CITY DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 1 ST Class - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CITY DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL

Class: 1ST Class Component City Capital of the Province of Davao del Norte Area: 19,580 hectares 59% dedicated to Agricultural Use Population: 259,444 Barangays: 23 Functional Role: Regional Center for Trade and Commerce (Davao Region RDP)

Sources: PSA, Davao Regional Development Council

TAGUM CITY

LOCATION AND GEOPHYSICAL FEATURES

Topography: Generally flat with rolling portions in the northern Part of the City

Hydrogeology: Recent Alluvium Acquifer consist

• f outwash, valley

fill, river and coastal deposits of clay, silt, sand and gravel, corals and other marine carbonates. These unconsolidated, partly compacted deposits are less than 1 – 20 meters thick. Depth to water is from 0 to less than 10 meters below land surface

Sources: DIDP, JICA

River System: 2 Major River Systems: Liboganon River Hijo River Commonly, outfall areas in the City are drained into the Davao gulf which also serves as the major outfall area of the municipalities and cities surrounding the gulf.

Source: MGB

Land Use Tagum’s physical development has generally followed a multi-nodal pattern based on the 2011 – 2025 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The plan should be able to pro vide adequate spaces to ensure that the city will accommodate future expansion of its urban areas and absorb the space requirement for commercial, institutional and industrial development.

Source: Tagum City GIS Unit

Level IV - rainfall is more or less evenly distributed throughout the year. 2020 Projection - Rainfall: reduction of rainfall during summer and habagat seasons and a slight increase during amihan season 2020 Projection – Temperature: increase will range from 0.9 ⁰C to 1.20 ⁰C and by 2050, from 1.90 ⁰C to 2.5 ⁰C.

Source: PAGASA

Climate

Tagum City’s Climate Change Action Plan is a 12- year plan that will help the city become climate change adaptive and resilient

Goals:

• 1. building the adaptive capacities of men and women in their

communities;

• 2. increasing the resilience of vulnerable sectors and natural

ecosystems to climate change; and

• 3. optimizing mitigation opportunities towards gender-

responsive and rights-based sustainable development.

Objectives:

• 1. to ensure availability, stability, accessibility and affordability
• f safe and healthy food amidst climate change;
• 2. to ensure the resilience of water resources, manage supply

and demand, manage water quality and promote conservation;

• 3. to protect and rehabilitate critical ecosystems and restore

ecological services;

• 4. to reduce the risks of women and men to climate

change and disasters;

Objectives Con’t:

• 5. to create green and eco-jobs and sustainable consumption and

production;

• 6. to promote and expand energy efficiency and conservation

and develop sustainable and renewable energy, environmentally sustainable transport; and

• 7. to enhance the knowledge on climate change, capacity for

climate change adaptation, mitigation and disaster risk reduction

LCCAP Framework

Situational Analyses

Hazards and Disasters

• Flood
• Landslide (Rain induced)
• Sea-level Rise
• Storm Surge
• Earthquake Related Hazards
• Liquefaction
• Tsunami

Historically, flooding and landslide are frequent in the city with an estimated occurrence of once every 1-3 years and sea level rise affects the communities at a very minimal prevalent rate while the rest of the identified hazards are just potential in the locality.

Exposed Elements Population Natural Resource Based Production Areas Urban Use Areas Critical Point Facilities Lifeline Utilities

Summary of Estimated Exposed Elements by Potential Hazard

Potential Hazard Exposed Element Population Natural-based Production Areas Urban Use Areas Critical Point Facilities Lifeline Utilities Flooding 44,510 or about 17 percent of the total population 6106.12 hectares

• r 53 percent of

the total agriculture land use Ø 278.01 Has. - residential Ø 12.88 Has. - agri-industrial Ø 3.68 Has. – cemetery Ø 11 schools (both public elementary and high schools) Ø 6 barangay halls and covered courts Ø 5 Day Care Centers Ø 6 Barangay Health Stations Ø 5.21 kilometers National Roads Ø 27.67 kilometers City Roads Ø 3 Bridges Landslide 8,188 population 1,225.69 hectares Ø 46.16 Has. - residential Ø 23.85 Has. - industrial/ agri-industrial Ø 4 public elementary schools Ø 3 barangay halls and covered courts Ø 3 Day Care Centers Ø 3 Barangay Health Stations Ø 4.03 kilometers National Road Ø 1.72 kilometers City Roads Ø Electric Posts

Summary of Estimated Exposed Elements by Potential Hazard - continued

Potential Hazard Exposed Element Population Natural-based Production Areas Urban Use Areas Critical Point Facilities Lifeline Utilities

Sea Level Rise 173.13 hectares - 1 public elementary school 0.89 kilometer city road Storm Surge/ Tsunami 2,551 population 524.61 hectares 11.76 Has. - residential Ø 3 public elementary schools Ø 1 barangay hall and covered court Ø 1 Day Care Center Ø 1 Barangay Health Station Ø 8.60 kilometers city roads Ø electric posts Liquefaction 26,370 population 1203.07 hectares Ø 561.97 Has. - residential Ø 4.50 Has. - agri- industrial Ø New City Hall Ø 2 public elementary schools Ø 2 barangay halls Ø 1 covered court Ø 2 Day Care Centers Ø 2 Barangay Health Stations Ø 5.23 kilometers National Roads Ø 3.62 kilometers City Roads Ø 2 Bridges Ø 1 Pumping Station Ø Bulk Water Project Ø 3 Cellsite Towers Ø Electric posts

Exposed Element Average Degree of Impact Average Adaptive Capacity Relative Vulnerability Population 1.88 2.17 4.07 Natural Production Area 1.89 2.15 4.07 Urban Use Area 1.95 2.06 4.00 Critical Point Facilities 1.63 1.88 3.06 Lifeline Utilities 2.18 2.25 4.91 Average 4.02

Vulnerability Assessment

LCCAP: Issues, Challenges, and Priorities

ISSUES Remarks 1 No Training Needs Assessment For capacity building of personnel 2 No approved LCCAP still a draft 3 Identification of LCCAP Technical Working Group to be revisited 4 No GHG Emissions Inventory 5 Environmental Code SP Committee Level 6 Mainstreaming of CDRA in the CLUP On process of integration 7 Not updated Comprehensive Development Plan 8 No approved Shelter Plan 9 No approved Drainage Master Plan 10 No Sewerage System major environmental concerns 11 Soil Erosion along riverbanks