Citizen-led Accountability: Power, Politics and Strategies Walter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

citizen led accountability power
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Citizen-led Accountability: Power, Politics and Strategies Walter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citizen-led Accountability: Power, Politics and Strategies Walter Flores, PhD wflores@cegss.org.gt Inequities of power In addition to disproportionate ill health, avoidable death and poverty, population groups facing inequities are also


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Citizen-led Accountability: Power, Politics and Strategies

Walter Flores, PhD wflores@cegss.org.gt

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Inequities of power

  • In addition to disproportionate ill health,

avoidable death and poverty, population groups facing inequities are also affected by:

– Social exclusion – Marginalization – Rights violations – Attacks to their dignity – Lack of political representation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Holding Governments and Providers to Account

  • Using the existing legal framework (national

and international)

  • Rights literacy campaigns among population
  • Capacity building:

– To monitor public policies and services and demand accountability from authorities – Strategic advocacy to engage with the State (in addition to health sector, Parliament, Judiciary system, National Ombudsman and others)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

From passive users of services to active citizens that demand accountability: examples

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Surveying drug availability at a health care facility Asking medical doctor to sign report

  • n shortage of working hours
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Interviewing users of services: Did you receive your medicines and vaccines? Did you experience discrimination? Were you asked for illegal payments? etc.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Presenting evidence to Minister, vice-ministers and provincial authorities

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What is the approach?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Engagement with authorities at municipal, provincial and national level

AudioVisual Evidence SMS complaints Referral of cases to HHRR bodies

Monitoring resolution

  • f complaints/service

improvements

Once critical consciousness is in place (through rights literacy and campaigns), then actions:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Key actors: Right to health Community Defenders

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Categories of complaints sent by users

  • Lack of vaccines and drugs
  • Lack of equipment and supplies at facilities
  • Charging patients for services or emergency transport
  • Selling MoH drugs in private clinics/pharmacies
  • Denying care based on: ethnicity, gender, lack of

documentation

  • Lack of informed consent
  • Mistreating users
  • Insufficient information on diagnosis and treatment
  • Health facility is closed
  • Health infrastructure in bad conditions
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Collecting audiovisual evidence Public exhibits: evidence of right to health violations

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Presenting audiovisual evidence to authorities Press conference informing on collected evidence and demanding action plans to resolve problems

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Meeting with Parliamentarians

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results

Ethnographic data (2015):

– 32 municipalities (of 35) have active channels of engagement with citizens to discuss problems and implement solutions – 20 municipalities are allocating financial resources to improve services – In 15 municipalities, users perceive reduced discrimination and better responsiveness from providers – In 12 municipalities, local authorities are working together with citizens to demand changes at higher level (provincial and national) – Channels of engagement at 5 provincial level

As a challenge: many problems are not under control of local authorities and are systemic

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Adapting our strategies to power & politics

Failed strategy New strategy CEGSS staff advocating for communities: dismissed by authorities as external efforts to create conflict or social unrest Communities advocating for themselves; travel to meet up with authorities at local, provincial and national level; learn how to navigate state apparatus Emphasis on technical arguments: probed to be not sufficient to influence authorities Less emphasis on technical; making visible the consequences of failing public services upon families (life stories); use of audiovisual evidence; Evidence and information conveyed by communities Legitimacy of actors: while raising accountability issues and demands, CEGSS staff seen as non-legitimate by authorities (non-indigenous, non- elected by indigenous communities and not living in rural areas) Communities exercising their power as electorate (municipal and national authorities); communities elect representatives to engage with authorities; CEGSS trains and provides TA to elected community leaders; community mobilization (collective action) to pressure authorities to act

slide-18
SLIDE 18

More info at: www.vigilanciaysalud.com www.cegss.org.gt wflores@cegss.org.gt

Thanks!