chapter 5 p 5
play

Chapter: 5 p 5 Why wider-band single carrier transmission? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3G Evolution Outline Chapter: 5 p 5 Why wider-band single carrier transmission? Equalization against radio- channel frequency selectivity Time domain linear equalization Frequency domain equalization Wider-band single-carrier


  1. 3G Evolution Outline Chapter: 5 p 5 • Why wider-band single carrier transmission? • Equalization against radio- channel frequency selectivity – Time domain linear equalization – Frequency domain equalization Wider-band single-carrier Wider band single carrier – Other equalizer strategies transmission • Uplink FDMA with flexible bandwidth assignment • DFT- spread OFDM Payam Amani – Basic principles – DFTS-OFDM receiver DFTS OFDM i Payam.Amani@eit.lth.se P A i@ it lth – User multiplexing with DFTS-OFDM Department of Electrical and Information Technology – Distributed DFTS-OFDM 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 1 1 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 2 2 Equalization against radio- channel frequency Why wider-band single carrier transmission selectivity selectivity • OFDM • Equalization: main method to handle signal corruption due to radio channel frequency selectivity channel frequency selectivity Advantages: – Provides overal very high transmission bandwidth. • Time domain linear equalization q – Robust to signal corruption due to radio channel frequency selectivity. g p q y y – Rake receiver in DS-CDMA Drawbacks: • Channel mached filtering with filter response as the complex conjugate of the – Large variations in the instantaneous power of transmitted signal. time reversed channel impulse response. p p • Reduced power amplifier efficiency • Also called Maximum Ratio Combining (MRC) • High power amplifier cost • Critical for uplink τ = h − τ w ( ) * ( ) – Some methods to reduce this power variations discussed in chapter 4. Some methods to reduce this power variations discussed in chapter 4 • Limitations on the amount of reduction in these variations. • Maximizes post filter signal to noise ratio • Significant computational complexity and/or reduced link performance. • No compensation for radio channel frequency selectivity • wider-band single carrier transmission as an alternative for multicarrier n ( t ) Channel Model transmission especially for Uplink. Receiver ˆ t Transmitter s ( t ) s ( ) r ( t ) ( τ ( τ w ) h ) 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 3 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 4

  2. Time domain linear equalization MMSE Equalization – Zero Forcing (ZF) equalizer: • Time domain linear equalization – Select the receiver filter to fully compensate for the radio channel frequency – MMSE Equalization selectivity. • A trade-off between signal corruption due to radio channel frequency selectivity τ ⊗ τ = h ( ) w ( ) 1 and noise/ interference. { { } } ε = − 2 E s ˆ ( ( t ) ) s ( ( t ) ) – Denotes linear convolution. Denotes linear convolution ⊗ • Select a filter to minimize the mean squared error between the equalizer output – Suppression of any signal corruption caused by radio channel frequency and the transmitted signal. selectivity. selectivity – Large or potentially very large increase in noise level after equalization. – Linear equalization implemented as time discrete FIR filter. q p – Overal degradation of the link performance. – Especially for channel with large variations in frequency response. 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 5 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 6 Time domain linear equalization – Complexity of such time discrete equalizer grows relatively rapidly equalizer grows relatively rapidly with bandwidth of the sigal to be – More wideband signal leads to a nT equalized: s correspondingly higher sampling r ( t ) nT s ˆ t ( ( ) ) rate for the received signal. rate for the recei ed signal s w w r ( t ) s ˆ t ( ) Filter processing shall run with w higher sampling rates. – More wide band signal is subject to relatively more radio channel t l ti l di h l } } selectivity r r n n – High complexity in the w w w w w w 0 − 1 L 1 − – Requires the equalizer to have a 0 equalization and also calculating 1 L 1 larger span to be able to g p the inverse of channel output p s s ˆ compensate it. autocorrelation matrix. n s ˆ 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 7 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 8

  3. Frequency domain equalization Frequency domain equalization • Reduce complexity of equalization. • Time domain filtering implements a time discrete implements a time discrete • Carried out block wise in block size linear convolution. nT nT N. ˆ ˆ s s r ( t ) s r ˆ r ( t ) s r ˆ R S R S n n n n k k k k • Frequency domain filtering • Equalization as frequency domain corresponds to circular filtering. { { convolution in the time domain convolution in the time domain. • Block size N preferably selected as for some integer n to = N 2 n • First L-1 samples at the output w w allow for computational efficient p 0 0 of the frequency domain radix-2 FFT/IFFT implementation of DFT/IDFT. equalizer will not be identical to ˆ ˆ s s R R 0 0 0 0 the corresponding output of the p g p w w − − N 1 N 1 • For channels with extensive time domain equalizer. frequency selectivity frequency R R ˆ ˆ s s − − N 1 N 1 domain equalization is less − − N 1 N 1 complex. complex 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 9 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 10 Frequency domain equalization Frequency domain equalization • Cyclic prefix � channel will seem to the receiver as circular convolution • Overlap of at least L-1 samples. O l f t l t L 1 l over a receiver processing block of size N. • Discard first L-1 samples at Discard first L 1 samples at • Frequency domain taps can be output of the frequency domain x ( t ) calculated directly. equalizer as they are also ≤ L − 1 provided as the last part of the provided as the last part of the • Estimate of MMSE equalizer in previously received / equalized frequency domain. block. • Overhead in power and bandwidth. • Computational overhead or Transmitter + + * H • Less overhead � increase block higher receiver complexity. higher receiver complexity. = Single carrier signal D/A W W K CP Insertion x ( t ) generation generation Conversion Conversion size : channel shall be constant in 2 2 + K + + + H N duration of a block size ; upper limit K 0 N Samples N+Ncp Samples for the block size • Cyclic prefix insertion. 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 11 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 12

  4. Uplink FDMA with flexible bandwidth Other equalizer strategies assignment assignment • Share uplink radio resource using plink intra-cell multiple access scheme. • D Decision feedback equalization (DFE) i i f db k li ti (DFE) Frequency cy – Previously detected symbols are fed back and used to cancel the • High rate packet data transmission � Assign the entire system bandwidth to a contribution of the corresponding transmitted symbols to the overal signal terminal. terminal corruption. Used in combination with time domain linear filtering. Also used in combination with frequency domain linear equalization. • Burstiness of most packet data Frequency services � in most cases mobile terminals do not have anything to send • Minimum Likelihood (ML) Detection or Maximum Likelihood Sequence in uplink. TDMA required. Estimator (MLSE) – Uses the entire received signal to decide on the most likely transmitted Uses the entire received signal to decide on the most likely transmitted • • Just TDMA is not bandwidth efficient Just TDMA is not bandwidth efficient. sequence, taking into account the impact of time dispersion on the signal. • Uplink is power limited. – Viterbi Algorithm – Used widely in 2G but too complex for 3G evolution (much wider • Allocating the entire system bandwidth to transmission bandwidth, much more channel frequency selectivity, much one terminal is inefficient in terms of higher sampling rate ) bandwidth utilization. 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 13 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 14 DFT Spread OFDM Basic principles • Small variations in the instantaneous power of the transmitted signal. • Small variations in the instantaneous power of the transmitted signal. • Possibility of low complexity and high quality equalization in frequency domain. • PAR distribution is independent of modulation in OFDM. • Cubic metric: a measure of the additional back off required for a certain Cubic metric: a measure of the additional back off required for a certain • Possibility for FDMA with flexible bandwidth assignment. signal wave form relative to the back off needed for some refrence wave form. • Uplink transmission scheme for LTE Uplink transmission scheme for LTE. Transmitter 0 0 a , a ,..., a Size -M OFDM D/A − 0 1 M 1 CP x ( t ) DFT (IDFT) Conversion M 0 N N 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 15 3/26/2009 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend