cha halleng nges in n archi hitecting ng fully y autom
play

Cha halleng nges in n archi hitecting ng fully y autom omated - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cha halleng nges in n archi hitecting ng fully y autom omated drivi ving ng; on Heav avy Commercial al Veh ehicles es with a h an n empha hasis on 1 Naveen Mohan et al. ; WASA 2016 To o the he b best of of ou our know


  1. Cha halleng nges in n archi hitecting ng fully y autom omated drivi ving ng; on Heav avy Commercial al Veh ehicles es with a h an n empha hasis on 1 Naveen Mohan et al. ; WASA 2016

  2. To o the he b best of of ou our know nowledge, this is paper is is uniq ique in in ➔ Full r ll range of possib ibil ilit itie ies o of Mai ain int ntegrating ng i int ntelligenc nce to o an n autom omot otive p platfor orm contrib ibutio ions ➔ Di Disc scussi ssion across ss a a broad ad sp spectrum of of asp spects w.r .r.t. onomy bot oth func nctiona nal autonom and extra-func an nctiona nal Autonom onomy mi mindma map 2

  3. : Case s study planned : KTH Res esea earch c concep ept veh ehicle, e, Scan ania t a truck 3

  4. Results: Case 3 vs Case 4 Higher Platform Reuse 5 Lower Information Lower accidental flow needed and Complexity(on 4 infrastructure reuse) 3 Lower Ease of Verification Variability(across 2 of ADI functionality platform) 1 Case 3 0 Case 4 Ease of Verifcation Lower Development of Modified Pf Cost Upfront functionality Lower Development Higher Security Cost over time Reduced need for Higher Diagnostics to Reliability/Availabilit ensure safety y 4

  5. www. www.kth.s .se/ it itm/ autonom onomymind ndmap Join and collaborate. KTH: Mechatronics ITRL IC 5

  6. Bio: o: Naveen M n Moha ohan ➔ Bachelor’s in Computer Science and Engineering (2009 009) ➔ 1 year; Defence Industry; Communication, Networks ➔ Master’s in Networks and Distributed Systems (2 (2012) ) Chalmers, Gothenburg ➔ 3 ye years; Automotive ve Indust stry; VCC; SW/ System responsible Hybrid, el drive ➔ PhD hD studies es a at M Mec echa hatroni nics KTH ( (Started ed end end of 2 2015); The he ARCHER ER proje ject: Vinno nnova fund nded ed 6

  7. What we are trying to do? ADI = Autonomous Driving Intelligence By Veronica538 (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons 7

  8. Full Reuse Case 1 Preserve legacy Case 2 Case 3 functionality Optimize for Case 4 Case 5 9 No Reuse

  9. Key Messages ➔ The e role o e of l leg egacy ➔ “intel elligen ence( e(ADI) in integratio ion” ➔ The he drive ver ha has to go! ➔ Sa Safety need eeds to b be e proven en ➔ Prototyp ype vs vs Pr Product 10

  10. Ou Outline ➔ Ab About the e Author(s (s) ) and nd the he projec ect ➔ Bac Background ➔ Complexity an and Legac acy ➔ Advan antag ages of autonom onomou ous HCVs vs passen enger er veh ehicles es ➔ Case ses: s: ADI DI i integration. ➔ Conc onclusions ons, future w wor ork a and nd questions ons 11

  11. The he rol ole of legacy in n automot otive sy syst stems s desi sign ➔ Accident ental vs es essent ential complexit ity ➔ Legac acy as as a s a source of accident ental c complex exity ➔ Modularit ity im implie ies that n no vehi ehicle i e is optimized ed i in t n ter erms of functionality. y. ➔ Ther here e are e differ erent ent ways to achi hiev eve e the he same e functio ionalit ity ➔ The he impact of l leg egacy By Andy Dingley (Own work) [CC BY 3.0 12 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

  12. (Exagger erated ed ex example) e) Design c n cons onsiderations ons ? CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=342457 By Andy Dingley (Own work) [CC BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)] 13 via Wikimedia Commons

  13. One Com ommon on Electrical Platfor orm 1.2 14

  14. 1500 00 logical al nodes es 15 A Scania production vehicle from 2013

  15. 14000 000 conne nnections ns 16 A Scania production vehicle from 2013

  16. ➔ We e compensate.. .. ➔ Arch chitect ctur ural Dealin ing w wit ith mechanism sms. s. complexi xity ➔ Pl Platforms ➔ Process m ss measu sures ➔ Stan andar ards ➔ Stan andar ardizat ation 17

  17. Heav avy C Commercial al Veh ehicles es vs s Passe ssenger Ca Cars ➔ TOOL: part of b broader er ec ecosystem em Trans nspor ort sol olution on – mov oving ng p peop ople an and good oods Gen ener erating busi siness ss val alue an and profit it for or ow owne ners - cust stomiza zable n; Second nd l life ; r ➔ Long ong l life span; res esale e val alue ➔ High mileag age ➔ High h depend ndability; empha hasis on on de degrade ded d mode des. ➔ Highl hly m mod odular: ➔ Low ow prod oduction on vol olumes; hi high h variability / Emphasi sis s on D& D&D D cost sts 18

  18. Advan antag ages of of autonom onomou ous HCV CVs ➔ Logist stics. s. Trucks currently limited in speed. ➔ Env nvironm onment ntal. Air resistance – convoying - Fuel 33 % 33 % savings ➔ Chauffer er r rel elated ed. Shortage of qualified drivers Truck dri river > r >33% 3% in in cost st ➔ Sim implif ific icatio ion ( (eventual) Stressful job and environment regulations to help drivers Design to help the driver: ergonomics, ➔ Ne New busi siness m ss models s possible if “C” drivers license is not essential. Lower cost of entry for more people. 19 Source: Sveriges Åkeriföretag

  19. Sa Safety • Are re curre rrently dri riven by prof pr ofessiona onal drivers. cons nsiderations ns specif ific ic t to HCVs • Coul ould c carry Haz azMat at • The e size o e of H HCV, ALARP; num number of of pe peopl ople ISO26262 trans nspor ported i inc ncreases the p possib ibilit ility a and s scale le of d dam amag age. 20

  20. Ou Outline ➔ Ab About the e Author(s (s) ) and nd the he projec ect ➔ Bac Background ➔ Complexity an and Legac acy impac act ➔ Advant ntages of of a autonom onomou ous H HCVs vs passen enger er veh ehicles es ➔ Cases: A ADI i int ntegration. on. ➔ Conc onclusions ons, future wor ork and nd questions ons 21

  21. Foc ocus on on per erspec ectives es o of ➔ Busi siness A ss Asp spects ➔ Sa Safety ➔ Dependabil ilit ity ➔ Verif ific icatio ion ➔ Real alizat ation 23

  22. ➔ Drastic increase in essential complexity ➔ Socio technical implications So Sources of of ou our that arise due to the potentially disruptive nature challen enges es of autonomy ➔ The absence of a driver to deal with unexpected failures. ➔ Saf afety av avai ailab ability trad adeoff 24

  23. Why cases at all? ➔ Man any skew ewed ed disc scussi ssions ➔ Exper ertise a e and differ eren ent cons onsiderations ons i in n play. ➔ Legac acy i is a a moving t tar arget ➔ Prot otot otype v vs prod oduct SO SOTA: mor ore or or l less prot otot otypes; OEM EM IP IP ➔ Reluct ctance ce, c cos ost to o cha hang nge legacy : ne needs m mot otivation. on. ➔ All cas ases ar are cap apab able of L5 au automat ation 25

  24. ➔ Issu ssues s common to all c case ses s e.g. col ollabor oration on with h ot othe her entit itie ies, l legal is issues, lia iabil ilit ity Scope and Sc ➔ Foc ocus is on on how how the he ADI can n inte tegrate te with th th the platf tform delim imit itatio ions ➔ Enabling reu euse e (wher ere e fea easible, e, r rea easonable, e, practic ical) is is a prio iorit ity. 26

  25. To o the he b best of of ou our know nowledge, this is paper is is uniq ique in in ➔ int ntegrating ng i int ntelligenc nce to o Mai ain an n autom omot otive p platfor orm contrib ibutio ions ➔ Di Disc scussi ssion across ss su such a a broad ad sp spectrum of of asp spects w.r .r.t. autonom onomy Autonom onomy mi mindma map 27

  26. ➔ OODA loop oop; O Obs bserve, ADI d defin init itio ion Orient nt, Decide de a and A nd Act. ➔ Orien ent and D nd Decide de di directly mapped d to t o the he ADI DI ➔ Obs bserve a and A nd Act m mapped d to bot o both h the he p platfor orm and nd the he A ADI, sens nsor ors ne need t d to o be r e reu eused ed By Patrick Edwin Moran (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC BY 3.0 28 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

  27. ➔ Safety a ana nalysis depe pend nds on on conf onfigur uration, on, coul ould cha hang nge per case a pe and nd c cont ontext. Con ondition ons f for or ➔ It cannot nnot be avoi oided, how however reuse se the e need eeded ed analysis could be e min inim imiz ized. ➔ Legacy c com ompone ponent nts can n be reus used onl only if Usage age still m meets de design de n decisions ons bot both h timing ng, and da nd data l limitations ons. 29

  28. ➔ Com ompone onent nts can b n be t turne ned off i if need eeded ed ➔ Fai ail Saf afe vs Fai ail Operat ational al. ➔ Actu tuato tors limite ted to to th the plat atform Assu ssumptions ➔ New ew Sen ensors can b be a e added ed to the e ADI freel eely ➔ ADI c can an ac access al all inf nfor ormation on available to o the he com ompone onent nt it c cont ontrol ols 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend