ceng5030 part 1 2 voltage scaling
play

CENG5030 Part 1-2: Voltage Scaling - A Dynamic Programming Approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CENG5030 Part 1-2: Voltage Scaling - A Dynamic Programming Approach Bei Yu (Latest update: January 14, 2019) Spring 2019 1 / 27 Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC07: Voltage Partitioning


  1. CENG5030 Part 1-2: Voltage Scaling —- A Dynamic Programming Approach Bei Yu (Latest update: January 14, 2019) Spring 2019 1 / 27

  2. Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC’07: Voltage Partitioning ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist ICCAD’07: Voltage Assignment on Slicing Floorplanning 2 / 27

  3. Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC’07: Voltage Partitioning ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist ICCAD’07: Voltage Assignment on Slicing Floorplanning 3 / 27

  4. Multi-Voltage Design @IBM 1 1 Ruchir Puri et al. (2003). “Pushing ASIC performance in a power envelope”. In: Proc. DAC , pp. 788–793. 3 / 27

  5. Level-Converter 2 Level-converter is used to avoid excessive static power consumption between the low and high voltage regions. 2 Ruchir Puri et al. (2003). “Pushing ASIC performance in a power envelope”. In: Proc. DAC , pp. 788–793. 4 / 27

  6. Placement Level Multi-Voltage 3 3 Huaizhi Wu and Martin DF Wong (2009). “Incremental improvement of voltage assignment”. In: IEEE TCAD 28.2, pp. 217–230. 5 / 27

  7. 4 4 Kristof Blutman et al. (2017). “Floorplan and placement methodology for improved energy reduction in stacked power-domain design”. In: Proc. ASPDAC , pp. 444–449. 6 / 27

  8. Floorplanning Level Multi-Voltage 8 2 Low voltage 6 ◮ Modules are assigned high-voltage or High voltage 7 4 low-voltage. ◮ Low voltage → high delay. 5 ◮ Trade off between the power saving and 1 3 performance. Power (d1,p1) (d2,p2) Delay 7 / 27

  9. Floorplanning Level Multi-Voltage 8 2 Low voltage ◮ Modules are assigned high-voltage or 6 High voltage 7 low-voltage. 4 ◮ Low voltage → high delay. 5 ◮ Trade off between the power saving and 1 3 performance. ◮ Consider Power Network Resource ◮ High voltage modules should pack close ◮ Generate Voltage Island Power Network Resource 7 / 27

  10. What’s Netlist? 1 2 3 5 4 6 N-1 N 2 Tcycle 5 N-1 1 4 N 3 8 / 27

  11. What’s Floorplanning? 1 6 2 3 4 5 7 8 8 2 6 7 After floorplanning 4 5 1 3 9 / 27

  12. B*-Tree 5 5 Yun-Chih Chang et al. (2000). “B*-Trees: A New Representation for Non-Slicing Floorplans”. In: Proc. DAC , pp. 458–463. 10 / 27

  13. Classic Design Flow 7 ◮ Integer linear programming (ILP) based ◮ More complicated ILP formulation is develped in ICCAD’07 6 . 6 Wan-Ping Lee, Hung-Yi Liu, and Yao-Wen Chang (2007). “An ILP algorithm for post-floorplanning voltage-island generation considering power-network planning”. In: Proc. ICCAD , pp. 650–655. 7 Wai-Kei Mak and Jr-Wei Chen (2007). “Voltage island generation under performance requirement for SoC designs”. In: Proc. ASPDAC , pp. 798–803. 11 / 27

  14. 12 / 27

  15. 12 / 27

  16. Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC’07: Voltage Partitioning ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist ICCAD’07: Voltage Assignment on Slicing Floorplanning 13 / 27

  17. NP-Completeness [Garey & Johnson,1979] 8 ◮ Decision Problem (Yes/No Problem) ◮ N P : Set of problems w. Nondeterministic Polynomial time algorithm ◮ P : Set of problems w. (Deterministic) Polynomial time algorithm ◮ N P -Complete : hardest problems in NP If a problem in NP -Complete solved in polynomial time → any problem in NP solved in polynomial time 8 Some contents & figures on this part come from Prof. Takahashi 13 / 27

  18. NP-Completeness [Garey & Johnson,1979] 8 ◮ Decision Problem (Yes/No Problem) ◮ N P : Set of problems w. Nondeterministic Polynomial time algorithm ◮ P : Set of problems w. (Deterministic) Polynomial time algorithm ◮ N P -Complete : hardest problems in NP ◮ Conjecture: P � = NP If a problem in NP -Complete solved in polynomial time → any problem in NP solved in polynomial time 8 Some contents & figures on this part come from Prof. Takahashi 13 / 27

  19. Polynomial Time Reduction ◮ Provides difficulty relation between problems ◮ SAT is NP -Complete → 3SAT, Hamilton, TSP, Coloring... 14 / 27

  20. NP-Hardness [Garey & Johnson,1979] ◮ Optimization problem ◮ Is neither in NP nor in NP -Complete ◮ N P -hard if a related decision problem is NP -complete ◮ E.g. Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) ◮ No polynomial time algorithm 15 / 27

  21. Strategies of Algorithm Design 1. Check whether problem is easy or not? 2. If possible, prove is NP -hard or NP -complete 3. For easy problem (in P ): 4. For not easy problem (in NP -hard): 16 / 27

  22. Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC’07: Voltage Partitioning ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist ICCAD’07: Voltage Assignment on Slicing Floorplanning 17 / 27

  23. Case 1: Calculating Binomial Coefficient 17 / 27

  24. Case 1: Calculating Binomial Coefficient Question Can we have a better Algorithm? 17 / 27

  25. Case 2: Knapsack Problem n � x i v i max i = 1 n � x i w i ≤ W s . t . i = 1 ◮ v i : value of object i ◮ w i : weight of object i ◮ x i ∈ { 0 , 1 } Question ◮ Design a Dynamic Programming Algorithm to Solve it. ◮ What is x i can be floating value? 18 / 27

  26. Principle of Optimality In an optimal sequence of decisions or choices, each subsequence must also be optimal. 19 / 27

  27. Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC’07: Voltage Partitioning ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist ICCAD’07: Voltage Assignment on Slicing Floorplanning 20 / 27

  28. 9 9 Hung-Yi Liu, Wan-Ping Lee, and Yao-Wen Chang (2007). “A provably good approximation algorithm for power optimization using multiple supply voltages”. In: Proc. DAC , pp. 887–890. 20 / 27

  29. ◮ On perfect-number partition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem ◮ Correction: 10 10 Tao Lin et al. (2010). “A revisit to voltage partitioning problem”. In: Proc. GLSVLSI , pp. 115–118. 21 / 27

  30. Overview Introduction Background: NP problem Background: Dynamic Programming DAC’07: Voltage Partitioning ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist ICCAD’07: Voltage Assignment on Slicing Floorplanning 22 / 27

  31. ICCAD’06: Voltage Assignment on Netlist 11 (a) Algorithm Flow (b) Notations Question: ◮ How to define a slack for each vertex v i ? ◮ Please provide a mathematical formulation minizing total power consumption. 11 Wan-Ping Lee, Hung-Yi Liu, and Yao-Wen Chang (2006). “Voltage island aware floorplanning for power and timing optimization”. In: Proc. ICCAD , pp. 389–394. 22 / 27

  32. 23 / 27

  33. 23 / 27

  34. ◮ Further speed-up: dual to min-cost flow 12 ◮ Overcome reconverge issue: 13 12 Qiang Ma and Evangeline FY Young (2008). “Network flow-based power optimization under timing constraints in MSV-driven floorplanning”. In: Proc. ICCAD , pp. 1–8. 13 Yifang Liu and Jiang Hu (2009). “A New Algorithm for Simultaneous Gate Sizing and Threshold Voltage Assignment”. In: Proc. ISPD , pp. 27–34. 23 / 27

  35. 14 Consistency Relaxation backward solution propagation (v 2 =1: v 4 =1)[ c=3, q=7] (v 2 =2: v 4 =2)[ c=2, q=5] v 2 (v 4 =1)[ c=3.1, q=8.2] (v 1 =1: v 2 =2, v 3 =2)[ c=5, q=3.5] v 1 v 4 (v 4 =2)[ c=2.9, q=8] (v 1 =2: v 2 =1, v 3 =2)[ c=5, q=4.4] (v 4 =3)[ c=2.7, q=7.9] v 3 (v 3 =1: v 4 =1)[ c=4, q=7] (v 3 =2: v 4 =2)[ c=3, q=6] 15 14 Yifang Liu and Jiang Hu (2009). “A New Algorithm for Simultaneous Gate Sizing and Threshold Voltage Assignment”. In: Proc. ISPD , pp. 27–34. 24 / 27

  36. 14 Consistency Relaxation (v 2 =1: v 4 =1)[ c=3, q=7] (v 2 =2: v 4 =2)[ c=2, q=5] v 2 (v 4 =1)[ c=3.1, q=8.2] (v 1 =1: v 2 =2, v 3 =2)[ c=5, q=3.5] v 1 v 4 (v 4 =2)[ c=2.9, q=8] (v 1 =2: v 2 =1, v 3 =2)[ c=5, q=4.4] (v 4 =3)[ c=2.7, q=7.9] v 3 (v 3 =1: v 4 =1)[ c=4, q=7] (v 3 =2: v 4 =2)[ c=3, q=6] 16 14 Yifang Liu and Jiang Hu (2009). “A New Algorithm for Simultaneous Gate Sizing and Threshold Voltage Assignment”. In: Proc. ISPD , pp. 27–34. 24 / 27

  37. 14 Consistency Relaxation (v 2 =1: v 4 =1)[ c=3, q=7] 1 or v 4 2 ? v 4 v 2 (v 4 =1)[ c=3.1, q=8.2] (v 1 =2: v 2 =1, v 3 =2)[ c=5, q=4.4] v 1 v 4 (v 4 =2)[ c=2.9, q=8] v 3 (v 3 =2: v 4 =2)[ c=3, q=6] 17 14 Yifang Liu and Jiang Hu (2009). “A New Algorithm for Simultaneous Gate Sizing and Threshold Voltage Assignment”. In: Proc. ISPD , pp. 27–34. 24 / 27

  38. 14 Consistency Restoration forward solution propagation (v 2 =1) [a=3.6] v 2 (v 4 =1) [a= ,q=8.2] (v 4 =2) [a= ,q=8] (v 1 =2) [a=2] v 1 v 4 (v 4 =3) [a= ,q=7.9] v 3 D(v i ,v j ) V 4 =1 V 4 =2 V 4 =3 V 2 =1 1.2 3 2.2 (v 3 =2) [a=3.6] V 3 =2 3 2 2.2 18 14 Yifang Liu and Jiang Hu (2009). “A New Algorithm for Simultaneous Gate Sizing and Threshold Voltage Assignment”. In: Proc. ISPD , pp. 27–34. 24 / 27

  39. 14 Consistency Restoration forward solution propagation (v 2 =1) [a=3.6] v 2 (v 4 =1) [a=6.6 ,q=8.2] (v 4 =2) [a=6.6 ,q=8] (v 1 =2) [a=2] v 1 v 4 (v 4 =3) [a=5.8 ,q=7.9] v 3 D(v i ,v j ) V 4 =1 V 4 =2 V 4 =3 V 2 =1 1.2 3 2.2 (v 3 =2) [a=3.6] V 3 =2 3 2 2.2 19 14 Yifang Liu and Jiang Hu (2009). “A New Algorithm for Simultaneous Gate Sizing and Threshold Voltage Assignment”. In: Proc. ISPD , pp. 27–34. 24 / 27

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend