Break out session: Construction Logistics and the role of Smart - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
break out session construction logistics and the role of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Break out session: Construction Logistics and the role of Smart - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 05, 2023 99 likes •468 views

Break out session: Construction Logistics and the role of Smart Governance CiViC: Construction In Vicinities: Innovative Co- creation Agenda Time 1030-1035 Welcome! 1035-1045 Presentation Smart Governance. 1045-1055 Introduction

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Break out session: Construction Logistics and the role of Smart Governance

  • CiViC:

Construction In Vicinities: Innovative Co- creation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

Time 1030-1035 Welcome! 1035-1045 Presentation Smart Governance. 1045-1055 Introduction MAMCA. 1055-1125 Discussion Q1. 1125-1155 Discussion Q2. 1155-1200 Wrapping up

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project goal

CIVIC (Construction In Vicinities: Innovative Co- creation) facilitates and supports transport to, from and around urban construction sites that minimises disruptions in the surrounding community and optimises energy efficiency.

2016-10-23 Mats Janné, mats.janne@liu.se PhD Student in Construction Logistics

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Civic goal is to be reached through:

  • 1) evaluation of alternative measures in a multi-actor

participatory setting;

  • 2) optimisation models for planning and impact

assessment using smart data; and

  • 3) development of smart governance concepts for

successful and efficient implementation of these tools.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Civic goal is to be reached through:

  • 1) evaluation of alternative measures in a

multi-actor participatory setting;

  • 2) optimisation models for planning and impact

assessment using smart data; and

  • 3) development of smart governance concepts

for successful and efficient implementation of these tools.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Research perspectives and cooperations

URBAN CONTEXT

  • Space limitations
  • Environmental concerns
  • Noice restrictions
  • Accessibility

CONSTRUCTION LOGISTICS SOLUTION

LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDER PERSPECTIVE SUPPLY OF LOGISTICS SERVICES MAIN CONTRACTOR PERSPECTIVE DEMAND FOR LOGISTICS SERVICES SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE

  • Residents’, business
  • wners’ and municipal

interests

  • Customer needs

CLIENT PERSPECTIVE

  • Increased productivity and

reduced completion time

  • Cost control and acceptable

total project cost

SMART GOVERNANCE CONCEPT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Smart governance concept definition

  • Enabling multi-stakeholder collaboration and

coordination

  • Facilitates transparent planning and decision

processes regarding construction logistics solutions.

  • Be based on available data in an interactive learning

cycle

  • Make daily activities in vicinity of city construction

projects more easily and efficient.

  • Support for economically, environmentally and

societally sustainable city development

  • Give improved access to logistics managment

systems.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Governance is part of an administrative control systems

– direct behaviour through the organizing of individuals (organisation design and structure), – and through the process of specifying how tasks or behaviours are to be performed or not performed (policies and procedures) – the monitoring of behaviour and who people are accountable to for their behaviour (governance); Source: Malmi and Brown, 2008

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Smart Governance Concept should therefore include the following:

  • Create understanding among

– citizens, municipality and local business for the demands of the construction site – the main contractors and clients of the needs of the society (Multi-actor)

  • To be able to visualize different solutions and effects

(optimization models)

  • Provide support of how and when to be used (organisation and

procedure)

  • Provide follow up so that the selected solution is implemented

and used as intended (governance)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Agenda

Time 1030-1035 Welcome! 1035-1045 Presentation Smart Governance. 1045-1055 Introduction MAMCA. 1055-1125 Discussion Q1. 1125-1155 Discussion Q2. 1155-1200 Wrapping up

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Mobility, Logistics and Automotive Technology Research Centre

MAMCA (Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis)

VREF Workshop Gothenburg, 19 October 2016 Tom van Lier

  • Prof. Cathy Macharis, Sheida Hadavi, Koen Van Raemdonck
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

June, 2014

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA)

Macharis, 2004

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Let’s MAMCA: www.mamca.be

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 1. Alternatives
  • Business as usual: truck and van deliveries to and from

construction site from 7 am until 5 pm

  • Bundled deliveries: Bundled deliveries in designated (limited) time

slots during the day with larger diesel truck

  • Inland waterway: Logistic flows via inland waterway by barge and

last mile with (smaller) electric trucks

  • After-hour deliveries: After-hour deliveries (off-peak) to a

maximum extent (before 7 am and after 5 pm) and longer working days

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 2. Actors (Stakeholder analysis)
  • Residents
  • Local government
  • Contractor and utility companies
  • Institutions and companies
  • Schools
  • Companies/shops
  • Institutions of public use (such as hospitals, fire department & police)
  • Transport infrastructure users
  • Car users
  • Bicyclists
  • Pedestrians
  • Public service entities
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 3. Add Criteria + weights
  • Residents:

– safety – noise – emissions

  • Local government
  • level of responsibility
  • enforceability of

measures

  • impact on voters
  • Contractor & utility

companies

  • construction time
  • costs
  • accessibility of

construction site

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Weigh the criteria

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Vrije Universiteit Brussel - MOBI MOBI - Mobility, Logistics and Automotive Technology 24

Stakeholder criteria Weight Logistics service providers Maximal profit Maximal positive difference between revenues and variable costs for logistics services 10.22% Service quality Satisfied shippers & contractors 30.47% Return on investments Positive expected return on investments 23.60% Employee satisfaction Employees are satisfied with work & working environment 22.69% Attention for environment and noise Positive attitude with regards to environmental impact 13.01% Inhabitants Good air quality Reduction in air polluting emissions 37.14% Minimal noise nuisance Minimal noise nuisance 12.34% Attractive shopping environment Attractive shopping environment for consumers 5.95% Good accessibility Minimal congestion 4.02% High traffic safety Less traffic victims and improved safety, particularly with regards to vulnerable road users 40.56%

Evaluation Example UFT

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Evaluation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Vrije Universiteit Brussel - MOBI

  • Results: multi-stakeholder view
  • Measures for UFT (Mechelen)

LSPs Merchants Residents Public services Local government

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Specific Actor Analysis

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

slide-29
SLIDE 29

WORKSHOP

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Discussion Smart Governance

  • The meaning and content of Smart Governance is hard to capture and

depending on what perspective you take it will be different. – What do you consider smart governance to be and especially related to construction logistics. Please provide examples from own experiences – What do you think a smart guvernanten concept should include? Please provide specific examples of tools or decision.

  • The goal with a smart governance concept is improved decision making and

increased understanding and agreement with the decisions made. However, it is hard to say in a construction context who should be responsible for using the smart governance concept – Who (what organisation) should own the smart governance concept and be responsible for developing it after the CIVIC project? – Who should be responsible for initiating the use of a smart governance process? Could anyone do it and if so why? Please provide examples of when and how to use the smart governance concept!

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Smart Governance Concept 1. 2.

Who should be responsible? Smart governance concept: What is it?

The meaning and content of Smart Governance is hard to capture and depending

  • n what perspective you take it will be different.

Discuss:

  • A. What do you consider smart governance to be and especially related to

construction logistics. Please provide examples from own experiences. ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................

  • B. What do you think a smart guvernanten concept should include? Please

provide specific examples of tools or decision. .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................

Name Organisation ____________________ ____________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________

Anna Fredriksson & Martin Rudberg The goal with a smart governance concept is improved decision making and increased understanding and agreement with the decisions made. However, it is hard to say in a construction context who should be responsible for using the smart governance concept. Discuss:

  • A. Who (what organisation) should own the smart governance concept and be

responsible for developing it after the CIVIC project? ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................

  • B. Who should be responsible for initiating the use of a smart governance

process? Could anyone do it and if so why? Please provide examples of when and how to use the smart governance concept! .................................................................................................. ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... .................................................................................................. .................................................................................................. .................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Summary

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Discussion MAMCA tool

  • Integrating the MAMCA into a smart governance concept aims to improve decision

making and to enable better and more broadly supported implementation of solutions. – How can the identification of stakeholders and their criteria within MAMCA benefit a smart governance concept? – Can or should the weighing of stakeholders or criteria be integrated in a smart governance concept (some criteria are more important to certain stakeholders, and some stakeholders might be more important than others)?

  • MAMCA allows to integrate a multi-stakeholder view when choosing between different

alternatives or solutions, taking into account each stakeholders’ criteria – At which governance level can MAMCA add (most) value? At the higher strategical level (tendering) or the lower operational level (implementation)? Before the start of the construction works or during the construction works? – Should the MAMCA include treshholds for certain criteria? Can you think of examples (eg excessive additional costs for contractor, environmental burdens for citizens,…) How should these tresholds be identified?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

MAMCA tool 1. 2.

MAMCA: when to use? MAMCA: how to use?

Integrating the MAMCA into a smart governance concept aims to improve decision making and to enable better and more broadly supported implementation of solutions. Discuss:

  • A. How can the identification of stakeholders and their criteria within MAMCA

benefit a smart governance concept? ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................

  • B. Can or should the weighing of stakeholders or criteria be integrated in a

smart governance concept (some criteria are more important to certain stakeholders, and some stakeholders might be more important than others)? .................................................................................................. ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... .................................................................................................. .................................................................................................. .................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................

Name Organisation ____________________ ____________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________ ____________________ ___________________________

Anna Fredriksson & Martin Rudberg MAMCA allows to integrate a multi-stakeholder view when choosing between different alternatives or solutions, taking into account each stakeholders’ criteria. Discuss:

  • A. At which governance level can MAMCA add (most) value? At the higher

strategical level (tendering) or the lower operational level (implementation)? Before the start of the construction works or during the construction works? ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................

  • B. Should the MAMCA include treshholds for certain criteria? Can you think of

examples (eg excessive additional costs for contractor, environmental burdens for citizens,…) How should these tresholds be identified? .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Summary