Christine Pecci, MD University of California, San Francisco Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

christine pecci md university of california san francisco
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Christine Pecci, MD University of California, San Francisco Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Christine Pecci, MD University of California, San Francisco Annual Review in Family Medicine December 5-6, 2016 A family physicians approach The Menu Genetic disorders and loss Two-thirds of unrecognized SAb Half of recognized 1 st


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Christine Pecci, MD University of California, San Francisco Annual Review in Family Medicine December 5-6, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A family physician’s approach

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Menu

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Genetic disorders and loss

 Two-thirds of unrecognized SAb  Half of recognized 1st trimester losses  5% stillbirths

ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 162, May 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Chromosomal Abnormalities

50% 15% 5% 12% 18%

0.4 % of births

Trisomy 21 Trisomy 18 Trisomy 13 Sex Chromosomes Other Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Expert Series ; Dashe July 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Apples, oranges and other things

 Chromosome numbers

 extra or missing chromosome  extra set of chromosome (triploidy)

 Chromosome structure

 deletion, duplication, translocation

 Single gene mutations  Neural tube defects  Major fetal anomalies (some associated with

aneuploidy)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What kind of testing does your patient want, if any?

Screening? Diagnosis?

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Listen to your patient

“Counseling for aneuploidy

screening has become a conversation”

Dashe, Jodi MD Aneuploidy Screening in Pregnancy Obstetrics and Gynecology July 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Risk based on age

1979 Amniocentesis should be

  • ffered to >35
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Dashe, Jodi MD Obstet Gyn 2016

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Evolution of Screening

1977

  • MSAFP

1987

  • Triple

Screen 1992

  • NT

1996

  • Quad

Screen 2003

  • First

trimester Screening

2007 ACOG statement Screening and diagnostic tests should be offered to all women 2011 Introduction of cf DNA

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What kind of testing does your patient want, if any? Diagnostic CVS Amnio Screening None

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Diagnostic Procedures

Procedure Chorionic Villus Sampling Amniocentesis Gestational Age 10-13 weeks 15-20 weeks or later Turnaround time 5-7 day turnaround 7-10 day turnaround Procedure loss rate 0.22% 0.1%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Listen to your patient

“Counseling for aneuploidy

screening has become a conversation”

Dashe, Jodi MD Aneuploidy Screening in Pregnancy Obstetrics and Gynecology July 2016

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What kind of testing does your patient want, if any? Diagnostic Screening None

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What kind of testing does your patient want, if any? Diagnostic Screening The Menu! None

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Menu

1st trimester 2nd trimester Combined Ultrasound Cell-free DNA

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Options for screening

First Trimester Second Trimester hcg + PAPP-A hcg + AFP + estradiol + inhibin 11-14 wks 15-22 wks Can be combined w NT Anatomy scan AFP in 2nd trimester for NTD Includes AFP

  • 1st trimester screening gives the patient early results
  • 2nd trimester screening good for late entry to care
  • DON’T do both independently
  • CAN do combined (7 serum markers + NT)
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Combined 1st and 2nd trimester screening

 Sequential testing

Stepwise

 high risk offered diagnostic testing after 1st trimester  Others get results after second trimester

Contingent

 highest risk offered diagnostic testing after 1st tri  lowest risk reassured- no further testing  Others get results after 2nd trimester

 Integrated testing

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Cell-free DNA

 Circulating DNA fragments placental in origin from

apoptotic troploblasts

 Can be done anytime after 9-10 wks gestation  Available in 7-10 days  Best for trisomy 21 and 18 but also screens for trisomy

13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies

 Gender  Can be used as primary or secondary screening

AJOG June 2016 SMFM Consult Series

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Dashe, Jodi MD Obstet Gyn 2016

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Limitations of cfDNA

 4-8% indeterminate

 occurs 10% in women >250 lbs

 Not for multiple gestation  Does not detect some genetics abnormalities picked

up by traditional testing

 Placenta and fetus do not always have the same

chromosomal complement

 Placental mosaicism can occur

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Discussing results

 A “positive” or a “negative” screen needs to be

interpreted with your patient

 Reflects the lab’s chosen threshold

 Positive predictive value

 likelihood that a patient with a positive screening result

has an affected fetus.

 Negative predictive value

 likelihood of a patient with a negative screening test

who does not have the disease

 Look at the exact risk and interpret this individually

according to your patient’s threshold (values)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Disease Present Disease Absent Screen Positive

True positive False positive

Screen Negative

False negative True Negative

PPV = TP/TP+FP NNV=FN/FN+TN

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

How does US fit into screening?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Ultrasound

 Gestational Age  Number of fetuses  Major and minor findings  90% of babies born with congenital anomalies are

born to women with no risk factors

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Major Structural Anomalies

 CV, neuro, GI, GU  25-30% of 2nd trimester fetuses with T21 have a major

anomaly that can be detected

 Trisomy 13 and 18- majority have major  If major anomaly seen, offer diagnostic test

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Minor “Soft” US markers

 Nuchal thicknesss  Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone  Echogenic intracardiac focus  Echogenic bowel  Pyelectasis  Shorted femur or humerus  Soft markers present in at least 10% of normal fetuses

and can be transient

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Screening desired Early entry 11-14 weeks Serum screening +/- NT (+/- combined) Late entry 15-22 weeks Ultrasound Quad screen cfDNA

slide-34
SLIDE 34

What is her risk + what are her values? Is diagnostic testing indicated? Offer serum and US screening Low risk (traditional); High risk (cfDNA) Discuss results and decide on whether to pursue diagnostic testing

Don’t make management decisions without diagnostic test

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Resources

 Aneuploidy Screening in Pregnancy

 Jodi S. Dashe. MD  OB GYN volume 128 (1); July 2016 181-194

 Seminars in Perinatology 2016

 Screening for fetal aneuploidy  Ultrasound screening

 ACOG Practice Bulletins May 2016

 Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders  Screening for fetal aneuploidy

 https://www.perinatalquality.org/Vendors/NSGC/NIPT/

slide-36
SLIDE 36