Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2019 Halifax, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

canadian society of internal medicine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2019 Halifax, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2019 Halifax, NS Snap, Crackle, Pop: An Approach to ILD Aaron LeBlanc Respirology and Internal Medicine Dartmouth General Hospital Assistant Professor Dalhousie University CSIM Annual


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine

Annual Meeting 2019

Halifax, NS

Snap, Crackle, Pop: An Approach to ILD

Aaron LeBlanc

Respirology and Internal Medicine Dartmouth General Hospital Assistant Professor Dalhousie University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CSIM Annual Meeting 2019

Aaron LeBlanc: Approach to ILD – October 4th, 2019

The following presentation represents the views of the speaker at the time of the presentation. This information is meant for educational purposes, and should not replace other sources

  • f information or your medical judgment.

Learning Objectives:

  • Review the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of interstitial lung

disease

  • Determine treatment strategies for acute flares
  • Recite updates on new therapies and their complications
slide-3
SLIDE 3

CSIM Annual Meeting 2019

Conflict Disclosures

Definition: A Conflict of Interest may occur in situations where the personal and professional interests of individuals may have actual, potential or apparent influence over their judgment and actions.

“I have the following conflicts to declare”

Company/Organization Details Advisory Board or equivalent

GSK

Attended a COPD expert network

Speakers bureau member Payment from a commercial (including gifts or other consideration ‘in kind’ compensation)

GSK, AZ

Compensation for other learning activities (OLAs) for

Grant(s) or an honorarium Patent for a product referred to or marketed by a commercial Investments in a pharmaceutical

  • rganization, medical devices
  • r communications firm.

Participating or participated in a trial

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Some of the drugs, devices, or treatment modalities mentioned in this presentation are: Nintendanib Pirfenidone I intend to make therapeutic recommendations for medications that have not received regulatory approval. Not applicable

CSIM Annual Meeting 2019

slide-5
SLIDE 5

QUICK SNAPPER 1

  • The gold standard for diagnosis in Interstitial lung disease is:

A. High-Resolution CT Scan B. Multi-Disciplinary Discussion C. Open Lung Biopsy D. Trans-bronchial cryobiopsy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

QUICK SNAPPER 2:

  • What percentage of patients with ILD remain unclassifiable?

A. 20% B. 30% C. 40% D. 50%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

QUICK SNAPPER 3:

  • In the definition of an acute exacerbation of IPF, what is the maximum time of

deterioration allowed prior to the diagnosis? A. 1 week B. 2 weeks C. 1 month D. 2 months

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CRACKLING CASES

  • 80M - Inpatient Consult for SOBOE
  • 76F – Outpatient Consult for CT abnormalities
  • 58M – Outpatient Consult for recurrent respiratory infections
slide-9
SLIDE 9

CASE #1

Case courtesy of Dr Yi-Jin Kuok, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 17341

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CASE #1

  • What pattern of ILD do the CT findings represent?
  • What are the three MOST LIKELY causes for this patient’s ILD?
  • What additional tests might you order?
  • Should this patient be referred for a lung biopsy?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

CASE #2

Case courtesy of Dr Mohammad Taghi Niknejad, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 61075

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CASE #2

  • What TWO main CT patterns could the CT findings represent?
  • What are the THREE MOST likely causes for this patient’s ILD?
  • What additional tests might you order?
  • Should this patient be referred for a lung biopsy?
slide-13
SLIDE 13

CASE #3

Case courtesy of Melbourne Uni Radiology Masters, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 38919

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CASE #3

  • Based on the CT findings, what are the THREE MOST likely causes?
  • What is the MOST LIKELY cause?
  • What is the MOST important step in management?
  • What should be the recommended initial route for biopsy?
  • List three pulmonary disease that can cause a mixed pattern of obstruction and

restriction:

  • COPD or asthma + ILD
  • Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
  • Sarcoidosis
  • Organizing Pneumonia
slide-15
SLIDE 15

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

ILD Fibrosis UIP IPF

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DIFFERENTIAL - ETIOLOGY

Idiopathic Pneumoconiosis HP Smoking CTD Drugs Misc IPF iNSIP Asbestosis Silicosis CWP Mold Birds RB-ILD DIP LCH RA Scleroderma DM Lupus Sjogren’s MCTD IPAF MTX Amio Nitrofuratoin Sarcoidosis

slide-17
SLIDE 17

DRUG-INDUCED ILD

www.pneumotox.com

slide-18
SLIDE 18

DIFFERENTIAL - IMAGING

Upper Zone Predominance Lower Zone Predominance HP Sarcoidosis RB-ILD Silicosis Ankylosis Spondylitis IPF iNSIP Asbestosis CTD

slide-19
SLIDE 19

DIAGNOSIS - IPF

  • CT Findings:
  • Supleural, Basal Predominance
  • Honeycombing +/- Traction Bronchiectasis
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

MULTIDISCIPLINARY DISCUSSION (MDD)

  • Considered gold standard in the diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease
  • With MDD:
  • Significant reduction in unclassifiable ILD
  • Significant number of cases with a change in diagnosis
  • Cases with greatest change:
  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
  • Connective-tissue disease (CTD) related ILD

Burge et al., Thorax, 2017 Chaudhuri et al., J. Clin Med, 2016 Jo et al., Respirology, 2016

slide-22
SLIDE 22

THE CASE CONTINUES TO CRACKLE:

  • Repeat CT:
  • Subpleural and lower-lobe predominant reticular changes
  • Resolution of previously noted ground glass changes
  • Traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing similar to previous

Case courtesy of Dr Yi-Jin Kuok, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 17341

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THE CASE CONTINUES TO CRACKLE

  • What is your diagnosis?
  • What is your management plan at this time?
slide-24
SLIDE 24

IPF TREATMENT

  • Comprehensive care
  • Anti-fibrotic therapy
slide-25
SLIDE 25

COMPREHENSIVE CARE

  • Pulmonary Rehabilitation
  • Consider oxygen therapy
  • Lung Transplantation Referral
  • Vaccinations
  • Reflux Management
slide-26
SLIDE 26

IPF TREATMENT

Drug Nintedanib Pirfenidone Patients studied Age: 67 FVC: 80% DLCO: 47% Age: 68 FVC: 68% DLCO: 44% Dosing 150 mg po BID 801 mg po TID Change in baseline FVC (mL) -95.1 vs. -205 (p < 0.001)

  • 95.3 vs. -205 (p < 0.001)
  • 235 vs. -428 (p < 0.001)

Significant Decline in FVC (Greater than 10%) 29.4% vs 43.1% (p < 0.001) 30.4% vs. 36.1 % (p = 0.18) 16.5% v. 31.8% (p < 0.001) Adverse events Diarrhea, Nausea Weight Loss LFT Elevation GI upset Rash LFT elevation Richeldi et al., NEJM 2014 King et al., NEJM 2014

slide-27
SLIDE 27

SIDE EFFECTS

Side Effect Management Liver Enzyme Elevation Monitor liver enzymes monthly x 6 months, then every 3 months after Decrease/discontinue drug if elevation occurs Rash Sun protective measures Decrease/discontinue drug if rash occurs GI Symptoms and/or Weight Loss Loperamide for diarrhea Decrease/Discontinue drug if symptoms occur

slide-28
SLIDE 28

THE CASE POPS

  • 3 months later:
  • Presents to ED with 2 weeks of increased SOB, cough and new sputum production
  • No hemoptysis
  • Leg edema, but no orthopnea or PND
  • Mild respiratory distress
  • Pulse: 110 O2: 87% room air
  • Lungs: crackles throughout most lung fields on auscultation
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Case courtesy of Dr Wayland Wang, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 50749

slide-30
SLIDE 30

THE CASE POPS

  • Is this an acute exacerbation of IPF?
  • What further investigations would you like to order?
  • How will you manage this patient?
  • What will you do with her anti-fibrotic therapy?
slide-31
SLIDE 31

ACUTE EXACERBATION

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ACUTE EXACERBATION

  • Therapy – unclear
  • Personal recommendations:
  • Treat any identified underlying causes
  • Continue anti-fibrotic therapy
  • Consider moderate dose steroids
slide-33
SLIDE 33

CONCLUSIONS

  • ILDs can be classified by clinical and radiographic criteria
  • MDD is the gold standard for diagnosis of ILD
  • IPF has specific anti-fibrotic therapy
  • Patients should be monitored for GI, hepatic and cutaneous side effects
  • Definition of exacerbation has been clarified – specific therapy is unclear
slide-34
SLIDE 34

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Flaherty et al., NEJM 2019

slide-35
SLIDE 35

QUESTIONS?