Brazilian Biodiversity Fund What Funbio do today Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

brazilian biodiversity fund what funbio do today
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Brazilian Biodiversity Fund What Funbio do today Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Brazilian Biodiversity Fund What Funbio do today Management programs and Among the thematic areas of projects for biodiversity action Funbio include: conservation Support on creation and consolidation of PAs. Operation of programs and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Brazilian Biodiversity Fund

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Management programs and projects for biodiversity conservation

  • Operation of programs and funds
  • Financial management and asset management
  • Procurement
  • Systems Project Management
  • Scholarships and student research / studies

Design, implementation and management of financial mechanisms

  • Maps and studies on territorial agendas,

demands, actors and financial resources available.

  • Financial mechanisms for REDD projects
  • Solutions for public and private sector

Network management

  • Executive Secretary
  • Capacity building
  • Organizing events and seminars

What Funbio do today

Among the thematic areas of action Funbio include:

  • Support on creation and

consolidation of PAs.

  • Conservation, restoration and

sustainable management of species and ecosystems.

  • Sustainable production.
  • Sustainable territories.
  • REDD.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mapa de Investimentos Infraestrutura na Amazônia

Investment Infrastructure Map in Amazon region

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Brazil Rj

Rio in Brazil and

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Atlantic Forest Fund

Rio de Janeiro’s State Atlantic Atlantic Fores Forest t Fund Fund

In partnership with the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Secretary, Funbio structured a fund to strengthen the environmental funding in the state. It has enormous potential to increase in the state of Rio de Janeiro, others states and in the federal government.

In total US$ 130 million in contracts for the fund, from private sector compensation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Analyzing a Source

Volume Accessibility Flexibility Mine Compensation in Brazilian legal framework Compensation Legal Reserve (forest code) Clear cut compensation (forest code and atlântic forest law) Superficiários – compensation for owners of the land State and Municipalitiy Climate Changes Laws Only in SNUC Environmental Compensation, Art. 36 - federal + states

  • Art. 33, 47 e 48 da Lei do SNUC (use of image,

environmental services, electric transport, and water use) Licensing process (mitigation and compensation defined in EIA)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GI = ISB + CAP + IUC, onde: ISB = Impacto sobre a Biodiversidade; CAP = Comprometimento de Área Prioritária; e IUC = Influência em Unidades de Conservação. 1.1. - ISB: Impacto sobre a Biodiversidade: ISB = IM x IB (IA+IT), onde: 140 IM = Índice Magnitude; IB = Índice Biodiversidade; IA = Índice Abrangência; e IT = Índice Temporalidade. 1.2 - CAP: Comprometimento de Área Prioritária: CAP = IM x ICAP x IT, onde: 70 IM = Índice Magnitude; ICAP = Índice Comprometimento de Área Prioritária; e IT = Índice Temporalidade. CA = VR x GI, onde: CA = Valor da Compensação Ambiental; VR = somatório dos investimentos necessários para implantação do Empreendimento GI = Grau de Impacto nos ecossistemas, podendo atingir valores de 0 a 0,5%. CA = VR x GI

Compensation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Environmental values

Total economic value

Use values Non-use values

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Total economic value

Use values Non-use values

Direct use values Indirect use values Option values Bequest values Existence values Compensation SNUC Law Usual Compensation

Environmental values

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Barriers

  • Legal Framework:

– this money is private or public; – Where’s the legal link for the new fund?

  • If it don’t exist what we can do?
  • What the expectations of the private sector?
  • How many money is involved?
  • Can we match other sources?
  • What about the governance?
  • Can the state propose sufficient high quality projects?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Distribution of the Protect Areas in Rio

Fonte : Ranbaldi, Denise - Funbio

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Distribution of the economic actors

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Main economic sectors i RJ

Distribuição por setor

petrolífero 50% siderúrgico 10% Outros 2% turismo 5% equipamentos 0% portuário 5% cimenteiro 0% borracha 0% agronegócio 0% alimentício 0% energético 8% naval 2% saneamento 2% rodoviário 1% química 0% aeroportuário 0% petroquímico 11% ferroviário 6% papel 0%

In the most

  • ptimistic

scenario more than US$600 millions be generated in the next four years.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

$ $ Público / Governo Privado / Empresas

Fontes $: Empresas Empreendedores Rendimentos Fontes $: Recursos Governamentais (previstos em lei) Agências Internacionais de Fomento Demandas Governamentais Composição do Orçamento FECAM e Recursos Públicos Fundo de compensação (pacerias e remunerações) Pública Natureza da Operação

ANÁLISE DAS OPERAÇÕES PROPOSTAS/ DEMANDAS FECAM FUNDO DE COMPENSAÇÃO

+ Governo Compens ação Recursos de terceiros Custos recorrentes Recursos de ONGs Parcerias Recursos de parceiros Rendimen tos FECAM Novas fontes Recursos Públicos Propostas de parcerias Recursos adicionais de Empreendedores

CONTRATAÇÃO DAS OPERAÇÕES SEGUNDO A NATUREZA (condições específicas)

Funding by a system of Funds

CARTEIRA DE PROGRAMAS/ PROJETOS/ AÇÕES CARTEIRA DE PROGRAMAS/ PROJETOS/ AÇÕES

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FMA – Financial Resources

Compensation

Ex: Federal, State, Municipal...

Donations

Ex: KfW, private sector

Resources

Portfolios of programs, projects and / or actions

Destinations

Atlantic Forest Fund

Others

Ex: Individual donations for marine projects

The source of the resources define the type of action that the portfolio can fund

Protected Areas Recovery Areas Sustainable Use Others Revolving and endowment fund Sinking fund

Financial management

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Transparency

The FMA/RJ projects are managed by a online system and manuals, like elements of good governance.

Sérgio Cabral

slide-17
SLIDE 17

An financial strategy for federal protected areas

How much costs an federal protected area

110 55 114 114 114 84 56 28 55 100 100 98 96 94 59 49 49 69 89 109 129 16 26 36 46 56 66 76 50 100 150 200 250 300 ano 0 ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4 ano 5 ano 6

Pré-estabelecimento Estabelecimento Pré-consolidação Consolidação Consolidadas

50.000.000 55.000.000 60.000.000 65.000.000 70.000.000 75.000.000 80.000.000 85.000.000 90.000.000 95.000.000 100.000.000 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 ano 0 ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4 ano 5 ano 6

Nº de funcionários X Evolução Custo de Pessoal (ano)

Nº de funcionários Custo de Salário + Benefícios

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Planing the investment

ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4

PRE-ESTABELECIMENTO 2

  • ESTABELECIMENTO

9 2

  • PRE-CONSOLIDAÇÃO

2 9 2

  • CONSOLIDAÇÃO

5 2 9 2 total de Ucs 18 13 11 2

PÓS CONSOLIDAÇÃO ano 2 ano 3 ano 4 ano 5 Fundo Permanente 5 7 16 18

ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4

PRE-ESTABELECIMENTO

  • ESTABELECIMENTO

7.508.666,67 1.546.625,00

  • PRE-CONSOLIDAÇÃO

1.638.250,00 7.508.666,67 1.546.625,00

  • CONSOLIDAÇÃO

10.390.341,22 1.638.250,00 7.508.666,67 1.546.625,00 total de Ucs 19.537.257,89 10.693.541,67 9.055.291,67 1.546.625,00

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Endownment Fund - Previsão de Fluxo (taxa de rentabilidade líq.= 8,43% aa)

  • R$ 5,000,000

R$ 0 R$ 5,000,000 R$ 10,000,000 R$ 15,000,000 R$ 20,000,000 R$ 25,000,000 R$ 30,000,000 R$ 35,000,000 R$ 40,000,000 R$ 45,000,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Endow nment Fund Rentabilidade Saldo - Fundo de Compensações Resgates p/ CC

Forecast Flow for a sinking and a Endowment Fund

Fundo de Compensação RJ Previsão de Fluxo

R$ 52,000,000 R$ 4,561 ,670 R$ 25,328,591 R$ 52,578,801 R$ 39,504,908

  • R$ 1

6,1 98,000

  • R$ 1

6,1 46,000

  • R$ 1

6,1 46,000

  • R$ 3,51

0,000

  • R$ 20,000,000
  • R$ 10,000,000

R$ 0 R$ 10,000,000 R$ 20,000,000 R$ 30,000,000 R$ 40,000,000 R$ 50,000,000 R$ 60,000,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Fundo - Saldo Resgates p/ Inv em UC de PI

slide-20
SLIDE 20

General Informations Categoria e nome da UC: Parque Estadual dos Três Picos - UC de proteção integral PA Areas (hectares): 58,790. Basic services Yes, trials administration center Cttys involved Nova Friburgo, Cachoeiras de Macacú,Teresopolis Attractivity of the PA and tourism Conditions Scenic Beauty (de 0 a 10): 10 Scenic Singularity (0 a 5): 5 Touristic permanence (days): 5 dias Seasonality (month de 1 a 12): 12 Support Capacity 10.000 ano Duration of cultural and sportive events : 45/60 dias por ano List of the activities Days of permanence Singularit y Seasonali ty Support Capacity Cultural x x x x Trekking 10 5 8 x Hikking 10 5 8 x Bird watching x 5 12 x Escalada 10 5 6 x Rapel Rafting 1 x x x Rivers/water falls /sea 10 3 6 x Dive Canyonisng Cachoeirismo Montanhismo 10 5 6 x Ciclismo 10 3 12 x Arvorismo Fotografia 10 5 12 x Passeios a cavalo 5 3 12 x Vôo livre 5 5 x x Parapente 5 5 x x Balonismo astronomy 5 1 x x Spotive fisheries

MATRIX OF TOURISTICS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES CATEGORIA CUSTO FIXO MINIMUM STRUCTURE 250.680,00 93.820,80 46.080,00 ALIMENTATION 242.270,40 126.720,00 57.360,00 SHOPS AND SERVICES 107.280,00 144.360,00 HOSTESS 48.720,00 100.560,00 165.960,00 ECOTURISM INFRAESTRUCTURE 393.900,00

Adjusting the demand for Turism

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sustainable Juruti Fund

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Brazil Para

Para state in Brazil and

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sustainable Juruti

A proposed model for local development

In partnership with Alcoa, Funbio is developing a voluntary fund to contribute with the sustainable development of Juruti in the state of Pará. The Pilot Fund is already in

  • peration, managed by Funbio. In the

second phase Alcoa will allocate R$6 million to sustainable development projects and Funbio will allocate US$1 million from PROBIO (GEF 1:3 matching).

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 1. Juruti/PA
  • 2. Lessons learned from mining
  • 3. Alcoa at Juruti
  • 4. Sustainable Juruti proposal
  • 5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
  • 6. Probio II in Juruti
  • 7. Forest management in Juruti

Funbio at Juruti

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 1. Juruti (PA)

Caracteristics of the municipality:

  • Located in the western boundary of Pará

state

  • 8.300 km2
  • 35.000 inhabitants (65% in the rural area)
  • Economic cycles: pau-rosa and juta
  • Today: mandioc, fishing, cattle and

extractivist activities

  • Per capita income = US$ 55,18
  • IDH = 0,63 (2000)
  • Low educational level within the

economic active population

  • Small local economy, with few job
  • pportunities
  • Important natural features - 67% of the

territory is unexploited native forest

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Impacts Very depending on the territory, the mineral to be extracted, and the management practices adopted.

Current model is based on compensatory activities and does not satisfy the various stakeholdes. Conflicts often reach the courts.

Perception of impacts

  • The perception of

affected communities is almost always negative.

  • It is as important as

the impact indicators.

Answer

  • Embracing, by the

company, of the community development agenda.

  • Direct financing for

the communities

  • 2. Lessons learned from mining
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Changes after company’s arrival

  • Increasing immigration
  • Speculation and growth of slums
  • Growth of informal economy
  • Increasing demand for public services and jobs
  • Consequent pressure on natural resources

Potential risks:

  • Pressure due to new investment in the operation
  • Perpetuation of a dependency relationship
  • Increased operating costs

Mitigation and offset measures:

  • Environmental control plans = R$ 30 millions
  • Environmental Compensation – R$ 40 millions
  • Positive Agenda = R$ 56 millions
  • 3. Alcoa at Juruti
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fund Features

  • Voluntary
  • Private
  • Self-governing
  • Long-term
  • Participative governance (local

empowerment)

  • Effectivity
  • Participative management
  • Promoting cofinancing and influencing
  • ther funds (public and private)
  • Proactivity and coresponsibility on

investment prioritization and new resources identification

  • Safeguards for donors
  • 5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Why a pilot fund?

  • Adjusting Fund’s concepts and tools to

local reality

  • Testing the proposed governance and

management, aimed at the establishment of a separate and autonomous legal entity

  • Assessing the suitability of thematic

lines and settled finance priorities

  • Promoting social mobilisation and

articulation

  • Promoting fundraising
  • Increasing local capacity for

developing proposals and implementing projects

  • 5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Financing Strategy:

  • It comprises entire territory (Juruti and

surrounding), since the agenda is not limited to administrative division

  • It is aimed at company’s externalities
  • First edict – generation of local revenue

through sustainable activities

  • It may assemble new partners and

financial resources

  • Alcoa Foundation
  • Organizational Citizenship Institute

(ICE)

  • Municipal Environmental Fund
  • Probio II - Funbio
  • 5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Public Polices for Juruti Development

Ideflor Territorial Planning:

  • Forest concession
  • Community management
  • Mamuru River State Park
  • Settlement project
  • To be defined
  • Area under judgment

(white)

  • other uses

(PEAEX, PEAS, communities)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Manoel Serrão

Conservation Finance Unit

Manoel.serrao@funbio.org.br 55 (21) 2123-5300 www.funbio.org.br