Childrens Services Every Child Matters By Meena Kishinani Head of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

children s services
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Childrens Services Every Child Matters By Meena Kishinani Head of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Childrens Services Every Child Matters By Meena Kishinani Head of Childrens Policy and Trust Commissioning ROGER LUXTON Corporate Director of Childrens Services TOLIS VOUYIOUKAS JANE HARGREAVES CHRISTINE PRYOR MEENA KISHINANI


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Children’s Services

Every Child Matters By Meena Kishinani Head of Children’s Policy and Trust Commissioning

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ROGER LUXTON Corporate Director

  • f Children’s Services

TOLIS VOUYIOUKAS Divisional Director Safeguarding & Rights JANE HARGREAVES Head of Quality & School Improvement CHRISTINE PRYOR Head of Shared Services & Engagement ANNA HARSKAMP Head of Pupil & Family Support MEENA KISHINANI Head of Children’s Policy & Trust Commissioning

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Universal Services

  • Development of children centres
  • Early Years and Child Care provision
  • Extended schools
  • Inspection and Advisory Service
  • Asset management
  • Admissions
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Targeted Services

  • Access and Attendance
  • Educational Psychology
  • Youth Service
  • Family and Targeted Support
  • Special Educational Needs
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Specialist Services

  • Care Management and Assessment
  • Looked After Children
  • Child Protection
  • Preventive Strategy
  • Disabled Children
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Support Services

  • Performance Management
  • Pupil and Student Services
  • Policy and Planning
  • School Support
  • Commissioning and Contracting
  • Development of the Children’s Trust
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Bottom quartile BV performance indicators 2005/06 (2006/07 year to date figure as at end of quarter 1)

Actual 2005/06 Quartile/ banding 2005/6* 06/07 year to date Quartile/ banding 2006/07* BV43a Percentage of statements of special educational need issued by the authority in a financial year and prepared within 18 weeks: excluding 'exceptions' under the Education (SEN) Regulations 2001 91.7%

  • 96.67%
  • BV46

Percentage of half days missed due to total absence in primary schools maintained by the local education authority 6.56%

  • 6.81%
  • BV50 (PAF

CF/A2) Percentage of young people leaving care aged 16 or

  • ver with at least one GCSE at grade A*-G or a GNVQ

45.45%

  • 47.10%
  • BV161

(PAF CF/A4) Percentage of young people who were looked after on the 1 April of the 17th year (aged 16), who were engaged in EET at the age of 19 to the percentage of young people in the population who were engaged in EET at the age of 19 0.54

  • 0.82
  • BV197

Percentage change in number of conceptions amongst 15-17 year old female population compared with baseline year of 1998 (54.6%) 31.50%

  • n/a

n/a BV181b Percentage of 14-year old pupils in schools maintained by the local education authority achieving Level 5 or above in the Key Stage 3 test in Mathematics 65.85%

  • 69.7
  • BV194a

The percentage of 11 year old pupils achieving Level 5 in Key Stage 2 English 19.5%

  • 23.37%
  • BV194b

The percentage of 11 year old pupils achieving Level 5 in Key Stage 2 Maths 22.9%

  • 25.59%
  • PI Ref.

Description Barking and Dagenham

slide-8
SLIDE 8

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Average Score - Bands

2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06

Year

Children's Services, Safeguarding & Rights Performance Improvement - Average PAF Indicator Score

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Examples of Children’s Social Care PIs

  • Children looked after who move 3 or more

times in one year

  • Children leaving care achieving 1+ GCSE
  • Review of Child Protection cases
  • Health of Looked After Children
  • Children adopted
  • Assessments completed on time
slide-10
SLIDE 10

% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-C grades at GCSE in Barking & Dagenham 1992-2006 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Borough average 15.8% 19.5% 27.6% 27.6% 27.1% 30.9% 31.3% 34.0% 38.3% 38.2% 42.4% 49.3% 46.3% 50.8% 55.8% England average 34.9% 41.1% 43.3% 43.5% 44.5% 45.1% 46.3% 47.9% 49.2% 50.0% 51.6% 52.9% 53.7% 57.1% 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

slide-11
SLIDE 11

% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-G grades at GCSE in Barking & Dagenham 1992-2006 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% Borough average 78.8% 81.6% 79.4% 79.7% 84.6% 84.5% 88.1% 91.6% 90.6% 88.8% 90.5% 88.0% 90.8% 90.3% England average 84.3% 85.6% 85.7% 86.1% 86.4% 87.5% 88.5% 88.9% 88.9% 88.9% 88.8% 88.8% 90.2% 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2005/6 Annual Performance Assessment

Key strengths:

  • Integrated Children’s Service
  • Workforce Development
  • Knowledge of our strengths & weaknesses
  • Targeting of resources
  • Good Partnership working
  • Strong commitment to children and young

people across the Council

slide-13
SLIDE 13

APA – Areas for Improvement

  • Reduce teenage conceptions
  • Improve children’s mental health services
  • Improve services to disabled children
  • Local placements for looked after children
  • Improving attendance at school
  • Reduce the number of NEETs
  • Improve standards of attainment in school

sixth forms

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Complaints

  • Learning from complaints
  • Governed by legislation
  • Children’s Act 1989
  • DfES Complaints Process
  • Corporate Complaints Procedure
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Complaints Statistics

  • 83 Stage one complaints received

– 20 were either upheld or partly upheld – 63 not upheld

  • 2 Stage two complaints
  • 0 Stage three complaints
  • 55 compliments
  • Stage 1 complaints resolved 98%
  • Increase in number of children complaining
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Engagement

  • Listening to the voice of children
  • Appointment of Group Manager

Engagement

  • Need to ensure the voice of children and

their parents are evident in all our decision making

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Regulation

JAR – Joint Area Review March 2007

  • Children’s Services are regulated by:
  • CSCI (Commission of Social Care

Inspection)

  • OFSTED (Office for Standards in

Education)

  • Audit Commission