Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
canadian society of internal medicine annual meeting 2017
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 04, 2024 27 likes •561 views

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON Extended Workshop Peter Wu, MD, MSc, FRCPC Department of Medicine University of Toronto November 1, 2017 CSIM Annual Meeting 2017 The following presentation represents

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON

Extended Workshop Peter Wu, MD, MSc, FRCPC Department of Medicine University of Toronto November 1, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CSIM Annual Meeting 2017

The following presentation represents the views of the speaker at the time of the presentation. This information is meant for educational purposes, and should not replace other sources

  • f information or your medical judgment.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Conflict Disclosures

“I have no conflicts to declare”

CSIM Annual Meeting 2017

slide-4
SLIDE 4

How to think critically about QI projects

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Learning Objectives

  • Establish an approach to appraising quality

improvement studies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Learning Objectives

  • Establish an approach to appraising quality

improvement studies

  • Focus on the how
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Learning Objectives

  • Establish an approach to appraising quality

improvement studies

  • Focus on the how
  • Apply to your own projects
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

GENERAL STRUCTURE

  • Introduction – Problem and Aim
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

“Focus more on the blueprint of success, rather than the success itself”

  • Kaveh Shojania
slide-13
SLIDE 13

GENERAL STRUCTURE

  • Introduction – Problem and Aim
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion
slide-14
SLIDE 14

How?

  • Define and measure the problem
  • Characterize the problem
  • Develop the intervention
  • Deploy the intervention
slide-15
SLIDE 15

PDSA as a tool

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PDSA

Tomolo AM et al. Postgrad Med J 2009;85:530–7

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

PDSA

  • Less than half of studies meet minimum requirements for

PDSA

  • Less than 20% fully document iterative cycles
  • Only 15% report data-driven change at at monthly or more

frequent intervals

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How?

  • Define and measure the problem
  • Characterize the problem
  • Develop the intervention
  • Deploy the intervention
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Defining and measuring the problem

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Benzodiazepine use at 6 months
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Defining and measuring the problem

  • Not always so easy
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Defining and measuring the problem

  • Not always so easy
  • Incident reports
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Not incident reports alone
  • Active surveillance
  • Intensive
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Defining and measuring the problem

  • Can you clearly articulate your problem?
  • Can you measure it? Accurately, easily?
slide-26
SLIDE 26

How?

  • Define and measure the problem
  • Characterize the problem
  • Develop the intervention
  • Deploy the intervention
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Characterizing the problem

  • Not only what, but why
  • Diagnostic work
  • Leads to intervention
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Developing the intervention

  • Not always a “light-switch”
  • Multifaceted
  • Should be revised and revisited
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Interventions

  • Too Soon
  • No theory (“Magical Thinking”)
  • Too good to be true
  • Active ingredient(s)
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Many patients had catheters without indication
  • Inserted in ED
  • Often triggered by order set
slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Many patients had catheters without indication
  • Inserted in ED
  • Often triggered by order set
  • Nurses communicate
  • Some even prompt to discontinue
slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Many patients had catheters without indication
  • Inserted in ED
  • Often triggered by order set
  • Nurses communicate
  • Some even prompt to discontinue
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Characterizing the problem

  • Do you know why it happens?
  • What are the “root-cause(s)”?
  • Have you done enough diagnostic work?
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Developing the intervention

  • What is the “theory” behind the intervention idea?
  • How is it linked to your diagnostics?
  • How might it change?
slide-37
SLIDE 37

How?

  • Define and measure the problem
  • Characterize the problem
  • Develop the intervention
  • Deploy the intervention
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Deploying interventions

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Mailing recruitment
  • Telephone call
  • In-home interview with study team
  • Booklet (information, tapering suggestion)
slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • 2-hour workshop
  • 1-hour role play and simulation
  • Faculty development
  • Direct observation
  • Branding
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Deploying interventions

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Deploying interventions

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Deploying interventions

We hope that these findings from Ontario will lead to greater attention not just to the intervention but also to the implementation process.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Deploying interventions

  • Characterized where protocol failed and tailored

intervention

  • Increased protocol adherence from 51.3% to 85.7%
  • Reduced surgical site infection rates
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Deploying the intervention

  • Is the intervention highly adoptable?
  • Is it sustainable?
  • (Were people engaged appropriately?)
slide-46
SLIDE 46

GENERAL STRUCTURE

  • Introduction – Problem and Aim
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Did the change result in improvement?

Jobson M et al. Pediatrics 2015;135:e187-95

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Did the change result in improvement?

  • Compared to controls, intervention not associated with

reduction in ED LOS

  • Multiple simultaneous interventions
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Did the change result in an improvement?

  • How will you know? (Ability to measure)
  • Controls
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Objectives

  • How to think critically about QI projects
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Objectives

  • Focus on the how
  • Problem, Diagnostics, Development/Deployment
  • Did it work?
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Objectives

  • Focus on the how
  • Problem, Diagnostics, Development/Deployment
  • Did it work?
  • Adoptable?
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Thank you