Bottom-up modelling of heating investment in Germany 13 th Enerday - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bottom up modelling of heating investment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bottom-up modelling of heating investment in Germany 13 th Enerday - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bottom-up modelling of heating investment in Germany 13 th Enerday 2019, April 12 th 2019 Working paper co-authored Fabian Arnold , Berit Hanna Czock and Cordelia Frings Bottom-up modelling of heating investment in Germany AGENDA I.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bottom-up modelling of heating investment in Germany

13th Enerday 2019, April 12th 2019

Working paper co-authored Fabian Arnold, Berit Hanna Czock and Cordelia Frings

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Bottom-up modelling of heating investment in Germany

I. Motivation II. Approach and Model

  • III. Outlook and Challenges

AGENDA

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • I. Motivation
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background

  • Energy consumption of households accounts for roughly a quarter of the

final energy consumption in Germany (UBA 2018).

  • Reducing GHG emissions in households may mean electrification of heat

supply systems or investment in less GHG intense heating technologies.

  • Development of the heating and building infrastructure is the result of

investment decisions of individuals.

Motivation and Research Focus

Research Focus

German energy transition scenarios accounting for individual household heating technology investment and

  • peration decisions

Therefore we propose a bottom-up approach based on the aggregation

  • f individual choices to the total building stock
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background

  • Energy consumption of households accounts for roughly a quarter of the

final energy consumption in Germany (UBA 2018).

  • Reducing GHG emissions in households may mean electrification of heat

supply systems or investment in less GHG intense heating technologies.

  • Development of the heating and building infrastructure is the result of

investment decisions of individuals.

Motivation and Research Focus

Research Focus

  • How can individual choices be scaled up to a superordinate

level?

  • How can reciprocal effect between household decisions and

the energy markets be modelled?

  • How can input information be condensed to address

computational demands?

Therefore we propose a bottom-up approach based on the aggregation

  • f individual choices to the total building stock
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Literature – Existing Models

e.g. Hirst 1978 e.g. Fumo, Biswas 2015 e.g. TABULA/EPISCOPE or Muratori et al. 2013 e.g. McKenna et al. 2013, Merkel et al. 2017 e.g. Hecking 2014, Müller 2015

Modelling of residential energy consumption Top-down Bottom-up Statistical Engineering based Static Dynamic Exogenous decision making Endogenous decision making Empirical approaches Bottom-up optimization of individual decisions in a power market framework

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • II. Model
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Approach

Bottom-up optimization of individual decisions in an power market framework

Aggregation Price signals

Bottom-up model

  • f individual

decisions (COMODO) Top-down model

  • f power market

(DIMENSION) Data Data Data

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Approach

Bottom-up optimization of individual decisions in an power market framework

Aggregation Price signals

Bottom-up model

  • f individual

decisions (COMODO) Top-down model

  • f power market

(DIMENSION) Data Data Data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Modelling steps

Economic optimisation of individual heating technology investment and operation

Load profiles

  • Electricity
  • Heating
  • Hot water

Total cost optimisation Optimisation of invest

COMODO Consumer Input

Subsidies and fees

  • Feed in tariffs
  • Market premiums
  • Grid fees, taxes

Installed capacities and investment Profiles of energy usage

Output

Operation profiles Generation profiles

  • Solar thermal
  • PV

Optimisation of storage and technology operation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Approach

Bottom-up optimization of individual decisions in an power market framework

Aggregation Price signals

Bottom-up model

  • f individual

decisions (COMODO) Top-down model

  • f power market

(DIMENSION) Data Data Data

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Definition of representative household types
  • Scenario based constraints
  • Building replacement and demolition
  • Insulation rate
  • Technology development

Building type Building age

Modelling steps

Aggregation

  • No. of inhabitants

Habitable area Rooftop area Region Installed technology Insulation level

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Approach

Bottom-up optimization of individual decisions in an power market framework

Aggregation Price signals

Bottom-up model

  • f individual

decisions (COMODO) Top-down model

  • f power market

(DIMENSION) Data Data Data

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Modelling steps

  • Soft coupling of consumer model and power market

model

  • Iterative exchange of outputs
  • Optimal solution where models converge

Integration with power market model in order to capture reciprocal effects

Demand Prices

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Outlook

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Challenges

  • Energy consumption of households accounts for roughly a quarter of the

final energy consumption in Germany (UBA 2018).

  • Reducing GHG emissions in households may mean electrification of heat

supply systems or investment in less GHG intense heating technologies.

  • Development of the heating and building infrastructure is the result of

investment decisions of individuals.

Research Focus

  • How can individual choices be scaled up to a superordinate

level?

  • How can reciprocal effect between household decisions and

the energy markets be modelled?

  • How can input information be condensed to address

computational demands?

Therefore we propose a bottom-up approach based on the aggregation

  • f individual choices to the total building stock
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Potential research spin-offs

  • How do regulatory changes affect the building stock in Germany?
  • RE support schemes/ surcharges
  • Grid fees
  • Taxes
  • How do market aspects (fuel costs, EU-ETS) affect the technology

based decisions in the building stock in Germany?

  • Under what circumstances do certain technologies prevail?
  • How can emission and efficiency targets in the household heating

sector be achieved?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank You! Questions?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

References

Umweltbundesamt, 2018. Endenergieverbrauch deutscher Haushalte. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/private-haushalte- konsum/wohnen/energieverbrauch-privater-haushalte. Last accessed on April 9th, 2019. Hirst E., 1978. A model of residential energy use. Simulation 1978;30(3):69–74. Fumo, N., & Biswas, M. R., 2015. Regression analysis for prediction of residential energy

  • consumption. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 47, 332-343.

Muratori M. et al., 2013. A highly resolved modeling technique to simulate residential power

  • demand. Applied Energy Volume 107, July 2013, Pages 465-473.

McKenna, R., Merkel, E., Fehrenbach, D., Mehne, S., Fichtner, W., 2013. Energy efficiency in the German residential sector: A bottom-up building-stock-model-based analysis in the context of energy-political targets. Building and Environment 62, 77–88. Merkel E., McKenna R., Fehrenbach D., Fichtner W., 2017. A model-based assessment of climate and energy targets for the German residential heat system. Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 142, Part 4, 20 January 2017, Pages 3151-3173. Hecking, H. (2015). Four Essays on the Economics of Energy and Resource Markets (Doctoral dissertation, Universität zu Köln). Müller, A., 2015. Energy Demand Assessment for Space Conditioning and Domestic Hot Water: A Case Study for the Austrian Building Stock. Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien, 2015.