CITYkeys Performance measurement of smart cities Miimu Airaksinen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

citykeys
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CITYkeys Performance measurement of smart cities Miimu Airaksinen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CITYkeys Performance measurement of smart cities Miimu Airaksinen Research Professor VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland The goal of CITYKEYS is to provide a validated, holistic performance measurement framework for monitoring and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CITYkeys

Performance measurement

  • f smart cities

Miimu Airaksinen Research Professor VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CITYkeys – 646440

The goal of CITYKEYS is to provide a validated, holistic performance measurement framework for monitoring and comparing the implementation of Smart City solutions.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CITYkeys – 646440

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CITYkeys – 646440

 Existing frameworks; Concerto, ITU etc.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CITYkeys – 646440

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CITYkeys – 646440

Cities and citizens needs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CITYkeys – 646440

Smart city level: Does your city measure its smart city performance?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CITYkeys – 646440

Smart city level: Does your city measure its smart city performance?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CITYkeys – 646440

For what kind of decisions would you need performance measurement for?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CITYkeys – 646440

Cities need to measure performance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CITYkeys – 646440

Mapped existing frame works

European frameworks International and European Standards Neighborhood certification schemes Relevant FP7 and H2020 projects Selected country frameworks Other international frameworks

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CITYkeys – 646440

Mapping existing frameworks

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CITYkeys – 646440

Mapping existing frameworks

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CITYkeys – 646440

Preliminary structure

People (e.g. safety, health, diversity, quality of

built environment)

Planet (environment, ecosystem, energy and other

resources)

Prosperity (employment, economic performance,

Innovation)

Process (multilevel governance, organisation, co-

creation, engagement)

Propagation (scalability, replicability)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CITYkeys – 646440

Preliminary sub themes

People - Quality of life Health (eg heat stress; noise; air quality; sanitation, access to health services) Safety Access to services/resources/amenities/networks Culture and leisure (later included in “access to services) Education & skills (high level education; early classes of technology) Creativity (later included in “education”) Diversity & Social inclusion Quality of housing and of the built environment Planet - Resource efficiency Energy and mitigation (performance, savings, efficiency, renewable energy, CO2/GHG emission / savings) Climate resilience Resources Water (later included in “resources”) Environment (later rephrased as “Pollution and Waste”) Ecosystems

Red is (also) recognized as important and/or necessary by at least 50% of the cities participating in the survey Green is (also) considered priority by citizens

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CITYkeys – 646440

Preliminary structure

Prosperity Economic Performance / GDP Equity Employment City attractiveness Innovation Process Policy & Organisation (later rephrased as “Organisation”) Community engagement Citizen participation (later rephrased as “Co-creation”) Multilevel governance Propagation (only at project level) Scalability Replicability

Red is (also) recognized as important and/or necessary by at least 50% of the cities participating in the survey Green is (also) considered priority by citizens

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CITYkeys – 646440

Preliminary structure

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CITYkeys – 646440

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CITYkeys – 646440

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CITYkeys – 646440

Gap analyse

 There are in principle indicators available for each of

the subthemes. However, there are significant variations in the coverage of the subthemes

 Best covered are People, Planet and Prosperity  Gaps:

 Project level Education, Employment, Scalability,

Replicability

 City level: Multilevel governance

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CITYkeys – 646440

KPIs

What you measure is what you get

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CITYkeys – 646440

Criteria for selecting indicators

  • 1. Relevance
  • 2. Completeness
  • 3. Availability
  • 4. Measurability
  • 5. Reliability
  • 6. Familiarity
  • 7. Non-redundancy
  • 8. Independence
slide-23
SLIDE 23

CITYkeys – 646440

Excamples Planet, energy and migitation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

CITYkeys – 646440

Project

Indicator title Indicator unit Definition Source Type of indicator

Reduction in annual final energy consumption by buildings % reduction Change in annual final energy consumption of buildings (kWh/m2/yr) for all forms of energy (heat and water heating, cooling, lighting, cooking, ventilation and other ancillary services, electrical appliances) due to the project. Eurbanlab; Concerto; CIVIS, DGNB impact Reduction in annual final energy consumption by transport % reduction Change in annual final energy consumption of transport of all types (GJ/year) due to the project. 2 Decide impact

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CITYkeys – 646440

Excamples Planet, energy and migitation, city

Indicator title Indicator unit Definition Source

Annual final energy consumption of buildings MWh/cap/yr Final energy consumption of buildings for all forms of energy (heat and water heating, cooling, lighting, cooking, ventilation and other ancillary services, electrical appliances) per city capita annually. Eurbanlab; Transform Final energy use for transport GJ/cap/yr Annual final energy consumption of transport of all types (GJ/year) Eurbanlab Final energy consumption by street lighting kWh/cap/yr Annual final energy consumption of street lighting (kWh/cap/yr) in city per capita. Final energy consumption by ICT MWh/cap/yr Annual final energy consumption of IT

  • f all types (MWh/cap/year) in city

Green Digital Charter Final energy consumption by public buildings kWh/m2/year Change in annual final energy consumption of public buildings (kWh/cap/year) for all usages (heat and water heating, cooling, lighting, cooking, ventilation and other ancillary services, electrical appliances) due to the project City Protocol; ISO 37120; Covenant of mayors

slide-26
SLIDE 26

CITYkeys – 646440

Project, energy

Description of the indicator Name

  • f

the indicator Reduction in annual final energy consumption by buildings Definition Change in annual final energy consumption of buildings (kWh/m2/yr) for all forms of energy (heat and water heating, cooling, lighting, cooking, ventilation and other ancillary services, electrical appliances) due to the project. Description incl. justification Energy use in buildings accounts for 40% of all sectors’ total energy consumption. To achieve the EU’s climate and energy objectives by 2020, 20% energy saving is

  • needed. The Directive on energy performance of

buildings is the main legislative instrument on EU level to improve energy performance in buildings. The directive states minimum requirements with regards to energy performance when constructing new facilities or major renovation of existing buildings. Annual energy consumption of buildings considers all energy consumed within the building. This means heat 

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CITYkeys – 646440

People, health, project

Description of the indicator Name of the indicator Improved access to basic health care services Description incl. justification Increased accessibility to basic health care will have social and economic benefits. Because… Definition The extent to which the project has increased accessibility to basic health care; e.g. with regards to physical distance (<500m), 24hrs availability, e-health services, overcoming literacy and language barriers. Normalisation (suggestion if available) Likert scale: No improvement – 1 — 2 — 3 — 4 — 5 — Very high improvement. 1. Not at all: the access to basic health care services was not improved. 2. Poor: there was little improvement in the accessibility of basic health care services. 3. Somewhat: access to basic health care services was improved, including a few important amenities such as a 

slide-28
SLIDE 28

CITYkeys – 646440

Excamples

Access to services (e.g. xx m2), Likert

scale

Reduction in energy consumption, (e.g.

compared to base line kWh/m2), percentage %

What kind of indicators are useful and

is the data available/easy to access?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

CITYkeys – 646440

Performance monitoring

 Decision-support based on:

 reliable real-time monitoring on smart city performance  holistic key performance indicators framework and a city index  The implementation of a common performance measurement

framework is based on a set of relevant indicators, open data applications and decision-support user-interfaces

 enables stakeholders to learn from each other, create trust in solutions

and monitor progress.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

CITYkeys – 646440

City Monitoring system - System concept

Sources: VTT Pro-IoT spearhead program. http://www.vtt.fi/research/spearhead_iot.jsp. VTT Ingrid Innovation program. http://www.vtt.fi/research/innovation_ingrid.jsp.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CITYkeys – 646440

CITYKEYS in nutshell

 The project focuses on developing and validating,

together with cities, performance indicators and data collection procedures that will be used for the common and transparent monitoring of Smart City projects (initiatives/actions) and solutions across European cities.

 The key results are:

 Key performance indicators for smart city projects  Performance measurement framework, Data sets &

data collection

 Policy making recommendations  Business models & opportunities  Smart city index recommendations

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CITYkeys – 646440

Web: www.citykeys-project.eu Twitter: @citykeys_eu

Supported by

Thank you Miimu Airaksinen, citykeys co-ordinator miimu.airaksinen@vtt.fi +358 40 770 4832