boundary element methods for scattering by fractal screens
play

Boundary element methods for scattering by fractal screens Andrea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

W AVES , V IENNA , 2630 A UGUST 2019 Boundary element methods for scattering by fractal screens Andrea Moiola http://matematica.unipv.it/moiola/ Joint work with S.N. Chandler-Wilde (Reading), D.P . Hewett (UCL) A. Caetano (Aveiro)


  1. W AVES , V IENNA , 26–30 A UGUST 2019 Boundary element methods for scattering by fractal screens Andrea Moiola http://matematica.unipv.it/moiola/ Joint work with S.N. Chandler-Wilde (Reading), D.P . Hewett (UCL) A. Caetano (Aveiro)

  2. Acoustic wave scattering by a planar screen Acoustic waves in free space governed by wave eq. ∂ 2 U ∂ t 2 − ∆ U = 0 . In time-harmonic regime, assume U ( x , t )= ℜ{ u ( x ) e − i kt } and look for u . u satisfies Helmholtz equation ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 , with wavenumber k > 0 . Scattering: incoming wave u i hits obstacle Γ and generates field u . Γ bounded subset of Γ ∞ := { x ∈ R n : x n = 0 } ∼ = R n − 1 , n = 2 , 3 ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 D := R n \ { Γ × { 0 }} x 3 x 2 u i ( x ) = e i k d · x Γ u = − u i x 1 u satisfies Sommerfeld radiation condition (SRC) at infinity � r ( 1 − n ) / 2 � (i.e. ∂ r u − iku = o uniformly as r = | x | → ∞ ). 2

  3. Acoustic wave scattering by a planar screen Acoustic waves in free space governed by wave eq. ∂ 2 U ∂ t 2 − ∆ U = 0 . In time-harmonic regime, assume U ( x , t )= ℜ{ u ( x ) e − i kt } and look for u . u satisfies Helmholtz equation ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 , with wavenumber k > 0 . Scattering: incoming wave u i hits obstacle Γ and generates field u . Γ bounded subset of Γ ∞ := { x ∈ R n : x n = 0 } ∼ = R n − 1 , n = 2 , 3 ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 D := R n \ { Γ × { 0 }} x 3 x 2 u i ( x ) = e i k d · x Γ u = − u i x 1 u satisfies Sommerfeld radiation condition (SRC) at infinity � r ( 1 − n ) / 2 � (i.e. ∂ r u − iku = o uniformly as r = | x | → ∞ ). 2

  4. Acoustic wave scattering by a planar screen Acoustic waves in free space governed by wave eq. ∂ 2 U ∂ t 2 − ∆ U = 0 . In time-harmonic regime, assume U ( x , t )= ℜ{ u ( x ) e − i kt } and look for u . u satisfies Helmholtz equation ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 , with wavenumber k > 0 . Scattering: incoming wave u i hits obstacle Γ and generates field u . Γ bounded subset of Γ ∞ := { x ∈ R n : x n = 0 } ∼ = R n − 1 , n = 2 , 3 ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 D := R n \ { Γ × { 0 }} x 3 x 2 u i ( x ) = e i k d · x Γ u = − u i x 1 u satisfies Sommerfeld radiation condition (SRC) at infinity � r ( 1 − n ) / 2 � (i.e. ∂ r u − iku = o uniformly as r = | x | → ∞ ). 2

  5. Scattering by Lipschitz and rough screens u tot = u + u i Incident field is plane wave u i ( x ) = e i k d · x , | d | = 1 . Classical problem when Γ is open and Lipschitz. What happens for arbitrary (rougher than Lipschitz, e.g. fractal) Γ ? 3

  6. Scattering by Lipschitz and rough screens u tot = u + u i Incident field is plane wave u i ( x ) = e i k d · x , | d | = 1 . Classical problem when Γ is open and Lipschitz. What happens for arbitrary (rougher than Lipschitz, e.g. fractal) Γ ? 3

  7. Waves and fractals: applications Wideband fractal antennas (Figures from http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/fractal.php ) 4

  8. Waves and fractals: applications Wideband fractal antennas (Figures from http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/fractal.php ) Scattering by ice crystals in atmospheric physics e.g. C. Westbrook Fractal apertures in laser optics e.g. J. Christian 4

  9. Scattering by fractal screens · · · Lots of mathematical challenges: ◮ How to formulate well-posed BVPs? (What is the right function space setting? How to impose BCs?) ◮ How do prefractal solutions converge to fractal solutions? ◮ How can we accurately compute the scattered field? ◮ . . . Note: several tools developed here might be used in the (numerical) analysis of different IEs & BVPs involving complicated domains. 5

  10. Outline ◮ Sobolev spaces on rough sets ◮ BVPs and BIEs ◮ open screens ◮ compact screens ◮ Prefractal to fractal convergence ◮ BEM and convergence ◮ Examples & numerics ◮ Cantor dust: dependence on Hausdorff dimension ◮ Sierpinski triangle: dependence on frequency ◮ Snowflakes: inner and outer approximations ◮ . . . 6

  11. Sobolev spaces on rough subsets of R n − 1 We need fractional (Bessel) Sobolev spaces on Γ ⊂ R n − 1 . For s ∈ R let � � � u ( ξ ) | 2 d ξ < ∞ H s ( R n − 1 )= u ∈ S ∗ ( R n − 1 ) : � u � 2 R n − 1 ( 1 + | ξ | 2 ) s | ˆ H s ( R n − 1 ) := For Γ ⊂ R n − 1 open and F ⊂ R n − 1 closed define [M C L EAN ] H s (Γ) := { u | Γ : u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) } restriction H s ( R n − 1 ) � H s (Γ) := C ∞ 0 (Γ) closure H s F := { u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) : supp u ⊂ F } support When Γ is Lipschitz it holds that For general open Γ H s (Γ) = ( H − s (Γ)) ∗ with equal norms ◮ � ◮ � � H s (Γ) ∼ � ◮ s ∈ N ⇒ � u � 2 Γ | ∂ α u | 2 L IPSCHITZ ◮ × | α |≤ s ◮ � ( ∼ H s (Γ) = H s = H s 00 (Γ) , s ≥ 0 ) ◮ × IS Γ ◮ H ± 1 / 2 = { 0 } L UXURY ! ◮ × ∂ Γ ◮ { H s (Γ) } s ∈ R and { � H s (Γ) } s ∈ R ◮ × are interpolation scales. 7

  12. Sobolev spaces on rough subsets of R n − 1 We need fractional (Bessel) Sobolev spaces on Γ ⊂ R n − 1 . For s ∈ R let � � � u ( ξ ) | 2 d ξ < ∞ H s ( R n − 1 )= u ∈ S ∗ ( R n − 1 ) : � u � 2 R n − 1 ( 1 + | ξ | 2 ) s | ˆ H s ( R n − 1 ) := For Γ ⊂ R n − 1 open and F ⊂ R n − 1 closed define [M C L EAN ] H s (Γ) := { u | Γ : u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) } restriction H s ( R n − 1 ) � H s (Γ) := C ∞ 0 (Γ) closure H s F := { u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) : supp u ⊂ F } support When Γ is Lipschitz it holds that For general open Γ H s (Γ) = ( H − s (Γ)) ∗ with equal norms ◮ � ◮ � � H s (Γ) ∼ � ◮ s ∈ N ⇒ � u � 2 Γ | ∂ α u | 2 L IPSCHITZ ◮ × | α |≤ s ◮ � ( ∼ H s (Γ) = H s = H s 00 (Γ) , s ≥ 0 ) ◮ × IS Γ ◮ H ± 1 / 2 = { 0 } L UXURY ! ◮ × ∂ Γ ◮ { H s (Γ) } s ∈ R and { � H s (Γ) } s ∈ R ◮ × are interpolation scales. 7

  13. Sobolev spaces on rough subsets of R n − 1 We need fractional (Bessel) Sobolev spaces on Γ ⊂ R n − 1 . For s ∈ R let � � � u ( ξ ) | 2 d ξ < ∞ H s ( R n − 1 )= u ∈ S ∗ ( R n − 1 ) : � u � 2 R n − 1 ( 1 + | ξ | 2 ) s | ˆ H s ( R n − 1 ) := For Γ ⊂ R n − 1 open and F ⊂ R n − 1 closed define [M C L EAN ] H s (Γ) := { u | Γ : u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) } restriction H s ( R n − 1 ) � H s (Γ) := C ∞ 0 (Γ) closure H s F := { u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) : supp u ⊂ F } support When Γ is Lipschitz it holds that For general open Γ H s (Γ) = ( H − s (Γ)) ∗ with equal norms ◮ � ◮ � � H s (Γ) ∼ � ◮ s ∈ N ⇒ � u � 2 Γ | ∂ α u | 2 L IPSCHITZ ◮ × | α |≤ s ◮ � ( ∼ H s (Γ) = H s = H s 00 (Γ) , s ≥ 0 ) ◮ × IS Γ ◮ H ± 1 / 2 = { 0 } L UXURY ! ◮ × ∂ Γ ◮ { H s (Γ) } s ∈ R and { � H s (Γ) } s ∈ R ◮ × are interpolation scales. 7

  14. Sobolev spaces on rough subsets of R n − 1 We need fractional (Bessel) Sobolev spaces on Γ ⊂ R n − 1 . For s ∈ R let � � � u ( ξ ) | 2 d ξ < ∞ H s ( R n − 1 )= u ∈ S ∗ ( R n − 1 ) : � u � 2 R n − 1 ( 1 + | ξ | 2 ) s | ˆ H s ( R n − 1 ) := For Γ ⊂ R n − 1 open and F ⊂ R n − 1 closed define [M C L EAN ] H s (Γ) := { u | Γ : u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) } restriction H s ( R n − 1 ) � H s (Γ) := C ∞ 0 (Γ) closure H s F := { u ∈ H s ( R n − 1 ) : supp u ⊂ F } support When Γ is Lipschitz it holds that For general open Γ H s (Γ) = ( H − s (Γ)) ∗ with equal norms ◮ � ◮ � � H s (Γ) ∼ � ◮ s ∈ N ⇒ � u � 2 Γ | ∂ α u | 2 L IPSCHITZ ◮ × | α |≤ s ◮ � ( ∼ H s (Γ) = H s = H s 00 (Γ) , s ≥ 0 ) ◮ × IS Γ ◮ H ± 1 / 2 = { 0 } L UXURY ! ◮ × ∂ Γ ◮ { H s (Γ) } s ∈ R and { � H s (Γ) } s ∈ R ◮ × are interpolation scales. 7

  15. BVPs for open and compact screens BVP D op (Γ) for open screens Let Γ ⊂ Γ ∞ be bounded & open. Given g ∈ H 1 / 2 (Γ) (for instance, g = − ( γ ± u i ) | Γ ), find u ∈ C 2 ( D ) ∩ W 1 , loc ( D ) satisfying ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 in D , ( γ ± u ) | Γ = g , Sommerfeld RC . γ ± = traces : W 1 ( R n ± ) → H 1 / 2 (Γ ∞ ) 8

  16. BVPs for open and compact screens BVP D co (Γ) for compact scr. BVP D op (Γ) for open screens Let Γ ⊂ Γ ∞ be bounded & open. Let Γ ⊂ Γ ∞ be compact. Given g ∈ � H 1 / 2 (Γ c ) ⊥ Given g ∈ H 1 / 2 (Γ) (for instance, g = − ( γ ± u i ) | Γ ), (e.g., g = − P Γ u i ), find u ∈ C 2 ( D ) ∩ W 1 , loc ( D ) find u ∈ C 2 ( D ) ∩ W 1 , loc ( D ) satisfying satisfying ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 in D , in D , ( γ ± u ) | Γ = g , P Γ γ ± u = g , Sommerfeld RC . Sommerfeld RC . Orthogonal projection γ ± = traces : W 1 ( R n ± ) → H 1 / 2 (Γ ∞ ) P Γ : H 1 / 2 (Γ ∞ ) → � H 1 / 2 (Γ c ) ⊥ . If Ω bdd open, � H − 1 / 2 (Ω) = H − 1 / 2 , then D op (Ω) &D co (Ω) are equivalent. Ω 8

  17. BVPs for open and compact screens BVP D co (Γ) for compact scr. BVP D op (Γ) for open screens Let Γ ⊂ Γ ∞ be bounded & open. Let Γ ⊂ Γ ∞ be compact. Given g ∈ � H 1 / 2 (Γ c ) ⊥ Given g ∈ H 1 / 2 (Γ) (for instance, g = − ( γ ± u i ) | Γ ), (e.g., g = − P Γ u i ), find u ∈ C 2 ( D ) ∩ W 1 , loc ( D ) find u ∈ C 2 ( D ) ∩ W 1 , loc ( D ) satisfying satisfying ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 ∆ u + k 2 u = 0 in D , in D , ( γ ± u ) | Γ = g , P Γ γ ± u = g , Sommerfeld RC . Sommerfeld RC . Orthogonal projection γ ± = traces : W 1 ( R n ± ) → H 1 / 2 (Γ ∞ ) P Γ : H 1 / 2 (Γ ∞ ) → � H 1 / 2 (Γ c ) ⊥ . If Ω bdd open, � H − 1 / 2 (Ω) = H − 1 / 2 , then D op (Ω) &D co (Ω) are equivalent. Ω 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend