charm physics prospects at the belle ii experiment
play

Charm physics prospects at the Belle II experiment Marko Stari c - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Charm physics prospects at the Belle II experiment Marko Stari c Belle Belle II collaboration Jo zef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana MESON 2018 M. Stari c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 1 / 18


  1. Charm physics prospects at the Belle II experiment Marko Stariˇ c Belle Belle II collaboration Joˇ zef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana MESON 2018 M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 1 / 18

  2. Outline Belle Super KEKB and Belle II Status of the detector and accelerator Selection of Belle II prospects on charm M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 2 / 18

  3. Belle II experiment Belle Successor of Belle experiment (KEK, Tsukuba, Japan) SuperKEKB accelerator upgraded KEKB Belle II detector luminosity 40 × KEKB upgraded Belle detector (8 × 10 35 cm − 2 s − 1 ) majority of components replaced nano-beam optics M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 3 / 18

  4. Belle II environment Belle Critical issues at L = 8 × 10 35 cm − 2 s − 1 Higher background ( × 10 - 20) radiation damage and occupancy fake hits and pile-up noise in EM calorimeter Higher event rate ( × 40) affects trigger, DAQ and computing Have to employ and develop new technologies to make such an apparatus work efficiently. M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 4 / 18

  5. Belle II detector upgrade → almost completed Belle Vertex detector 4-layer DSSD replaced with 2 DEPFET layers + 4 DSSD layers smaller inner radius, larger outer radius → better vertex resolution → improved efficiency for slow pions and K S Central drift chamber smaller cells, larger outer radius → improved momentum resolution and dEdx Hadron ID ACC + TOF replaced with TOP (barrel) and aerogel RICH (forward) → less material in front of calorimeter → improved hadron ID Electromagnetic calorimeter waveform sampling technique to cope with increased background K-long and muon detector RPC’s in endcaps and first two layers of barrel replaced with scintillator counters to cope with increased neutron background M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 5 / 18

  6. Belle II performance improvements Belle Improvements w.r.t Belle primary and secondary vertex resolution K S and π 0 reconstruction hadron and muon ID in the end caps K /π separation M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 6 / 18

  7. Belle II schedule Belle 2018 (phase 2): first collisions on April 26 th 2019 (phase 3): start of physics run collect ∼ 5 ab − 1 by mid 2020 collect 50 ab − 1 by 2025 M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 7 / 18

  8. First collisions: Bhabha candidate Belle M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 8 / 18

  9. First collisions: Hadronic event Belle M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 9 / 18

  10. First bumps observed Belle K S → π + π − π 0 → γγ Evidence of K S and π 0 in the collected data sample of 5 pb − 1 Calibrations at a very early stage M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 10 / 18

  11. We got charm Belle D ∗ + → D 0 ( → K − π + ) π + Evidence of D ∗ + and D 0 in the collected data sample of 5 pb − 1 Calibrations at a very early stage, no PID requirements M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 11 / 18

  12. Prospects for charm at Belle II Belle Mixing and CPV Belle measurements extrapolated to 50 ab − 1 Systematic uncertainties primarily scale with integrated luminosity, with two exceptions: model related systematics of t-dependent Dalitz analysis (resonance parameters - masses, widths, form factors, angular dependence etc.) 0 interactions in material A CP of modes with K 0 s : asymmetry of K 0 / K (PRD 84, 111501 (2011)), σ ired ≈ 0 . 02% Extrapolation: � sys ) L Belle ( σ 2 50 ab − 1 + σ 2 σ BelleII = stat + σ 2 ired Detector performance improvements are not included in the extrapolation M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 12 / 18

  13. Mixing and indirect CPV Belle Belle Belle II D 0 → K ( ∗ ) − ℓ + ν 492 fb − 1 (2008) 50 ab − 1 (1 . 3 ± 2 . 2 ± 2 . 0) × 10 − 4 ± 0 . 3 × 10 − 4 R M D 0 → K + K − , π + π − 976 fb − 1 (2016) 50 ab − 1 y CP (1 . 11 ± 0 . 22 ± 0 . 11)% ± 0 . 04% A Γ ( − 0 . 03 ± 0 . 20 ± 0 . 08)% ± 0 . 03% D 0 → K + π − 400 fb − 1 (2006) 50 ab − 1 x ′ 2 (1 . 8 ± 2 . 2 ± 1 . 1) × 10 − 4 ± 0 . 22 × 10 − 4 y ′ (0 . 06 ± 0 . 40 ± 0 . 20)% ± 0 . 04% 0 . 67 ± 1 . 20 ± 0 . 11 A M | φ | 0 . 16 ± 0 . 44 ± 0 . 04 D 0 → K 0 921 fb − 1 (2014) s π + π − 50 ab − 1 (0 . 56 ± 0 . 19 ± 0 . 06 ± 0 . 08)% ± 0 . 08% x (0 . 30 ± 0 . 15 ± 0 . 06 ± 0 . 04)% ± 0 . 05% y | q / p | 0 . 90 ± 0 . 16 ± 0 . 04 ± 0 . 06 ± 0 . 06 φ − 0 . 10 ± 0 . 19 ± 0 . 04 ± 0 . 07 ± 0 . 07 | q / p | = 1 + 1 2 A M ⇒ δ | q / p | = 1 2 δ A M M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 13 / 18

  14. Time-integrated measurements ( A CP ) Belle L (fb − 1 ) Belle II at 50 ab − 1 mode A CP (%) D 0 → K + K − 976 − 0 . 32 ± 0 . 21 ± 0 . 09 ± 0 . 03 D 0 → π + π − 976 +0 . 55 ± 0 . 36 ± 0 . 09 ± 0 . 05 D 0 → π 0 π 0 966 − 0 . 03 ± 0 . 64 ± 0 . 10 ± 0 . 09 D 0 → K 0 S K 0 921 − 0 . 02 ± 1 . 53 ± 0 . 02 ± 0 . 17 ± 0 . 21 S D 0 → K 0 s π 0 966 − 0 . 21 ± 0 . 16 ± 0 . 07 ± 0 . 03 D 0 → K 0 s η 791 +0 . 54 ± 0 . 51 ± 0 . 16 ± 0 . 07 D 0 → K 0 s η ′ 791 +0 . 98 ± 0 . 67 ± 0 . 14 ± 0 . 09 D 0 → π + π − π 0 532 +0 . 43 ± 1 . 30 ± 0 . 13 D 0 → K + π − π 0 281 − 0 . 60 ± 5 . 30 ± 0 . 40 D 0 → K + π − π + π − 281 − 1 . 80 ± 4 . 40 ± 0 . 33 D + → φπ + 955 +0 . 51 ± 0 . 28 ± 0 . 05 ± 0 . 04 D + → ηπ + 791 +1 . 74 ± 1 . 13 ± 0 . 19 ± 0 . 14 D + → η ′ π + 791 − 0 . 12 ± 1 . 12 ± 0 . 17 ± 0 . 14 D + → K 0 s π + 977 − 0 . 36 ± 0 . 09 ± 0 . 07 ± 0 . 03 D + → K 0 s K + 977 − 0 . 25 ± 0 . 28 ± 0 . 14 ± 0 . 05 D + → π + π 0 921 +2 . 31 ± 1 . 24 ± 0 . 23 ± 0 . 17 D + s → K 0 s π + 673 +5 . 45 ± 2 . 50 ± 0 . 33 ± 0 . 29 D + s → K 0 s K + 673 +0 . 12 ± 0 . 36 ± 0 . 22 ± 0 . 05 M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 14 / 18

  15. Direct CPV in D 0 → φγ, ρ 0 γ Belle Direct CPV in radiative decays can be enhanced by chromomagnetic dipole operators (G. Isidori and J. F. Kamenik, PRL 109, 171801 (2012)) D 0 → φγ : A CP up to 2% D 0 → ρ 0 γ : A CP up to 10% D 0 → φγ Belle, 943 fb − 1 , PRL 118, 051801 (2017) A CP ( D 0 → φγ ) = ( − 9 . 4 ± 6 . 6 ± 0 . 1)% A CP ( D 0 → ρ 0 γ ) = (5 . 6 ± 15 . 2 ± 0 . 6)% → consistent with no CPV Sensitivity at 50 ab − 1 A CP ( D 0 → φγ ) : 0 . 9% A CP ( D 0 → ρ 0 γ ) : 2 . 1% M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 15 / 18

  16. D 0 → γγ on the next slide 90% C.L. Belle 10 − 9 10 − 8 10 − 7 10 − 6 10 − 5 10 − 4 10 − 3 10 − 2 Belle II can improve these UL by several orders of magnitude Decays involving π 0 , η and ω mostly done by CLEO γγ Rare and forbidden decays HFLAV Summer 16 M. Stariˇ e + e − µ + µ − π 0 e + e − π 0 µ + µ − c (IJS) ηe + e − ηµ + µ − π + π − e + e − ρ 0 e + e − π + π − µ + µ − ρ 0 µ + µ − ωe + e − ωµ + µ − K + K − e + e − Charm physics prospects at the Belle II φe + e − K + K − µ + µ − φµ + µ − K 0 e + e − ¯ K 0 µ + µ − ¯ K − π + e + e − K ∗ 0 (892) e + e − ¯ K − π + µ + µ − K ∗ 0 (892) µ + µ − ¯ π + π − π 0 µ + µ − µ ± e ∓ LF π 0 e ± µ ∓ ηe ± µ ∓ π + π − e ± µ ∓ ρ 0 e ± µ ∓ ωe ± µ ∓ K + K − e ± µ ∓ φe ± µ ∓ K 0 e ± µ ∓ ¯ Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 K − π + e ± µ ∓ K ∗ 0 (892) e ± µ ∓ π ∓ π ∓ e ± e ± L π ∓ π ∓ µ ± µ ± K ∓ π ∓ e ± e ± K ∓ π ∓ µ ± µ ± K ∓ K ∓ e ± e ± E653 CLEO BaBar BESIII Belle CLEO II E791 K ∓ K ∓ µ ± µ ± π ∓ π ∓ e ± µ ± K ∓ π ∓ e ± µ ± K ∓ K ∓ e ± µ ± Mark3 Argus CDF HERAB E789 LHCb pe − 16 / 18 BL pe + ¯

  17. D 0 → γγ Belle SM predictions: long distance effects dominate Br ∼ few × 10 − 8 Belle, 832 fb − 1 PRD 93, 051102 (2016) Br < 8 . 5 × 10 − 7 @ 90% CL Belle II at 50 ab − 1 : → depends how background behaves if UL would scale with L : UL ∼ 2 × 10 − 8 √ if UL would scale with L : UL ∼ 1 × 10 − 7 M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 17 / 18

  18. Conclusions Belle SuperKEKB is completing commissioning phase first collisions achieved a month ago Phase 2 data taking started understand the machine and the backgrounds detector and software checkout possible initial physics studies Physics run will start in less than a year, at beginning of 2019 A rich charm physics program ahead, ready to improve precision on CP asymmetries, mixing and CPV parameters limits on rare and forbidden decays decay constants f D and f Ds from semileptonic decays measurements of charm baryons M. Stariˇ c (IJS) Charm physics prospects at the Belle II Krakow, June 7-12, 2018 18 / 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend