cisco ds te lab trial
play

Cisco DS-TE Lab Trial Bill Cerveny <cerveny@internet2.edu> - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cisco DS-TE Lab Trial Bill Cerveny <cerveny@internet2.edu> John Moore <jhm@ncstate.net> Paul Schopis <pschopis@itecohio.org> and mostly as a proxy... Ben Teitelbaum <ben@internet2.edu> IETF TEWG Experience Report -


  1. Cisco DS-TE Lab Trial Bill Cerveny <cerveny@internet2.edu> John Moore <jhm@ncstate.net> Paul Schopis <pschopis@itecohio.org> and mostly as a proxy... Ben Teitelbaum <ben@internet2.edu> IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  2. Background • Abilene backbone trying to implement a QBone Premium Service domain • Service goal : EF edge-to-edge "virtual trunk" • Cisco suggested that DS-TE might be helpful tool to complement MDRR, CAR, QPPB,... • Learned enough to pique our interest • Cisco and Internet2 agree to perform EFT • Test suite developed and executed in lab by Internet2 ITECs IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  3. •47 connectors Abilene Topology •183 participants January, 2001 •34 connections to 20 peer networks IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  4. Early Hopes for DS-TE • Before we were fully briefed, we thought DS-TE might give us... – Resource accounting / admissions control – Up-calls on constraint failure – Delay constraints too – "Trunk-style" classification and policing – Mechanism to protect PQ resources from non- policed connectors • After briefing, understood that DS-TE only addressed first item above IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  5. Implementation vs. Drafts • Support for two Class-Types (CT0, CT1) • CT1 bounded by "Max Reservable CT1" and by "Max Reservable Aggregate" • CT0 bounded by "Max Reservable Aggregate" only • Class-Types called "bandwidth pools" • Pre-standard IGP extensions ( e.g. use of Cisco-proprietary TLV in OSPF) IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  6. Abilene Premium Service Example Guaranteed Bandwidth service 10 Mbps OSU-->UNC Real-Time OSU UNC Campus 2 BE (Class-Type 0) Tunnel Campus3 (BE up to 100% on every link) EF (Class-Type 1) Tunnel (EF below 10% on every link)

  7. Test Network Smartbits 2000 AS 1000 AS 4000 AS 2000 10.130.x.y/24 10.160.x.y/24 10.140.x.y/24 3.2 7200-VXR-A (ARz) Semtec (GSR A) FE Nitro (GSR C) 3.1 OC-3 3.1 3.2 LB = 255.3 LB = 255.2 P4/2 7505-A (ARx) L4 172.16 P1/3 172.16 P3/3 49.1 49.2 OC-12 2.1 2.2 1.2 1.1 P5/3 P4/3 OC-3 OC-3 P3/2 P3/1 P1/2 P1/1 1.1 1.2 2.2 4.1 6.1 7505-B (ARy) 1.1 FE FE L5 L3 1.2 1.2 OC-12 OC-12 Gunpowder (GSR B) AS 3000 Smartbits 2000 Smartbits 2000 OC-12 LB = 255.1 OC-12 10.150.x.y/24 2.1 1.1 P3/0 P3/1 Sink Domains Source Domain 4.2 6.2 Smartbits 6000 Smartbits 6000 Abilene Pseudo-Core

  8. Basic MPLS TE Verification • Verification of Basic/Aggregate MPLS TE – Global Pool (Class-Type 0) bandwidth constraint mechanism – Route selection based on administrative weight – Re-routing on link failure – Verification of correct tunnel routing via CLI and by passing traffic IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  9. Test Network Smartbits 2000 AS 1000 AS 4000 AS 2000 10.130.x.y/24 10.160.x.y/24 10.140.x.y/24 3.2 7200-VXR-A (ARz) Semtec (GSR A) FE Nitro (GSR C) 3.1 OC-3 3.1 3.2 LB = 255.3 LB = 255.2 P4/2 7505-A (ARx) L4 172.16 P1/3 172.16 P3/3 49.1 49.2 OC-12 2.1 2.2 1.2 1.1 P5/3 P4/3 OC-3 OC-3 P3/2 P3/1 P1/2 P1/1 1.1 1.2 2.2 4.1 6.1 7505-B (ARy) 1.1 FE FE L5 L3 1.2 1.2 OC-12 OC-12 Gunpowder (GSR B) AS 3000 Smartbits 2000 Smartbits 2000 OC-12 LB = 255.1 OC-12 10.150.x.y/24 2.1 1.1 P3/0 P3/1 Sink Domains Source Domain 4.2 6.2 Smartbits 6000 Smartbits 6000 Abilene Pseudo-Core

  10. DS-TE Lab Test Results 1/2 • DS-TE Extensions – Verified sub-pool route selection based on bandwidth availability: • e.g. Best Effort can get up to 100% of link capacity while EF tunnels were limited to the configured sub- pool budget – Achieves separate CAC and separate Route Computation for sub-pool tunnels – Verification of correct sub-pool (Class-Type 1) tunnel routing and forwarding IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  11. DS-TE Lab Test Results 2/2 • DS-TE Extensions (continued) – Verified sub-pool preemption mechanism (preemption orthogonal to b/w pool) – Successfully added MDRR PQ, CAR, and QPPB to approximate complete solution IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

  12. Conclusions • DS-TE worked as advertised • Potentially useful tool in kit (if TE needed for non-Premium traffic) • Complete test report to be made public "real soon now"™ IETF TEWG Experience Report - March 22, 2001

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend