bottoms up
play

Bottoms Up! One View of a Bottom-Up Parse E E T E E + T T T int - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 05, 2023 •18 likes •308 views

Different Types of Parsing Top Down Parsing Beginning with the start symbol, try to guess the productions to apply to end up at the user's program. Bottom-Up Parsing Beginning with the user's program, try to apply productions in

  1. Different Types of Parsing • Top Down Parsing • Beginning with the start symbol, try to guess the productions to apply to end up at the user's program. • Bottom-Up Parsing • Beginning with the user's program, try to apply productions in reverse to convert the program back into the start symbol. Wednesday, April 10, 13

  2. Bottoms Up!

  3. One View of a Bottom-Up Parse E E → T E → E + T T T → int T → ( E ) E E E E T T T T int + ( int + int + int )

  4. A Second View of a Bottom-Up Parse E → T ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E → E + T ⇒ T + (int + int + int) T → int ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T → ( E ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E

  5. A Second View of a Bottom-Up Parse E → T ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E → E + T ⇒ T + (int + int + int) T → int ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T → ( E ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E

  6. A left-to-right, bottom-up parse is a rightmost derivation traced in reverse.

  7. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse ⇒ int + (int + int + int) ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) Each step in this bottom-up Each step in this bottom-up ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) parse is called a reduction . parse is called a reduction . ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) We reduce a substring of We reduce a substring of ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) the sentential form back to the sentential form back to ⇒ E + ( E + int) a nonterminal. a nonterminal. ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E

  8. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T int + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  9. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T int + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  10. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T int + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  11. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  12. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) T E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  13. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  14. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T int ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  15. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  16. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) T int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  17. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  18. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) int ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  19. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  20. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) E T ⇒ E + ( E + int) + int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  21. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  22. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) int ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  23. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  24. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) E T + ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  25. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  26. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) E ( ) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  27. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  28. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) E T + ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

  29. A Third View of a Bottom-Up Parse E ⇒ int + (int + int + int) ⇒ T + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + (int + int + int) ⇒ E + ( T + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T + int) ⇒ E + ( E + int) ⇒ E + ( E + T ) ⇒ E + ( E ) ⇒ E + T ⇒ E int + ( int + int + int )

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Chasing Bottoms Nils Anders Danielsson Patrik Jansson Chalmers Chasing Bottoms p.1/7

Chasing Bottoms Nils Anders Danielsson Patrik Jansson Chalmers Chasing Bottoms p.1/7

Chasing Bottoms Nils Anders Danielsson Patrik Jansson Chalmers Chasing Bottoms p.1/7 Context Cover project. Verification of real Haskell programs. Haskell non-strict partial and infinite values relatively common. Chasing Bottoms

555 views • 7 slides
Caring for Those Who Give Care E. Brooke Pope, Ph. D. Jeremy M. Bottoms, Psy. D. Who Are We?

Caring for Those Who Give Care E. Brooke Pope, Ph. D. Jeremy M. Bottoms, Psy. D. Who Are We?

Addressing Staff Well-Being: Caring for Those Who Give Care E. Brooke Pope, Ph. D. Jeremy M. Bottoms, Psy. D. Who Are We? Battle Creek VA Medical Center Classified as a neuropsychiatric facility 200 Acre Campus 4 Outpatient

229 views • 11 slides
Extensible Lineage Manager (ELM) Kevin Bottoms and Dan Olsen BYU - Computer Science The

Extensible Lineage Manager (ELM) Kevin Bottoms and Dan Olsen BYU - Computer Science The

Extensible Lineage Manager (ELM) Kevin Bottoms and Dan Olsen BYU - Computer Science The Research Process Record what you know Find what tasks will produce more information from what you have and can guess Perform such tasks (ex.

256 views • 11 slides
State of the In Industry ry May 16, 2017 Miami, FL Total apparel +2.7% in in 2016: m most

State of the In Industry ry May 16, 2017 Miami, FL Total apparel +2.7% in in 2016: m most

State of the In Industry ry May 16, 2017 Miami, FL Total apparel +2.7% in in 2016: m most categories grew DOLLAR VOLUME CHANGE (2015 v. 2016) DOLLAR VOLUME (000) Tops Bottoms Sweats/Active Bottoms Dresses Outerwear Intimates

326 views • 21 slides
Progress is Stalled: Career Pathways: Accelerating Access to the Middle Class Presentation to:

Progress is Stalled: Career Pathways: Accelerating Access to the Middle Class Presentation to:

Progress is Stalled: Career Pathways: Accelerating Access to the Middle Class Presentation to: North Carolina House Select Committee on Education Strategy and Practices Gene Bottoms, SREB Senior Vice President Gene.Bottoms@SREB.org 1 Better

734 views • 71 slides
Year 3 2017-2018 Welcome to a new year. A very busy year! Introduction to us: 3A Mrs

Year 3 2017-2018 Welcome to a new year. A very busy year! Introduction to us: 3A Mrs

Year 3 2017-2018 Welcome to a new year. A very busy year! Introduction to us: 3A Mrs Pieroni 3B Mrs Campbell 3C Miss Zhorna 3D Miss Edmonds Uniform Boys Girls Nursey Black/grey jogging bottoms Black/grey jogging bottoms

997 views • 26 slides
Stop thinking about bottoms when writing programs . . . Thorsten Altenkirch University of

Stop thinking about bottoms when writing programs . . . Thorsten Altenkirch University of

Stop thinking about bottoms when writing programs . . . Thorsten Altenkirch University of Nottingham BCTCS 06 p.1/19 Trouble with BCTCS 06 p.2/19

930 views • 81 slides
Project Development IT Efforts Presented by Brad Bottoms & Jeff Jasper Ongoing Software

Project Development IT Efforts Presented by Brad Bottoms & Jeff Jasper Ongoing Software

Project Development IT Efforts Presented by Brad Bottoms & Jeff Jasper Ongoing Software & Application Efforts in Project Development Program Delivery Platform (PDP) Umbrella data system over specific modules serving Program and

345 views • 21 slides
EASM 2014 measure the primary impact, a bottoms-up approach as expounded by Preuss (2011)

EASM 2014 measure the primary impact, a bottoms-up approach as expounded by Preuss (2011)

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WRC NESTE OIL RALLY FINLAND Submitting author: Mrs Aila Ahonen JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Sport Business School Jyvaskyla, 40200 Finland All authors: Aila Ahonen (corresp), Kamilla Kamilla Type: Scientific

177 views • 3 slides
Heterogeneous Integration Enabling the future of the Electronics Industry Presented by W. R.

Heterogeneous Integration Enabling the future of the Electronics Industry Presented by W. R.

Heterogeneous Integration Enabling the future of the Electronics Industry Presented by W. R. Bottoms PhD Four Issues Are Driving Change In Information Technology The approaching end of Moores Law scaling of CMOS Migration of Data,

902 views • 67 slides
Full Uniform Bundle O W E H L K L C H I I R G INITIALS C H EST 1904 INITIALS

Full Uniform Bundle O W E H L K L C H I I R G INITIALS C H EST 1904 INITIALS

Full Uniform Bundle O W E H L K L C H I I R G INITIALS C H EST 1904 INITIALS CARDIFF BLUES Socks x 2 Training Jersey Leisure Tee x 2 Hoody Contact Top INITIALS INITIALS Gym Shorts Playing Shorts Track Bottoms x 2 Gym

313 views • 3 slides
FOR AS/A2 Fail to prepare Prepare to fail We can learn anything! Walt Disney was afraid of

FOR AS/A2 Fail to prepare Prepare to fail We can learn anything! Walt Disney was afraid of

PREPARING FOR AS/A2 Fail to prepare Prepare to fail We can learn anything! Walt Disney was afraid of mice Turtles breathe through their bottoms Venus is the only planet that rotates clockwise You burn more calories sleeping

724 views • 26 slides
FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY PORTFOLIO PROCESS THE PORTFOLIO: GENERAL OVERVIEW Individual

FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY PORTFOLIO PROCESS THE PORTFOLIO: GENERAL OVERVIEW Individual

FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY PORTFOLIO PROCESS THE PORTFOLIO: GENERAL OVERVIEW Individual Equity Securities. Buy stocks on local exchanges. Global Mid to Large-Cap Value. Long-only orientation in individual stocks. Bottoms

443 views • 15 slides
THE ECONOMY IN 2020: THE AUDACITY OF SLOPE Presented by: Elliot F. Eisenberg, Ph.D. President:

THE ECONOMY IN 2020: THE AUDACITY OF SLOPE Presented by: Elliot F. Eisenberg, Ph.D. President:

THE ECONOMY IN 2020: THE AUDACITY OF SLOPE Presented by: Elliot F. Eisenberg, Ph.D. President: GraphsandLaughs, LLC June 1, 2020 The Economy Is Bottoming GDP = C+I+G+(X-M) Univ of Michigan Indices Bottoms Index collapsed sharply but

660 views • 64 slides
UV Absorption in NGC 5548 Jerry Kriss STScI 8/17/2017 The Narrow Absorption Components in NGC

UV Absorption in NGC 5548 Jerry Kriss STScI 8/17/2017 The Narrow Absorption Components in NGC

UV Absorption in NGC 5548 Jerry Kriss STScI 8/17/2017 The Narrow Absorption Components in NGC 5548 This is the C IV region prior to the 2013 XMM campaign. Absorption components are labeled from high to low velocity. The Bottoms of the Narrow

587 views • 48 slides
Desert Mesa Uniform Policy Dress Code Shirts Gray Maroon Navy School Shirt

Desert Mesa Uniform Policy Dress Code Shirts Gray Maroon Navy School Shirt

Desert Mesa Uniform Policy Dress Code Shirts Gray Maroon Navy School Shirt Bottoms Shorts Pants Jumpers Skirts Navy Blue Khaki Denim (Blue Jeans) Footwear Casual / Athletic

540 views • 5 slides
Objectives LL Parsing The topic for this lecture is a kind of grammar that works well with

Objectives LL Parsing The topic for this lecture is a kind of grammar that works well with

2 * 3 4 + + 2 * 3 4 Introduction LL Parsing Breaking LL Parsers Introduction LL Parsing Breaking LL Parsers Objectives LL Parsing The topic for this lecture is a kind of grammar that works well with recursive-descent parsing. Classify

425 views • 3 slides
Agenda What is Top-down Web services? Benefit of top-down Web services How to develop

Agenda What is Top-down Web services? Benefit of top-down Web services How to develop

3/22/11 Web Services Development using Top-down Design Web Services Development using Top-down Design Asst. Prof. Dr. Kanda Runapongsa Saikaew (krunapon@kku.ac.th) Mr.Pongsakorn Poosankam (pongsakorn@gmail.com) 1 Agenda What is Top-down

649 views • 11 slides
CSCI 6760 - Computer Networks Spring 2017 Instructor: Prof. Roberto Perdisci perdisci@cs.uga.edu

CSCI 6760 - Computer Networks Spring 2017 Instructor: Prof. Roberto Perdisci perdisci@cs.uga.edu

source: computer-networks-webdesign.com CSCI 6760 - Computer Networks Spring 2017 Instructor: Prof. Roberto Perdisci perdisci@cs.uga.edu CSCI 6760 } What is the purpose of this course? } Graduate-level computer networks course } Focuses on

265 views • 14 slides
ELC 2017 War Story: Using Zephyr to Develop a Wearable Device Neil Armstrong & Fabien Parent

ELC 2017 War Story: Using Zephyr to Develop a Wearable Device Neil Armstrong & Fabien Parent

ELC 2017 War Story: Using Zephyr to Develop a Wearable Device Neil Armstrong & Fabien Parent Agenda Based on a true story Many choices, why Zephyr? Zephyr in a nutshell Porting & upstreaming a new platform

356 views • 35 slides
Computational Linguistics: Parsing Raffaella Bernardi CIMeC, University of Trento e-mail:

Computational Linguistics: Parsing Raffaella Bernardi CIMeC, University of Trento e-mail:

Computational Linguistics: Parsing Raffaella Bernardi CIMeC, University of Trento e-mail: bernardi@disi.unitn.it Contents First Last Prev Next Contents 1 Done and to be done. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.57k views • 120 slides
Syntax & ANTLR Prof. Tom Austin San Jos State University Syntax vs. Semantics

Syntax & ANTLR Prof. Tom Austin San Jos State University Syntax vs. Semantics

CS 152: Programming Language Paradigms Syntax & ANTLR Prof. Tom Austin San Jos State University Syntax vs. Semantics Semantics: What does a program mean? Defined by an interpreter or compiler Syntax: How is a program

352 views • 18 slides
Compilerconstructie najaar 2018 http://www.liacs.leidenuniv.nl/~vlietrvan1/coco/ Rudy van Vliet

Compilerconstructie najaar 2018 http://www.liacs.leidenuniv.nl/~vlietrvan1/coco/ Rudy van Vliet

Compilerconstructie najaar 2018 http://www.liacs.leidenuniv.nl/~vlietrvan1/coco/ Rudy van Vliet kamer 140 Snellius, tel. 071-527 2876 rvvliet(at)liacs(dot)nl college 3, vrijdag 21 september 2018 + werkcollege Syntax Analysis (1) 1 LKP

903 views • 76 slides
CS406: Compilers Spring 2020 Week 5: Parsers, AST, and Semantic Routines 1 Recap 2 3

CS406: Compilers Spring 2020 Week 5: Parsers, AST, and Semantic Routines 1 Recap 2 3

CS406: Compilers Spring 2020 Week 5: Parsers, AST, and Semantic Routines 1 Recap 2 3 Top-down Parsing predictive parsers 4 Suggested reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LL_parser Top-down Parsing contd.. Also called

750 views • 46 slides

More recommend