Biopow er: Technology Biopow er: Technology and Policy Challenges and Policy Challenges
NYSERDA EMEP November 2007 Edward Gray, P.E., Antares Group, www.antares.org
Biopow er: Technology Biopow er: Technology and Policy Challenges - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Biopow er: Technology Biopow er: Technology and Policy Challenges and Policy Challenges NYSERDA EMEP November 2007 Edward Gray, P.E., Antares Group, www.antares.org Outline Biomass Resource What qualifies as Biomass? How large
NYSERDA EMEP November 2007 Edward Gray, P.E., Antares Group, www.antares.org
FEEDSTOCKS
– Unused logging slash – Primary mill residues – Forest fuels treatment biomass
– Crop Residues – Manure Solids & Biogas – Energy Crops
– Biomass recovered from solid wastes – Biosolids – Landfill gas – Biogas from waste-water treatment plants
POWER TECHNOLOGIES
Power Plants
Microturbines
Food, Fiber, Chemicals, Wood Products, Plastics Food, Fiber, Chemicals, Wood Products, Plastics Round Wood, Pulp Chips Grains & Cereals Forests and Woodlots Farmland Products Biomass Energy Feedstocks Biomass Energy Feedstocks Residuals B i
a s s W a s t e Whole Tree Chips, Energy Crops Crop & Wood Harvest Residuals Forest Management Treatments Animal manures Industry Municipalities
368 Million Tons wood biomass, 998 MMT Ag biomass
(Wood Portion Mapped DOE/USDA Billion Ton Report-2005)
1.2 Billion tons coal produced in 2006 (EIA)
MW (capacity) 400 860 Source Platts NYSERDA 2003
New York Biomass Power Plants > 5,000 GWh annually in 2012
Platt's North America Power Plant Database, October 2005, http://www.platts.com Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Resource Development Potential in New York State, Vol. 1, prepared for NYSERDA, 2003. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, New York Field Office
– Greenhouse gas balance – Competition with food production, local energy supply, medicines and building materials – Biodiversity – Economic prosperity – Social well-being – Environment
– Best management practices apply
– Forest and Harvest management certifications (SFI, FSC & Tree Farm) – State and Federal regulations apply
– Contaminants from processing must be addressed – Raw material sources will be an issue
– Complex mix of biomass materials – Stream separation and pretreatment are key
U.S. Historical Energy-Related CO2 Emissions
Source: Program on Technology Innovation: An Assessment of the Future Potential for Biomass Electricity Generation in a Carbon-Constrained World. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2007. 1014828.
Key Questions: To what extent will electricity provide transport services? To which sector will biomass resources be directed?
Source: Program on Technology Innovation: An Assessment of the Future Potential for Biomass Electricity Generation in a Carbon-Constrained World. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2007. 1014828.
Source: Program on Technology Innovation: An Assessment of the Future Potential for Biomass Electricity Generation in a Carbon-Constrained World. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2007. 1014828.
Net Zero Carbon applies to the GROWTH and CONVERSION portion of biomass energy
process steps can tip the balance either way.
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Coal-fired Natural Gas CC Biomass IGCC Carbon Eqv. Emissions (lb/kWh)
Carbon Emission: No LCA Carbon Emissons: LCA Carbon Emission: LCA w/CCS Based on Data from: Program on Technology Innovation: An Assessment of the Future Potential for Biomass Electricity Generation in a Carbon-Constrained World. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2007. 1014828.
Steven J. Smith, Antoinette Brenkert, Jae Edmonds, Biomass with Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS), GTSP Presentation, May 23, 2006. The MiniCAM is a long- term, partial-equilibrium model of the energy, agriculture, and climate system.
BioPower NOx Emissions
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000 2,400 2,800 3,200 3,600 4,000
Heat Input (thousand MMBtu/yr) NOx Emissions (lb/MMBtu)
ME:1986 FL:1990 CA:1985 ME:1987 ME:1988 ME:1993 NY:1993 NY:1992
NSPS Limit PSD Limit
BioPower SO2 Emissions
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000 2,400 2,800 3,200 3,600 4,000
Heat Input (thousand MMBtu/yr) SO2 Emissions (lb/MMBtu)
ME:1986 FL:1990 CA:1985 ME:1987 ME:1988 ME:1993 NY:1993 NY:1992
NSPS Limit 0.15 lb/MMBtu
PSD Limit
Natural mercury levels in plants range from 0.001 to 0.1 ppm (dry weight).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Unified Air Toxics Program: Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Hazardous Air Pollutant Emission Study, 2000 Mercury Releases from Deforestation, University of British Columbia Department of and Mineral Process Mining Engineering
Solid Fuel Firing Solid Fuel Firing Reforming & Hydrotreating Reforming & Hydrotreating Fermentation Fermentation Fuels Power Heat Esterification Esterification Gasification, Pyrolysis & Digestion & Decomposition Gasification, Pyrolysis & Digestion & Decomposition Hydrolysis & Steam Treatment Hydrolysis & Steam Treatment 32 18 21 28 Residential Services Commercial Services Industrial Utilities Transportation
Biomass Feedstocks
Economic Sectors (Primary Quads - 2006)
EIA 2007
Biomass currently provides 2.8 Quads (H&P 2.5, Fuels 0.3)
Ottumwa, IA Shasta, CA Schiller, NH
Amer-9 NL 39 MWe of 650 MWe total Nuon Power, NL ~25 MW of 250MW total USC Cogen 1.38 MW + 60 klbs/hr
Net Output (MWe) Net Heat Rate (Btu/kWh) Source Biomass direct-fired (stoker) 50 14,840
Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations, EPRI 1997
Coal – PC sub-critical 500 9,500 – 10,300 (1)
EPA Presentation 2006
Coal IGCC 500 8,170 – 8,700 (1)
EPA Presentation 2006
Biomass IGCC 50 9,000
Antares in-house resources (WGA report)
NGCC 400 7,500
EPRI 2000
1). Depends on coal type. Bituminous has lowest heat rate, lignite has the highest.
2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Plant Scale (MWe) Net Heat Rate (Btu/kWh)
IGCC Heat Rate Cogen Heat Rate Gen Sets Heat Rate EPI Gen Sets Heat Rate
Engine Gensets IGCC
1000oF 1800oF PYROLYSIS GASIFICATION 1000oF 1800oF PYROLYSIS GASIFICATION
Forestland: 216 MM acres Timberland: 141 MM acres Timberland screened for Fire Severity Regime 89 MM acres Treatment opportunities
23 MM acres Butte Creek Fuels Reduction Treatment Results WUI 1.4 MM Non-WUI 21.6 MM
Final Screens:
Fire Severity Regime Screens:
Source: Langholtz et al. 2006
Synergies with existing infrastructure – no new transmission capability Dispatchable Fire Risk Reduction Rural Economic Growth And Preservation Distributed Resources Productive Use of Byproducts Carbon Neutral
Bio Streamline interconnection for distributed biomass developers Contracts Intercon Power, BioFuels, BioProducts Power contracts that reflect distributed long-term benefits , Create incentives to make the switch nection Feedstocks Permitting Consistent permitting rules that recognize all biomass benefits Build infrastructure to move raw feedstocks to new bioenergy projects
Creating an Environment Conducive to Bioenergy Development