BUILDING INTEGRATED PV TASK FORCE European market outlook and next - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

BUILDING INTEGRATED PV TASK FORCE

European market outlook and next regulatory challenges for BIPV

20th September 2018 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM CEST Brussels

2

SOLARPOWER EUROPE For more info visit: www.solarpowereurope.org

Agenda

Topic Speaker Time

Block 1 Welcome and introductions

• Dr. Hannah Bürckstümmer

Merck 15:00 Sylvain Robert European Commission 15:10 Block 2 Smart Readiness Indicator of Buildings: preliminary findings of the technical study

• Ing. Momir Tabakovic

Fachhochschule Technikum Wien SolarPower Europe & ETIP PV report on BIPV and Cities Mariano Guillén SolarPower Europe 15:50 Block 3 State of play – Construction 2020, Construction Products Regulation and Ecodesign Mariano Guillén SolarPower Europe 16:10

3

15:30 Current status and outlook for BIPV in Europe Wrap up & next steps Mariano Guillén SolarPower Europe 16:30

1

Welcome & introductions

4

• Dr. Hannah Bürckstümmer

Global Marketing Manager - Performance Materials, MERCK Acting chair BIPV TF

2

Current status and outlook for BIPV in Europe

5

• Ing. Momir Tabakovic

MSc, Fachhochschule Technikum Wien

6

Agenda ▪ Status and Outlook to BIPV Market ▪ Educational needs - Stakeholder survey ▪ Conclusion

Source: AVANCIS

7

BIPV Market - Status and Outlook

8

The global market is estimated at 2.3 GW in 2015 compared to 1.5 GW in 2014.

Global BIPV Market perspective and the recent past of annual installation capacity from 2014 to 2020

CAGR-compounded annual growth rate Source: (Global Industry Analysts, 2015)

9

These new regulations caused more optimistic forecasts for BIPV-generation.

BIPV market: Global installation capacity forecasted till 2020 in MW

Tripathy et al., 2016

10

Germany in kW France in kW Spain in kW Italy in kW Rest of Europe in kW Total 2014 45.404 241.370 13.829 278.271 70.993 649.867 2016 96.279 523.565 33.580 611.627 175.498 1.440.548 2018 193.925 1.075.083 69.523 1.222.177 368.154 2.928.861 2020 307.277 1.822.297 121.661 1.988.281 598.584 4.838.100 500.000 1.000.000 1.500.000 2.000.000 2.500.000 3.000.000 3.500.000 4.000.000 4.500.000 5.000.000 kW

France, Germany, Italy, Spain and rest of Europe market analysis and forecast of annual installation capacity in kW for years 2014 to 2020

Source: (Global Industry Analysts, 2015) Rest of Europe include Austria, Belgium. Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK. Error tolerance for the data is 10%(+/-)

11

BIPV: Logistic reasons: ▪ Lack of available area (densely populated areas) ▪ No/less dependence on the electricity grid Regulatory reasons: ▪ European Commission: nZEB – directives

• All new buildings must be near Zero-Energy Buildings by 31 dec. 2020

▪ Dutch government: Energielabel

• All Dutch offices will have at least an ‘energielabel C’ (scale A-G) in 2023

Relevance

12

13

Academia

• Education on

BIPV

• International

coordinated R&D Industry

• New Business Models
• Collaboration construction

sector

• Prices per m2 (not per Wp)
• Simplified integration

(prefab)

• BIPV industry association
• Communication

Government

• Future security in incentive

schemes

• BIPV-specific legislation &

support

• Standardization &

Certification BIPV

Recommendations for stakeholders

14

Status and outlook for BIPV in relation to educational needs in the BIPV sector through - Stakeholder survey

15

Survey Design

• The Dem4BIPV - Consortium defined the

Stakeholder groups and the topics

• Participants in the questionnaire were able to

state their opinion on a 4-points scale (no need, not so strong need, fairly strong need, very strong need), besides ‘don’t know’

• Questionnaire was available on the

Internet (Google forms) from February to April 2016.

• A total number of 100 participants

took part in the survey

16

Portrayal of participating Stakeholders and Countries

Austria; 25 Cyprus; 21 Germany ; 8 Netherlands; 12 Belgium; 3 Italy; 3 Norway; 3 Japan; 2 France; 4 Korea; 1 Spain; 8 UK; 1 Switzerland ; 4 Portugal; 2 Sweden; 2

Number of response in total per country

The majority of the participants are from R&D, followed by architects. About 10% are PV installer, BIPV producer and consultant. Facade manufacturer and educational sector share about 5%. Facade installer, electrician and buildings planners were in focus of the survey, no response was received.

Percentage of response per Stakeholder group

17

Attitude towards BIPV systems

*F&E institution, Electrical engineer, Mounting systems producer, Building contractor, Building Services & Sustainability, Consultant, Consultancy in BIPV policy, Pilot project development, Legal reseach, Project manager, University, Education, Research. Civil & Environmental Engineer, Electrical engineer, Investor, BIPV Producer, PV module producer, Mounting systems, producer, government, Robot cleaning BIPV, Civil Engineer

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stakeholder response in from the categories Very favorable, fairly favorable, "Neither unfavorable/ nor favorable

Very favorable Fairly favorable Neither unfavorable/ nor favorable

18

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Façade systems Roofs Atria Canopies Curtain walls Rainscreens

Envision of the integration of BIPV systems in the building envelope environment of all respondents; n=100

19

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Stakeholder groups with an important role in wider deployment of BIPV; all corespondents;n=100

Don’t know/ No answer Not important at all Not important Fairly important Very important

20

5 10 15 20 25 Professionals (i.e. Architects, Engineers, Planners etc.) Building contractors Post-graduate students (MSc) in relevant fields (i.e. architecture, engineering etc.) Higher education (university) students in relevant fields (i.e. electrical engineering) Vocational/tertiary sector employees (i.e. PV installers)

Educational need for groups of students and/or professionals in Austria, Cyprus, Germany and Netherlands; n=66

Austria Cyprus Germany Netherlands

21

Constructional integration of BIPV; 1455 Energetic integration of BIPV; 859 Design integration of BIPV; 1505 Regulatory barriers; 1334 Economical barriers ; 1123 Standards; 678 Maintenance and recycling; 280 Manufacturing barriers ; 295 Market driven barriers ; 271 Cultural barriers; 264 Lack of information; 312

Sum of the educational requirement towards BIPV

• f all respondents; n=100

22

240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 Best practice examples/demonstration examples Glass (optical, colours,..) Sun protection Different BIPV /products / materials / technologies Aesthetics (variety of colours, sizes and types) BIPV software /tools for early integration in the design process Mounting systems Combination with conventional building materials Building envelope material properties Moisture protection Orientation/inclination Lack of information Design integration of BIPV Constructional integration of BIPV 312 288 292 318 294 313 284 309 305 269 288 score

Educational needs for the groups - design integration, constructional integration and lack of information

23

• from 1.5 GW in 2014 to 2.3 GW in 2015 global

BIPV market increase: about 40%.

• Forecast: 4.8 GW for 2020 in Europe (11.1 GW

global).

• Positively impacted by the regulatory framework.

the European level the Directive on Energy Performance in Buildings (EPBD) (Directive 2010/31/EU) and the Renewable Energy Directive (1/77/EC) was set up by the European Union (EU).

Conclusion (1/3)

24

• Three main topics with high priority for education: design

integration, regulatory and constructional topics

• Especially on mounting systems and building, envelope

materials properties, different BIPV products/materials/technologies, BIPV software, laws and directives

Conclusion(2/3)

25

• Architects, building contractors, building

planers, façade and mounting systems producers, as well as investors play an important role in the future.

• Main group of Stakeholder for educational

need is identified as the professionals (i.e. Architects, Engineers, Planners etc.), followed by building contractors and post- graduate students (MSc) in relevant fields ( i.e. architectural, engineering, etc.).

Conclusion(3/3)

26

For further Information please visit

www.dem4bipv.eu

Thank you for Your Attention

• Ing. Momir Tabakovic MSc

FH Technikum Wien, Institut für Erneuerbare Energie ENERGYbase, Giefinggasse 6, 1210 Wien Telefon: +43 1 333 40 77 573 Mail: momir.tabakovic@technikum-wien.at

28

The Dem4BIPV project: Development of innovative educational material for Building- Integrated Photovoltaics

Dem4BIPV started in September 2015 and will run until August 2018. The project is funded by the Erasmus+ programme of the European Commission.

Consortium

Source: AVANCIS

29

• Analysis of the existing and future market needs in

terms of BIPV system integration and education needs in this field

• Development of high-quality didactic content on BIPV for

higher education

• Development of a virtual learning environment for the

practical aspects of the course (i.e. lab work of experimental nature)

• Deployment of remote laboratories
• Pilot testing of the course and refinement

Project activities

3

Smart Readiness Indicator of Buildings

30

Sylvain Robert Policy Officer, Building Unit Energy Efficiency DG ENERGY European Commission

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

Sylvain Robert Buildings team - Unit Energy Efficiency DG ENERGY, European Commission 20 September 2018 SolarPower Europe BIPV webinar

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD REVISION OF THE EPBD. Entered into force on 9 July. Stronger long term renovation strategies

• Decarbonisation by 2050,
• Solid financial component.

Promotion of smart technologies

• Requirements on automation and control (e.g. BACS),
• Smart readiness indicator,
• Requirements on electromobility recharging infrastructure.

Enhanced transparency of energy performance calculation and requirements.

A STRENGTHENED DIRECTIVE

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD SMART READINESS INDICATOR (SRI). The SRI is intended to:

• raise awareness about the benefits of smart technologies and ICT in buildings

(from an energy perspective, in particular),

• motivate consumers to accelerate investments in smart building technologies

and support the uptake of technology innovation in the building sector. The SRI could:

• Contribute to enhancing energy efficiency, comfort and well-being in

buildings,

• Improve policy linkages between energy, buildings and other policy segments,

in particular in the ICT area,

• contribute to the integration of the buildings sector into future energy systems

and markets

MOTIVATION

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD SMART READINESS INDICATOR. “An optional common Union scheme for rating the smart readiness of buildings” (Article 8(10) revised EPBD) Establishment thanks to:

• A delegated act for definition and calculation methodology and;
• an implementing act for implementation modalities

The indicator is being developed by the EC, with the support of technical studies:

• 1st technical study: March 2017 – August 2018.
• 2nd technical study: start October 2018 (TBC).

Status of the policy making process:

• The formal process has just begun with entry into force of the revised EPBD.
• The conclusions of the 1st study are only a starting basis.
• Further investigation and discussions are needed to ensure a wide consensus
• n the SRI.

POLICY MAKING STATUS

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD SMART READINESS INDICATOR. “(…) The rating shall be based on an assessment of the capabilities of a building or building unit to adapt its operation to the needs of the occupant and the grid and to improve its energy efficiency and overall performance (…)” Article 8(10) of the revised EPBD. “(…) Three key functionalities relating to the building and its technical building systems: (a) the ability to maintain energy performance and operation of the building through the adaptation of energy consumption (…); (b) the ability to adapt its operation mode in response to the needs of the

• ccupant (…), maintaining healthy indoor climate conditions (…); and

(c) the flexibility of a building's overall electricity demand (…)” Annex Ia of the revised EPBD.

WHAT IT MUST BE

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

AN ONGOING PROCESS

SUPPORTING TECHNICAL WORK. 1st technical study: March 2017 – August 2018. https://smartreadinessindicator.eu/ Final report / executive summary available. 2nd technical study: from October 2018 (TBC). Inclusive and collaborative development:

• Publication of intermediary results;
• Stakeholder meetings;
• Written comments.

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION

RESULTS OF THE 1ST STUDY ON THE SRI Investigation of the scope of the SRI, Identification of services / functions that can have an impact on building smart readiness: smart-ready services, Development of a draft calculation methodology to derive a score from the identification and assessment of available services, Streamlining of the draft methodology to facilitate practical assessment of the SRI, Initial tests of the proposed SRI calculation methodology on theoretical and real buildings, First quantitative evaluation of possible impacts of the SRI.

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

THE PROPOSED CALCULATION FRAMEWORK (1)

RESULTS OF THE 1ST STUDY ON THE SRI

• 1. Assessment of available smart-ready services: what services are available

and their smartness level.

• 2. Derivation of individual impact

scores of smart-ready services along proposed impact criteria.

• 3. Aggregation of individual service impact scores into domain impacts

scores (heating, controlled ventilation, etc.)

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

THE PROPOSED CALCULATION FRAMEWORK (2)

RESULTS OF THE 1ST STUDY ON THE SRI

• 4. Aggregation of domain impact scores into total impacts scores (energy,

comfort, etc.): weighted sum of the domain impact scores.

• 5. The SRI score is then derived as a weighted sum of the 8 total impact

scores. Notes:

• Normalised score.
• Qualitative approach.
• Flexibility (aggregated or more focused scoring, tuning of weights).
• Several possible consolidations points: domains; impact criteria; individual

services’ impact scores; weights.

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

COMPONENTS OF THE PROPOSED SRI CALCULATION FRAMEWORK

RESULTS OF THE 1ST STUDY ON THE SRI

• 1. Smart–ready

catalogue

• 10 domains,
• 112 services (52 after

streamlining)

• 2. Multi-criteria

calculation methodology

• 3. Triage process:

upfront identification of relevant services to facilitate service assessment.

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

OUTCOMES

RESULTS OF THE 1ST STUDY ON THE SRI Generally a good starting basis. The approach has generally been welcomed by the community, with some caveats, e.g.:

• Towards a more quantitative (performance-based) approach,
• questions of scoring and weighting consolidation…

Many comments from stakeholders along the process, taken on-board when possible. The calculated impact is significant – by 2030:

• Up to 5.2 Mtoe p.a. savings,
• Up to 140 000 jobs.

Further investigation and discussions needed.

Smart Readiness Indicator under the revised EPBD

42 #EnergyUnion

Thank you

Sylvain Robert

Unit Energy Efficiency DG ENERGY, European Commission

https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-efficiency/buildings

4

State of play – EU Regulatory framework

43

• 1. CLEAN ENERGY PACKAGE
• 2. CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS REGULATION
• 3. CONSTRUCTION 2020
• 4. ECODESIGN

44

CLEAN ENERGY PACKAGE

File Status

EPBD Published in the Official Journal of the EU – June 2018 Transposition deadline - March 2020 RED II European Parliament and Council adoption – November 2018 Publication - December 2018 Transposition deadline - 30 June 2021 EED

45

CLEAN ENERGY PACKAGE – NEXT STEPS

File Action

RED II Draft NECPs – December 2018 EED EPBD EPBD Guidance document Article 8. Technical building systems, electromobility and smart readiness indicator

SolarPower Europe contribution to EPBD guidance

46

CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS REGULATION

Public consultation Publication of the evaluation Development

• f the

supporting study

April 2018 June - August 2018

• Sep. 2018

Late 2018 Early2019 TBD 2019

Final decision on the revision Publication of the supporting study Impact assessment

TBD 2019

CONSTRUCTION 2020

Thematic Group 1: ''Stimulating investment in building renovation, infrastructure and innovation” Thematic Group 4: "Internal Market“ Thematic Group 5: "International Competitiveness of the Construction sector“

Activities

• "Digitalisation of SMEs“

Workshop – 14 December 2018

• "Digital Construction

Brussels" conference on 24- 25/10/2018

Activities Activities

48

ECODESIGN

5

SolarPower Europe & ETIP PV report on BIPV and Cities

49

50

SolarPower Europe & ETIP PV report on BIPV and Cities

Business models for Smart Cities - identifying best BIPV practices in cities

• a. The role of the investment and financing sector
• b. The role of city planners
• c. The role of the construction sector
• d. The role of architects

Manual for BIPV in cities

Checklist for Mayors and other interested stakeholders

Case studies - Perspective from specific building constraints

• Lack of space
• Historical patrimony
• Self-consumption
• Improving Energy Efficiency

Report

• n

BIPV & cities

51

REPORT ON BIPV AND CITIES - TIMELINE

Stakeholder identification Workshop Finance Workshop Architects

September 2018 October 2018 October 2018 October 2018 December 2019

Presentation at the COP24 Workshop Mayors Report writing

November 2018

WORKSHOPS

6

Wrap up & next steps

52

Mariano Guillén Policy Advisor, SolarPower Europe

53

NEXT STEPS

• 1. SolarPower Europe & ETIP PV report on BIPV and Cities
• 2. Contribution to the EPBD guidance document
• 3. Follow-up regulatory developments of the SRI, CPR and Ecodesign
• 4. Keep an updated overview of BIPV installations and capacity in

Europe. Next call – 1st week October

54

ec.europa.eu/research/horizonprize

Sponsored by

CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES IN THE NEW ENERGY WORLD

Organised by:

www.digitalsolar-storage.org

SolarPower Europe (European Photovoltaic Industry Association) Rue d’Arlon 69-71, 1040 Brussels, Belgium T +32 2 709 55 20 / F +32 2 725 32 50 info@solarpowereurope.org /www.solarpowereurope.org

THANK YOU

For further information contact: m.guillen@solarpowereurope.org

• r visit:

www.solarpowereurope.org