Case study of technical contradiction Japan VE Association (Kansai - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case study of technical contradiction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case study of technical contradiction Japan VE Association (Kansai - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Japan TRIZ symposium in 2013 Research of Development type TRIZ Technique (Part 7) Case study of technical contradiction Japan VE Association (Kansai Branch, West Japan) Easy-to-use TRIZ Study Group (former TRIZ Spreading and Utilizing Study


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Japan TRIZ symposium in 2013

Research of Development type TRIZ Technique (Part 7)

Case study of technical contradiction

Japan VE Association (Kansai Branch, West Japan) Easy-to-use TRIZ Study Group (former TRIZ Spreading and Utilizing Study Group) Hisayoshi Tanaka (Shimadzu Corporation), Makoto Unno ( ), Kazuyasu Ikeda (Sekisui Engineering Co Ltd.), et al.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Case study project members

Project members other than those on cover slide (INPO)

Masa sayuki I i Ish shii i (Sum umito tomo E Electr tric Indu Industries, , Ltd.) Ltd.) Hiroshi hi O Oyatani ani ( (Mazda) da) Takas ashi hi S Suzuk uki (Mazda da) Chi hiak aki H Hay ayashi (Kaw awasaki Indu Industries, Ltd.) Ltd.) Sato atoshi H Hirono

  • no (Omron)
  • n)

Tos

  • shiaki M

Mas asaki (Nitto D tto Denk enko) Shini nichi M Matsue ( ue (West t Japan pan Railway ay) Manabu abu Mizobuc

  • buchi

hi (Panas nasoni

  • nic)

Ets tsuo Yam amada ( (Cano anon Inc Inc.) .) Masay ayuk uki I Inoguc guchi hi (Panas nasoni

  • nic)

Ichiro

  • Inoue (

ue (Kyot

  • to S
  • Sangy

gyo

  • Univer

ersity ty) Tor

  • ru K

u Kaw awai ai ( (Shar harp) Seiya a Sato (

  • (Dainippon

ppon Screen M een Mfg.) Naohi aohiko

  • Tak

akay ayam ama ( (Shi himadz adzu Co u Corpor porati tion

  • n)

Ryu yuji ji Naka ka (Mitsubi ubishi hi E Elec ectric C Corporat ation)

  • n)

Hiromi F Fujiwar wara ( a (Shimadz adzu C u Corpor

  • rat

ation)

  • n)

Shigeak geaki Matsui ui (Mitsubi ubishi hi E Elec ectric C Corporat ation)

  • n)

Bunt nta M a Matsuhana ( uhana (Shimadz adzu C u Corporati ation)

  • n)

Naoshi hi Y Yoshi hida da (Mitsubi ubishi hi H Heavy Indus ustr tries es) Takas ashi hi S Shitak taka ( a (Kubota)

  • ta)

Hirofu

  • fumi Sato

ato ( (Brot

  • ther Indu

Industries, Ltd.) Ltd.)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Current content of activity

2.Individual tool 1 1.Entrance

①Problem definition ②Product analysis ③Analysis why why ④Attribute analysis ⑤technical contradiction ⑥Physical contradiction

3.Individual tool 2

⑦Place material-analysis

⑧Law of technological system evolution The 2nd report The 1st report The 3rd report The 4th report technical contradiction report omission The 6th report

⑨SLP

The 5th report

The case study project was done from 2006 to 2011.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Content of presentation

1.Purport of this report 2.Introduction of "Examination procedure of technical contradiction cancellation (idea)" 3.Introduction of outline of case study 4.Reflection of finding obtained by case study 5.Summary

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

  • 1. Main message of this report

The case study project was done during 2006 - 2011. From 2012, it is examined to maintain it as a guidance used easily. This time, it reports concerning the technical contradiction

  • mitted in past reports.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

  • 2. Introduction of "Examination procedure of

technical contradiction cancellation (idea)"

"Examination procedure of the technical contradiction cancellation (idea)" obtained from the case study project executed in 2006 - fiscal year 2011 is as follows. "Measures plan" Phase "Problem analysis" Phase

Step5: Setting of technical contradiction

Step4: Attribute analysis Step3: Analysis why why Step2: Product analysis Step1: Problem definition Step6: Idea creation

This time, It explains around "Step5: the setting

  • f technical

contradiction".

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Step5: Setting of technical contradiction

Step5-1: Selection of primary cause Step5-2: Definition of profitable action Step5-3: Definition of excessive harmful/shortage/action Step5-4: The contradiction model's making Step5-5: Setting of technical contradiction

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

  • 3. Introduction of the outline of the case study

"Problem of the inclination of the picture frame" was caught as a theme, it examined according to "Examination procedure of the technical contradiction cancellation" made with this society, and it verified it concerning this procedure.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

New case: Problem of inclination of picture frame

Picture frame

String (1) Nail (1) Hook (2 pieces) Wall I want to prevent the picture frame from inclining even if there is a vibration that exists in standard living conditions. Measures against the inclination of the picture frame in the environment with an abnormally large vibration that the train passes immediately side near the construction site are not done this time.

Vibratio ion The string shifts by the vibration transmitted from the wall.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Step1: Problem definition

1.Syst stem n name Pic icture fra frame s set 2.Ba Back ckgroun und The g goin ing stri ring on t the n nail s shift fts gra radually b by the v vib ibration t tra ransmitted fro from t the w wall ll, and t the p pic icture fra frame in inclines. 3.Id Ideal al s solution The he pict cture f frame does esn't i inc ncline ev even if det etaching and nd t the r he reg egistration

  • f

f the p pic icture fra frame are re e easy and t there is is a vib ibra ration. 4.The m he main n elem emen ent that c composes techn chnological s system em and t the e funct ction

  • n

Omissio ion ( (Refe fer to the p product analy lysis is). ). 5.Solu lutio ion p proble lem It improves es it so that t the p e pict ctur ure f frame e shoul uld not i incl cline e even en i if ther ere e is is a vib ibra ration t that exis ists wit ithout g gre reatly b basically c changing a pre resent metho hod in stand ndard l living ng c cond nditions ns. 6.Lim imit itin ing c condit itio ion ・Measur ures es a agains nst the i e incl clination o n of the e pict ctur ure frame i e in the e environment w wit ith a an abnormally la larg rge v vib ibration that the tra rain p passes immed ediatel ely s side n e nea ear t the c e cons nstruct ction n site e are n e not d done t ne this time. ・The s stri ring is is 1, , and b both s sid ides are re fix fixed in in the hook. ・The s stri ring is is not wra rapped aro round t the n nail il. ・The he b bottom o

  • f the

he p pict cture frame ha has co come i in n co contact w with t h the he wall. ・On Only t the ro roll ll : : the vib ibration t tra ransmitted fro from the w wall. ll.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Step2: Product analysis

Two hooks Nail St String

The b bear a against by t the f fricti ctiona nal force. ce. It h hold lds. s. It maintains it. The end of a string is fixed.

Cause the vibration Cause the vibration The vibration is caused.

Weig ight is is suppo pport rted. d.

The bear against by the frictional force.

Picture frame (product) Wall

The vibration is caused. The vibration is caused.

It It i is pos possible t to

  • tr

try to y to put i t it. t.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Step3: “Why why” Analysis

The picture frame inclines. Center of gravity doesn't encounter it.

The position in which the string catches on a nail shifts.

Center of gravity is not understood easily. Center of gravity is not matched easily. The vibration of the outside is transmitted. The frictional force of the picture frame and the wall is weak. The frictional force of the nail and the string is weak. The vibration cannot be absorbed. The center of gravity of the picture frame has changed.

The string slips.

When putting it on the wall After time passes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Change in product analysis by passage of time

When putting it on the wall After time passes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Step4: Attribute analysis

Thi Thing ng

Attr ttribute Incr crea ease Rela latio ion /t /that ca cannot b be e ca called whic ich i investig igatio ion nece ecessity A A de decrease Rela latio ion

String

  • Thickn

kness ss Elastic icit ity Fla lat ra rate Transformation Water p permeabilit ility Weight ht Frictio ional p l propertie ies

Nail

  • Thickn

kness ss Inclin linatio ion ( (installa llatio ion a angle le) Fla lat ra rate Easiness t to rust st Frictio ional p l propertie ies

Attribute

Problem (bad effect) Attribute Problem (bad effect)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Step5-1: Selection of primary cause

The picture frame inclines. Center of gravity doesn't encounter it. The position in which the string catches on a nail shifts. Center of gravity is not understood easily. Center of gravity is not matched easily. The vibration of the outside is transmitted. The frictional force of the picture frame and the wall is weak. The frictional force of the nail and the string is weak. The vibration cannot be absorbed. The center of gravity of the picture frame has changed. The string slips.

It examined it by this this time.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Step5-2: Definition of profitable action

Selected primary cause Object (The thing that is original of the primary cause . The attribute is not included). Purpose of object (reason wanting it like current state each other) Being acted thing (thing to receive action from object) Action that causes it for thing that it acts object The thing (object) that is

  • riginal of the selected primary

cause is clarified.

Because it is that the reason wanting it like the current state each other (purpose) is sure to exist, the purpose is clarified to the object.

When some actions have been caused for the thing (being acted thing) to achieve the purpose, the object is caught. Primary cause selected from result of analysis why why.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Step5-2: Definition of profitable action

Selected primary cause The frictional force of the nail and the string is weak. Object (The thing that is original of the primary cause . The attribute is not included). String Purpose of object (reason wanting it like current state each other) ??? Being acted thing (thing to receive action from object) Nail Action that causes it for thing that it acts object

The purpose of the object (string) was not defined easily.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Consideration concerning reason why purpose

  • f object is not put out easily

Because the action is not correctly expressible by the product analysis, it is likely not to think easily. After deciding the object, you should review the product analysis for the thing and the action of the object surroundings.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Review of product analysis

Two hooks Nail St String

The bear against by the frictional force. It holds. It maintains it. The end of a string is fixed.

The vibration is told.

The vibration is caused. Weight is supported.

Picture frame (product) Wall

The vibration is caused. The vibration is caused. It is possible to try to put it.

One of "Can start starting"

  • f the reasons (purpose) to

use the string. It doesn't describe it as an action.

Because the object is a string, you should think as an action of the

  • bject.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Reviewed product analysis

Two hooks Nail St String

The bear against by the frictional force. It holds. It maintains it. The end of a string is fixed.

Cause the vibration Cause the vibration

The vibration is caused.

Weigh ght i is s told ld. . The bear against by the frictional force.

Picture frame (product) Wall

The vibration is caused. The vibration is caused.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Step5-2: Definition of profitable action

Selected primary cause The frictional force of the nail and the string is weak. Object (The thing that is original of the primary cause . The attribute is not included). String Purpose of object (reason wanting it like current state each other) Detaching the picture frame is easy and the adjustment of the inclination is facilitated. Being acted thing (thing to receive action from object) Nail Action that causes it for thing that it acts object The weight of the picture frame is told.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Rule of drawing

 It models because of object (S), being acted thing (O), and action (V).  A profitable action is shown by the solid line. The lack action is shown in the short dashed line. An excessive action is shown in a double line. The adverse effect is shown in the wavy line. The model expresses the clarification.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Step5-2: Definition of profitable action

String Nail

A profitable action: The weight of the picture frame is told.

The purpose: Detaching the picture frame is easy and the adjustment of the inclination is facilitated.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Step5-3: Definition of harmful/insufficient/excessive actions

Selected primary cause At each embarrassment that the selected primary cause causes Object (The thing that is original of the primary cause . The attribute is not included). Being acted thing (thing to receive action from object) Action that causes it for thing that it acts object In general, a high-ranking factor shows one about the primary cause selected when analyzing it why why at this each embarrassment. "Each embarrassment" that the selected primary cause causes is caught when having caused as a result of causing some actions for the thing that it acts the object.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Selected primary cause The frictional force of the nail and the string is weak. At each embarrassment (a ..one.. high-ranking factor of the selected primary cause) The string slips. Object (The thing that is original of the primary cause . The attribute is not included). String Being acted thing (thing to receive action from object) Nail Excessive harmful/shortage/action that causes it for thing that it acts object The bear against by the frictional force (lack action).

Step5-3: Definition of harmful/insufficient/excessive actions

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

String Nail The lack action: Bear against by the frictional force. The result: The string slips. Step5-3: Definition of harmful/insufficient/excessive actions

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

String Nail

The lack action: Bear against by the frictional force.

The result: The string slips.

The action model is made from the

  • bject as a model that the being

acted thing and the action work. (above figure) However, there is impossibility in the expression as the action that works at one direction to the thing act from the object because the frictional force is power to work mutually between two things. (figure below) The way things are going, the contradiction model cannot be

  • made. 。。

Object Being acted thing Profitable action:○○○ Excessive action:●●● Purpose:□□□ Result:■■■

Act ction

  • n mod
  • del

el assum umed ed at fi first Exces cessive e ha harmful ful/s /shor hortage/a e/act ction

  • n in

n prob

  • blem

em of

  • f

incl nclina nation

  • n of
  • f pict

ctur ure e fr frame

Step5-3: Definition of harmful/insufficient/excessive actions

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Consideration on the model structuring

What is the purpose of structuring the action model? →Device to make contradiction easy to see. The model might not have to express contradiction forcibly. The model was made in the image that pulled out the part (surroundings of the object) that became a focus from the product analysis, contradiction was expressed in the word referring to this model, and it changed to the method. The name of the model also changed from "Contradiction model" to "Action model".

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Step5-4: Structuring the action model

String Nail A profitable action: The weight of the picture frame is told. The lack action: Bear against by the frictional force.

The purpose: Detaching the picture frame is easy and the adjustment of the inclination is facilitated.

The result: The string slips.

I have occurred the phenomenon "The string slips" because of "Bear against by the frictional force" insufficient, and want to prevent this from occurring. It becomes impossible to achieve the purpose "Detaching the picture frame is easy and the adjustment of the inclination is facilitated" though it only has to fix the string to the nail and to prevent the position of the string and the nail from shifting for that. Explanation ≫ of model of record on ≪

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Step5-5: Setting of technical contradictions

The improved characteristic and the deteriorating characteristic are defined. Improved characteristic Power (power to fix position of string and nail) Deteriorating characteristic Easiness of operation (easiness of detaching and registration of picture frame to do) I have occurred the phenomenon "The string slips" because of "Bear against by the frictional force" insufficient, and want to prevent this from occurring. It becomes impossible to achieve the purpose "Detaching the picture frame is easy and the adjustment of the inclination is facilitated" though it only has to fix the string to the nail and to prevent the position of the string and the nail from shifting for that.

The improved characteristic and the deteriorating characteristic are chosen referring to the above-mentioned sentences.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

  • 4. Reflection of findings obtained by the case study

Step5-1: Selection of primary cause Step5-2: Review of product analysis Step5-3: Definition of profitable action Step5-4: Definition of excessive harmful/shortage/action Step5-5: The action model's making Step5-6: Setting of technical contradiction The procedure of "Step5: the setting of technical contradiction" was changed as follows.

It newly adds it.

"Contradiction model" is changed to "Action model".

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

  • 5. Summary: Result of the case study

The following result was achieved as a result of doing the case study concerning technical contradiction that assumed "Problem of the inclination of the picture frame" to be a theme.

  • When you set technical contradiction

1.Necessity and the method of reviewing product analysis 2.Method of making more logical "Action model" [Ni] was concerned, and the new insight was able to be obtained.

  • When the product was analyzed, awareness with an important

consideration analysis of the time passage was obtained.

  • The above-mentioned finding was reflected in "Examination procedure
  • f the technical contradiction cancellation", and this examination

procedure was able to be made a refinement.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Thank you for your attention

END