clonal evolution in therapy related neoplasms
play

CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS E. Fabiani 1 , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS E. Fabiani 1 , G. Falconi 1 , L. Fianchi 2 , M. Criscuolo 2 , T. O9one 1 , L. Cicconi 1 , S. Hohaus 2 , S.


  1. CLONAL ¡EVOLUTION ¡IN ¡THERAPY-­‑RELATED ¡NEOPLASMS ¡ E. ¡Fabiani ¡ 1 , ¡G. ¡Falconi ¡ 1 , ¡L. ¡Fianchi 2 , ¡M. ¡Criscuolo 2 , ¡T. ¡O9one 1 , ¡L. ¡Cicconi 1 , ¡ ¡ S. ¡Hohaus 2 , ¡S. ¡Sica 2 , ¡M. ¡Postorino 1 , ¡A. ¡Neri 3 , ¡M. ¡LioneB 3 , ¡ ¡ G. ¡Leone 2 , ¡F. ¡Lo-­‑Coco 1 ¡and ¡MT. ¡Voso 1 ¡ 1 Department ¡of ¡Biomedicine ¡and ¡Preven3on, ¡Universita’ ¡Tor ¡Vergata, ¡ ¡Rome, ¡Italy, ¡ ¡ 2 Department ¡of ¡Hematology, ¡Universita’ ¡CaBolica ¡Sacro ¡Cuore, ¡Rome, ¡Italy ¡ ¡ 3 Department ¡of ¡Clinical ¡Sciences ¡and ¡Community ¡Health, ¡Università ¡degli ¡studi ¡di ¡Milano, ¡Italy ¡ ¡

  2. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms are characterized by high incidence of complex karyotypes, frequent abnormalities of chromosome 7 and/or 5 High prevalence of the t(4;11)(q21;q23) translocation have been commonly reported in t-ALL. Italian ¡Registry ¡on ¡Secondary ¡Leukemias. ¡Fianchi ¡et ¡al., ¡Am ¡J ¡Hematol ¡2015 ¡

  3. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS Prevalence of Somatic Mutations in t-MN = ¡ ≠ ¡ OK ¡et ¡al., ¡Leuk ¡Res ¡2015. ¡Muta3on ¡hotspots ¡of ¡53 ¡genes ¡ TP53 ¡ Voso ¡et ¡al., ¡Leukemia ¡2013 ¡and ¡Fabiani ¡et ¡al., ¡Haematologica ¡2014. ¡

  4. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS Patient Characteristics

  5. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 1. Methods Mutational screening of common somatic mutations and other gene alterations in therapy-related leukemia patients Sanger Sequencing Next Generation Sequencing IDH1 R132 TP53 IDH2 R140/R172 Epigenetic enzymes DNMT3A R882 ASXL1 Q-RT-Polymerase chain reaction t(4;11)(q21;q23) SF3B1 ex 13-16 Spliceosome machinery KMT2A/AFF1 SRSF2 P95 U2AF1 S34 Pyrosequencing SETBP1 SKI Domain Validation & quantification N-RAS of the mutated clone K-RAS

  6. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 2. Methods Mutations identified in the t-MN sample were then tracked backwards in samples collected during follow-up of the primary tumor, using high sensitivity techniques High-throughput Next Generation Sequencing ² Specific homemade designed primers were linked to specific flags ² Average coverage was >120000x for all corresponding specific amplicon ² Variant allele frequencies in % (alternative allele count/total depth x100)

  7. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS Screening of genetic changes in therapy-related neoplasms $"%& !"# IDH1 R132 IDH2 R172 IDH2 R140 DNMT3A R882 U2AF1 SF3B1 13-16 SRSF2 SETBP1 N-RAS K-RAS ASXL1 ! "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# $%&!' ( $(()* "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# + "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# ,-.&' / "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# 0-&+' % "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# - "# "# "# "# "# "# 12))3 "# "# "# "# "# 2 "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# . "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# & "# 0!+(4 "# "# "# "# "# 5&%4 "# "# "# "# !) "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# !! "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# !( "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# !+ "# "# "# "# "# "# "# "# 6.2)0 "# "# "# ² We identified 8 mutations ( IDH1 R132H, SRSF2 P95H, SF3B1 K700E, SETBP1 G870R, TP53 Y220C, ASXL1 Y591*, ASXL1 S689* and ASXL1 R693* ) in 7 of 13 t-MN patients ² UPN 9 carried two mutations ( IDH1 R132H and SRSF2 P95H) ² UPN 14, a t-ALL patient, was KMT2A-AFF1 -positive

  8. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS Quantification of the identified variants at the time of t-MN diagnosis ² Pyrosequencing analyses, specifically designed to quantify the mutations confirmed the data obtained from Sanger sequencing in all cases. ² Mutations identified in epigenetic regulators, spliceosome enzymes and SETBP1 were detectable at a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 20 to 42% at the time of t-MN diagnosis ² TP53 mutation was detectable at a lower rate (6,75%) ¡ ¡ ² UPN9 carried two mutations ( IDH1 R132H and SRSF2 P95H), at a similar VAF (38% and 35%, respectively) suggesting that the two mutations were present in the same leukemic clone. ² Quantitative evaluation of the KMT2A-AFF1 transcript in UPN 14 revealed strong positivity for the chimeric transcript at the time of t-ALL diagnosis (3500 copies /10 4 ABL)

  9. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS Disease markers and clonal evolution Ultra-deep NGS reveals at least two different patterns of clonal evolution First ¡scenario ¡ Second ¡scenario ¡ Somatic mutations Somatic mutations characterizing the t-MN were detectable at clone were not detectable primary cancer at primary cancer diagnosis, prior to any diagnosis and appeared cytotoxic treatment after cytotoxic treatment

  10. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 1. ¡First ¡scenario ¡ Somatic mutations characterizing the t-MN clone were not detectable at primary cancer diagnosis and appeared after cytotoxic treatment MICMA/PB-SCT RTX F) UPN6: SF3B1 K700E G) UPN13: SETBP1 G870R D) UPN6: SF3B1 K700E E) UPN13: SETBP1 G870R 40 25 25 Variant allele frequency (%) Variant allele frequency (%) 35.0 35 20.0 20 20 30 25 15 15 20 10 10 15 10 5 5 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 B-ALL CR t-MN DG AML BC DG t-MN DG DG (23 mos) (32 mos) DG (53 mos) (83 mos) GMALL 05/93 AML-12 Trial CTH + RT Fabiani et al., submitted

  11. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 2. ¡First ¡scenario ¡ Somatic mutations characterizing the t-MN clone were not detectable at primary cancer diagnosis and appeared after cytotoxic treatment A) UPN4: ASXL1 R693* &#" 35 30.0 Variant allele frequency (%) 30 &!" 25 %#" 20 %!" $#" 15 13.0 10 $!" 5 #" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 !" NHL (21 mos) (30 mos) (43 mos) t-MN DG (120 mos) DG (113 mos) CHOP/MICMA/ Fludarabin RTX HD-CTX CTX MICMA/PB-SCT RTX Fabiani et al., submitted

  12. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 3. ¡First ¡scenario ¡ Somatic mutations characterizing the t-MN clone were not detectable at primary cancer diagnosis and appeared after cytotoxic treatment B) UPN3: ASXL1 S689* 46.0 45 Variant allele frequency (%) 40 35.0 34.0 35 30 29.0 25 19.0 20 15 10 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 NHL (3 mos) (9 mos) (14 mos) (20 mos) (23 mos) (49 mos) (78 mos) t-MN DG DG (86 mos) CHOP R-MICMA PB-SCT R-Vel-dex Lenalidomide Fabiani et al., submitted

  13. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 4. ¡First ¡scenario ¡ Genomic alteration characterizing the t-ALL clone was not detectable at primary cancer diagnosis and appeared after cytotoxic treatment C) UPN14: KMT2A/AFF1 5000 4390 4000 Copies/10 4 ABL 3522 3000 2000 962 1000 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 APL CR CR CR t-ALL DG (21 mos) Allo-SCT (31 mos) (20 mos) DG (11 mos) (13 mos) (15 mos) (18 mos) (24 mos) AIDA 2000 (induction, consolidation Clofarabine Vincristine Endoxan & manteinance) Daunorubicin L-Asparaginase Fabiani et al., submitted

  14. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 1. Second scenario Somatic mutations were detectable at primary cancer diagnosis, prior to any cytotoxic treatment A) UPN2: TP53 Y220C 7.0 6.00 Variant allele frequency (%) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.01 2.03 2.0 1.0 0.10 0 APL CR CR APL t-MN DG DG (14 mos) (20 mos) (30 mos) AIDA 2000 Fabiani et al., submitted

  15. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 2. Second scenario Somatic mutations were detectable at primary cancer diagnosis, prior to any cytotoxic treatment B) UPN1: ASXL1 Y591* 45 42.0 Variant allele frequency (%) 40.0 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 7.0 5 0.3 0 NHL (31 mos) (36 mos) t-MN DG DG (83 mos) Pro MACE Cytabom/RT Fabiani et al., submitted

  16. CLONAL EVOLUTION IN THERAPY-RELATED NEOPLASMS 3. Second scenario Somatic mutations were detectable at primary cancer diagnosis, prior to any cytotoxic treatment C) UPN9 40 38.0 IDH1 R132H Variant allele frequency (%) 35.0 35 35.0 30 25 20 SRSF2 P95H 15 10 5 0.0 0.0 0 NHL Follow-up t-MN DG DG (1 mos) (100 mos) Chlorambucil/Rituximab/RT Fabiani et al., submitted

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend