Challenges in midwifery practice - The OptiBIRTH project Professor - - PDF document

Challenges in midwifery practice - The OptiBIRTH project

Professor Cecily Begley

Chair of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin Ireland

and Visiting Professor, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

AIM To improve maternal health service delivery, and

• ptimise childbirth, by increasing vaginal birth

after caesarean section (VBAC) through enhanced women-centred maternity care across Europe.

Presenting OptiBIRTH

• Introduction – background
• Development of the intervention
• Trial methods and conduct
• Trial results (preliminary)
• Anthropological study
• Challenges
• Summary and conclusion

Introduction – background

Increasing CS rates

CS rate VBAC rate Primary (First) CS rate

Graph source: The American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists (2014) (U.S. National Centre for Health Statistics)

Repeat routine CS

A systematic review of 21 studies across the world, including over 2 million births (Marshall et al, 2011), showed that:

• increase in rates of blood transfusions,

hysterectomy, surgical injury and adhesions as the number of caesarean births increase.

Maternal mortality rates

Guise et al. 2010a

0.0000% 0.0020% 0.0040% 0.0060% 0.0080% 0.0100% 0.0120% 0.0140% 0.0160% PVBAC ERCS

Perinatal mortality rates

Guise et al. 2010a

0.00% 0.02% 0.04% 0.06% 0.08% 0.10% 0.12% 0.14% pVBAC ERCS

Perinatal mortality rates

Guise et al. 2010a

0.00% 0.02% 0.04% 0.06% 0.08% 0.10% 0.12% 0.14% pVBAC ERCS

Success rates – always around 75%

Success rates – 90%, if previous VBAC

VBAC rates

• VBAC rates in Ireland, Germany, and Italy are 29-36%

(EURO-PERISTAT 2008).

• VBAC rates in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Finland

are 45-55% (EURO-PERISTAT 2008).

• This difference results in an extra direct annual cost
• f €156m, based on Irish figures of CSs costing

approximately €900 more than a vaginal birth (Begley

et al 2011).

VBAC rates

• So – rates of 45-55% are possible in a number of

countries.

• NB: To achieve a VBAC rate of 55%, a maternity unit

would need to support at least 75% of women with a previous CS to start labour, of whom 75% will have a VBAC if supported appropriately.

OptiBIRTH intervention development

Two systematic reviews (women-centred and clinician- centred interventions) Focus group interviews with women (in both high-and low-VBAC countries) Focus group interviews with clinicians (in both high-and low-VBAC countries)

Systematic reviews

• From the SRs we gathered that our intervention should

include:

• The use of opinion-leaders

to lead care for women with previous CS

• The use of decision-aids

and provision of information programmes for women

Focus group interviews

61 midwives, 53 obstetricians and one neonatologist (115) 71 women

FGIs - results

trust between the woman and professionals early follow-up of the first CS, alleviate fear a common, positive and supportive approach from all clinicians a culture that views VBAC as expected correct and balanced information on VBAC importance of letting go the previous childbirth in preparation for the new birth alleviate fear, and increase confidence in VBAC

OptiBIRTH intervention

Appointment of an obstetrician Opinion Lead (OOL) and midwife Opinion Lead (MOL) in each intervention site Two antenatal classes of two hours each, for women with one previous CS A one-hour education session for clinicians, to inform them of the up-to-date literature Website and online materials

Unblinded cluster randomised trial

• Ethical approval was obtained from TCD, Ireland

and then from all three trial countries, and all participating sites.

• Sample size calculation: with a background

proportion of successful VBAC of 25% and an ICC of 0.05, 12 sites were required, each containing 120 participating women (840 women in each group)

• This would detect a 15 percentage point difference

in successful VBAC (i.e. an absolute increase from 25% in the control group to 40% in the intervention group), with power of at least 80% and an alpha level of 0.05.

Site selection and randomisation

• Protocol was registered in the ISRCTN Registry

(ISRCTN10612254) before randomisation of the units.

• Five sites in Germany, Ireland and Italy
• Annual births of 1800 to 8500, and VBAC rates below 35%
• Similar sites were matched in each country and then

randomised 1:1 or 2:1 (favouring OptiBIRTH intervention)

Recruitment of women

• January 2014 to 31 October 2015
• Eligibility criteria:
• pregnant women (≥18 years)
• ne previous lower uterine segment CS
• singleton pregnancy
• spoke the language of the country
• gave consent

Data collection

• 2002 women recruited to the main trial

(intervention 1195, control 807)

• Birthing data were available for 1956 of

these (intervention 1174 (98.2%), control 782 (96.9%))

• (Self-reported data of antenatal and

postnatal health, and healthcare resource use and expenditure surveys, were also collected)

Outcomes

• Primary outcome

Preliminary analysis presented today is:

the primary outcome, comparing the calendar year before the trial (2012) versus the last year

• f the trial (2015)

Outcomes

• Secondary outcomes
• Maternal outcomes, e.g.:

Labour onset (spontaneous, induced, etc.) Mode of birth etc

• Neonatal outcomes, e.g.:

Fetal demise during pregnancy Admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) Neonatal mortality

Trial results

Trial results (whole study)

• Preliminary results: No statistically significant difference in the

change in the proportion of women having a VBAC between 2012 and 2015 (NOT 2012-2016) 2012 2015 However: Italy: intervention sites 8% 22% RR 2.43 [1.84, 3.22) The OptiBIRTH intervention may assist in supporting VBAC, in sites with very low VBAC rates.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes

• Perinatal deaths after 24 weeks gestation

4 in the intervention group (0.34%) 4 in the control (0.51%)

• No difference in rates of admission to Neonatal ICU

(7.7% v 8.1% (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.17; p=0.36))

• Two uterine ruptures (one in each group)
• Both women and babies were discharged home well on day 4

(Ireland) and 5 (Germany).

Anthropological study

Anthropological study

• AIM: To evaluate cultural change before,

during, and after the implementation of a complex intervention (within OptiBIRTH) designed to increase VBAC in women who have had one previous CS, in one intervention site

Data collection methods

• Observation

–Participant and non-participant

• bservation at 16 antenatal classes, and
• ver 16 months in the antenatal clinic
• Semi-structured interviews with 15

women (19 interviews) participating in the trial and 14 clinicians caring for them (16 interviews)

Findings (1)

• The findings indicated that

the changing of women’s identities, the transference of authoritative knowledge, and the effect of various power positions

affected the intervention and its status in the field-site.

Examples

“It’s just great hearing other women’s experiences as well and what they’ve gone through and what they’re hoping to do this time as well”. W3(Interview) “I assumed that a C-section, you were almost destined to have another C-section. What it really raised my awareness around is that every birth is different and that you kind of have to go with the

• experience. I think that has prepared me for the

next delivery” (W12)

Findings (2)

• While the overall culture in the field-site did not change,

smaller, more individual cultural changes were observed, from both the women and clinicians taking part.

• However, the absence of participation by senior consultants

was found to hinder implementation of the intervention.

• It was the women who were driving change around mode
• f birth after CS, rather than the clinicians who did not

engage fully with the intervention.

Examples

“It’s about trying to change the culture in the hospital, which I think the main aim of OptiBIRTH is. I’m trying to change it into a more pro-VBAC, or prochoice, I suppose, clinical

• environment. Really, that’s probably been the

hardest part of it.” (Interview, C7, June 2015)

Recommendations (from ethnographic study)

• Thought around the subject of VBAC and repeat CS

has slowly changed, but needs further time to change the culture completely.

• MOLs in the labour ward are recommended, to

support midwives and obstetricians there.

Summary

• Our results showed similar, and low, adverse

maternal or neonatal outcomes between women exposed to the OptiBIRTH intervention and those who were not.

• The intervention thus appears feasible and safe.
• The country-specific results appear to show that

the OptiBIRTH intervention may assist in supporting VBAC, in sites with very low VBAC rates, but more time is needed for change to take place.

Conclusion

• Any intervention that is feasible and safe and

that may lead to a decrease of elective CS, should be promoted.

• Continued research to refine the best way of

promoting VBAC is essential. The OptiBIRTH intervention provides an evidence-based starting point for this research.

Acknowledgements

A big thank you to the women who took part

& staff in the study sites, particularly the Midwife Opinion Leads and Obstetrician Opinion Leads, the researchers/post- doc researchers in all countries and the OptiBIRTH team.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 305208

References

• Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, McCann C, Hughes P, Reilly M, Maguire R, Higgins S, Finan A, Gormally S,

Doyle M. Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2011; 11:85-94 (29 October 2011) http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/85

• Clarke, M., Savage, G., Smith, V., Daly, D., Devane, D., Gross, M.M., Grylka-Baeschlin, S., Healy, P., Morano,

S., Nicoletti, J. & Begley, C. (2015) Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and

• ptimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-

centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254). Trials, 16, 542.

• EURO-PERISTAT Project, with SCPE, EUROCAT, EURONEOSTAT. European Perinatal Health Report. 2008.

Available http://www.europeristat.com/reports/european-perinatal-health-report2004.html

• Guise, J.-M., Denman, et al. (2010a). Vaginal birth after cesarean. New insights on maternal and neonatal
• utcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115(6), 1267-1278.
• Lundgren, I., Smith, V., Nilsson, C., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Nicoletti, J., Devane, D., Bernloehr, A., van

Limbeek, E., Lalor, J. & Begley, C. (2015a) Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 15, 16.

• Lundgren, I., van Limbeek, E., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K. & Nilsson, C. (2015b) Clinicians' views of factors of

importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 15, 196.

• Lundgren, l., Carrol, M., Healy, P., Begley, C., Matterne, A., Gross, M., Grylka-Baeschlin, S., Nicoletti, J.,

Morano, S., Nilsson, C. & Lalor, J. (2016) Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(350).

• Marshall, N.E., Fu, R. et al. (2011). Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a

systematic review. AM J. Obstet Gynecol, 205:262.e, 1-8

• Nilsson, C., Lundgren, I., Smith, V., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Nicoletti, J., Devane, D., Bernloehr, A., van

Limbeek, E., Lalor, J. & Begley, C. (2015a) Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review. Midwifery, 31(7), 657-63.

• Nilsson, C., van Limbeek, E., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K. & Lundgren, I. (2015b) Vaginal Birth After Cesarean:

Views of Women From Countries With High VBAC Rates. Qual Health Res.