Calculating Dome Thickness as a Function of Radial Distance for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

calculating dome thickness as a function of radial
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Calculating Dome Thickness as a Function of Radial Distance for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Calculating Dome Thickness as a Function of Radial Distance for Cryovolcanic Domes on Europa ALYSSA MILLS 2 Cryovolcanism Definition: volcanoes that erupt volatiles instead of u molten rock Cryovolcanism creates domes through: u u


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Calculating Dome Thickness as a Function of Radial Distance for Cryovolcanic Domes on Europa

ALYSSA MILLS

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cryovolcanism

2

u

Definition: volcanoes that erupt volatiles instead of molten rock

u

Cryovolcanism creates domes through:

u Diapirism u Extrusion of viscous fluid

Top figure: Diapirism and cryomagmatism schematic, taken from Fagents et al., 2003 Bottom left figure: Examples of cryovolcanic domes formed via diapirism or cryomagmatism, taken from Quick et al., 2017

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

u

Understand the mechanisms of cryovolcanism

u

Find if analogous with siliceous volcanism on Earth

u Run models made for siliceous

volcanism to cryovolcanism

u

Gauge the activity on Europa

u

Understand the role of tidal heating on Europa

3

Lava dome on Earth taken from USGS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Previous Work: Quick et al., 2017

u

Created the method to measure the emplacement and relaxation of cryolava domes

u Tests multiple rheological

parameters, times, and radial distances

u

Relaxation time of domes: 3.6 days to 7.5 years

u

Models are consistent with the 2 sets of domes with radius of 3 km

4

Dome thickness as a function of radial distance using four time steps taken from Quick et al., 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5

My Work: Sample Selection

5 1

u

Location: Southern region near Libya Linea

u

Cryovolcanoes formed from effusive processes

u

Radius for Dome 1: 2 km

u

Height for Dome 1: 25 m

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sample Selection Continued

6 2

u

Radius for Dome 2: 1.9 km

u

Height for Dome 2: 32 m

slide-7
SLIDE 7

My Work

u

Set up model to run six time steps based on:

u ℎ 𝑠, ⍬ =

'( )*+,

  • .

(.01 2 ⁄ )5/7 1 − +- +,

  • .

(.01 2 ⁄ )5/7 ./)

u Ends at final dome radius determined

from cross-sections

u

Run model with different boundary conditions

u E.g. Time-dependent viscosity

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Dome 1 Closest Matches

u

A.) t=12 hours

u

B.) t=12 hours

u

C.) None

u

D.) t=3 days

u

Overall closest match occurs at:

u t= 12 hours u Viscosity: 10; <-

=

u Results in final radius of 2001 m

and thickness of 23 m

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dome 2 Closest Matches

u

A.) t = 12 hours

u

B.) t= 1.5 days

u

C.) None

u

D.) t=3 days

u

Overall closest match occurs at:

u t= 1.5 days u Viscosity: 10; <-

=

u Results in final radius of 2001 m

and thickness of 33 m

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Implications

u

Consistent with Quick et al.’s results where smaller domes have shorter relaxation times

u

These domes are smaller due to recent emplacement

u

Expected to grow with time u

Use these smaller domes for more accurate initial dome radii and thicknesses for model

u

Short relaxation time implies current active cryovolcanism

u Consistent with Roth et al., 2014’s prediction

10

Artist depiction of cryovolcanism on Europa, taken from NASA/JPL/Ted Stryk; NASA/JPL/Caltech

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Questions?

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Future Work

u

Calculate dome relaxation with asymmetry

u

Consider other aqueous solutions for better accuracy

u

Apply models to other icy bodies with cryovolcanism

u E.g. Pluto

12

Close-up of suspected cryovolcanoes on Pluto’s southern terrain, taken from NASA

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Supplement Material: Boundary Conditions

13