Charge: Examine the environmental and financial implications of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

charge examine the environmental and financial
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Charge: Examine the environmental and financial implications of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Charge: Examine the environmental and financial implications of diverting paper, composting, and comingle recycling to the local waste to energy incineration plant. Existing Condition- Total Waste Waste Tonnage by Year 2,000.0 1,781.0


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Charge: Examine the environmental and financial implications of diverting paper, composting, and comingle recycling to the local waste to energy incineration plant.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Existing Condition- Total Waste

1,781.0 1,664.7 1,735.2 1,505.9 1,153.2 1,275.8 275.1 511.5 459.4

  • 200.0

400.0 600.0 800.0 1,000.0 1,200.0 1,400.0 1,600.0 1,800.0 2,000.0

2014 2015 2016

Tonnage Calendar Year

Waste Tonnage by Year

Total Waste MSW Total Recycling

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Existing Condition- Total Waste

85% 69% 74% 15% 31% 26% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 2014 2015 2016

Percent of Total Calendar Year

Waste by Percent Type by Year

MSW Total Recycling

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Existing Condition- Recycled Waste

275.1 511.5 459.4 46.7 37.8 46.7 184.3 356.0 277.8 19.1 45.7 95.8 25.0 72 39.1 100 200 300 400 500 600 2014 2015 2016

Tonnage Calendar Year

Tonnage of Recyled Materials by Type

Total Recycling Glass, Cans, Plastic Bottles Paper (Incl. Composting) Scrap Metals Other

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Existing Condition- Recycled Waste

17% 7% 10% 67% 70% 60% 7% 9% 21% 9% 14% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2014 2015 2016

Percent of Total Calendar Year

Recycling by Percent Type by Year

Glass, Cans, Plastic Bottles Paper (Incl. Composting) Scrap Metals Other

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Environmental Impact of WTE by Fuel Source

  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis Comparisons

– In every study we reviewed recycling, when compared to landfilling, was said to create lower air emissions including lower life cycle GHG emissions. – In most studies recycling, when compared WTE, was also said to create lower air emissions including lower life cycle GHG emissions. – Not all studies considered all variables

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • One study which reviews 9 different LCAs including

73 different scenarios found that most scenarios favored recycling paper and cardboard over WTE.

  • Other studies found similar results but showed that

the benefits of recycling paper products and plastics were marginal or non existent compared to WTE in some conditions.

Environmental Impact of WTE by Fuel Source

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Health Impacts of WTE

  • Summary from a 2008 British Study

– Higher rates of cancer and birth defects found around municipal waste incinerators. – Increased particulate pollution known to cause cardiovascular mortality; lung cancer; asthma, and COPD – Increases in heavy metals emissions know to cause neurological issues, particularly during early developmental periods.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cost Savings From Proposal

Incineration Added Hauling Costs Incineration Cost $ 117,088 Incineration and composting cost $ 105,906 Annual Added Cost $ 11,181 Operating Savings 1 Moving and Storage Specialist $ 32,099 Benefits (43%) $ 13,803 Maintenance (Trucks+Equip) $ 4,000 Fuel $ 600 Annual Savings $ 50,502 Total Annual Savings $ 39,320 Carbon Offsets $ (21,526) Net Annual Savings $ 17,794 One Time Savings 2 Trucks $ 4,000 Bailer $ 10,000 Shredder $ 25,000 Total One Time Savings $ 39,000