Chief Consultant for Clinical Pharmacy Services and Healthcare - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

chief consultant for clinical pharmacy services and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Chief Consultant for Clinical Pharmacy Services and Healthcare - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Anthony P. Morreale, Pharm.D., MBA, BCPS, Assistant Chief Consultant for Clinical Pharmacy Services and Healthcare Delivery Services Research of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 1 12:03 12:08pm Introductions 12:08 12:20pm


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Anthony P. Morreale, Pharm.D., MBA, BCPS, Assistant Chief Consultant for Clinical Pharmacy Services and Healthcare Delivery Services Research of the Department

  • f Veterans Affairs.

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 12:03 – 12:08pm – Introductions  12:08 – 12:20pm – Overview of PCPCC’s

Medication Management Guide

 12:20 – 1:05pm - Integration of Clinical

Pharmacists into the Medical Home: Measuring Clinical Impact

 1:05 – 1:25pm – Audience Q&A  1:25 – 1:30pm – Closing Remarks

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Introduction by:

Te Terry rry Mc McInn nnis is, MD, MPH, FACOEM, President and Founder of Blue Thorn Inc.

 Guest Speaker:

Anthony ny P. Morre real ale, Pharm.D., MBA, BCPS, Assistant Chief Consultant for Clinical Pharmacy Services and Healthcare Delivery Services Research of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

 Moderator:

Edwin win Webb, PharmD, MPH, Associate Executive Director & Director of Government and Professional Affairs, American College of Clinical Pharmacy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 The PCPCC Guide Defines

comprehensive medication management in the patient centered medical home

 AHRQ Innovation Center-

Quality Toolkit

 2nd Revision with Appendix A-

“Guidelines for Practice and Guidelines for Documentation

PCPCC Resource Guide- Integrating Comprehensive Medication Management to Optimize Patient Outcomes http://www.pcpcc.org/guide/patient-health-through-medication-management

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Describe the VA version of the Medical Home Model called Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) and share data on improvements in care that have been demonstrated to date Discuss the integration of the Clinical Pharmacist in the PACT focusing on the top of the license collaborative practice in Chronic Disease & Medication Management. Describe data systems that have been created to document the interventions and outcomes associated with clinical pharmacist care. Discuss the outcomes being demonstrated by Clinical Pharmacists and the implications to cost benefit and cost effectiveness through validated modeling techniques.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Clinical Indicator

VA Average Percent (1) HEDIS 2011 (2) 2012 (6) 2011

(6)

2010 (6) Commercial

(7)

Medicare

(7)

Medicaid

(7)

Breast Cancer Screening

87 85 87 71 69 50

Cervical Cancer Screening

93 93 94 77 n/a 67

Cholesterol Management for Patients with Cardiovascular :LDL-C Control (<100 mg/dL)

70 71 69 59 57 42

Cholesterol Management for Patients with Cardiovascular Conditions: LDL-C Screening

96 96 96 88 89 82

Colorectal Cancer Screening

82 82 82 62 60 n/a

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - Blood Pressure Control (<140/90)

80 81 82 66 63 61

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - Eye Exams

90 90 91 57 66 53

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - HbA1c Testing

98 99 90 91 83

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - LDL-C Controlled (LDL-C<100 mg/dL)

68 69 70 48 53 35

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - LDL-C Screening

97 97 97 85 88 75

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - Medical Attention for Nephropathy

95 95 96 84 90 78

Comprehensive Diabetes Care - Poor HbA1c Control (8)

19 17 15 28 27 43

Controlling High Blood Pressure - Total

77 78 79 65 64 57

Medical Assistance with Smoking Cessation - Advising Smokers To Quit 3

96 97 97 77 n/a 76

Medical Assistance with Smoking Cessation - Discussing Medications 3

94 94 94 53 n/a 44

Medical Assistance with Smoking Cessation - Discussing Strategies 3

96 97 97 48 n/a 40

Flu Shots for Adults (50-64) 3

65 65 71 53 na n/a

Flu Shots for Adults (65 and older) 3, 4, 5

76 79 82 n/a 69 n/a

Immunizations: Pneumococcal 3,4, 5

93 94 95 n/a 69 n/a

SOURCE: Office of Analytics and Business Intelligence Updated 11/28/2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Patient Centered and Team Based Team Members work at top of their license, training and competency Same Day Access Focus on Preventive Care Population management of High Risk Patients Evidence Based Lower Cost through reductions in ER visits and hospitalizations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Other Team Members Teamlet: assigned to 1

panel (±1200 patients)

  • Provider: 1 FTE
  • RN Care Mgr: 1 FTE
  • Clinical Associate

(LPN, MA, or Health Tech): 1 FTE

  • Clerk: 1 FTE

Patient

Caregiver

Other Team Members Clinical Pharmacy Specialist: ± 3 panels Clinical Pharmacy anticoagulation: ± 5 panels

Social Work: ± 2 panels Nutrition: ± 5 panels Case Managers Trainees Integrated Behavioral Health Psychologist ± 3 panels Social Worker ± 5 panels Care Manager ± 5 panels Psychiatrist ± 10 panels For each parent facility Health Promotion Disease Prevention Program Manager:1 FTE Health Behavior Coordinator: 1 FTE My HealtheVet Coordinator: 1 FTE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Patient ient provid ider encou

  • unte

nters have ve increased d 12 perce cent nt Encounters unters with Veterans rans has increased reased 50 perce cent nt mostly ly due to telehe heal alth, th, teleph phone

  • ne and group

p enco counters. unters. 65 perce cent t of Veterans rans request uestin ing g a sa same day primar ary y care appointment ntment with h their ir personal nal provid ider are accommodate

  • mmodated

78 percen cent t of Veterans erans are able to se see their r own primary ry care provider der for an appoin intment tment on the date they y desire re Veteran ran acce cess to primary ary care during ng extend tended d hours (non- busines ness hours) ) has increased ased 75 perce cent t since Januar uary y 2013. 13. Source: VA Press Release April 30, 2014

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Over r 72 perce cent t of all Veteran terans discharge harged d from VA a are contacte tacted within in two days. . Mental tal healt lth se servi vice ces s offered ered in VA A primary ry care e clinics ics increased d 18 perce cent nt. . 33 perce cent t decrease in primary ry care patient ients urge gent t care visits. ts. 12 perce cent t decrease and acute te hospit ital al admissio ions ns. Veterans rans strongl ngly y endor

  • rse VA he

heal alth th care, , with h 91 perce cent nt

  • fferin

ing g positive ive assessments ments of inpatient ient care and 92 percent nt for outpat atient ient care. Source: VA Press Release April 30, 2014

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Under der Feder deral al law 38 8 USC C 740 402(b), 2(b), the Depart artmen ment of Veter teran ans s Aff ffairs irs (VA) is auth thori rized zed to to: establ ablish ish profes fessio ional nal practice ctice elements ements such ch as licensu ensure e requiremen uirements, s, qualificati lifications,

  • ns, and sco

copes pes of practice ctice for the employmen ployment of VA pharmac rmacist sts VHA Direct ectiv ive e 200 009-014: 014: grant nted ed Pharma armacist cist medicati ication

  • n

prescribi scribing ng & monitori nitoring ng privilege leges s based ed on a locall ally- defined fined scope

  • pe of

f practice ctice Compreh mprehensiv ensive e medic icatio ation managemen nagement is performed formed autonomous tonomously ly but collabor llaborati tivel ely y by the CPS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

P a t i e n t C o m p l e x i t y , H e a l t h S t a t u s , N e e d s Patient ent Al Aligne ned Care e Team Speci cialt lty y Care

Clinical Pharmacy Specialist st Coordination tion of Care

Manag agemen ment of C Care Disease/Cohort Management

Clinical Pharmacy Model Vision: Bridging the Gap Between Primary Care and Specialty Care

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Role PACT CPS

Acc ccess ss

Improve PC access Improve e Speci cial alty ty access Med reconc

  • ncili

iliati ation Walk-in n prescr cript iptio ion n renewa newal clinic

Practi tice e Redesig design

Cost avoidance ce Increased sed safety ty Provi vider der educati tion

  • n

Innova vative tive avenues es for management t

Care Manag agement ment & Coordina nati tion

  • n

Disea ease se state te managemen ent Clinical perfor formance e measure re improvem vement ent Dual Care Antico coagu gulatio tion Clinic High risk k patient t managemen ent t

Patient Centeredness: Mindset and Tools Improvement: Systems Redesign Resources: Technology, Staff, Space, Community

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Of These e 2,935

Re Residency dency = 64 64% BPS Certification ification = 38 38% Ot Other r Certification ification = 15 15% Re Reside denc ncy &/ &/or r Certification ification = 76 76%

Pharmac rmacis ists ts wit ith Sc Scope of Practice ice exceeds eds 2, 2,93 935 5 (42 42%) VH VHA has approxi

  • xima

matel tely y 7,050 Pharma macists cists

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Data ta Sour urce: e: CPP PPO Scop

  • pe of Practi

tice ce Share rePo Point nt Data tabase e

46% 46%

1,945 945 2,087 087 2,284 284 2,473 473 2,654 654 2,716 716 2,853 853 2,965 965 1,70 1,700 1,90 1,900 2,10 2,100 2,30 2,300 2,50 2,500 2,70 2,700 2,90 2,900 3,10 3,100

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1237 1237 876 876 478 478 406 406 405 405 621 621 288 288 329 329 279 279 246 246 172 172 167 167 210 210 122 122 209 209 195 195 157 157 100 100 58 58 21 21 68 68 70 70

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Data Source: CPPO Scope of Practice SharePoint Database

17 175 37 375 575 77 775 97 975 1,17 1,175 1,37 1,375

Jul ul-11 11 Sep Sep-11

  • 11

Nov

  • v-11
  • 11

Jan-12

  • 12

Ma Mar- r-12 12 Ma May-1 y-12 Jul ul-12 12 Sep Sep-12

  • 12

Nov

  • v-12
  • 12

Jan-13

  • 13

Mar- Mar-13 13 May May-1

  • 13

Jul ul-13 13 Sep Sep-13

  • 13

Nov

  • v-13
  • 13

Jan-14

  • 14

Mar- Mar-14 14

An Antic ticoag

  • ag

Li Lipids pids Di Diabe betes tes Hy Hyper perten tension sion Gl Glob

  • bal
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

548 548 417 417 388 388 1611 1611 20 200 40 400 60 600 80 800 10 1000 00 12 1200 00 14 1400 00 16 1600 00 <25 25% % (<10 10 hrs/ hrs/wk wk) 25 25-49%

  • 49% (10-19

0-19 hrs/ hrs/wk wk) 50 50-74%

  • 74% (20-29

0-29 hrs/ hrs/wk wk) 75 75-100

  • 100%

% (30 30-40

  • 40 hrs/

hrs/wk wk)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Define differences between a Clinical Pharmacist and Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Developed field guidance on Scope of Practice (SOP Outline routine pharmacist activities that do and do not need a SOP Revise VHA Directive 2008-043 Scope of Practice for clarity Assured impact of SOP are adequately reflected in pharmacist qualification standards

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Required for all pharmacist with a scope

  • f practice

Prospectively designed metrics which define performance developed locally and reviewed at least annually Used to demonstrate

  • ngoing competencies

and outcomes Important for identifying areas of strength and weakness

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pharmac macy Chroni nic c Disease ase Manag agement ment (Phase ase I 2010-2011) 2011)

  • Pain

in Mana nage gement ent

  • Diabetes

etes

  • Hepati

titi tis C

  • Hyperli

erlipid idem emia ia

  • Hyperten

pertensi sion

  • Osteop

teoporo

  • rosi

sis

  • Tobacco

co Depen enden ence ce

Specia ecialt lty y Care e focu cused sed (Phase ase II 201 012-2013) 2013)

  • Cardiol
  • logy
  • gy – Heart

Failure

  • Menta

tal Health th

  • Hemato

tology

  • gy/O

/Oncolog colog y

  • Respirato

tory ry

  • Nephrol

rology

  • gy
  • Women’s Health

All programs rams are recorded

  • rded and can be

take ken by t traine nees and new employee

  • yees

to assure re consiste istency ncy in manag agin ing g patients nts the “VA way”.

.

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Paramet ameter er FY11 11 FY12 12 FY13 13 % Chan hange ge # Pharmacists with SOP 2,132 2,616 2,870 35% % Pharmacist FTE Under SOP Data not available 32% 35% 9% Encounters/FTE 403 615 629 56% Total 160 Encounters 2,454,419 3,677,269 4,067,110 66%

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Single Site - utility for scalability is limited Small numbers

  • f patients

which may not allow for strong statistical analysis Descriptive in nature and lack control groups Multiple centers analysis suffer from methodological issues

A b A better tter way ay is needed! eded!

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Development of cost

benefit model underway based on Lee et.al. which provided base for cost avoidance of interventions

  • Modeling and validation is

still a work in progress in 2014.

  • Aldridge et.al. showed

that 7% of interventions made in ED had potential to cause harm.

Type of Intervention

Avg Cost Avoidance per intervention (Lee et. al) Possible Cost Avoidance assoc with FY12 CPS Interventions Disease State Medication Interventions

$363. 3.73 73 $6,533,318 ,533,318

  • Adj. Dose or Frequency

$363.73 $616, 6,522 522

Drug Interaction

$398. 8.97 97 $83,384 3,384

Drug Not Indicated

$91.88 1.88 $30,923 0,923

Duplicate Therapy

$169. 9.91 91 $22,937 2,937

New Tx for Existing Diagnosis

$1,861.46 ,861.46 $4,275,773 ,275,773

Manage ADE

$674. 4.61 61 $1,204,853 ,204,853

Manage Allergy

$289. 9.48 48 $43,132 3,132

Total CPS Cost Avoidance (based on Lee et.al.) $12,810, 0,846 846

Lee et.al. AJHP 2002;59:2070-2077 Aldridge et al AJHP 2010

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

CPS Documentation of Pharmacotherapy Interventions

Anticoagulation Intervention Compliance/Adherence Addressed Contraindication to Medication Drug Interaction Addressed Drug Not Indicated Duplication Of Therapy Medication Interventions Med Reconciliation Performed Non-formulary Review/Conversion Prevent /Manage Drug Allergy Manage Adverse Drug Event Non-pharmacologic Intervention Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Diabetes Intervention or Goal Met Hypertension Intervention or Goal Met Heart Failure Intervention or Goal Met Lipid Intervention or Goal Met Bone Health Intervention Smoking Cessation Intervention or Goal Met Hepatitis C Intervention or Goal Met

PBM designed a clinical reminder tool for roll-out by end of calendar year. Project aligns with VHA Transformational Initiatives Tool provides documentation of clinical interventions related to medication management by Clinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPS) across VHA, as non- physician providers. CPRS tools provide the ability to document Pharmacotherapy interventions which have demonstrated:

  • Potential to reduce harm to patients
  • Potential cost avoidance to

healthcare system CPS demonstrate the ability to document clinical interventions and therapeutic achievements for specific disease states

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

The CPS documents interventions made and when goals achieved

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Metric ic FY12 12 FY13 13 FY14* Number mber of Phar armac macis ist t tool l users rs 117 117 893 893 964 964 To Total Disease se State te Inte terventions rventions 15 15,41 410 18 180, 0,01 019 320, 20 200 To Total Additi tion

  • nal

l Pharmacothe rmacotherapy apy Inte terventions rventions 16 16,71 717 12 129, 9,91 917 299,800 299,800 Avg Number ber of Inte terventions rventions per visi sit 1. 1.87 87 1. 1.75 75 1.74 1.74

32

* As of March 1, 2014 6 months data extrapolated to 12 months

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Archimedes is a well substantiated and validated modeling tool which can be used to project cardiovascular and diabetes related outcomes based on changes in surrogate markers. First created and described by Kaiser Permanente but spun off as a separate company. Predicted outcomes show strong correlation to real

  • utcomes in numerous studies. Costs are not VA specific

but a starting point for future work. Now being applied to our PhARMD data to project both

  • utcomes and cost benefit of various interventions in various

cohorts, standardized to our demographics.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Slides based on PhARMD data run April 2014

Represent Outcomes as documented by the PhARMD tool.

Analysis of Outcomes of patients referred for a specific disorder (e.g.: DM or Lipids) to a clinical pharmacist.

Outcomes are measured 6 months after baseline referral.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Bioma marker rker baseli line ne 6 6 months nths Absolute lute ch change nge HbA1c 8.92 7.82

  • 1.1

LDL 105 93.71

  • 11.29

Bioma marker rker baseli line ne 6 6 months nths Absolute lute ch change nge LDL 118 95.5

  • 22.5

Lipid Cohort Diabetes Referral Cohort

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Parame amete ter Value Age 64.4 LDL 105.4 BMI 28.2 DBP 74 SBP 131 Weight kg 105 Male 95.9% GFR 73.9

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Trial Arm Size MI (NNT) 95% CI CHD death (NNT) 95% CI CHF (NNT) 95% CI Acute Heart Failure (NNT) 95% CI Foot amputation (NNT) 95% CI Foot ulcer (NNT) 95% CI Control 10,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Trial Arm_ 10,000 32 (29;36) 214 (146;400) 31 (28;35) 28 (25;31) 35 (31;39) 18 (16;19)

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Disea ease se Cohort Clinical Outcome NNT NNT Visit s $Cost/ t/ Visit (Avg cost) Estimated ted 2 year Cost t /Even vent* t* Benefi efit/ t/ Cost **

DM DM MI MI 32 32 (29:36) :36) 2-4 $75 $75-15 150 ($112 112) $30, 0,000 000 5.5:1 CHF 31 31 (28:35) :35) 2-4 $75 $75-$1 $150 50 ($112 112) $40, 0,000 000 7.6:1 Foot Amp 35 35 (31:39) :39) 2-4 $75 $75-$1 $150 50 ($112 112) $81, 1,000 000 13.8: 8:1 Foot Ulcer 18 18 (16:19) :19) 2-4 $75 $75-$1 $150 50 ($112 112) $13, 3,000 000 4.5:1 CHD Death th 63 63 2-4 $75 $75-$1 $150 50 ($112) 112) Priceless less

45

Ref: Population Health Management Volume 14, Number X 2011 Ref: J Vasc Surg 2010;52:17S-22S Ref: Diabetes Care 22:382-387, 1999 ref: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1685-92 Calcu culation

  • ns

s for benef efit: : cost st rati tio

  • used

ed the e max x visits, s, the e worst rst 95% % confiden ence ce interv tervals

slide-46
SLIDE 46

 Important to remember that the described NNT’s were achieved

during the same 2-4 visits to the Clinical Pharmacist. Therefore Cost benefits of each individual sequela needs to be combined to give true ROI.

 Even if one were to double or triple the time and cost of the

Pharmacist for these interventions return on investment would exceed $9 for every $1 invested.

 Magnifies the importance of the Pharmacist having a more global

scope of practice so they can manage multiple diseases simultaneously!

Max NNT NNT Max visits (4) Cost MI MI Cost CHF Cost Foot Amp Cost Ulcer Total $ Benefi nefit Total Benefi nefit/ t/ cost 39 $150 $30K $40K $81K $13K $164K 28:1

slide-47
SLIDE 47

10 20 30 40 50 60 14 16 20 24 28 CB ratio Benefit:Cost Ratio % Dz

  • verlap
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Additional analysis of outcomes achieved examining patient variability including demographics and co-morbidities. Additional analysis of outcome variability based on medications used, training and background of pharmacists and other demographic variables to identify strong practices. Application of patient complexity and matched control groups of usual care to the economic and outcomes models.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

The VA’s “PACT” Model has made significant progress since its roll out in mid-2010 with impressive gains in key areas. In alignment with PCPCC documents there has been widespread application of Clinical Pharmacist in this model to perform Chronic Disease & Medication Management. Creation and application of data collection and analytical tools are leading to a broad recognition of the benefits of Clinical Pharmacist to health outcomes achieved. The consistency of outcomes achieved and impressive cost: benefits ratio represents a significant argument for more universal and widespread application of clinical pharmacist with a broad, global scope of practice in the health care system.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Anthony P. Morreale, Pharm.D., MBA, BCPS Assistant Chief Consultant for Clinical Pharmacy Services and Healthcare Delivery Services Research Pharmacy Benefits Management Services (119) Department of Veterans Affairs anthony.morreale@va.gov

50