disk buffers and

transfers at the limit (systems provisioned for lower PU)

Still, all ok with

increased human effort Daily Tier-0

utput; clear

change of pace after TS2

P5Tier-0 streamer area Tier-0 main working area

(last month)

24/10/17 RRB45 25

SLIDE 26

CPU Task Force

Interim report: Of the 2 sources of inefficiency we have succeeded

in tuning the submission infrastructure such that the CPU inefficiency from it is only 3% from a high of 20%.

Over the last few weeks we have turned our attention to the second

source, application (production and analysis) inefficiency.

26 24/10/17 RRB45

SLIDE 27

Updated 2017/18 Production Schedule

24/10/17 RRB45 27

SLIDE 28

Run 2 Physics Results

RRB45 24/10/17 28

SLIDE 29

Publication Status

24/10/17 RRB45 29

665 physics papers submitted – 10 in Collaboration review or later – 7 ready for submission

Approaching approval

– pre-app or later: 26 – going to pre-approval: 14

http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications-vs-time/

SLIDE 30

Top quark production

24/10/17 30

CMS-PAS-TOP-17-002

Recent example from the rich harvesting of top-quark events
Precise measurements of differential cross sections,

as functions of many kinematic observables

Comparisons to modern MC generators

CMS-PAS-TOP-15-015

First measurement of the jet mass of a hadronically

decaying top quark in boosted regime (pT > 400 GeV) !

Sensitivity to top quark mass
All these results consistently show softer top production

than predicted by MC generators

RRB45

SLIDE 31

Higgs Properties from ZZ* (4 leptons) and gg

24/10/17 31

ATLAS , CMS Run 1 Combined: M H =125.09 ±0.21(stat)± 0.11(syst) GeV CMS 2016, 4 lepton: M H =125.26 ±0.20(stat)±0.08(syst) GeV

HIG-16-041, Submitted to JHEP

RRB45

SLIDE 32

Observation of H  𝝊+𝝊-

Branching ratio = 6.3%, best channel to establish coupling of Higgs boson to fermions
Final states: 𝜐h𝜐h, e𝜐h, µ𝜐h, eµ  Significance of 4.9𝜏 observed (4.7𝜏 expected) using 13 TeV data
Combination with 7 and 8 TeV data: 5.9𝜏 obs. (5.9𝜏 exp.) and µ = 0.98 ± 0.18

CMS-PAS-HIG-16-043

First direct observation by a single experiment of H coupling to fermions!  Observed before in CMS+ATLAS combination First direct observation of H coupling to leptons and to fermions of the 3rd generation!

24/10/17 32

µ = 1.09

arXiv:1708.00373 RRB45

SLIDE 33

Evidence for Higgs VH(bb)

24/10/17 33

Br of Higgs to bb ~58%(expected)
Huge QCD backgrounds
Most sensitive channel is associated

production with W or Z, Hbb

0L: Z(nn)
1L: W(m n) W(e n),
2L : Z(m m), Z(ee)
Mass resolution of Mbb is ~10%
Based in several BDTs Validated

using di-boson production VZ(bb)

RRB45

SLIDE 34

SUSY Searches

24/10/17 34

Broad program: 19 searches completed with full 2016 CMS dataset, with several already submitted to journals

Probing different models (inclusive production, strong and electroweak

production, and 3rd generation sparticles (stops)

Different final states(with leptons, photons, jets) and analysis techniques

RRB45

SLIDE 35

Top in Heavy Ions

24/10/17 RRB45 35

SLIDE 36

Xenon- Xenon Collisions

24/10/17 RRB45 36

A lot of data was acquired
A physics plan is already defined
Picture of an early event was

attached to a tweet

There was a press release
And an article

https://www.theguardian.com/science/life-and-physics/2017/

ct/15/a-day-of-xenon-collisions-at-cern?CMP=share_btn_tw

SLIDE 37

CMS HL-LHC upgrades: Progress towards TDRs, LHCC/UCG Reviews, and Schedules

RRB45 24/10/17 37

SLIDE 38

HL-LHC TDRs and ITDRs submitted so far

24/10/17 38

Endcap Calorimeter TDR and MIP Timing Detector Technical Proposal will be submitted to the LHCC at the end of November.

RRB45

SLIDE 39

Status of LHCC/UCG Reviews

Tracker Phase-2 TDR-17-001scientific review is completed report at:

https://cms-docdb.cern.ch/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=13409

Answering questions on UCG package (cost…)

Review of Muon and Barrel Calorimeters TDRs by LHCC started two

weeks ago

Review of Trigger and DAQ ITDR (interim Technical Design Report), made
f off-the-shelf components started. Answers to questions being prepared
Costs can be defined by current non-optimal technology and roadmaps of key

companies

Calorimeter Endcap TDR
Collaboration-Wide Review (CWR) will start Oct 30, for delivery to LHCC end of
Nov. with object performance
Update with final Physics studies early Dec. for submission to LHCC before

Christmas

MIP Timing Detector Technical Proposal
New condensed version at request of the committee is available
Follow-up review of changes since March and critical reading ongoing with Mar.

review panel

CWR planned for Oct. 30 and submission to LHCC Nov. 27
LHCC review includes a common meeting with ATLAS at LHCC session Dec. 1

RRB45 24/10/17 39

SLIDE 40

Tracker HL-LHC Upgrade

“In summary, the Tracker Upgrade Project pushes tracker

designs into a new paradigm with a scope that is justified in terms of technical realization as well as physics

performance. The design is bold, but no technical

showstoppers have been identified. It is critical that the remaining R&D be supported as strongly as possible and that appropriate funding for the R&D efforts be provided. Strong oversight is required to keep the schedule. Based

n the technical and scientific review, approval is given for

the project to proceed with the UCG review.”

Report closeout presentation at
https://cms-docdb.cern.ch/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=13409

RRB45 24/10/17 40

SLIDE 41

A Snapshot of the CMS Phase 2 Upgrade Cost - I

The core cost of the CMS Phase-2 upgrade is currently estimated

at 278.9 MCHF including:

1) The scope of the 2015 Technical Proposal 264 MCHF

Improved quality of estimates prepared for the system TDRs or Interim

TDRs, including several design optimizations for performance versus cost

Compares to 265 MCHF in TP (new cost of 264 MCHF includes the effect of

updating to 2016 currency exchange rates: a 3 MCHF increase)

2) A new Minimum Ionizing Particle Timing Detector (MIP-TD)

f 14.9 MCHF cost
Additional mitigation of collision pile-up through precise time association of

tracks to vertices will improve all physics object reconstruction and enable CMS to fully benefit from the highest luminosity potential

We are studying whether this can also lead to a significant impact on HL-

LHC computing

RRB45 24/10/17 41

SLIDE 42

42

The CMS Phase-2 upgrade expected funding is established at 275.6 MCHF

≃ 11.9% of the funding is at the

level of requests to Funding Agencies (FA) (grey)

≃ 51.5% is being processed by

FAs as a target (yellow)

≃ 36.6% is agreed by FAs (green)

Funding EC-CALO ECAL Barrel HCAL Barrel Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL L1 Trigger DAQ/HLT Austria Belgium FNRS Belgium FWO Brazil Bulgaria China Colombia Croatia Egypt Estonia Finland France-CEA France-IN2P3 Germany BMBF Germany Helmholtz Greece Hungary India Iran Italy Korea Lithuania Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Pakistan Poland Portugal RDMS-DMS-Russia Spain Switzerland Taipei Thailand Turkey United Kingdom USA-DOE-NP USA-DOE-NSF CERN

This is based on the CMS FA link persons inputs and may not reflect the latest

progress (e.g. France announcement to move green…)

Further progress is expected in preparation of MoUs after TDR approvals

A Snapshot of the CMS Phase 2 Upgrade Cost - II

24/10/17 RRB45

~88% is considered highly likely

SLIDE 43

A Snapshot of the CMS Phase 2 Upgrade Cost – III

43

The Phase-2 upgrade cost, including the MIP-TD, currently exceeds the expected funding by 3.3 MCHF (1.2%)

1.2 MCHF of this arises from missing contributions to Common Funds,

expected to be forthcoming but not considered guaranteed

Several possibilities are considered to overcome the over-budget.

Particularly technical choices still to be made may allow cost reductions up to 3% of the total cost, and most will be known in 2018. The present best candidates are:

The HCAL barrel tile replacement of 1.9 MCHF, current information indicates

that this is most likely not needed

A new scheme with commercial grade power supplies for the major detector

systems is actively investigated and considered a good candidate to save ≥ 2 MCHF

The target to confirm these two cost reductions is early spring 2018

24/10/17 RRB45

SLIDE 44

44

Cost and funding alignment of all systems is at a % level of the total funding

Funding relocations are however needed to cover all system upgrades
This requires flexibility to adjust FA deliverables to different systems in order to cover the best possible

scope for physics reach. This process is ongoing

CMS

Member country EC-CALO ECAL Barrel HCAL Barrel Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL Trigger DAQ/HLT Common Fund Total Current cost 66000 12600 2500 24900 111900 14900 2600 5900 12600 25000 278 900 Funding 65 964 12 040 2 500 24 926 115 416 9500 1 495 7 272 12 678 23 791 275 582 Funding-cost

36
560

26 3516

5400
1105

1372 78

1209
3318

(Funding-cost)/cost

0,05%
4,44%

0,00% 0,10% 3,14%

36,24%
42,50%

23,25% 0,62%

4,84%
1,19%

(Funding-cost)/total cost -0,01%

0,20%

0,00% 0,01% 1,26%

1,94%
0,40%

0,49% 0,03%

0,43%
1,19%

To be ready to react in case of a funding shortfall, CMS is preparing mitigation options. This will accompany the next funding plan iteration by Apr 2018 RRB

A level of 10% is consistent with the current knowledge of discussions at FAs
Several cost reduction options have already been identified:
Technical choices still to be made in the next year may allow additional cost reductions up to 3%
Descoping of system elements are being considered, they should minimize operation risks and loss of

performance, and preferably be recoverable

A Snapshot of the CMS Phase 2 Upgrade Cost – IV

24/10/17 RRB45

SLIDE 45

Summary

RRB45 24/10/17 45

SLIDE 46

Summary and Outlook

The EYETS went well
We encountered problems with the new pixel detector but are

taking excellent data with it

Physics results continue to be excellent with much exciting

analysis ahead for 2016 data and with an equal or greater amount of new data from 2017

Computing navigated the challenges of the larger than expected

2016 data set and performed very successfully in the campaign for the winter/spring conferences and so far in 2017

Plans are in place for the next few years.
The Upgrade Document preparation is on track and has acquired

a new element in the MIP Precision Timing Detector

The Tracker (inner and outer) received scientific and technical

approval from the LHCC and is now being reviewed for cost by the UCG/LHCC

RRB45 24/10/17 46

SLIDE 47

Thanks to all our Funding Agencies for the outstanding support provided to CMS for many years!

24/10/17 47 RRB45

Thank you for your attention

SLIDE 48

Backup

RRB45 24/10/17 48

SLIDE 49

CMS Management Board 2017

Regional Representatives Upgrade Coordination D.Contardo

L. Malgeri, J. Spalding

Technical Coordination

A. Ball
W. Zeuner

Electronics Coord. M. Hansen GLIMOS N. Dupont

Collaboration Board

U.S.A

G. Snow

Coordinations

BRIL

D. Stickland
A. Dabrowski

Subsystems

DAQ

F. Meijers

ECAL

D. Petyt
F. Cavallari

HCAL

P. Rumerio
J. Dittmann

Tracker

A. Venturi
F. Hartmann

CTPPS

J. Varela

Italy

R. Tenchini

Germany

T. Müller

RDMS

V. Matveev

U.K.

D. Newbold

France

Y. Sirois

Switzerland

F. Canelli

CERN

T. Camporesi

Non-MS

K. Mazumdar

Other MS

P. Sphicas

L1 Trigger

A. Tapper
E. Perez

Conferences

A. Meyer

Muons

J. Hauser
A. Colaleo

Endcap Calorimete r

T. Virdee
M. Mannelli

MB Secretary

Q. Ingram

Physics Coordination

J. Alcaraz Maestre
S. Rahatlou

Advisors Ex-SP: T. Camporesi Ex-TC: A. Hervé Advisors: L.A.T. Bauerdick , H. Chen,

I. Golutvin, V. O'Dell, A. Santoro,
A. Sharma, F. Sikler , G.

Tonelli, B. Wyslouch

Communication

A. Petrilli

Publications

B. Gary

Trigger

A. Bocci
S. Gennai

PPD

G. Cerminara
M. Klute

Offline & Computing

D. Bonacorsi
E. Sexton-Kennedy

Run

G. Rakness
S. Goy-Lopez
S. Paramesvaran
L. Silvestris

Spokesperson

J. Butler
R. Carlin, G. Dissertori

Resources Manager

A. Charkiewicz

Engagement Office

K. Borras

CB Chair

J. D’Hondt
S. Choi (Deputy)
N. Hadley (secretary)

January 2017 Version 6

49

SLIDE 50

Pr Presen esent t Regions gions

Two large, heterogeneous Regions

Country M&O A PhD # CMS Institutes "Qualifying" Institutes (3 M&O or 1 per state) Country M&O A PhD # CMS Institutes "Qualifying" Institutes (3 M&O or 1 per state) 1 Austria

16 1 1

1 Brazil

27 3 3

2 Belgium

41 6 5

2 China

21 4 2

3 Bulgaria

8 2 2

3 Colombia

3 2 1 Other CERN

4 Finland

9 3 1 Other

4 Croatia

10 3 2 Member State

5 Greece

13 4 3 Non-CERN

5 Ecuador

2 2 1 Countries

6 Hungary

10 4 1 Member State 6 Egypt 3 1 1

7 Poland

14 2 2 Countries

7 Estonia

3 1 1

8 Portugal

8 1 1

r Regions

8 Iran

6 1 1

9 Spain

38 4 3

9 Korea

32 16 5

10 Cyprus

7 1 1

10 Malaysia

5 1 1 and Associated 11 India 44 10 7

11 Mexico

12 4 3 Member State

12 Pakistan

3 1 1

12 New Zealand

2 2 1 Countries

13 Serbia

4 1 1

13 Ireland

1 1 1

14 Turkey

12 4 4

14 Lithuania

2 2 1

15 Ukraine

2 3 1

15 Taipei

17 2 2

Total

15

229 47 34

16 Thailand

4 1 1

Total

16

150 46 27

24/10/17 RRB45 50

SLIDE 51

Country M&O A PhD # CMS Institutes "Qualifying" Institutes (3 M&O or 1 per state) Country M&O A PhD # CMS Institutes "Qualifying" Institutes (3 M&O or 1 per state) 1 Austria

16 1 1

1 Croatia

10 3 2

2 Belgium

41 6 5

2 Cyprus

7 1 1 Other CERN

3 Bulgaria

8 2 2 Other

3 Egypt

3 1 1 Member State 4 Finland 9 3 1 Non-CERN

4 Estonia

3 1 1 Countries

5 Greece

13 4 3 Member State 5 Ireland 1 1 1

6 Hungary

10 4 1 Countries or

6 Lithuania

2 2 1

7 Poland

14 2 2 Regions

7 Serbia

4 1 1

8 Portugal

8 1 1

8 Turkey

12 4 4

9 Spain

38 4 3

9 Ukraine

2 3 1

Total 9 157 27 19

10 Brazil

27 3 3

11 Colombia

3 2 1

12 Ecuador

2 2 1

1 China

21 4 2

13 Mexico

12 4 3

2 India

44 10 7

Total

13

88 28 21

Asian

3 Iran

6 1 1 Non-CERN

4 Korea

32 16 5 Member State 5 Malaysia 5 1 1 Countries or

6 New Zealand

2 2 1 Regions

7 Pakistan

3 1 1

8 Taipei

17 2 2

9 Thailand

4 1 1

Total 9 134 38 21

Pr Proposal

posal

This Region 3 could be split into two later. MB suggested review after 2 years

Latin

America Add (?): Montenegro + Lebanon

24/10/17 RRB45 51

SLIDE 52

Three kinds of membership in CMS

Full participation
Cooperating - preparing for full membership in less

than 5 years

Associate – collaboration on technical issues

RRB45 24/10/17 52

SLIDE 53

Pixels

RRB45 24/10/17 53

SLIDE 54

24/10/17 RRB45 54

Phase 1 Pixel Detector

Pixel Upgrade:

Baseline L = 2x1034 cm-2sec-1 with 25ns BX  50 pileup (50PU) with very small efficiency loss
Tolerate L = 2x1034 cm-2sec-1 with 50ns BX  100 pileup (100PU) with reduced performance
Survive Integrated Luminosity of 500 fb-1
Same detector concept: higher rate readout, data link and DAQ w/ less material forward
More Robust tracking : 4 hit coverage; 3 layers/2 disks to 4 layers / 3 disks (can compensate point

losses in strips)

Inner layer closer to beam  Better primary and secondary vertex resolution

(To be installed in EYETS)

SLIDE 55

HF: Forward Hadron Calorimeter

New thin-windowed, metal envelope Multi-anode PMTs

were installed in LS1

Less glass eliminated sources of Cerenkov light that

were causing large pulses  Fake MET

Multianode feature is the next step in this process since

true signals are symmetric and false ones are not

Anodes currently ganged in “adapter board”
Timing is also different and a TDC is part of the new

readout, implemented in the new QIE board

Status (Led by University of Iowa)
PMT box rework started – December 7th 2016
PMT box rework completed – February 10th 2017
All PMT boxes installed – February 16th 2017 (three

weeks ahead of schedule!)

RRB45 24/10/17 55

SLIDE 56

Summary of the Status of Phase I Upgrade

Most work is now complete
Muon and Infrastructure Upgrades were done in LS1
E.g. YB4 (beam halo shield), CO2 cooling, beampipe
We used the upgraded Level 1 Trigger starting in 2016
Trigger was installed in 2015 and operated parasitically
HF was started in LS1 and completed now in EYETS
Pixels are now installed
HE construction is finished
All equipment is at CERN , tested and ready to install
Installation will likely be in 2017/2018 YETS
HB will be done in LS2 as planned
Very similar to HE
Should be at CERN well in advance of LS2 and installed

and checked out well before resumption of running

RRB45 24/10/17 56

SLIDE 57

Top Pair Cross Sections

24/10/17 RRB45 57

Factory Quark Cross Section (nb) Luminosity (cm-2s-1) B (KEKb) Bottom 1.15 (Y(4S)) 2.11x1034 LHC Top 0.82 (incl t-t) 1.51x1034

Top pair rate is > 10 Hz, enabling us to address much more precise questions

Single and double differential cross

sections

Rare (FCNC) decays
CP violation (a beginning)
Width and more complex methods

for measuring the mass

Top pair production at 13 TeV CM

energy is mainly (80%) produced by gluons, providing important information on the gluon distribution at relatively high xF, up to ~0.25

CMS: 835 ± 33 pb Theory: 816 ± 42 pb

SLIDE 58

Higgs Properties from ZZ* (4 leptons)

24/10/17 58

Cross sections

ATLAS , CMS Run 1 Combined: M H =125.09 ±0.21(stat)± 0.11(syst) GeV CMS 2016, 4 lepton: M H =125.26 ±0.20(stat)±0.08(syst) GeV

HIG-16-041, Submitted to JHEP

RRB45

SLIDE 59

Higgs  gg

24/10/17 59

Signal strength modifiers

Differential cross section

Likelihood scan for signal strength

HIG-16-040

HIG-17-015

Njet Differential cross section

RRB45

SLIDE 60

Higgs Coupling to Top Quarks

24/10/17 60

3σ evidence for tt-H in multi-lepton final states

3.3 σ (2.5 expected) when combined with 2015 result HIG-17-004

SS dilepton

RRB45

SLIDE 61

Boosted Objects, e.g., Vector Like Quarks

24/10/17 61

Resolve into two subjets

Limit: Expected: 1245 GeV Observed: 1365 GeV

B2G-17-003

,Q=2/3

See B2G-17-008 For Q=5/3

RRB45

SLIDE 62

Evidence for Higgs VH(bb)

24/10/17 62

Br of Higgs to bb ~58%(expected)
Huge QCD backgrounds
Most sensitive channel is associated

production with W or Z, Hbb

0L: Z(nn)
1L: W(m n) W(e n),
2L : Z(m m), Z(ee)
Mass resolution of Mbb is ~10%
Based in several BDTs Validated

using di-boson production VZ(bb)

mVH,SM = s/sSM= 1.19 +.21
.20(stat)+.34
.32 (syst)

(2016 data)

Significance 3.2 (2.8) s measured(expected)
mVH,SM = s/sSM= 1.06 +.31
.29 (2016+Run 1)

Significance 3.79 (3.75) s measured (expected)

mVZ,SM = s/sSM= 1.02 +.22
.23 (5.0 s)

HIG-16-044, submitted to PLB

RRB45

SLIDE 63

Rare Decay Highlight

Search for lepton flavour violating decays of the Higgs boson to eτ

and μτ in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeVwith full 2016 statistics.

Previous 2.4σ hint in Hμτ in Run1 data (Phys. Lett. B 749 (2015)

337) not confirmed

stringent limits set on branching fractions, in few per cent range

24/10/17 RRB45 63

HIG-17-001

eτ μτ

SLIDE 64

64

HL-LHC: CMS Phase-2 upgrades

New Tracker

Rad. tolerant - increased granularity - lighter
40 MHz selective readout (strips) for Trigger
Extended coverage to η ≃ 3.8

Trigger/HLT/DAQ

Track information in trigger at 40 MHz
12.5 µs latency
HLT input/output 750/7.5 kHz

Muon systems

New DT & CSC FE/BE

electronics

New station to complete CSC

at 1.6 < η < 2.4

Extended coverage to η ≃ 3

New Endcap Calorimeters

Rad. tolerant - High granularity

transverse and longitudinal

4D shower measurement including

precise timing capability

Barrel EM calorimeter

New FE/BE electronics for full

granularity readout at 40 MHz - with improved time resolution

Lower operating temperature (8∘)

Beam radiation and luminosity Common systems and infrastructure MIP precision Timing Detector

Barrel layer: Crystal + SiPM
Endcap layer: Low Gain Avalanche Diodes

SLIDE 65

65

Time of flight precision ≃ 30 ps, ∣η∣< 3, pT > 0.7 GeV “Provide a factor 4-5 effective pile-up reduction”

≃ 15% merged vertices reduce to ≃ 1.5%
Low pileup track purity of vertices recovered

VBF H  ττ in 200 p-p collisions

MIP Precision Timing Detector Advantages

24/10/17 RRB45

SLIDE 66

Reminder of overall LHCC/UCG review process timeline

66

CMS LHCC UCG LHCC UCG LHCC UCG LHCC UCG LHCC "UCG" LHCC "UCG" LHCC "UCG" LHCC "UCG" 26-juin-17

TDR 1-Jul

03-juil-17 10-juil-17 17-juil-17

Koff 21-Jul ID to reader ID to readers

24-juil-17

Review UCGP

31-juil-17

Start CWR part 1 Aug 1 Start CWR part 1 Aug 1 Start CWR Aug 1

07-août-17

Start CWR Aug 8

14-août-17

Inter 14-Aug. UCGP 14-Aug Start CWR part 2 Aug 14 Start CWR part 2 Aug 14

21-août-17 28-août-17

Inter 1-Sep

04-sept-17

Rehearse ID to readers Review Doc Input

11-sept-17 Sep LHCC

Rev 11-Sep App 14-Sep Koff 12-Sep TDR 12-Sep TDR 12-Sep Submit ID Submit ID

18-sept-17 25-sept-17 RIO CMS

Review UCGP Review UCGP TDR to readers Start CWR

02-oct-17

Submit Doc

09-oct-17

Koff 9-Oct Koff 10-Oct

16-oct-17

UCGP 16-Oct UCGP 16-Oct

23-oct-17 Oct RRB

Iter 27-Oct Start CWR

RRB 30-oct-17

Iter 30-Oct Iter 31-Oct Submit Doc

06-nov-17 13-nov-17 20-nov-17

Rehearse Rehearse Rehearse

27-nov-17 Nov LHCC

Rev 27-Nov Rev 28-Nov App 30-Nov Koff 1-Dec LHCC-R 29- Nov LHCC-A 30- Nov Koff 1-Dec TDR 28-Nov Review 27-Nov

04-déc-17 Dec RB 11-déc-17

Review UCGP

18-déc-17

Iter 18-Dec Iter 19-Dec Koff 18-Dec

25-déc-17 Christmas 01-janv-18

Rehearse Rehearse

08-janv-18

Iter 11-Jan

15-janv-18

Rehearse UCGP 15-Jan

22-janv-18 Jan P-II Mtg

Rev 23-Jan Rev 24-Jan Rev 22-Jan

29-janv-18 05-févr-18 12-févr-18 19-févr-18 26-févr-18 Feb LHCC

App 1-Mar Koff 27-Feb

05-mars-18 12-mars-18

Iter 13-Mar

19-mars-18

Rehearse

26-mars-18 Easter week 02-avr-18 09-avr-18 Apr P-II Mtg

Rev 11-Apr

16-avr-18 23-avr-18 Apr RRB RRB 7-Mar RRB 18-Apr Trigger DAQ BARREL MUON ENDCAP Cost/MM MTD RB 6-Dec TRACKER

Today’s presentation

24/10/17 RRB45

SLIDE 67

TDR and Interim Document Approval Process Timeline

Tracker TDR
Submission to LHCC 1st of July and UCG package Aug 15
LHCC/UCG Sep.: Scientific approval and publication, UCG package review start
Muons TDR
Submission to LHCC Sep12 and UCG package Oct 15
LHCC/UCG Nov. 2017: Scientific approval and publication, UCG package review start
Barrel Calorimeters TDR
Submission to LHCC Sept. 12 and UCG package Dec. 15
LHCC/UCG Feb. 2018: Scientific approval and publication, UCG package review start
Endcap Calorimeter TDR
Submission to LHCC Nov. 28 and UCG package Feb. 15
LHCC/UCG May. 2018: Scientific approval and publication, UCG package review start
L1 Trigger, DAQ/HLT and Common Infrastructure and Logistics of Works Interim

Documents, Sep 2017

Probably a MIP Timing Layer Interim Document in Sep 2017

RRB45 24/10/17 67

CMS goal is to be ready for full approval by Fall 2018 RRB

SLIDE 68

Updated Overall Timeline for Phase 2 Upgrade

24/10/17 RRB45 68

Calendar Year Long Shutdowns Tracker:

Outer

EDR Inst.

Comm.
Pixel

Engineering

Prototyping

EDR Pre-production

Production
Integration
Commissioing

Inst.

Comm.

EDR ESR EDR Installation

Commissioning

End cap 1: Pre-production

Production
Integration
Commissioning

Inst.

Comm.

Inst.

Comm.

Muons:

GEM1

EDR Inst.

CSC

ESR FE Inst. BE Engin.

Pre-prod.

ESR BE Production BE Inst.

Comm.
DT

EDR End cap 1: Production Inst.

End

cap 2: Production Inst. ESR Barrel Link System: Production Inst.

End

cap 1: Production Inst.

End

cap 2: Production Inst.

GEM0

ESR Pre-pro EDR Production MIP-Timing

Barrel
Engin.
Proto.

EDR

Pre-prod.
Prod.
Int.

in Tracker

Comm.

Inst.

Comm.

End cap EDR Inst.

Comm.
L1-Trigger

ITDR TDR Pre-production ESR Installation

Comm.

DAQ/HLT ITDR TDR ESR Prodcution Installation

Commissioning

Installation

Comm.

Inst.

Comm.

End cap Calorimeter Engineering

Prototyping

Engin. Production Barrel Calo.

ECAL
HCAL

LS3 Design

Demo.

TDR Engineering

Prototyping

Pre-production

Production
Integration
Commissioing

LS2 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2026 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Pre-production
Production
Pre-production
Production

Integration

Installation
Commissionin

Design

Demo.

Engineering

Prototyping

TDR Production

End

cap 2: Pre-production

Production
Integration
Commissioning

TDR Design

Demo.

EDR FE Engin. Pre-pro Engineering

Prototyping

Pre-pro Engineering

Prototyping

EDR Pre-pro

RPCDesign
Demo.

Engin.

Proto.

TDR

GEM2 Design
Demo.

ESR EDR Engin.

Proto.

ESR Pre-pro. Pre-pro. TP Design

Demo.

Design

Demo.

Pre-pro

Demo.

V2 Electronics production

Slice

Electronics Proto.

Demo.

Production Engin.

Prototyping

Design

Design

Electronics Proto.

Demo.

V1 Engin.

Proto.

TDR Pre-production

Production
Integration
Commissioing

Based on TDRs and other documents for LHCC reviews

For overview talks and discussions or reviews at FAs

SLIDE 69

Status of LHCC/UCG Reviews - III

RRB45 24/10/17 69

Update of cost and funding situation was provided to CERN RD,

LHCC/UCG chairs

New cost - with explanation of major changes since TP
CMS

Phase-2 cost (kCHF) EC-CALO ECAL Barrel HCAL Barrel Muons Tracker BRIL Trigger DAQ/HLT Common Fund

TP

scope MIP-TD TP scope + MIP-TD TP cost (2014 rates) 63 600 9 950 1 500 24 400 112 300 4 000 7 300 17 000 25 000 265 050

Current

cost (2016 rates) 66 000 12 600 2 500 24 900 111 900 2 600 5 900 12 600 25 000 264 000 14 900 278 900

SLIDE 70

Status of LHCC/UCG Reviews - IV

RRB45 24/10/17 70

Confidential MM - with level of discussion at FAs
Discussion of options to address over-budget (1.2%) and of preparation mitigation

plans in case of funding shortfall

Balance of cost and funding of projects
CMS

Member country EC-CALO ECAL Barrel HCAL Barrel Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL Trigger DAQ/HLT Common Fund Total Current cost 66000 12600 2500 24900 111900 14900 2600 5900 12600 25000 278 900 Funding 65 964 12 040 2 500 24 926 115 416 9500 1 495 7 272 12 678 23 791 275 582 Funding-cost

36
560

26 3516

5400
1105

1372 78

1209
3318

(Funding-cost)/cost

0,05%
4,44%

0,00% 0,10% 3,14%

36,24%
42,50%

23,25% 0,62%

4,84%
1,19%

(Funding-cost)/total cost -0,01%

0,20%

0,00% 0,01% 1,26%

1,94%
0,40%

0,49% 0,03%

0,43%
1,19%
We are expecting feedback from LHCC/UCG chair before the Oct. RRB

SLIDE 71

Update of Current Organization for Phase 2 Upgrade

24/10/17 RRB45 71

For discussions or reviews at FAs New convener names/MIP-Timing Detector a project (previously a WG)

SLIDE 72

72

The CMS Phase-2 upgrade expected funding is established at 275.6 MCHF

A Snapshot of the CMS Phase 2 Upgrade Cost - II

24/10/17 RRB45

Funding EC-CALO ECAL Barrel HCAL Barrel Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL L1 Trigger DAQ/HLT Austria Belgium FNRS Belgium FWO Brazil Bulgaria China Colombia Croatia Egypt Estonia Finland France-CEA France-IN2P3 Germany BMBF Germany Helmholtz Greece Hungary India Iran Italy Korea Lithuania Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Pakistan Poland Portugal RDMS-DMS-Russia Spain Switzerland Taipei Thailand Turkey United Kingdom USA-DOE-NP USA-DOE-NSF CERN

Assuming similar level of discussion as ATLAS:

≃ 12% of the funding is at

the level of requests to Funding Agencies (FA) (grey)

≃ 9.7% is being processed

by FAs as a target (yellow)

≃ 78.3% is agreed by FAs

(green)