Choosing Representation: I i i d P f Institutions and Powers for Decentralized Natural Resource Decentralized Natural Resource Management g
Jesse C Ribot Jesse C. Ribot Institutions and Governance Program World Resources Institute
Choosing Representation: I Institutions and Powers for i i d P - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Choosing Representation: I Institutions and Powers for i i d P f Decentralized Natural Resource Decentralized Natural Resource Management g Jesse C Ribot Jesse C. Ribot Institutions and Governance Program World Resources Institute
Jesse C Ribot Jesse C. Ribot Institutions and Governance Program World Resources Institute
Today’s Talk
Program: Decentralization and Environment
Comparative Research Program
Analytic Framework: Actors, Powers and
Accountability Research Framework Fi di D t li ti i P ti
Findings: Decentralization in Practice
What is happening in the name of decentralization? Why? Why? Focus on Implementation rather than Outcomes
Recommendations: Options and Opportunities
Defining Decentralization Defining Decentralization =
A transfer of powers from central A transfer of powers from central
government to lower levels IN a political administrative territorial hierarchy administrative territorial hierarchy.
Central Government
Ministries:
Donors
Defining Decentralization
Ministries:
Big NGOs Power Transfers
Decentralization
Non-market Privatization
Contracts & Grants
Individual or Democratic Local Government Administrative Local Authority Customary Authority NGO PVO CBO Corporation Participation Government 3rd Sector Government
Decentralization Not Decentralization
Participation
Decentralization Not Decentralization
Central Government
Ministries:
D
Donors Big NGOs
Accountability
? Co-Management Co-Management Democratic Local Government Administrative Local Authority Customary Authority NGO PVO CBO ? Participation Individual or Corporation ?
Local Populations
? ? Strong Weak
Committees
Questionable
p
Why Decentralize? Theoretical Mechanisms of Theoretical Mechanisms of Decentralization Benefit
Advertised Benefits
Enfranchisement, Equity, Efficiency, Development, Better Resource
Management, Better service delivery, Benefit retention…. Mechanisms Local Authorities are believed to:
Better match services to needs and aspirations (public choice theory) Reduce transaction costs (new institutional eco.) by proximity allowing: Reduce transaction costs (new institutional eco.) by proximity allowing:
Mobilizing local knowledge and skills for collective/public good Mobilizing local labor for collective projects Improved coordination among local programs
B l f ti d iti t i d i i ki
Balance of negative and positive outcomes in decision making
(economic theory of “internalizing externalities”) ALL ARGUMENTS IMPLY INCLUSIVE & INTEGRATIVE ALL ARGUMENTS IMPLY INCLUSIVE & INTEGRATIVE MECHANISM: I.e. Representation = Downwardly Accountable INSTITUTIONS *With* POWERS
Representation Policy Model
Representation = When authorities act in Representation
When authorities act in the best interest of the public [Pitkin; Manin, Przworski and Stokes] Przworski and Stokes] R t ti i th ti i di t
Representation is the active ingredient
making decentralized institutions effective [S k ] [Smoke]
REPRESENTATION
= Responsiveness &/or Accountability
Responsiveness Accountability
p y
Policies Outcomes M d t Preferences Mandates Sanctions Signals
Elements of Representation
Responsiveness = f(Powers/Capabilities Responsiveness f(Powers/Capabilities
[internal powers])
Accountability = f(Sanctions or
A t bilit Accountability mechanisms)
Actors Powers & Actors, Powers & Accountability Framework
Positive Outcomes are Expected from:
p
Local Actors (individuals or Institutions)
cto s ( d dua s o st tut o s)
With Powers (executive legislative and judicial: With Powers (executive, legislative and judicial:
discretion+capabilities to exercise them)
With Accountability to the Local Population
Choice of Institutions in Practice P Ch i i P ti Power Choices in Practice
Choice of Institutions Resisting Power Transfers Resisting Power Transfers
Getting the Institutions Right? g g
Decentralization theory is an IF-THEN proposition
y [out of new institutionalism]
If we have the right institutions with the right powers Then we get all these positive outcomes
But we’re not getting to ‘IF’ in most cases
New institutionalism is being stomped out by a larger set of political-economic forces [Sort of like “Bambi Meets Godzilla”]
New Institutionalism Meets Political Economy
CONCLUSIONS
What do we need to do?
Subsidiarity Principles Principles of Institutional Principles of Institutional Choice
Central Government
Ministries:
Ideal Accountability
A t bilit Power Transfer Accountability
Democratic Local Government Administrative Local Authority Individual or Corporation Customary NGO/ PVO CBO Authority CBO Committees
L l P l ti Local Populations