CFW Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc. Facilities Planning, Public - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
cfw
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CFW Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc. Facilities Planning, Public - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 17, 2023 119 likes •396 views

Kern Community College District School Facilities Improvement District (SFID) March 2013 CFW Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc. Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration Improvement Districts In 1997 K 12 school districts

slide-1
SLIDE 1

CFW

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

School Facilities Improvement District (SFID)

March 2013

Kern Community College District

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Improvement Districts

1

  • In 1997 K‐12 school districts and community college districts were granted the authority to

form School Facilities Improvement Districts (SFIDs) and, in doing so, allow the issuance of General Obligation (G.O) bonds by the SFID

  • SFIDs allow the voters of the specified geographical area, who enjoy the maximum benefits
  • f the improvements to be funded by the G.O. bond, to vote on the measure
  • SFIDs are established within a defined geographical area that must be mapped and recorded

with the county and state

  • Districts may customize the boundaries of the SFID, based on the improvements required
  • SFIDs are formed by a vote of the District’s Board of Trustees after holding a public hearing
  • The District has been very successful in creating Special Districts such Kern and as Mammoth

to meets its various facilities needs, however significant facilities needs remain

  • A new SFID could improve Bakersfield, Porterville, and Cerro Coso colleges, including the

programs available at the Delano Center, to further promote educational opportunities in those communities

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Kern CCD SRID

2

  • Kern Community College District includes most of Kern County, a small portion of San

Bernardino County, the southern portion of Tulare County, and portions of Inyo and Mono Counties

  • The District currently operates three college campuses and four State approved

instructional centers

  • In 2002 the Kern Community College District formed the Safety, Repair and Improvement

District (SRID) to address the various priority facility needs of the Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville College Campuses

  • The voters within the specified geographical area approved $180 million in general
  • bligation bonds for purposes of financing capital projects
  • The District has been able to improve the educational facilities at various campuses and
  • ffer a positive impact on student learning in these communities, but additional needs

remain today

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Mammoth SFID

3

  • In the past, the five‐county service area covering approximately 24,000 square

miles has benefitted from the successful implementation of School Facilities Improvement Districts (SFIDs)

  • In 2000, the District formed the Mammoth Schools Improvement Facilities District

to propose a $15 million bond to District voters. The voter approval rate was 76%

  • The boundaries for the Mammoth SFID were co‐terminous with the town of

Mammoth Lakes (except for the area comprising the Municipal Airport)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Existing SFIDs

4 Mammoth SFID Kern SRID

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Options

5

  • Kern CCD has the opportunity to establish a regional funding source with one or

more School Facility Improvement Districts focused on the following communities : 1) Porterville 2) Delano 3) Cerro Coso 4) Bakersfield

  • A new SFID via a Prop. 39 G.O. bond program may provide a viable option to achieve

multiple objectives:

  • Address remaining facilities needs to support the District’s educational vision
  • Develop an expanded set of programs and offerings tailored to an area’s needs
  • Provide resources to strengthen CTE programs and improve career pathways
  • Invest in technology infrastructure to geared towards 21st century education
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Option 1: Porterville SFID

6

Boundary Map

  • The proposed

Porterville SFID would be created along the boundaries of the Porterville USD

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Historical Assessed Valuation Growth

7

  • The proposed Porterville SFID’s

2013 Assessed Valuation (A.V.) is approximately $5.2 billion and has only experienced one year of negative growth

  • Annual A.V. growth has averaged 5.20% in the last 10 years

Year Secured Unsecured Total % Change 2002‐03 $3,048,477,567 $115,422,195 $3,163,899,762 2003‐04 $3,178,563,995 $118,424,175 $3,296,988,170 4.21% 2004‐05 $3,659,513,130 $123,642,835 $3,783,155,965 14.75% 2005‐06 $3,888,743,946 $145,005,797 $4,033,749,743 6.62% 2006‐07 $4,106,598,487 $144,949,119 $4,251,547,606 5.40% 2007‐08 $4,490,582,202 $182,373,590 $4,672,955,792 9.91% 2008‐09 $4,725,956,766 $159,048,847 $4,885,005,613 4.54% 2009‐10 $4,716,803,784 $176,257,228 $4,893,061,012 0.16% 2010‐11 $4,723,433,244 $197,408,588 $4,920,841,832 0.57% 2011‐12 $4,656,154,571 $202,537,406 $4,858,691,977 ‐1.26% 2012‐13 $5,004,145,096 $201,143,554 $5,205,288,650 7.13% Average 5.20%

Option 1: Porterville SFID

Assessed Valuation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

G.O. Bond Program Assumptions

  • Annual Assessed Valuation Growth: 4%
  • Total Bond Series: 4; 25/30 year term

8

  • The Porterville SFID could generate up to $39 million in bond proceeds by establishing

a tax rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value

  • All options would require a 55% voter approval

Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total $25 18,858,162 $ 8,844,245 $ 3,038,007 $ 8,696,354 $ 39,436,767 $ $20 15,086,530 $ 7,075,396 $ 2,430,405 $ 6,957,083 $ 31,549,414 $ $15 11,314,897 $ 5,306,547 $ 1,822,804 $ 5,217,812 $ 23,662,060 $ $10 7,543,265 $ 3,537,698 $ 1,215,203 $ 3,478,542 $ 15,774,707 $

* Includes Porterville USD

Option 1: Porterville SFID

  • Est. Bond Proceeds at Various Tax Rates

Option 1: Porterville SFID

  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

9

  • Based on previous elections, a November 2014

bond election for a Porterville SFID would require approximately 8,102 “yes” votes in

  • rder to pass
  • District demographics are comparable to other

local voters who have supported improving local community colleges

Political Party Voter Age Gender

Option 1: Porterville SFID

Voter Demographics

DEMOCRATS 34% OTHER 23% REPUBLICANS 43% FEMALE 55% MALE 45% AGE 18‐24 12% AGE 25‐34 16% AGE 45‐54 16% AGE 55‐64 18% AGE 65+ 24% AGE 35‐44 14%

Election Date:

  • Nov. 2014

Total District Voters: 28,204 Projected Turnout: 52% Estimated Total Ballots Cast: 14,731 Yes Votes Req. To Win Prop 39 Election (55%): 8,102 Suggested "Yes" File Goal To Win: 10,533

Source: Political Data *Voter data not currently not available for Strathmore Union ESD

Projected Voter Turnout

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

10

Option 2: Delano SFID

Boundary Map Boundary Map

  • The Proposed

Delano SFID includes the combined area currently consisting of the Delano Joint Union HSD, McFarland USD, and Wasco Union SD

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Historical Assessed Valuation Growth

11

  • The 2013 Assessed Valuation (A.V.) for a Delano SFID is more than $ 9.4 billion
  • A.V. has more than doubled in the last 10 years and the annual A.V. growth has

averaged 9.37%

Year Secured Unsecured Total % Change 2002‐03 $3,765,561,785 $151,642,104 $3,917,203,889 2003‐04 $3,970,591,596 $160,497,268 $4,131,088,864 5.46% 2004‐05 $4,461,604,209 $157,846,918 $4,619,451,127 11.82% 2005‐06 $4,757,642,979 $171,433,782 $4,929,076,761 6.70% 2006‐07 $5,780,993,490 $188,391,018 $5,969,384,508 21.11% 2007‐08 $6,516,098,549 $231,429,963 $6,747,528,512 13.04% 2008‐09 $7,485,050,116 $219,761,613 $7,704,811,729 14.19% 2009‐10 $7,183,487,913 $262,232,379 $7,445,720,292 ‐3.36% 2010‐11 $7,577,002,535 $247,531,074 $7,824,533,609 5.09% 2011‐12 $8,145,027,296 $297,684,758 $8,442,712,054 7.90% 2012‐13 $9,104,676,856 $328,728,883 $9,433,405,739 11.73% Average 9.37%

Option 2: Delano SFID

Assessed Valuation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Option 2: Delano SFID

12

  • The Delano SFID could generate up to approximately $71 million in bond proceeds by

establishing a tax rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value

  • Alternatively, lower tax rates would generate the revenues set forth below
  • All options would require a 55% voter approval

G.O. Bond Program Assumptions

  • Annual Assessed Valuation Growth: 4%
  • Total Bond Series: 4; 25/30 year term

Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total $25 34,176,144 $ 16,028,188 $ 5,505,699 $ 15,760,170 $ 71,470,201 $ $20 27,340,915 $ 12,822,551 $ 4,404,559 $ 12,608,136 $ 57,176,161 $ $15 20,505,686 $ 9,616,913 $ 3,303,419 $ 9,456,102 $ 42,882,120 $ $10 13,670,457 $ 6,411,275 $ 2,202,279 $ 6,304,068 $ 28,588,080 $

* Includes Delano HSD, McFarland USD, and Wasco Union HSD

Option 2: Delano SFID

  • Est. Bond Proceeds at Various Tax Rates
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

13

  • It is estimated that 3,929 “yes” votes would be

required in order to pass a bond in November 2014

  • District demographics are comparable to other

local voters who have supported improving local community colleges

Political Party Voter Age Gender

AGE 18‐24 18% AGE 25‐34 22% AGE 45‐54 15% AGE 55‐64 13% AGE 65+ 16% AGE 35‐44 16% DEMOCRATS 59% OTHER 19% REPUBLICANS 22%

MALE 46% FEMALE 54%

Voter Demographics

Option 2: Delano SFID

Election Date:

  • Nov. 2014

Total District Voters: 17,619 Projected Turnout: 41% Estimated Total Ballots Cast: 7,144 Yes Votes Req. To Win Prop 39 Election (55%): 3,929 Suggested "Yes" File Goal To Win: 5,108

Source: Political Data

Projected Voter Turnout

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

14

Option 3: Cerro Coso SFID

Boundary Map Boundary Map

  • The proposed

Cerro Coso SFID includes the combined area currently consisting of the Sierra Sands USD, Tehachapi USD, Mojave USD, So. Kern USD, and Muroc Joint USD

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Historical Assessed Valuation Growth

15

  • The 2013 Assessed Valuation (A.V.) for the proposed Cerro Coso SFID is

approximately $10.7 billion

  • Annual A.V. growth has averaged 13.93% in the last 10 years
  • A.V. has increased significantly in the last 2 years, increasing by almost almost

$2 billion in 2013

Year Secured Unsecured Total % Change 2002‐03 $4,638,196,054 $520,672,882 $5,158,868,936 87.63% 2003‐04 $4,796,974,406 $523,895,725 $5,320,870,131 3.14% 2004‐05 $5,157,280,529 $502,956,431 $5,660,236,960 6.38% 2005‐06 $5,726,767,647 $565,829,083 $6,292,596,730 11.17% 2006‐07 $6,699,277,172 $683,385,926 $7,382,663,098 17.32% 2007‐08 $7,888,401,951 $650,221,304 $8,538,623,255 15.66% 2008‐09 $8,392,626,842 $631,814,613 $9,024,441,455 5.69% 2009‐10 $8,300,826,120 $784,023,977 $9,084,850,097 0.67% 2010‐11 $7,876,760,487 $885,237,641 $8,761,998,128 ‐3.55% 2011‐12 $7,645,104,586 $1,549,375,799 $9,194,480,385 4.94% 2012‐13 $7,538,414,517 $3,216,703,919 $10,755,118,436 16.97% Average 13.93%

Assessed Valuation

Option 3: Cerro Coso SFID

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

16

  • The Cerro Coso SFID could generate approximately $76 million in bond proceeds by

establishing a tax rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value

  • All tax rate options would require a 55% voter approval

G.O. Bond Program Assumptions

  • Annual Assessed Valuation Growth: 4%
  • Total Bond Series: 4; 25/30 year term

Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total $25 38,964,557 $ 18,273,895 $ 6,277,101 $ 17,968,325 $ 76,304,032 $ $20 31,171,645 $ 14,619,116 $ 5,021,681 $ 14,374,660 $ 65,187,102 $ $15 23,378,734 $ 10,964,337 $ 3,766,261 $ 10,780,995 $ 48,890,326 $ $10 15,585,823 $ 7,309,558 $ 2,510,840 $ 7,187,330 $ 32,593,551 $

* Includes Mojave USD, Tehachapi USD, Sierra Sands USD, Southern Kern USD, and Muroc Jt. USD

Option 3: Cerro Cosso SFID

  • Est. Bond Proceeds at Various Tax Rates
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds

Option 3: Cerro Coso SFID

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

17

  • Based on previous elections, a November 2014

bond election for a Cerro Coso SFID would require approximately 12,066 “yes” votes in

  • rder to pass
  • District demographics suggest that the voters

in these communities are mostly Republican and older

Political Party Voter Age Gender

FEMALE 51% MALE 49% DEMOCRATS 25% OTHER 27% REPUBLICANS 48% AGE 18‐24 10% AGE 25‐34 14% AGE 45‐54 21% AGE 55‐64 20% AGE 65+ 22% AGE 35‐44 13%

Voter Demographics

Option 3: Cerro Coso SFID

Election Date:

  • Nov. 2014

Total District Voters: 34,327 Projected Turnout: 55% Estimated Total Ballots Cast: 18,988 Yes Votes Req. To Win Prop 39 Election (55%): 10,443 Suggested "Yes" File Goal To Win: 13,576

Source: Political Data *Voter data not currently not available for Sierra Sands USD

Projected Voter Turnout*

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

18

Option 4: Bakersfield

Boundary Map Boundary Map

  • The proposed

Bakersfield SFID includes the area consisting of the Kern Union HSD

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Historical Assessed Valuation Growth

19

  • The 2013 Assessed Valuation (A.V.) for the proposed Bakersfield SFID is

approximately $47 billion

  • Annual A.V. growth has averaged 6.68% in the last 10 years
  • A.V. rebounded by 4.91% in the most recent fiscal year, 2013, following a slight

decline

Option 4: Bakersfield

Assessed Valuation

Year Secured Unsecured Total % Change 2002‐03 $24,200,908,243 $1,165,099,154 $25,366,007,397 2003‐04 $26,037,258,799 $1,153,650,565 $27,190,909,364 7.19% 2004‐05 $28,362,541,002 $1,262,148,587 $29,624,689,589 8.95% 2005‐06 $32,492,241,387 $1,318,616,559 $33,810,857,946 14.13% 2006‐07 $39,471,084,087 $1,418,069,195 $40,889,153,282 20.93% 2007‐08 $45,819,821,752 $1,696,895,112 $47,516,716,864 16.21% 2008‐09 $46,357,191,176 $1,784,821,080 $48,142,012,256 1.32% 2009‐10 $42,794,544,959 $1,967,934,304 $44,762,479,263 ‐7.02% 2010‐11 $43,098,943,259 $2,014,097,774 $45,113,041,033 0.78% 2011‐12 $42,633,839,480 $2,203,276,671 $44,837,116,151 ‐0.61% 2012‐13 $44,797,998,326 $2,242,852,693 $47,040,851,019 4.91% Average 6.68%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

20

  • The Bakersfield SFID could generate approximately $399 million in bond proceeds by

establishing a tax rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value

  • All tax rate options would require a 55% voter approval

G.O. Bond Program Assumptions

  • Annual Assessed Valuation Growth: 4%
  • Total Bond Series: 4; 25/30 year term
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds
  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds

Option 4: Bakersfield

  • Est. G.O. Bond Proceeds

Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total Tax Rate 2014 2017 2020 2023 Total $25 177,726,360 $ 104,562,441 $ 53,375,588 $ 64,240,600 $ 399,904,989 $ $20 142,181,088 $ 83,649,953 $ 42,700,470 $ 51,392,480 $ 319,923,991 $ $15 106,635,816 $ 62,737,465 $ 32,025,353 $ 38,544,360 $ 239,942,994 $ $10 71,090,544 $ 41,824,977 $ 21,350,235 $ 25,696,240 $ 159,961,996 $

* Includes Kern Union High School District

Option 4: Bakersfield SFID

  • Est. Bond Proceeds at Various Tax Rates
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

21

  • Based on previous elections, a November 2014

bond election for a Bakersfield SFID would require approximately 65,658 “yes” votes in

  • rder to pass
  • District demographics suggest that the voters

in these communities are majority female, above the ages of 45

Political Party Voter Age Gender

Voter Demographics

Option 4: Bakersfield

MALE 47% FEMALE 53% DEMOCRATS 37% OTHER 22% REPUBLICANS 41% AGE 18‐24 11% AGE 25‐34 20% AGE 45‐54 17% AGE 55‐64 17% AGE 65+ 19% AGE 35‐44 16%

Election Date:

  • Nov. 2014

Total District Voters: 247,460 Projected Turnout: 48% Estimated Total Ballots Cast: 119,378 Yes Votes Req. To Win Prop 39 Election (55%): 65,658 Suggested "Yes" File Goal To Win: 85,355

Source: Political Data

Projected Voter Turnout

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Timeline

22

  • 1. Program Design
  • 2. Technical Background Review
  • 3. Community Poll
  • 4. Community Process
  • 5. Facilities Assessment
  • 6. Capital Plan
  • 7. Financing Plan
  • 8. Sequencing and Implementation
  • 9. Adopt Implemenation Plan

* Election date not yet annouced by County Registrar of Voters; timeline may be adjusted for a June or November 2014 election date June 2014 – Statewide and School District Elections Nov 2014 – Regularly Scheduled Election

Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sept

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Planning Process

23

  • Conduct Facilities Needs Assessment and Implementation Plan

Review District needs and goals

Conduct preliminary community voter opinion poll to establish priorities and funding

  • ptions

Prepare draft Plan for District consideration

  • Analyze Financing Options

Determine available sources of funding, including local G.O. Bond options

Prepare draft Financing Plan for District consideration

  • Conduct Public Information Program

Undertake Public Information campaign

Conduct Voter Opinion Survey

Modify Capital and Finance Plan based on results

  • Conduct Election

Assist District in conducting election, including adoption of resolution, project list and ballot language

Assist District in public acceptance and campaign committee in voter approval program

  • Begin Program Implementation

Design local Bond Program for District and voter approval, if needed

Assist in Bond approval

Issue Bonds

Implement Construction Program

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

24

  • CFW was founded in 1986 by George Caldwell, Ed.D., Ernesto Flores, and Michael Winters, Ed.D., as a

multidisciplinary, full service firm meeting the needs of school districts throughout the State

  • Over our 26 year history, CFW has represented over 200 districts with comprehensive facilities planning,

election, and financial advisory services

  • In 2012, CFW was instrumental in passing approximately 30% of all successful G.O. bond elections

undertaken in California, including McFarland, Lindsay, and Lancaster Unified School Districts

  • In addition, CFW has worked with many school districts within by the Kern Community College District such

as: Bakersfield City, Porterville, Richgrove, Mojave, Sierra Sands, Southern Kern, Wasco, Needles and Big Pine

  • Some accomplishments include:
  • Over 550 bond sales and $5.0 billion in bond proceeds sold
  • Over $1.0 billion approved in State Hardship and Matching funds
  • Over 200 bond campaigns won – a 90% success rate
  • Over $200 million in Federal Stimulus authorization received in 2009 alone
  • Over $500 million in Program Management services provided
  • Today, CFW continues as a leader in the procurement of State aid and development of financing vehicles

involving Federal Stimulus programs

  • CFW has pioneered many facility programs that enhance and maintain general fund sustainability
  • CFW is committed to maintaining its increased level of personal service and attention to the Kern

Community College District

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

CFW Experience in Kern CCD

25

No. District County 1 Arvin Kern 2 Bakersfield City SD Kern 3 Buttonwillow ESD Kern 4 Caliente SD Kern 5 Edison SD Kern 6 Elk Hills SD Kern 7 Fairfax SD Kern 8 General Shafter SD Kern 9 Kern CCD, Mammoth Kern 10 Kernville Union SD Kern 11 Lamont SD Kern 12 Lost Hills SD Kern 13 Maricopa USD Kern 14 McFarland Unified SD Kern 15 Midway SD Kern 16 Mojave USD Kern 17 Muroc Jt USD Kern 18 Richgrove SD Kern 19 Richland SD Kern 20 Sierra Sands USD Kern No. District County 21 Southern Kern USD Kern 22 Standard ESD Kern 23 Vineland ESD Kern 24 Wasco ESD Kern 25 West Kern CCD Kern 26 Lindsay USD Tulare 27 Porterville USD Tulare 28 Earlimart ESD Tulare 29 Pixley ESD Tulare 30 Adelanto ESD San Bernardino 31 Bear Valley San Bernardino 32 Beaumont San Bernardino 33 Needles San Bernardino 34 Palo Verde CCD San Bernardino 35 Rialto USD San Bernardino 36 Big Pine USD Inyo 37 Bishop USD Inyo 38 Bishop ESD Inyo 39 Owens Valley USD Inyo 40 Round Valley Mono Other: 41 Lancaster SD Los Angeles 42 Palmdale SD Los Angeles

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc.

Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration

Contact

26

Ernesto Flores President Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc. Ph.: (510) 596‐8170 Rosa Perez Principal Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc. Ph.: (510) 596‐8170