Case Presentation Brigitte M. Ronnett, MD Department of Pathology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case Presentation Brigitte M. Ronnett, MD Department of Pathology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Case Presentation Brigitte M. Ronnett, MD Department of Pathology The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD USA Case Presentation The patient is a 39 year-old woman, G2P1, who presented with a missed abortion at 8-10


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Case Presentation

Brigitte M. Ronnett, MD

Department of Pathology The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Case Presentation

  • The patient is a 39 year-old woman, G2P1,

who presented with a missed abortion at 8-10 weeks and ultrasound findings suggesting a molar pregnancy (serum beta-HCG level not available). The material for review is from the curettage specimen.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Diagnosis?

  • In follow-up, the beta-HCG level became

undetectable by 6 months and remained so during an additional 6 months of follow-up, without requiring chemotherapy. Original diagnosis: Partial hydatidiform mole

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Case Presentation

  • Follow-up: 2 years later, 8 month history of

dysfunctional uterine bleeding (menorrhagia), serum beta-HCG level 750,000 mIU/mL (patient reported that she had not been sexually active since the prior molar pregnancy)

  • Imaging studies & hysteroscopy: 6.0-7.8 cm uterine

mass; no evidence of metastatic GTD

  • Curettage: markedly atypical trophoblast without villi
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Possible Hydatidiform Mole p57 negative

(villous stroma, cytotrophoblast)

p57 Immunohistochemistry p57 positive

(villous stroma, cytotrophoblast)

Diandric Triploidy Biparental Diploidy Molecular Genotyping Androgenetic Diploidy Partial Hydatidiform Mole Non-molar Complete Hydatidiform Mole

Algorithmic Approach to Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Moles

slide-11
SLIDE 11

p57

slide-12
SLIDE 12

p57

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Non-molar Specimen: Biparental Diploidy p57 protein RNA

Maternal Chr 11 Paternal Chr 11

CH3 CH3 CH3

p57 p57

IHC

Positive in nuclei of villous stromal cells, cytotrophoblast, and intermediate trophoblast

p57: paternally imprinted, maternally expressed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Partial Hydatidiform Mole: Diandric Triploidy p57 protein RNA

Paternal Chr 11 (2 copies)

CH3 CH3 CH3

p57 p57

IHC

CH3 CH3 CH3

p57 Maternal Chr 11

Positive in nuclei of villous stromal cells, cytotrophoblast, and intermediate trophoblast

p57: paternally imprinted, maternally expressed

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Complete Hydatidiform Mole: Androgenetic Diploidy

p57: paternally imprinted, maternally expressed

p57 protein RNA

Paternal Chr 11 (2 copies)

CH3 CH3 CH3

p57

IHC

CH3 CH3 CH3

p57

X

No maternal DNA

Negative in villous stromal cells and cytotrophoblast

(intermediate trophoblastic cells +)

X

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Diagnosis?

Consultation diagnosis:

  • Androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric

conception with a molar component (complete hydatidiform mole) Original diagnosis: Partial hydatidiform mole

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Characterization of Androgenetic/Biparental Mosaic/Chimeric Conceptions, Including Those with a Molar Component

Brigitte M. Ronnett, MD

Department of Pathology The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD USA

slide-18
SLIDE 18

533 POC specimens analyzed by p57 IHC +/- genotyping 168 CHMs 126 PHMs 222 NMs 17 complex specimens per genotyping 11 specimens with distinct p57 and genotyping patterns

5 without foci

  • f trophoblastic

hyperplasia 6 with foci of trophoblastic hyperplasia

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

p57

slide-22
SLIDE 22

FISH: diploid XX stromal cells & diploid XX cytotrophoblast

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Non-molar mosaic specimen

p57+ biparental diploid XX cytotrophoblast p57- androgenetic diploid XX villous stromal cells

slide-24
SLIDE 24

p57+ biparental diploid cytotrophoblast & p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

P:M = 2.5:1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

THO1 D13S317

183

Decidua Villi

VWA

179 183 179 221 209 217 171 186 P:M allele ratio 2.7 3.1 3.1 186 221

M P M P M P

Molecular Genotyping:

Androgenetic/Biparental Diploid Mosaic

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

p57

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

p57

slide-32
SLIDE 32

FISH: diploid XX stromal cells & diploid XX cytotrophoblast (both p57-discordant mosaic villi and p57-negative molar villi with trophoblastic hyperplasia)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Non-molar mosaic component

p57+ biparental diploid XX cytotrophoblast p57- androgenetic diploid XX villous stromal cells

slide-34
SLIDE 34

p57+ biparental diploid cytotrophoblast & p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

P:M = 2.5:1

slide-35
SLIDE 35

p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

Molar component: features of CHM

p57- androgenetic diploid cytotrophoblast

slide-36
SLIDE 36

p57- androgenetic diploid cytotrophoblast & p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

P:M = 2:0

slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39

p57

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Non-molar mosaic component Molar component: CHM

p57+ biparental diploid XX cytotrophoblast p57- androgenetic diploid XX villous stromal cells p57- androgenetic diploid XX cytotrophoblast p57- androgenetic diploid XX villous stromal cells

slide-41
SLIDE 41

P:M ~ 5:1

Mixture of p57+ & p57- biparental & androgenetic diploid cytotrophoblast & p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

slide-42
SLIDE 42

P:M = 2.5:1 P:M = 2:0 Mosaic component Molar component

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Amelogenin 103 THO1 TPOX 170 Decidua 223 CSF1PO 300 304 Villi

(with trophoblastic hyperplasia)

296 239 175 103 P:M allele ratio 2:0 2:0 2:0

P P P

Villi

(no trophoblastic hyperplasia)

P:M allele ratio 103 170 223 175 239 4:1 3:1 5:1

M M P P

296 304

M P

Molecular Genotyping: Androgenetic/Biparental Diploid Mosaic with Molar Component

slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

p57

slide-47
SLIDE 47

FISH: diploid XX stromal cells & mixed diploid XX, triploid XXX, and tetraploid XXXX cytotrophoblast (p57-discordant mosaic villi)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Non-molar mosaic component

p57- androgenetic diploid XX villous stromal cells p57+ biparental diploid XX, triploid XXX, & tetraploid XXXX cytotrophoblast

slide-49
SLIDE 49

p57+ biparental diploid, triploid, and tetraploid cytotrophoblast & p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

P:M >2:1*

*depends on number of paternal sets in aneuploid cells

slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51

p57

slide-52
SLIDE 52

FISH: diploid XX stromal cells & diploid XX cytotrophoblast (p57-negative molar villi with trophoblastic hyperplasia)

slide-53
SLIDE 53

p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

Molar component: features of CHM

p57- androgenetic diploid cytotrophoblast

slide-54
SLIDE 54

p57- androgenetic diploid cytotrophoblast & p57- androgenetic diploid villous stromal cells

P:M = 2:0

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Molecular Genotyping: Androgenetic/Biparental Mosaic with Molar Component (CHM)

THO1 D5S818 171 Decidua 123 148 153 175 D3S1358 P:M allele ratio 2:0 2:0 2:0 135 131 183 157 Villi

(with trophoblastic hyperplasia)

Villi

(no trophoblastic hyperplasia)

P:M allele ratio 3.9:1 4.3:1 2.7:1 171 123 148 175 135 157

P P P P P P M M M Androgenetic Biparental (P:M > 2:1)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Amelogenin 103 THO1 D5S818 171 Decidua 123 148 153 175 D3S1358 103 103 175 148 123 P:M allele ratio 2:0 2:0 2:0 P:M allele ratio 2:0 2:0 2:0 135 131 183 157 171 153, 157 131,135 183 Villi

(with trophoblastic hyperplasia)

Trophoblast

(recurrent GTD)

P P P P P P M* M* M,M* M,M*

*maternal DNA contamination

Molecular Genotyping: Androgenetic/Biparental Mosaic with Molar Component (CHM)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Case Presentation

  • Therapy: multi-agent chemotherapy (+high-risk factors); over 2

months, the beta-HCG levels declined significantly but plateaued (29 mIU/mL).

  • Hysterectomy: 5.0 cm firm yellow well-circumscribed mass in

myometrium

  • Pathology: complete microscopic evaluation disclosed

extensively necrotic tumor with surrounding inflammatory cells and only occasional multinucleated cells; immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated extensive expression of beta-HCG and focal expression of cytokeratins in the necrotic tumor

  • Follow-up: 4 weeks post-operatively, the serum beta-HCG level

had declined to 3 mIU/mL; resumption of chemotherapy was planned for the post-operative period

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Summary

  • Androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric

conceptions can be recognized by their unusual p57 expression patterns – Characterized by a mixture of p57-positive biparental and p57-negative androgenetic cells

  • Genotyping results are complicated, with variable

paternal:maternal allele ratios and an excess of paternal alleles

  • Often misclassified as PHM by morphology
  • Those with a p57-negative androgenetic component

with features of CHM have some risk of persistent GTD and warrant management as a molar pregnancy

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Acknowledgements

Johns Hopkins Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory: Cheryl DeScipio, PhD Lisa Haley, MS Katie Beierl, BS Stacey Mosier, BS ProPath, Dallas, TX: Kathleen M. Murphy, PhD Sharon Tandy, BS Debra S. Cohen, MS