Choice of stent for AMI patients The University of Tokyo Hospital - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

choice of stent for ami patients
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Choice of stent for AMI patients The University of Tokyo Hospital - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Choice of stent for AMI patients The University of Tokyo Hospital Jiro Ando, MD Which Stent we can use in AMI BMS or DES ? Drug-Eluting Stents The Concept Stent design and delivery system Drug- Pharmacologic Drug carrier Eluting vehicle


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Choice of stent for AMI patients

The University of Tokyo Hospital Jiro Ando, MD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Which Stent we can use in AMI

slide-3
SLIDE 3

BMS or DES ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Concept

Stent design and delivery system Pharmacologic agent

Drug- Eluting Stent

Drug-Eluting Stents

Drug carrier vehicle

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent

Bx VELOCITYTMStent

  • Balloon expandable stainless

steel stent

  • Blend of components:

2 polymers (PEVA + PBMA) and sirolimus in a fixed ratio

  • Thin uniform coating

(~ 10um thick)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 365 730 1095 1460 1825

Bare Metal Stent (n=870) CYPHER Stent (n=878) p<0.0001 9.6% (80) 23.9% (205) Days

Number at risk

BMS CYPHER 870 877 680 827 659 797 632 766 603 732 518 645

RAVEL, SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS, C-SIRIUS

Kirtane A. TCT 2007. Adapted from Stone GW et al. NEJM 2007;356:998–1008

CYPHER vs. BMS: TLR

Pooled Analyses of 4 RCTs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 365 730 1095 1460 1825

Bare Metal Stent (n=870) CYPHER Stent (n=878) p=0.99 2.1% (17) 2.0% (17) Days

Number at risk

BMS CYPHER 870 878 848 858 834 835 813 809 784 783 683 694

RAVEL, SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS, C-SIRIUS

Pooled Analyses of 4 RCTs

CYPHER vs. BMS: ARC def/prob ST*

* ARC def/prob ST counts all ST

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vascular responses in porcine

models

slide-9
SLIDE 9

BMS or DES ?

  • BMS Stented region is good Covered with

neointima , and we can reduce DAPT in early term .

  • First generation DES stented region isn’t

covered well with neointima , and we continue DAPT in long term.

  • But BMS result of restenosis rate is higher

than DES.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How about Second generarion DES in ACS and DAPT ?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Everolimus-eluting stent vs. Bare-metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

EXAMINATION randomized trial

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2-year results of the EXAMINATION randomized trial

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2-year results of the EXAMINATION randomized trial

― Stent Thrombosis ―

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The COMFORTABLE AMI Randomized Trial

To compare stents eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer with bare-metal stents in primary PCI.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2-year results of the Conformatble AMI

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Ultimaster by comparing with Xience

CENTURY II Trial

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CENTURY II Trial

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CENTURY II – High risk ACS

Total population

n=1119

BP-SES

n= 126 patients/ 166 lesions

PP-EES

n= 138 patients 205 lesions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

n=264 BP-SES n=562 PP-EES n=557 Randomization 1:1

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Clinical outcomes at 12 months

0.0159 0.0159 0.0317 0.0317 0.0476 0.0476 0.0145 0.0362 0.0362 0.0217 0.0435 0.0507 0.0725 Cardiac death MI Target vessel MI CD TLR CD TVR TLF TVF 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% Ultimaster Xience

P=NS P=NS P=NS P=NS P=NS P=NS P=NS

TVF: composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and clinically driven TVR TLF = composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and clinically driven TLR

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions

  • 2nd generation DES is good result for ACS ,and

also the risk of thrombotic occulusion is low.

  • Many of New generation DES will be

released , we should check the results of those study and choice good DES for patient.