CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND
Disparity Study Consulting Services
1 235 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: (404) 584-9777 Fax: (404) 584-9730
CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND Disparity Study Consulting Services 235 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND Disparity Study Consulting Services 235 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: (404) 584-9777 Fax: (404) 584-9730 1 ABOUT GRIFFIN & STRONG, P.C. No study conducted by Griffin & Strong, P.C.
Disparity Study Consulting Services
1 235 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: (404) 584-9777 Fax: (404) 584-9730
Firm Specializes in Disparity Research, Contract Compliance, Program Development, Training & Supplier Diversity Consulting
The most qualified team in the industry:
Anthropology
disparity research.
No study conducted by Griffin & Strong, P.C. has ever been challenged or
Project Executive, Rodney K. Strong has unmatched expertise, serving as Director
Contract Compliance and as principal architect
the City
Atlanta’s distinguished MWBE contracting program. Principal Researcher, Dr. Vince Eagan is
conducting
120 studies & successfully defending 6 studies as expert witness.
Disparity Studies Form the Factual Basis for Remedial Contracting Programs City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989) Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena. 515 U.S. 200 (1995) H.B. Rowe v. Tippett, 615 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2010) Strict Scrutiny for race-based programs (Intermediate for gender-based programs) Must have a factual basis in evidence Methodology dictated by Case Law Must have narrowly-tailored remedy (to avoid over- or under-inclusion)
A DISPARITY STUDY is an objective research tool that determines whether a governmental agency has actively or passively discriminated against certain groups due to their race or gender. These studies measure disparities between availability and utilization for race, ethnicity, and gender groups. Availability Utilization
Discrimination, which may be the present effects of past discrimination, is determined through quantitative (statistical) and qualitative (anecdotal) evidence, as well as an examination
The findings of the disparity study will result in recommendations by the study team to remedy any discrimination or disparities found. The recommendations, if accepted, are intended to be implemented as policy.
GSPC Fourth Circuit Disparity Studies:
Transportation
Team Members Fourth Circuit Disparity Studies:
Commission
Recent Program Development and Legislation:
8
Process for Study Execution
Legal Analysis Policy Review Collect and Clean Data Relevant Market Analysis Utilization and Threshold Analysis Availability Analysis Disparity Analysis Private Sector Analysis Anecdotal Evidence Collection and Analysis Final Report with Recommendations
INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS ANECDOTAL INTERVIEWS SURVEY OF BUSINESS OWNERS PUBLIC HEARINGS FOCUS GROUPS BUSINESS CIVIC AND TRADE ORGANIZATION MEETINGS EMAIL/SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS
Findings
Recommendations
policy review, anecdotal evidence and institutional knowledge.
Approaches for:
findings of the study.
Study Roll Out Plan
Implementation is Key
promoting M/W/DBE utilization. Post-Study Consultation
programs.
growth.
FIND US ON THE WEB AT WWW.GSPCLAW.COM
@GriffinStrong