CityLines: Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke System for Urban Transportation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

citylines hybrid hub and spoke system for urban
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CityLines: Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke System for Urban Transportation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CityLines: Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke System for Urban Transportation Services Yanhua Li Assistant Professor Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute Global Urbanization and Transportation Todays Urban Transit Services


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CityLines: Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke System for Urban Transportation Services

Yanhua Li Assistant Professor Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Global Urbanization and Transportation
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Today’s Urban Transit Services

Private Transit Public Transits

affordable ride-sharing services reduce the personal vehicle usage

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Limitations of Today’s Public Transits
  • Fixed Routes and Time Tables

– Transit supply mis-match dynamic demands

  • Large number of stops and transfers

– Long travel time

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Limitations of Today’s Private Transits
  • Expensive

– High operation cost, – Due to the exclusive service

  • Service delay

– On-demand services – Delay after the service request

  • Transit modes run independently

– Lack of inter-transit coordination

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Future Smart Transit

Today’s Transits

  • Private Transits

– High Cost – Service delay

  • Public Transits

– Fixed routes – Fixed timetable – Long travel time

  • No Inter-Transit

Coordination

  • Dynamic services

– Real time trip demands

  • Short travel time

– as private transits

  • Low cost

– as public transits

Future Urban Transit Services

Private Transits: Point-to-point mode Public Transits: fixed route mode

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Hub-and-Spoke Transit Mode

Airlines routes

  • Traffic move along spokes connected via a few hubs

– Less operation cost (than private), thus lower cost – Less stops/stations (than public), thus lower transit time

  • A promising transit mode, and how to design it in urban areas?

Package delivery system

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • CityLines Transit System
  • CityLines: a Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke Transit Mode

– point-to-point mode: high demand source-destination pairs – hub-and-spoke mode: low demand source-destination pairs D

1

S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4 S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4 Private transit Point-to-point model CityLines Hybrid hub-and-spoke mode Reduce routes, thus operation cost

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • CityLines Transit System
  • CityLines: a Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke Transit Mode

– point-to-point mode: high demand source-destination pairs – hub-and-spoke mode: low demand source-destination pairs

S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4 S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4 Public transit Fixed-route model CityLines Hybrid hub-and-spoke mode Reduce stops/stations, thus travel time

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • CityLines Transit System Design
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Input Data Description

  • Trip Demand Data (in Shenzhen):
  • Source: Taxi GPS, Bus, Subway Transactions
  • Duration: March 1st–30th, 2014.
  • Size: 19,428,453 trips in all transit modes
  • Format: Taxi ID, time, latitude, longitude, load
  • Road Map, Subway Lines, and Bus routes:
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Stage 1: Road Map Gridding

  • Given a side length s=0.01o
  • 1,508 grids are obtained
  • 1,018 grids are strongly connected by road network
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Stage 2: Trip demand aggregation

  • Trip demand: <src, dst, t>
  • Aggregated trip demand <src_grid, dst_grid, t>

6am to 9am No demand Low demand Medium demand High demand

The spatial distribution of trip demand sources

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Stage 3: Optimal Hybrid Hub-and- Spoke Planning

  • Problem definition:
  • Given: n spokes, a set of K trip demands,

a budget of M point-to-point paths, L Hub stations

  • How to plan the hybrid hub-and-spoke network?
  • Goal: Minimize the average travel time
  • Constraints: Up to one-stop (at a hub) per trip

S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stage 3: Optimal Hybrid Hub-and- Spoke Planning

  • Challenges:
  • A large number of hub candidates: all spokes
  • n=1,018 spokes; L=10 hubs;
  • Joint modeling of point-to-point and hub-and-spoke
  • Two Components:
  • Optimal Hub Selection (OHS): Find L+M hub candidates
  • Goal: “Cover” the most shortest paths of trip demands
  • Optimal Trip Assignment (OTA): Hub-spoke net with L hubs
  • Goal: Minimize the average travel time
  • (introducing virtual hub to model the joint optimization )
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Stage 3-I: Optimal Hub Selection (OHS)

  • Problem Definition:
  • Find M+L hub candidates
  • Goal: “Cover” the most trip demands
  • A hub h covers a trip demand <src, dst, t>,
  • If h is on the shortest path from src to dst.

S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4

D

1

S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4

L=2, M=1, L+M=3

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Stage 3-I: Optimal Hub Selection (OHS)

  • Maximum Coverage Problem
  • NP-Hard Problem
  • Approximate Algorithm with rate 1-1/e [1]

[1] D. S. Hochbaum. Approximating covering and packing problems: set cover, vertex cover, independent set, and related problems. In Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. PWS Publishing Co., 1996.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Stage 3-II: Optimal Trip Assignment

  • p-Hub problem for hub-and-spoke model
  • p-Hub problem with L hubs and 1 virtual hub

LP relaxation based approximation solution [2] D1 S1 D1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4 S1 S2 S3 D2 D3 D4

[2] A. T. Ernst and M. Krishnamoorthy. Exact and heuristic algorithms for the uncapacitated multiple allocation p-hub median problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998.

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Comparison with

Public and Private Transits

42 mins Average Travel Time: ~42mins reduction over public transits Slightly higher (4 mins) than private transits Aggregation level: Slightly less (8) than public transits ~23 more over private transits 23 per segment

Average travel time (min) overall trip demands Aggregation level: Average # passengers per trip segment

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Evaluation

  • Optimal Hub Selection
  • Baselines
  • Rand-Sel: Random hub selection
  • Top-Sel: Top coverage hub selection
  • OHS algorithm
  • Optimal Trip Assignment
  • Baselines
  • Rand-Ass: Random Trip assignment
  • Ave-Ass: Average Trip assignment
  • OTA algorithm
slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 80%

12% 35% 25%

Average travel time: 12%–80% reduction rate Average Waiting Time: 25%-35% increase

Comparison with baselines

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Case Studies: Point-to-point Model
slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Case Studies: Hub-and-spoke
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Case Studies: Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • CityLines Transit System

Cyber-Analytics subsystem Physical-Sensing subsystem Transit-Control subsystem Private Transits Public Transits CityLines Scalability Dynamicity Reliability Compatibility GPS Sets: Trajectories of Vehicles, Trains, …; Automated Fare Collection system: Transactions of all transits; Road Infrastructure: Traffic status from loop detectors, cameras; Trip Demand Prediction Trip QoE Modeling Incentive Mechanism Analysis

  • CityLines: a Hybrid Hub-and-Spoke Transit Mode

– point-to-point mode: high demand source-destination pairs – hub-and-spoke mode: low demand source-destination pairs – Autonomous vehicles?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Questions?