European Gold Forum| May 6-8, 2014 Zurich, Switzerland
NYSE-MKT: AXU TSX: AXR
Building a Sustainable Future in Silver Forward Looking Statement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
European Gold Forum | May 6-8, 2014 Zurich, Switzerland NYSE-MKT: AXU TSX: AXR Building a Sustainable Future in Silver Forward Looking Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States
European Gold Forum| May 6-8, 2014 Zurich, Switzerland
NYSE-MKT: AXU TSX: AXR
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws (together, “forward-looking statements”) concerning Alexco's business plans, including but not limited to anticipated results and developments in Alexco’s operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of its mineral properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future, made as of the date of this
applicable law. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to future remediation and reclamation activities, future mineral exploration, the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the realization of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, future mine construction and development activities, future mine operation and production, the timing of activities, the amount of estimated revenues and expenses, the success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, requirements for additional capital and sources and uses of funds. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events
actual results and timing of exploration and development activities; actual results and timing of mining activities; actual results and timing of environmental services operations; actual results and timing of remediation and reclamation activities; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of silver, gold, lead, zinc and other commodities; possible variations in mineable resources, grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and
competition; and delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development activities. Furthermore, forward- looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of Alexco or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to those referred to in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in the MD&A included in Alexco’s most recent interim and annual financial reports, its current AIF and U.S. Form 40-F, and various of its other continuous disclosure documents. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable at the time they are made. In making the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, Alexco has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, the assumption that: (1) the proposed development of its mineral projects will be viable operationally and economically and proceed as planned; (2) market fundamentals will result in sustained silver, gold, lead and zinc demand and prices, and such prices will be materially consistent with or more favourable than those anticipated in the Bellekeno Development Plan, (3) the actual nature, size and grade of its mineral resources are materially consistent with the resource estimates reported in the supporting technical reports; and (4) any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms.
2
Readers are cautioned that mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. The PEA is preliminary in nature; as well, while the consolidated mine production under the PEA is derived primarily from indicated mineral resources, approximately 6% is derived from inferred mineral resources. There is no certainty that the PEA will be realized, and it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. The PEA contemplates an initial development and construction period beginning in the second quarter of 2014, with startup
commercial production in the second quarter
Alexco making a development decision, which would be dependent on a number
silver, lead, zinc and gold as well as the US-Canadian dollar exchange rate, and the availability of development capital. Additionally, a production decision which is made without a feasibility study of mineral reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability carries additional potential risks which include, but are not limited to, the risk that additional detailed work may be necessary with respect to mine design and mining schedules, metallurgical flow sheets and process plant designs, and the noted inherent risks pertaining to the inclusion of approximately 6% inferred mineral resources in the mine plan.
3
On December 12, 2013, Alexco Resource Corp. filed a Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report entitled “Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Eastern Keno Hill Silver District Project – Phase 2, Yukon, Canada”
4
*Please see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide for full mineral resource disclosure. 5
6
7
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Alexco Fortuna Pan American Bear Creek Silver Wheaton Santacruz Tahoe
(March 2014)
8
full mineral resource disclosure.
9
Source: Public information available April 2014
Keno 700 Onek District Mill
10
Eastern Keno Hill Silver District Area (EKHSD)
11
(See PEA Cautionary language on slide 3. The PEA is based on metal prices of US$24 per ounce for silver, US$0.95 per pound for lead, US$0.85 per pound for zinc and US$1,300 per ounce for gold. )
12
Please see the December 12, 2013, Alexco Resource Corp. Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report entitled “Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Eastern Keno Hill Silver District Project – Phase 2, Yukon, Canada” for further information.
13
14
15
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013
Q1 2011 to Date - Mill/Mine Costs & Tonnes
Total Cost per Tonne Milled Tonnes Milled Per Day Cost Per Tonne Trendline Tonnes Milled Per Day Trendline
Total mine & mill cost per tonne milled (including sustaining development) has declined by
Tonnage milled has increased approx. 25%
Cost per Tonne Milled Milled Tonne per Day
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
2012-13 Average AISC Q3 2013 AISC Increase in Throughput Increase in Variable Cost Self Mining Cost Reduction Initiatives Targeted AISC
Cost per Oz AISC per Oz Cost Reductions SLW Share Cost Increases
10 10-20% 20% 10 10-15% 15% 5-10% 10%
~$ ~$27 27
~$19 ~$19 5-10% 10% ~$ ~$16 16
SLW Stream
*Cash Cost per Ounce is calculated on a payable ounces produced **AISC is calculated on payable ounces sold on a co product basis
Cash Cost per Oz net of by product*
SLW Stream AISC per Oz** Cost Reductions Cost Increases
17
SILVER DISCOVERY Inception – To Date Inception – To Date Discovery Cost Discovery Rate All Exploration ’05-’13 Last 5 years ’08-’13 $0.92/oz $0.60/oz 500 oz/meter 700 oz/meter Flame & Moth $0.42/oz 1,040 oz/meter Lucky Queen $0.72/oz 690 oz/meter Bellekeno $1.08/oz 375 oz/meter Onek $1.25/oz 400 oz/meter Bermingham $1.69/oz 300 oz/meter
10 20 30 40 50 60 2009 2010 2011 2012 Current
18
*Please see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide for full mineral resource disclosure.
19
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Coeur ALEXCO Hecla Endeavor Silver Fortuna
(M&I) (M&I) (P&P) (M&I) Standard (P&P)
(P&P) Great Panther
(M&I)
Source: Public information available April 2014. The higher of either Proven & Probable or Measured & Inferred for each company’s growth in reserve/resource was used for purposes of the graph.
20
*Please see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide for full mineral resource disclosure.
Proposed Portal Location Keno Hill Mill
21
Possible Ramp Location Flame & Moth West Discovery
22
Basal Quartzite Sourdough Hill Member
Flame NE Extension Target Flame SW Extension Target Flame West Target Moth Vein Target
Flame Resource Footprint Christal Lake Corridor 1 km
Earn Group
Drill Sites
Mill
2013 Updated Resource Estimate1 Indicated = 22,859,000 Moz Ag Inferred = 1,081,000 Moz Ag
(1See appended Summary of Silver Resources slide)
Block Model at $185 NSR Cutoff
23
100 200m
400gpt Ag 500gpt Ag 600gpt Ag
24
(See the technical report filed on SEDAR dated March 15, 2013 entitled “Updated Technical
Report on Flame & Moth Deposit, Flame & Moth Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”.)
25 *Including the impacts from the execution of the ARSA and from changes in the estimates of the environmental services contract loss provision, the gross margin for 2012 and 2013 was 36% and 54%, respectively.
Globeville smelter site, Denver, CO
26
27
In $000s, , except cept per er shar hare amounts unts
Year r End 2013 Year r End 2012 Fourth th Quarter er 2013 Fourth th Quarter er 2012
Revenue 59,433 33 84,708 5,1 ,163 20,309 Gross Profit 8,820 17,920 2,618 3,931 Income (Loss) Before Taxes (62,079) 79) 7,979 (505) (505) 737 Net Income (Loss) Adjusted Net Income (Loss)* (50,450) 450) (4,313) 3) 3,420 3,420 (1,1 ,131) 1) (1,1 ,131) 1) (519) (519) Earnings (Loss) Per Share Adjusted Earnings (Loss) Per Share* ($0.81) 1) ($0.07) 7) $0.06 $0.06 ($0.01) 1) ($0.01) 1) ($0.01) ($0.01)
*Adjusted figures do not include the impairment charge recorded in Q2 2013
28
29
20131 2012 Ore tonnes mined 65,206 86,354 Ore tonnes processed 66,297 94,810 Mill throughput (tonnes per day) 271 260 Grade of ore processed: Silver (grams per tonne) 705 760 Lead 7.7% 9.6% Zinc 3.8% 4.8% Recoveries: Silver 94% 93% Lead in lead concentrate 92% 90% Zinc in zinc concentrate 61% 56% Concentrate production: Lead concentrate: Tonnes produced 7,796 13,000 Concentrate grade: Silver (grams per tonne) 5,458 4,965 Lead 60% 63% Zinc concentrate: Tonnes produced 3,450 5,685 Concentrate grade: Silver (grams per tonne) 360 413 Zinc 45% 45% Production – contained metal: Silver (ounces) 1,408,164 2,150,959 Lead in lead con (pounds) 10,324,978 18,183,755 Zinc in zinc con (pounds) 3,443,855 5,676,284 Sales volumes by payable metal: Silver (ounces) 1,456,925 2,033,821 Lead (pounds) 10,930,186 17,207,146 Zinc (pounds) 3,190,850 4,771,416 Cash costs of production2 Per ounce of payable silver produced $14.00 $11.89
1 The year ended December 31, 2013
represents a shortened operating period encompassing 245 days.
2 Cash costs of production per ounce
IFRS measure with no standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS. See page 16 of Alexco’s December 31, 2013 MD&A for explanation and reconciliation.
30
Consolidated production 806,900 tonnes (t) Consolidated production grade 745 grams per tonne (gpt) silver (Ag), 0.4 gpt gold (Au), 2.7% lead (Pb), 4.7% zinc (Zn) Commercial production period Q2 2015 – Q2 2020 Development, construction period Q2 2014 – Q1 2015 Mill throughput Average 406 tonnes per day (tpd) Mill recoveries Ag 93.6%, Au 71.3%, Pb 83.9%, Zn 60.4% Concentrate produced (6% moisture) 30,685 tonnes Pb con, 51,026 tonnes Zn con Total payable metal production Ag 16.8Moz, Au 5,800oz, Pb 37.7Mlb, Zn 36.4Mlb Production cost (mining, milling and G&A) $253 per tonne of ore Net Smelter Return (NSR) per tonne of ore (after incorporation of Silver Purchase Agreement) $419 per tonne of ore Total capital (life of mine) $76 million, including $37 million underground development Initial capital to achieve positive cash flow $25 million Net Cash Contribution Pre-Tax $53.7 million IRR Pre-tax 45% NPV Pre-tax (5%) $39.9 million Net Cash Contribution After Tax $41.4 million IRR After Tax 38% NPV After Tax (5%) $29.6 million Prices Used in PEA Ag US$24.00/oz, Pb US$0.95/lb, Zn US$0.85/lb, Au US$1,300/oz
(See PEA Cautionary language on slide 3.)
31
Category1,2,11 Property Tonnes Ag (g/t) Au (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%) Contained Ag (oz) Indicated Bellekeno Deposit4 262,000 585 n/a 3.5% 5.3% 4,933,000 Lucky Queen Deposit5 124,000 1,227 0.2 2.6% 1.7% 4,891,000 Flame & Moth Deposit6 1,378,000 516 0.4 1.7% 5.7% 22,859,000 Eastern Keno Hill Silver District3 1,764,000 576 n/a 2.0% 5.4% 32,683,000 Onek7 585,000 194 0.7 1.2% 13.7% 3,648,000 Bermingham8 257,000 460 0.1 2.0% 2.1% 3,800,000 Total Indicated – Sub-Surface Deposits 2,606,000 479 n/a 1.9% 6.9% 40,131,000 Elsa Tailings9 2,490,000 119 0.1 1.0% 0.7% 9,526,000 Total Indicated – All Deposits 5,096,000 303 n/a 1.4% 3.9% 49,657,000 Inferred Bellekeno Deposit4 243,000 428 n/a 4.1% 5.1% 3,338,000 Lucky Queen Deposit5 150,000 571 0.2 1.4% 0.9% 2,753,000 Flame & Moth Deposit6 107,000 313 0.3 0.9% 4.2% 1,081,000 Eastern Keno Hill Silver District3 500,000 446 n/a 2.6% 3.7% 7,172,000 Onek7 236,000 203 0.4 1.1% 11.5% 1,540,000 Bermingham8 102,000 372 0.1 1.1% 1.8% 1,220,000 Total Inferred 838,000 369 n/a 2.0% 5.6% 9,932,000 Historical Silver King10 Resources
98,998 1,354 n/a 1.6% 0.1% 4,310,000
22,581 1,456 n/a 0.1% n/a 1,057,000
Notes: 1. All mineral resources are classified following the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (December 2005), in accordance with the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines and the guidelines of NI 43-101. 2. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. 3. The Eastern Keno Hill Silver District property is comprised of three deposits: Bellekeno, Lucky Queen and Flame & Moth. The resource estimates for the Eastern Keno Hill Silver District are supported by disclosure in the news release dated December 5, 2013 entitled “Alexco Releases Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment for Expanded Silver Production from Eastern Keno Hill Silver District, Yukon” and by a technical report filed on SEDAR dated November 15, 2013 entitled “Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Eastern Keno Hill Silver District Project – Phase 2, Yukon, Canada”. 4. The resource estimates for the Bellekeno deposit are based on a geologic resource estimate having an effective date of May 31, 2012. The Bellekeno indicated resources are as at September 30, 2013, and reflect the geologic resource less estimated subsequent depletion from mine production. 5. The resource estimates for the Lucky Queen deposit have an effective date of July 27, 2011. 6. The resource estimates for the Flame & Moth deposit have an effective date of January 30, 2013. 7. The resource estimates for Onek have an effective date of July 27, 2011, and are supported by disclosure in the news release dated July 27, 2011 entitled “Alexco Announces Initial Resource Estimates for Lucky Queen and Onek” and by a technical report filed on SEDAR dated September 8, 2011 entitled “Technical Report on the Onek Deposit, Onek Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”. 8. The resource estimates for Bermingham have an effective date of June 27, 2012, and are supported by disclosure in the news release dated June 28, 2012 entitled “Alexco Announces Initial Resource Estimates for Flame & Moth and Bermingham” and by a technical report filed on SEDAR and signature dated August 8, 2012 entitled “Technical Report on the Bermingham Deposit, Bermingham Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”. 9. The resource estimate for the Elsa Tailings has an effective date of April 22, 2010, and is supported by the technical report dated June 16, 2010 entitled “Mineral Resource Estimation, Elsa Tailings Project, Yukon, Canada”. 10. Historical resources for Silver King were estimated by United Keno Hill Mines Limited, as documented in an internal report entitled “Mineral Resources and Mineable Ore Reserves” dated March 9, 1997. The historical resources were estimated based on a combination of surface and underground drill holes and chip samples taken on the vein and calculated using the polygonal (block) method and the 1997 CIM definitions for resource categories. These estimated historical resources include a total of 55,674 tonnes classified as proven and probable reserves and 43,324 tonnes classified as indicated resources, plus an additional 22,581 tonnes classified as inferred resources. Though believed by Alexco management to be relevant and reliable, this estimate of historical resources has not been verified by Alexco, pre-dates NI 43-101 and is not compliant with NI 43-101 resource categories. Verification of the estimate would require new drill holes into a statistically significant number of the historical resource blocks and/or a combination of on-vein sampling. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify this estimate of historical resources as current, nor is Alexco treating this historical estimate as a current mineral resource. 11. The disclosure regarding the summary of estimated resources for Alexco’s mineral properties within the Keno Hill District has been reviewed and approved by Scott Smith, P.Eng., former Bellekeno Mine Manager and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.
32
Potential Mineable Tonnes included in PEA Plant Feed
Mine Diluted Ag Au Pb Zn Calc'd (kt) (gpt) (gpt) (%) (%) NSR Bellekeno 85.7 660 6.74 4.15 $405 Lucky Queen 129 1054 0.12 2.35 1.47 $557 Flame & Moth 593 690 0.52 2.18 5.44 $391 Total PEA Plant Feed (kt) 807 745 0.40 2.69 4.67 $419
Potentially Mineable Tonnes Excluded from PEA Production Plan
In each of the three deposits there are some potentially mineable tonnes that were excluded from the PEA production plan for various
Mine Diluted Ag Au Pb Zn Calc'd (kt) (gpt) (gpt) (%) (%) NSR Bellekeno 111 545 0.00 3.50 3.20 $314 Lucky Queen 19.5 932 0.10 2.40 0.97 $495 Flame & Moth 32.1 419 0.31 1.25 6.77 $243 Excluded from PEA Plan (kt) 163 566 0.07 2.92 3.64 $321
Please see the December 12, 2013, Alexco Resource Corp. Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report entitled “Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Eastern Keno Hill Silver District Project – Phase 2, Yukon, Canada” for further information.
33
Planned Mine Blocks
200 100 metres
Tonnes Silver (gpt) Gold (gpt) Lead (%) Zinc (%) Silver (Oz) 1,378,000 516 0.42 1.7% 5.7% 22.9 mil
F&M Indicated Mineral Resource*
Tonnes Silver (gpt) Gold (gpt) Lead (%) Zinc (%) 593,000 690 0.52 2.2% 5.4%
F&M Potentially Mineable Tonnes in PEA**
*Please see appended Summary of Resources slide for full mineral resource disclosure. **Please see appended Potentially Mineable Tonnes slide for full disclosure.
34
Tonnes Silver (gpt) Lead (%) Zinc (%) Silver (Oz)
262,000 585 3.5% 5.3% 4.9 mil
*Please see appended Summary of Resources slide for full mineral resource disclosure.
Bellekeno Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate* Planned Mine Blocks Previously Mined Belle lleken eno: : 3 years s fro rom m dis isco cover ery to commercial ercial pro roducti uction
200 100 metres
Bellekeno Potentially Mineable Tonnes in PEA**
Tonnes Silver (gpt) Lead (%) Zinc (%)
85,700 660 6.7% 4.2%
**Please see appended Potentially Mineable Tonnes slide for full disclosure.
Note: Bellekeno East Zone Mineral Resource not shown in this figure
400 200 metres
Lucky Queen Historical Workings Proposed Development
500 Level Workings
Historical Production: 10.96 Moz Ag 123,530 tons @ 88.7opt Ag
(see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide)
Current Resource Tonnes Ag (gpt) Au (gpt) Pb (%) Zn (%) Ag ozs. (000) Indicated 124,000 1,227 0.2 2.6 1.7 4,891 Inferred 150,000 571 0.2 1.4 0.9 2,753
35
36
A “Win-Win” partnership between Alexco/Canada/Yukon/First Nations through a
37
2005 Company Founded
38
39
40
SENIOR OR MANAGEM GEMENT
Clynton R. Nauman, B.Sc. (Hons.)
Brad A. Thrall, B.Sc., MBA - Executive Vice President & COO David E. Whittle, C.A.
Al McOnie, M.Sc. (Geology), FAusIMM
Jim Harrington, M.Sc.
Vicki Veltkamp
BOARD OF DIRECTOR ORS
George Brack, Chairman Michael Winn David H. Searle, C.M., Q.C. Terry Krepiakevich, C.A., ICD.D. Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, M.Sc. Rick Zimmer, P.Eng., MBA Clynton R. Nauman, B.Sc. (Hons.)
41
Except where specifically indicated otherwise, the disclosure in this presentation of scientific and technical information regarding exploration projects on Alexco’s mineral properties has been reviewed and approved by Alan McOnie, FAusIMM, Vice President, Exploration, while that regarding mine development and
43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). All material technical information included herein has previously been disclosed by Alexco, and the viewer Is particularly directed to the company’s most recently filed AIF and U.S. Form 40-F and its most recently filed interim and annual financial reports; as well as the remaining filings completing Alexco’s continuous disclosure records. This presentation has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource and reserve estimates included in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Classification System. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. NI 43-101 permits the disclosure of an historical estimate made prior to the adoption of NI 43-101 that does not otherwise comply with NI 43-101, using the historical terminology, if the disclosure: (a) identifies the source and date of the historical estimate; (b) comments on the relevance and reliability of the historical estimate; (c) to the extent known, provides the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to prepare the historical estimate; (d) states whether the historical estimate uses categories
issuer; (f) comments on what work needs to be done to upgrade or verify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves; and (g) states with equal prominence that a qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves and that the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of Industry Guide 7 promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and resource and reserve information contained herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does not equate to the term “reserves”. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SEC's disclosure standards under Industry Guide 7 do not define the terms and normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. U.S. Investors should also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC’s Industry Guide 7, and reserves reported by the Corporation in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under Industry Guide 7 standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards.
42